Log in

View Full Version : Australian State Bans Swearing


Aspiringanonymous
June 23rd, 2010, 02:28 AM
THOUSANDS more Queenslanders could be slapped with fines for offences that would never have attracted police attention in the past under sweeping reforms to police powers.

Experts fear swearing in public, with a fine of $100, will be a major money spinner for the state and could become the weapon of choice for frustrated officers on the beat.

Premier Anna Bligh announced the new powers for police to issue on-the-spot notices for public nuisance offences on Tuesday.

Ms Bligh said the move would increase efficiency, save time and fast-track more important matters in the courts by stopping minor public nuisance offenders from clogging the justice system.

She said the measures, targeting offences such as public urination, disorderly conduct and abusive language, would save the Government between $18 million and $30 million.

The power to issue on-the-spot fines of between $100 and $300 could result in public nuisance prosecutions soaring 20 per cent, based on figures from a 12-month trial in South Brisbane and Townsville.

In 2008-2009 terms, that could see 5500 more people slapped with the offence across Queensland each year.

Ms Bligh said it was hard to estimate if the 20 per cent increase would hold true right across the state.

She attributed it to police having more time "on the beat" because the on-the-spot powers saved hours compared to the time spent processing an arrest.

But an evaluation of the trial by Griffith University said evidence existed that, given on-the-spot powers, police were more likely to issue tickets in situations unlikely to be considered criminal before the courts.

The NSW Ombudsman said the problem particularly concerned police fining people for swearing, saying: "The words spoken would not be considered offensive if the matter was to be determined by a court."

Queensland Council of Civil Liberties president Michael Cope said the powers were a concern when it came to offensive language and would see public nuisance offence rates soar.

"This will become the thing police just slap on someone whenever they aren't happy," Mr Cope said. "No one will fight them and ultimately people who are homeless or young will bear the brunt of this."

Trial figures showed 1 per cent of those charged had appealed.

Police Minister Neil Roberts said inappropriate behaviour in public places was not acceptable and would not be tolerated.

The legislation will be introduced to Parliament later this year, with the new powers to take effect by 2011.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/cops-get-new-power-to-fine-for-public-nuisance-offences/story-e6freon6-1225879937252

Ryhanna
June 23rd, 2010, 02:31 AM
It's things like this that make me hate us juuuuuusssst a little bit.

It's swearing - It's not like your stabbing randoms on the street! -_-

Gumleaf
June 23rd, 2010, 02:37 AM
typical queenslanders :P

Bougainvillea
June 23rd, 2010, 04:29 AM
Queenslander: Oh shit I dropped me nickel.
Policeman: Then that's $300.05 you'll be losing today, then.

:P

Continuum
June 23rd, 2010, 06:01 AM
^lol

Governments will do everything to save money then

Scarface
June 23rd, 2010, 06:26 AM
I would lose a lot of money out there that's for sure. That's just too bad lol.

Sage
June 23rd, 2010, 07:56 AM
I blame the communists.

CaptainObvious
June 23rd, 2010, 12:14 PM
Wowwww. Do you lot not have free speech protections down there? I would consider the right to swear - absent any other problematic circumstances like abusing or harassing another person - a fundamental part of free speech rights. How I choose to emphasize things is my concern alone.

peaceloverugby
June 23rd, 2010, 12:21 PM
They would make soooooo much money off of me if I lived in Queensland... What they should do is just stand outside the gates of a rugby pitch, and give everyone who leaves a ticket, just on probable cause.

deadpie
June 23rd, 2010, 12:48 PM
Hm.

Well, shit.

Antares
June 23rd, 2010, 02:56 PM
This will be a flop :P

Whisper
June 23rd, 2010, 11:04 PM
Wowwww. Do you lot not have free speech protections down there? I would consider the right to swear - absent any other problematic circumstances like abusing or harassing another person - a fundamental part of free speech rights. How I choose to emphasize things is my concern alone.

Agreed!!!!!!!
there'd be riots if they ever dared to try and pull that shit here.

first western nation with a great firewall
and now swearing's on the verge of being illigal
if it passes successfully (god forbid) i doubt it would take long for the rest of the provinces to follow suit.

Bougainvillea
June 23rd, 2010, 11:08 PM
I'd wear a nametag saying "HI MY NAME IS: ShitFuckAssBitchTittyPussy"

And right when I see a policeman walking up to me pointing his finger at me I just fuckin bite it off and spit it in his face and yell "STOP HAVING SEX WITH MY WIFE!"

Whisper
June 23rd, 2010, 11:24 PM
I also LOVE how they're dictating laws not on the societies holistic morals but on the basis of profit
what? taxes aren't gouging the citizens enough?
maybe they need fiscal responsibility in the government instead of police state laws for a cash grab to finance their incompetence

mrmcdonaldduck
June 24th, 2010, 04:09 AM
I also LOVE how they're dictating laws not on the societies holistic morals but on the basis of profit
what? taxes aren't gouging the citizens enough?
maybe they need fiscal responsibility in the government instead of police state laws for a cash grab to finance their incompetence

our government stopped dictating laws on common sense around 10-15 years ago. now its profit profit profit!