Log in

View Full Version : Police: Dad Placed $3K Bounty On Daughter's Boyfriend 'Reward' Signs Posted At Gross


ShyGuyInChicago
March 29th, 2011, 03:37 PM
http://www.10news.com/news/27326500/detail.html

SPRING VALLEY, Calif. -- An East County man who allegedly offered a $3,000 bounty for the "dead or alive" capture of his teenage daughter's sex-offender boyfriend was jailed Friday on suspicion of solicitation of murder.
Detectives arrested Domingos Jose Oliveira, 50, at his Spring Valley home about 9 a.m., several hours after serving a search warrant at the Roadside Place residence, according to police.
Oliveira's 19-year-old daughter and her 33-year-old boyfriend, a registered sex offender, reported him to authorities after he allegedly posted several home-made "reward" signs at Grossmont College in La Mesa, Lt. Dan Willis said.

10News learned Oliveira's daughter's boyfriend is a registered sex offender after being convicted of lewd and lascivious acts on a child 14-15 years old.
Police said about a dozen flyers were posted on the Grossmont College campus two weeks ago, and the posters read: "Reward, $3,000 for the body of convicted sex offender."
According to police, the poster lists the man's name and has his picture. It also said he's a "resident of El Cajon, California 92019 and currently enrolled at Grossmont College" and that "he's friends with a 19-year-old student at the college." At the bottom it says the reward will go to "anyone who can deliver his body dead or alive to us," followed by a personal email address.
The placards bore the boyfriend's name and photo and offered the cash bounty "for the (man's) body ... dead or alive," according to Willis.
"It's fairly blatant and pretty specific what he wanted done," Willis added.
Oliveira was booked into county jail and was being held without bail pending arraignment, scheduled for Tuesday afternoon.
Oliveira could face up to nine years in state prison if he's convicted.

Amnesiac
March 29th, 2011, 03:55 PM
Good. It fucking annoys me when I see people overreact to new stories of sex offenders molesting children. Yes, these people clearly have problems, and they present a threat to society and must be removed, but calling for castration and murder is 100% ridiculous and incredibly stupid.

It seems like I see people bitching about the Constitution one minute and then advocating violation of the 8th amendment another.

CaptainObvious
March 29th, 2011, 04:20 PM
It seems like I see people bitching about the Constitution one minute and then advocating violation of the 8th amendment another.

Those who scream the longest and loudest about the Constitution rarely care about enforcement of all of it, ironically.

Amnesiac
March 29th, 2011, 04:52 PM
Those who scream the longest and loudest about the Constitution rarely care about enforcement of all of it, ironically.

Indeed, they'll only support the Constitution when it runs parallel with their own agendas.

ShyGuyInChicago
March 29th, 2011, 07:33 PM
Lot's of people feel that when you commit crimes like assault, rape, murder and etc. you give up your all your rights. That is not the case. And you know something, I read a comment on Facebook which is where I found the link, and the person said that juries should be consisted solely of people who can relate to the victim such as in child molestation cases the jury should be parents of small children or in the mans case fathers of teen daughters. The person said that if the jury consisted of fathers of teen daughters the man would get acquitted. I think that if such a thing happens it will lead to biased juries and potentially prevent defendants from getting fair trials.

Amnesiac
March 29th, 2011, 07:39 PM
Lot's of people feel that when you commit crimes like assault, rape, murder and etc. you give up your all your rights. That is not the case. And you know something, I read a comment on Facebook which is where I found the link, and the person said that juries should be consisted solely of people who can relate to the victim such as in child molestation cases the jury should be parents of small children or in the mans case fathers of teen daughters. The person said that if the jury consisted of fathers of teen daughters the man would get acquitted. I think that if such a thing happens it will lead to biased juries and potentially prevent defendants from getting fair trials.

It would be a completely unbalanced trial. Jury selections are random for a reason.

ShyGuyInChicago
March 29th, 2011, 09:07 PM
It would be a completely unbalanced trial. Jury selections are random for a reason.

Exactly. When people here about such crimes, they tend to not think critically.