View Full Version : Are you in favor of, or opposed to circumcision?
Jamie
November 16th, 2010, 07:43 AM
Poll coming.
I am against circumcision simply for the reason that unless it is medically necessary for treatment, etc. the boy should ultimately have the say over whether or not his foreskin is removed.
chazzrox2
November 16th, 2010, 09:20 AM
Yes i agree but i would say i have no opinion on it. Forced circumcision, yes I am oppsed to, but if the boy has a choice on wether to have the operation or not then it is purely their decision.
I personally think benefits/drawbacks are insignificant to establish a proper argument over and it should be personal preference.
1_21Guns
November 16th, 2010, 10:30 AM
TWPR :arrow: ROTW
Korashk
November 16th, 2010, 10:35 AM
If you want one, go for it. However, don't do it to babies.
closed
November 16th, 2010, 11:26 AM
Poll coming.
I am against circumcision simply for the reason that unless it is medically necessary for treatment, etc. the boy should ultimately have the say over whether or not his foreskin is removed.
Exactly.
Magus
November 16th, 2010, 11:33 AM
If you want one, go for it. However, don't do it to babies.
I will do it my babies. When a boy reaches the age of having to chose to do it or not is then already late for circumcision.
UnknownError
November 16th, 2010, 11:37 AM
If you want one, go for it. However, don't do it to babies.
This.
closed
November 16th, 2010, 11:49 AM
I will do it my babies. When a boy reaches the age of having to chose to do it or not is then already late for circumcision.
Not true. Circumsision can be done even if you are dead, or 90, or 60, and actually any time. It just right to let the person decide himself.
Korashk
November 16th, 2010, 02:23 PM
I will do it my babies. When a boy reaches the age of having to chose to do it or not is then already late for circumcision.
Pretty ignorant statement right there.
Amnesiac
November 16th, 2010, 04:38 PM
I believe it's a personal choice that should be left up to the child once he comes of age.
Fact
November 16th, 2010, 04:44 PM
I believe it's a personal choice that should be left up to the child once he comes of age.
Exactly this.
nick
November 16th, 2010, 04:49 PM
I dont begin to understand how anyone can do that to their child, I'm not in favour.
Lifeguard18
November 16th, 2010, 05:21 PM
Im totally against it. The boy ahould have the choice when 18. Its total mutilation of the body. It should only be done if its for a medical reason. I have no idea why parents would do that to their child. If I had the choice to be, I would choose no.
Thankfully there is restoring. Im in the process of this. Even though its not the real foreskin, I will enjoy what I do gain back like sensitivity.
Sent from my DROID2 using Tapatalk
TopGear
November 16th, 2010, 06:28 PM
I don't understand why it is even done, unless its for a medical reason then there is no reason. When I have children I will not have them circumcised and let them have the choice when they have become the age to choose for them self.
~Drew
Continuum
November 17th, 2010, 04:06 AM
Pretty ignorant statement right there.
That's why we love Faris. :)
Clearly I am against any genital mutilation (or any other kind of mutilations even), but it all depends on the free will of the one who's going to be circumcised. Forcing younglings like little children without their consent might even lead to physical trauma.
Magus
November 17th, 2010, 11:03 AM
Pretty ignorant statement right there.
Elucidate, please.
That's why we love Faris. :)
And I love being the :devil: 's advocate.
Jess
November 17th, 2010, 11:08 AM
it's the boy's choice. it's just like abortion. it's someone's body, THEY make the choice
Korashk
November 17th, 2010, 04:48 PM
Elucidate, please.
Adults get circumcisions all the time.
Amnesiac
November 17th, 2010, 05:05 PM
I voted indifferent in the poll, but that bugs me. Let me say that yes, I am opposed to circumcision of children. Adults I couldn't give less of a fuck about.
Magus
November 18th, 2010, 03:35 AM
Adults get circumcisions all the time.
Really? Never knew that. Cool. :cool:
ShaneK
November 18th, 2010, 03:38 AM
As long as it is consented to i aint got a problem with it
Perseus
November 18th, 2010, 07:25 AM
Well, gawddamn. I am for circumcision for the sole purpose I hate the way the foreskin looks. I don't care if that makes me sound like a fucking douche whacker, but I honestly hate foreskin. I plan on circumcising my son(s)(if I have one) because I just can't stand foreskin. And I don't see why some people want it back after you get circumcised. Oh boo hoo, you don't have as much sensitivity. Who the fuck cares? Do you really care that much about the physical pleasure of sex instead of the intimacy of it?
Magus
November 19th, 2010, 01:10 AM
Well, gawddamn. I am for circumcision for the sole purpose I hate the way the foreskin looks. I don't care if that makes me sound like a fucking douche whacker, but I honestly hate foreskin. I plan on circumcising my son(s)(if I have one) because I just can't stand foreskin. And I don't see why some people want it back after you get circumcised. Oh boo hoo, you don't have as much sensitivity. Who the fuck cares? Do you really care that much about the physical pleasure of sex instead of the intimacy of it?
I totally agree with you on this.(pssst... vote man, vote!)
Reminder, the top part of the phallus is the most sensitive part in the human body. It responds much quicker than the skins on the sides.
And yes, foreskin is useless just like the gall bladder and wisdom teeth.
And for those who disagree. Deal with it. It is our opinion on circumcision.
Antebellum
November 19th, 2010, 01:12 AM
I'm not in favor of it. Some have said circumcision is better health wise, but I disagree.
Death
November 19th, 2010, 11:56 AM
If someone wants to circumcise themselves, then that's their choice, but I think that circumcising babies is twisted because they are not old enough to decide to make a permanent choice like that for themselves. Even if it's for religious reasons; their god created them with the foreskin on, right?
karl
November 19th, 2010, 12:43 PM
I notice that you're only talking about boys. But Muslims circumcise girls (ablacion) A practice that is illegal in Spain but certainly not in African countries
Sith Lord 13
November 19th, 2010, 12:46 PM
I notice that you're only talking about boys. But Muslims circumcise girls (ablacion) A practice that is illegal in Spain but certainly not in African countries
They're referred to by the same term, but are two very different procedures.
Magus
November 19th, 2010, 01:17 PM
I notice that you're only talking about boys. But Muslims circumcise girls (ablacion) A practice that is illegal in Spain but certainly not in African countriesThey're referred to by the same term, but are two very different procedures.
I know only of Egypt and Sudan practice girl circumcision.
This is the perfect time to call female circumcision a genital mutilation. Because when performed on a patient(or a victim), they will then lose all the sexual pleasures. It is useless and has no benefits at all, but comes with different kinds of terrible ailments.
So, yes. I am all against female genital mutilation.
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.