ShyGuyInChicago
August 3rd, 2010, 08:17 PM
Please respond to what he Supreme Court said when they found executing a juvenile to be unconstitutional in the Roper v. Simmons Case
This is what the Supreme Court said in the Roper v. Simmons case that made executing a person under age 18 unconstitutional
"First, lack of maturity and an underdeveloped sense of responsibility are found in youth more often than in adults and are more understandable among the young. These qualities often result in impetuous and ill-considered actions and decisions…."
"Second, juveniles are more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures, including peer pressure…."
"Third, the character of a juvenile is not as well formed as that of an adult. The personality traits of juveniles are more transitory, less fixed."
If you believe juveniles should be exucted how old should they be?
Do you think that a constitutional amendment should be made in order to allow such a thing?
This is what the Supreme Court said in the Roper v. Simmons case that made executing a person under age 18 unconstitutional
"First, lack of maturity and an underdeveloped sense of responsibility are found in youth more often than in adults and are more understandable among the young. These qualities often result in impetuous and ill-considered actions and decisions…."
"Second, juveniles are more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures, including peer pressure…."
"Third, the character of a juvenile is not as well formed as that of an adult. The personality traits of juveniles are more transitory, less fixed."
If you believe juveniles should be exucted how old should they be?
Do you think that a constitutional amendment should be made in order to allow such a thing?