View Full Version : Cut VS Uncut Poll
SylvioUltima
April 1st, 2011, 12:53 PM
This poll is completely private, and it only takes seconds to complete! I made it as simple as possible. >:]
Emiil
April 1st, 2011, 12:57 PM
Uncut :)
JonTyler
April 1st, 2011, 02:40 PM
Cut. It looks cleaner :p
kylek97
April 1st, 2011, 03:04 PM
cut....
rocklee96
April 1st, 2011, 03:23 PM
Cut. I like it.
Lodge
April 1st, 2011, 03:54 PM
Cut, but I wish I knew what it was like to be uncut.
sen69
April 1st, 2011, 03:57 PM
I am cut, it looks much nicer, i have seen uncut ones and when they are not hard they look gross. Yet it is harder to get orgasm without the rolling action of the foreskin
Fact
April 1st, 2011, 05:14 PM
Boy's :arrow2: Both
Joshuaharris
April 1st, 2011, 05:39 PM
i am uncut and i love it. not many of my friends are uncut thought. some of them wish they were. i think i would hate being cut cause jacking off would suck without the foreskin. plus i think uncut looks ten times better.
Wicked_Syn
April 1st, 2011, 05:49 PM
I have chosen to erase my previous answer to this thread
Jockstrapz
April 2nd, 2011, 10:51 AM
It is really a cultural and religious preference. In the United States most males are circumcised at birth regardless of religion. In the Jewish faith circumcision is required and in Christianity it is not required but often suggested. However is some regions, such as Europe, circumcision is not practiced often. :yeah:
*note* This is what is typical and by no means an exact scientific pole :yummy:
~ I am an American Christian who was circumcised at birth~
smitty35
April 2nd, 2011, 02:57 PM
cut :-(
thingmebob
April 2nd, 2011, 03:08 PM
I'm uncut
JuJu92
April 2nd, 2011, 04:43 PM
Cut, uncut willies look strange to me for the record. :L
WAFFLES
April 2nd, 2011, 04:46 PM
Uncut... Being cut, you loss sensitivity. I looked it up because I didn't know what it meant.
SimplyTom
April 2nd, 2011, 04:47 PM
uncut
JuJu92
April 2nd, 2011, 04:48 PM
My orgasms feel great so being cut hasn't held me in any disadvantages what's so ever.
Judas
April 2nd, 2011, 10:38 PM
cut.
kryptonite
April 3rd, 2011, 02:19 PM
It is really a cultural and religious preference. In the United States most males are circumcised at birth regardless of religion. In the Jewish faith circumcision is required and in Christianity it is not required but often suggested. However is some regions, such as Europe, circumcision is not practiced often. :yeah:
*note* This is what is typical and by no means an exact scientific pole :yummy:
~ I am an American Christian who was circumcised at birth~
Not entirely true. Christians don't care either way. And actually, if you take it literally, there is a passage in the New Testament which states that as long as a Christian is baptized, that's good enough.
I think Muslims do, but later in life, like at the start of the teenage years.
Jewish people do, usually on the 8th day, but this can change like if the baby is in an incubator or something.
The United States is pretty much the only country where it is done. There is a map at the link that shows various percentages by states. It's approximate, so you could be circumcised and have a lot of circumcised friends in a state with a low rate...or you could have skin and your friends are about "half and half" in a state with a high circ rate.
http://mgmbill.org/statistics.htm
blaine97
April 7th, 2011, 01:45 PM
Cut.
tom.94
April 7th, 2011, 01:50 PM
uncut
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.