Log in

View Full Version : Britain or America


The Dark Lord
June 26th, 2010, 06:07 PM
Which country is better? Obviously there are a variety of issues but which country has the most pregedius history, greatest heros, even best TV shows.

Britain or America and Why

Death
June 26th, 2010, 06:32 PM
Well, Britain has come further in passing laws to give people rights which only some states of America have.

Camazotz
June 26th, 2010, 09:42 PM
Britain because it has a longer history, and thus more time periods for flourish. Currently, I like my United States. But in any case, each country will be better in some category, and it's in the opinions of their inhabitants to decide which is better. So I'm torn and can't vote.

Atonement
June 26th, 2010, 09:54 PM
When it comes to this, it really reflects a quote I've heard a lot lately.

"Its not right, its not wrong, its just different."

I don't think they can be compared, but rather respected in their individual rights.

Zero Beat
June 26th, 2010, 10:09 PM
Neither, Australia is way better then the both of them put together!

Peace God
June 26th, 2010, 10:15 PM
America, because our food tastes better.
what do you guys eat...spotted dick and pickled eggs? ...that shit's nasty yo

Pommy
June 26th, 2010, 10:25 PM
When it comes to this, it really reflects a quote I've heard a lot lately.

"Its not right, its not wrong, its just different."

I don't think they can be compared, but rather respected in their individual rights.

^This is correct. Apart from TV, I miss the BBC so much... :whoops:

America, because our food tastes better.
what do you guys eat...spotted dick and pickled eggs? ...that shit's nasty yo

What do you guys eat? Hamburgers with a side of heart attack? ;)

Iron Man
June 26th, 2010, 11:04 PM
Oh snap! That just happened.

Antares
June 26th, 2010, 11:30 PM
this is an amazingly vague question...

I mean...I say socially...probably the UK.
Economically probably the US.
Governmentally...probably the...US?
Militarially, the US; durr.

Such a vague question so its hard to compare.

Both have weaknesses and strong points

Continuum
June 26th, 2010, 11:30 PM
Britain. Without them America wouldn't exist, and they flourished earlier than them :)

Ryhanna
June 26th, 2010, 11:40 PM
Well, it's not like there is a war over power between the two countries so why take sides?
I'm going to say Australia.
We have a FEMALE leader now.... with RED HAIR. Growth, my children. Growth.
:P

punkjake
June 27th, 2010, 12:05 AM
I'm American yes,but do we have to always argue all the freaking time?I think every country is good in it's own weird or different way,some may seem better but they still have their faults.I like both Britain and America,so I picked neither.

Antares
June 27th, 2010, 12:44 AM
Im glad to see the British are so modest.....:rolleyes:

Sage
June 27th, 2010, 08:43 AM
I can't say either country is definitively better than the other, but boiling down to a few things, I would personally rather live in the US: More varied landscape, cultural and geographically, a better (in my opinion) public schooling system, and less restrictive gun laws.

The Dark Lord
June 27th, 2010, 11:51 AM
Im glad to see the British are so modest.....:rolleyes:

Yes America are soo much more modest and realistic;)

CrazyGaga
June 27th, 2010, 12:58 PM
im gonna go with britain, free healthcare!!

Magus
June 27th, 2010, 02:32 PM
Britain; for being a bit more expatriate-friendly than the U.S.

Tiberius
June 27th, 2010, 02:49 PM
Britain. Without them America wouldn't exist, and they flourished earlier than them :)
The U.S is more powerful than england ever was and we've grown much faster than England. BTW, France is the reason the United States is it's own country and Spain discovered this side of the world.
Well, it's not like there is a war over power between the two countries so why take sides?
I'm going to say Australia.
We have a FEMALE leader now.... with RED HAIR. Growth, my children. Growth.
:P
What if your ginger lady leader is totally incapable of fulfilling her job correctly?

im gonna go with britain, free healthcare!!
You guys still pay for your healthcare, it's called taxes.

AgusCO
June 27th, 2010, 04:56 PM
The U.S is more powerful than england ever was
More than the British Empire?(This is a serious question, I really don't know)
Anyway. I can't decide, I love both even though I'm slightly more in Britain's side.

Peace God
June 27th, 2010, 05:38 PM
What do you guys eat? Hamburgers with a side of heart attack? ;)
...extra mayo

Huskyboy132
June 27th, 2010, 06:01 PM
omgggggggggggggggg
i dont get british humor..
YAY AMERICA!

MadManWithaBox
June 27th, 2010, 06:08 PM
The united kingdom of great britain, no question.

Mattyboy2
June 27th, 2010, 06:27 PM
Isn't there quite an American heavy audience for this?

Jess
June 27th, 2010, 06:53 PM
America, Britain's spelling is weirder. let's see....I just think America because I've never been to Britain so...yeah

but both has its good and bad....

The Ninja
June 27th, 2010, 10:09 PM
i don't know about britain but america is going down the shit hole, we owe to much money to too many countries

Ryhanna
June 27th, 2010, 10:13 PM
What if your ginger lady leader is totally incapable of fulfilling her job correctly?


We jump ship, persumably. That's how she got the job, anywho... :)

Death
June 28th, 2010, 10:45 AM
America, Britain's spelling is weirder.

You're only saying that because you are used to American spelling. Myself, I find American spelling weirder; but naturally I would seeing that I'm British. Also, in my experience, on forums (such as this one), it tends to be the British people who type more coherantly.

The Dark Lord
June 28th, 2010, 11:02 AM
omgggggggggggggggg
i dont get british humor..
YAY AMERICA!

Whats the difference? Programmes like the Office and Curb Your Enthusiam have British versions (although the Office is british) and we both have quite ironic/sarcastic senses of humour and love the Simon Cowell TV talent show format

Continuum
June 28th, 2010, 11:28 AM
The U.S is more powerful than england ever was and we've grown much faster than England. BTW, France is the reason the United States is it's own country and Spain discovered this side of the world.



Britain's 13 colonies on North America gave way for the first states of the US. Plus, the US' acquired most of its territories by buying them from France and Russia. Later on, Texas conceded to be another state. Even though US grew faster, England had more time for development than any other newbie nations.

The Dark Lord
June 28th, 2010, 11:34 AM
The U.S is more powerful than england ever was and we've grown much faster than England. BTW, France is the reason the United States is it's own country and Spain discovered this side of the world.

Has America conquered all of Africa and America? Britain conquered the world in a way only a few powerful individuals (Julius Caesar, Adolf Hitler etc) have ever done. Why is France the reason the US is its own country, it certainly contributed to the growth of America with the Lousissana Purchase, but most Americans are of British descent.

You guys still pay for your healthcare, it's called taxes.

Not all of us do. Old people and unemployed people who don't pay taxes still get free health care.

Peace God
June 28th, 2010, 12:29 PM
most Americans are of British descent.

no...im pretty sure most americans have german ancestors

The Dark Lord
June 28th, 2010, 12:50 PM
no...im pretty sure most americans have german ancestors

I was under the impression that America gained its independence from Britain and a lot of brits travelled to America to live the American dream dream. Germany wasn't a country until 1871 so I doubt that

Death
June 28th, 2010, 03:06 PM
America

How convincing.

Seriously though, how many of America's states have modern laws? Only some. And yet all of Britain does have civilised laws.

Peace God
June 28th, 2010, 05:15 PM
I doubt that

http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/usancestry-2000.jpg

The Dark Lord
June 28th, 2010, 05:17 PM
http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/usancestry-2000.jpg

I stand corrected. Sorry.

Sage
June 28th, 2010, 05:42 PM
Seriously though, how many of America's states have modern laws? Only some. And yet all of Britain does have civilised laws.

That's a rather incendiary and debatable claim. What laws would you consider to be civilized that America lacks?

sassy boi
June 28th, 2010, 05:53 PM
Neither, Australia is way better then the both of them put together!

errr... australia is like englands little helper! :D

Awesome
June 29th, 2010, 12:10 AM
I live in America, but I just by the looks of it and little I have learned about Britian, I would maybe want to live there.

America has so much crime, and people and immigrants. But I like living in the powerfullest country in the world, make you fell safe sorta, because we still have crimes.

Missing
June 29th, 2010, 11:34 AM
Has anyone considered the alternative? ...Canada...:yes:.....


Huuuge trading partner with U.S., about 80% of all goods are traded with U.S. and Canada is a primarily trade oriented country

There is no need for an army, owing to NATO and NORAD, if anyone attacks Canada, America will be on their :rolleyes: before you can say owned

+REP. "Hello i'm an American" - YOU AMERICAN DEVIL, I WILL KILL YOU INFIDEL!
"Hello, i'm Canadian" - "Oh that's swell! :D That Terry Fox is a hell of a guy!"

American+British allegiance. We're down with Roosevelt, or Churchill, we're just cool like that

Last but not least, living in Canada feels no different than living in America, idk about Britain though

But if I had to choose? England, i've always wanted to live on an island

Patchy
June 29th, 2010, 12:04 PM
Neither, we are both fucked up in our own unique ways,

unnecessary wars
a uncooperative government that achieves almost nothing
letting the banks fuck up our countries

Jess
June 29th, 2010, 03:01 PM
You're only saying that because you are used to American spelling. Myself, I find American spelling weirder; but naturally I would seeing that I'm British. Also, in my experience, on forums (such as this one), it tends to be the British people who type more coherantly.

Yeah I know that.

Whisper
June 29th, 2010, 10:13 PM
Allot of popular "american" shows are actually filmed in Vancouver

To say one is better than the other would never work they're two completely different nations with entirely unique perspectives and histories.

As far as which county i personally prefer between the two? America.

Antares
June 29th, 2010, 11:29 PM
wtf is with all the germans :P

Tiberius
June 29th, 2010, 11:56 PM
Has America conquered all of Africa and America? Britain conquered the world in a way only a few powerful individuals (Julius Caesar, Adolf Hitler etc) have ever done.
Fact 1. England controlled less than 1/3 of Africa.
If you can understand French, please refer to this map:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/43/Africa1898.png
Fact 2. France conquered all of Quebec, England bought the rest of Canada after it won New France as a prize.
Fact 3. England conquered less than 7 of the original colonies. Treaties, money and American colonists did the rest until 1783.
Fact 4. France conquered Louisiana; America bought it.
Fact 5. Spain, Portugal and France conquered the rest of North and South America, England didn't.
Fact 6. America is the most powerful country in the world in terms of technology, economy and in some ways, it's military.
Why is France the reason the US is its own country, it certainly contributed to the growth of America with the Lousissana Purchase, but most Americans are of British descent.
http://xenophongroup.com/mcjoynt/yrtnsieg.htm
Ever heard of the Siege of Yorktown? You know, the massive ass-kicking that America and France gave the British? Did they not teach you in school that without the money, munitions, advisors, soldiers and navy that the French provided was the cause for the U.S winning the war? Do they not teach the fact that France actually won a war against England? If you don't know what you're talking about, don't say anything.

Thanks for playing.

Antares
June 30th, 2010, 12:34 AM
I am going to extend the above statement and conclude that the United States has the most powerful military in the world.
We can literally blow you guys off the face of the earth.

Heres a bit to back me up although that doesnt take into account the capabilites we have as far as economy backing us up, the amount of money that pours into defense, and the stuff that the US government doesn't tell us about

United States
Army: 7900 Tanks (M1-A1) Navy: 74 Subs, 12 Carriers, 27 Cruisers, 52 Destroyers, 35 Frigates, & 21 Patrol Boats Air Force:3533 Combat AircraftAtomic Weapons Cap.
United Kingdom
Army: 2500 Tanks (Challenger 1&2(Best Tank In Nato)) Navy: 20 Subs, 4 Carriers, 25 Frigates, & 23 Patrol Boats Air Force: 800 Combat Aircraft Atomic Weapons Cap.
China
Army: 7000 Battle Tanks(old russian tanks most do not work or do not have spare parts) Est. 1500 working Navy: 65 subs (most not working), 20 destroyers (most old U.S or Russian most might work), 40 Frigates (Old U.S, Russian, May Work) and 368 Patrol (Small Not Heavly Armed) Air Force: 3000 Combat Aircraft (Old Soviet Aircraft, No spare parts, Out-Of-Date) Atomic Weapons Cap.
Russia Fed.
Army: 21,820 Tanks (Most If Not All Do Not work(need spare parts)) Navy: (Most Vessels Do Not work or are too old to run or be effective) 67 Subs, 1 Carrier, 7 Crusiers, 10 Frigates, 108 Patrol Boats (Not heavly Armed) Air Force: 1500 Combat Aircraft (not many trained pilots, some do not work or need spare parts, Most old Soviet Aircraft this information on it


I think its fair to put a fight in other areas but as far as military goes, I think it is wise for the UK to admit that they can't be the US militarily.
World War 1 and 2 we saved your asses lol

Whisper
June 30th, 2010, 07:24 AM
I am going to extend the above statement and conclude that the United States has the most powerful military in the world.
We can literally blow you guys off the face of the earth.
That has to be Americas most favorite saying, pathetic
sooner or later every american brags about their nukes
Britain has nukes too....
you don't need thousands, thats the beauty and terror of a nuke....one is more than sufficient to destroy a great deal, especially considering allot of models have multiple warheads and are capable of taking out multiple cities at once.


"The nuclear arms race is like two sworn enemies standing waist deep in gasoline, one with three matches, the other with five."
— Carl Sagan

Continuum
June 30th, 2010, 08:39 AM
Last but not least, living in Canada feels no different than living in America, idk about Britain though



For starters, it's colder :P

Zephyr
June 30th, 2010, 08:56 AM
Being where I live, of course it'll be biased: America. It's a big place to explore, and being somebody who loves to travel, it's perfect.

There's going to be crime, idiots and assholes no matter where you go in the world, so it all comes down to which suits your interests best.

Rutherford The Brave
June 30th, 2010, 09:46 AM
Does it really matter? The two countries are huge name countries, in both you have probably the most rights as a people in the world. You are protected by two of the best armies, that are geared with some of the best technology. The two have been successful in previous wars, and we have patched up our previous issues. I don't think you can really put one over the other. Of course someone will say Nationalism, of course america/britain is better.

Death
June 30th, 2010, 10:53 AM
I think its fair to put a fight in other areas but as far as military goes, I think it is wise for the UK to admit that they can't be the US militarily.
World War 1 and 2 we saved your asses lol

Have you noticed that the United States is so much larger than the UK? Hell, if you look at the proportions of the British army compared to their country size and the same for America, Britain had more military wise.

steve1234
June 30th, 2010, 10:54 AM
Britain!
If it wasn't for Britain, America could be a completley different place!

Rutherford The Brave
June 30th, 2010, 11:12 AM
Britain!
If it wasn't for Britain, America could be a completley different place!

Technically, there really wouldn't be an America. It's debatable. It would either be a bunch of seperate colonies, or a bunch of trible territories. However, colonizing an area that is already pretty much inhabitited is not a admirable feat.

Jess
June 30th, 2010, 01:23 PM
I should've chose 'neither'. my mom doesn't like America for several reasons and I have to agree

12 years and we still haven't gotten the papers for our citizenship

Ryhanna
June 30th, 2010, 06:39 PM
I said neither.

Because both countries have their good and bad, both countries are great places to live and have heaps of culture and hertitage.

Entertainment wise, America has better TV shows and movies (apart from Harry Potter of course), but the UK has far superior comedians. In my opinion, anyway.

billium183
June 30th, 2010, 06:44 PM
well, the britain version of the office sucks ass. but the american one is awsome

Sage
June 30th, 2010, 10:37 PM
For starters, [Canada's] colder :P

Not really. The vast majority of Canada's population lives within 100 miles of the US border.

Death
July 1st, 2010, 01:10 PM
well, the britain version of the office sucks ass. but the american one is awsome

Yeah, well the American version of "small" (*cough* *cough* large! *cough*) sized coke and fries sucks - unlike the British one.

Peace God
July 1st, 2010, 01:32 PM
Yeah, well the American version of "small" (*cough* *cough* large! *cough*) sized coke and fries sucks - unlike the British one.

If you are comparing an american fast food chain to your local restaurants then of course its better. But unless you've actually been to a real restaurant over here idk how you can say that.

Edit: And for record Belgium has the best fries in the world...imo.

Death
July 2nd, 2010, 01:00 AM
I wasn't comparing the restaurants/fast food areas as such, but more the portion sizes. I believe that a video called Supersize me was done to reflect this. One of the British people actually tried eating out using their smallest portion sizes (but "upgrading" to king sized when asked) for a week or something, and he endedup vomitting because he had to eat it all and it was all too much.

Peace God
July 2nd, 2010, 01:42 PM
I wasn't comparing the restaurants/fast food areas as such, but more the portion sizes. I believe that a video called Supersize me was done to reflect this. One of the British people actually tried eating out using their smallest portion sizes (but "upgrading" to king sized when asked) for a week or something, and he endedup vomitting because he had to eat it all and it was all too much.

Yeah i saw that movie
1. It was mcdonalds...not a real restaurant.
2. the guy was american
3. how does larger portion sizes make our food worse?

Death
July 2nd, 2010, 02:27 PM
If he's American than I heard wrong since I was told he was British. So I take that back. As for the portion size thing, it doesn't make your food inferior, but it is rather annoying when people only want a smallish amount of something and can't get it making them have to pay more for what they don't want.

Sith Lord 13
July 2nd, 2010, 07:13 PM
If he's American than I heard wrong since I was told he was British. So I take that back. As for the portion size thing, it doesn't make your food inferior, but it is rather annoying when people only want a smallish amount of something and can't get it making them have to pay more for what they don't want.

You can get a small if you want, or take the leftovers to go. It's very bad practice for a restaurant of any kind to have it's patrons go hungry. Better to serve more and have the person take home the extra than to serve too little and have the person hungry after they finish eating.

Tiberius
July 3rd, 2010, 12:00 AM
If he's American than I heard wrong since I was told he was British. So I take that back. As for the portion size thing, it doesn't make your food inferior, but it is rather annoying when people only want a smallish amount of something and can't get it making them have to pay more for what they don't want.

Food in America is cheaper...

Peace God
July 3rd, 2010, 09:18 AM
it is rather annoying when people only want a smallish amount of something and can't get it
When does that happen?

making them have to pay more for what they don't want.
you can just take it home

Death
July 4th, 2010, 03:12 AM
You shouldn't have to take food home if you just want a snack. I'm just saying they could have more options like Britain does for your fast food.

Peace God
July 4th, 2010, 08:23 AM
You shouldn't have to take food home if you just want a snack. I'm just saying they could have more options like Britain does for your fast food.

what are talking about man? what makes you think you cant buy a snack?... there are several fast food restaurants within a few miles of my house and almost all of them have small portions, snacks and/or value menus

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_BaWeTAWt3VI/SbfARS-LIoI/AAAAAAAAKdY/Rfr1W35rHCU/s400/McDonalds-dollar-menu.gif
http://fastfood.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/06/kfc-value-menu-panel.jpg
http://fastfood.freedomblogging.com/files/2008/05/tacobell_valuemenu_web2.jpg

and what fast food options does britain have to offer that america doesnt?

Death
July 4th, 2010, 12:36 PM
Then you're lucky. It's just I heard that there are many places which don't allow that. But heck, they may be wrong for all I know - it's just what I heard.

Rutherford The Brave
July 4th, 2010, 03:28 PM
Then you're lucky. It's just I heard that there are many places which don't allow that. But heck, they may be wrong for all I know - it's just what I heard.

If you don't want a large portion you can order an appetizer or from the bar menu...