ShyGuyInChicago
September 16th, 2010, 05:36 PM
Should something like this be up to each individual state to decide when punishments in one state can be harsher than in another state. I though of this when I read news coverage of Chelsea's Law which was passed in California and allows for life without parole for certain sex crimes against children and there were comments that laws like this should be passed all through out the country. I have been thinking about and considering this comment that a user on the new site left:
I agree with Kevin,, It doesn't make sense to me... How can someone do the same crime and get a lesser punishment then if they had done it in a different state,, when all the states are in the United States... I just don't get it..... I believe all laws and punishments should be the same through out the entire United States. If your breaking the law why does it matter what state your in,, your still breaking the law.... wrong is wrong no matter where you are...
There are some concerns about such a thing because the 10th amendment gives states powers that either the Federal government lacks or that is not forbidden to be done by the states.
I agree with Kevin,, It doesn't make sense to me... How can someone do the same crime and get a lesser punishment then if they had done it in a different state,, when all the states are in the United States... I just don't get it..... I believe all laws and punishments should be the same through out the entire United States. If your breaking the law why does it matter what state your in,, your still breaking the law.... wrong is wrong no matter where you are...
There are some concerns about such a thing because the 10th amendment gives states powers that either the Federal government lacks or that is not forbidden to be done by the states.