![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Delay before a topic is locked after no activity | |||
Keep 2 months (as of today) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 25.00% |
3 months |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 28.57% |
4 months |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 10.71% |
6 months |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 28.57% |
9 months |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 3.57% |
1 year |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 10.71% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |
Awesome Poster
![]() Name: Pseudo
Join Date: December 3, 2018
Location: 🇪🇺 European Union 🇪🇺
Gender:
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Since I consider locking topics when they are bumped after only two months does not help create new topics, but instead : - deters people from participating to existing discussions - is felt negatively by newcomers who see the topic of their messages immediately blocked ; - make readers lost amongst dozens of topics about the same subject, with always the same answers coming again and again. I suggest we change the rules and increase the time of non-activity after which a topic that is bumped need to be locked. Feel free to participate to the poll or propose other solutions. It will be very appreciated. Thank you. Last edited by Diable rouge; November 6th, 2020 at 10:32 PM. |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Legendary Member
![]() |
![]() Quote:
threads cause they see something that interests them and then answer only to have the thread locked. Yes you have to read the rules but I think newbies should have a little bit more leeway before they get the feel of the forum. ![]() |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Professional slacker
![]() Name: Anita
Join Date: May 15, 2018
Location: Behind you
Age: 17
Gender:
![]() |
![]()
4 months would be nice. After that, it's truly dead.
Meh, who am I kidding. ![]() |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
PrincessQueenAngel
![]() Name: Ashleigh
Join Date: September 10, 2018
Location: Didsbury, Manchester, UK
Age: 15
Gender:
![]() |
![]()
I think the two month rule works fine for some of the topics, most on the upper times aren’t really, it would be good if they could be auto locked after two months but other section just kept going
I’m not clumsy its just the floor hates me, the tables and chairs are bullies and the wall gets in the way |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Great Poster
![]() Name: Ralph
Join Date: May 25, 2020
Location: Gibraltar... an Englishman abroad.
Gender:
![]() Blog Entries: 4
|
![]()
I think it should probably be on a case by case basis... sometimes I see something that someone posted ages ago and genuinely think I can add something useful
“Life is pain, anyone who says differently is selling something.” |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Junior Member+
![]() Name: Trevor
Join Date: October 23, 2018
Location: USA
Age: 16
Gender:
![]() |
![]()
I voted for 3 months, after that then the topic is probably dead.
|
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Administrator
![]() Name: George
Join Date: November 27, 2015
Location: Planet Earth
Gender:
![]() |
![]()
It would be a little more helpful if more people who responded to the poll would post their thoughts as well...
But anyway. There is some leeway... as I've said the countless times this has come up if the general activity on the site is low, if the OP is still active (or in fact has posted in the thread itself since it was bumped) etc etc. Most of the threads that are bumped however are threads, particularly in the puberty sections, where the user is long gone and/or the question in the thread was resolved a long time ago - there's no need for these to remain open. and to answer someone's point about newbies having more leeway - they certainly don't get any warnings just for bumping one or two threads - unless they were clearly going through bumping threads for no reason/to get their post count up/whatever. |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Awesome Poster
![]() |
![]()
I’m only new but I can see why there is a two month rule it stops old topics been brought up for no reason and if some has the same problem they could always start their own topic about it
|
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
![]() Name: jay
Join Date: May 27, 2020
Location: GB
Gender:
![]() |
![]()
I believe if you change it from 2 to a higher number you probably would have more activity as users wouldn't be turned off by answering a slightly older forum or users answer something on the thread for it to just be immediately locked.
you could make it auto-lock after +2 months of inactivity (for example if the limit was 2 month you'd auto lock at 4 months) Could also add a "lock forum" option for the owner of the thread so they can lock it once they're satisfied (such as them asking a question and receiving enough answers) Also, should I create a post for this? You could make it warn users that they're about to post on a forum that is X months old (2 months etc) to prevent necroposting either by accident or them not thinking. |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Make some noise
![]() Name: Kara
Join Date: December 10, 2018
Location: Fortress of Solitude
Age: 17
Gender:
![]() Blog Entries: 3
|
![]()
Seems fine the way it is. Some threads, like in the music section for example, eh whatever that's fine. But in the advice and puberty sections, the 2 month rule is more than fair. It is crazy every now and then someone will dig up a thread in there from like 10 years ago and it is like..... really??? Umm dude, OP is like in their 20s now, pretty sure they got it figured out by now.
![]() 2020 ![]() |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
hello beautiful
![]() Name: Fiona
Join Date: September 22, 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 20
Gender:
![]() |
![]()
Bumping a thread that's older than 2 months only shows one thing...that you didn't bother to read the site rules.
20 *** f *** Wes Anderson fan *** proud Italian-American *** UCLA student But for now we are young Let us lay in the sun and count every beautiful thing we can see |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Awesome Poster
![]() Name: Chris
Join Date: January 29, 2019
Location: London, UK
Age: 17
Gender:
![]() |
![]()
The 2 month rule works just fine, usually the ones that bump old threads are new members who are trying to get to 100 posts and they don’t just bump post that are 3-4 moths old they bump 5 year plus ones.
And here comes Hurst! He's got. Some people are on the pitch! They think it's all over! It is now, it's four! Kenneth Wolstenholme - World Cup 1966 |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Member
![]() Name: jay
Join Date: May 27, 2020
Location: GB
Gender:
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() although I do agree, I guess we new members do bump old posts and I usually try go for the ones within 2 months ![]() |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Awesome Poster
![]() Name: Pseudo
Join Date: December 3, 2018
Location: 🇪🇺 European Union 🇪🇺
Gender:
![]() |
![]()
I agree that totally dead topics should not be brought back from the dead. Two months is too short in my opinion, especially in lesser visited sections of the forum.
As many participants are older, sometimes they also log in less frequently. @Atlantis I appreciate the leeway you have shown on some topics, thank you. Quote:
For you, a topic is made to answer a specific question and to answer to the original poster. It means you consider at some point there is no need for more answers, because it is too late or because the original poster has been banned. Everything depends on the original poster. For me, a topic is a place where someone starts a discussion about a topic, and everyone should be free to debate and add interesting comments about the subject, as long as people can talk about it. Even if they bring something new much later. The topic does not depend on the original poster, it is a community. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|