Log in

View Full Version : Baby boy survives for nearly two days after abortion


nick
April 29th, 2010, 02:18 AM
A baby boy abandoned by doctors to die after a botched abortion was found alive nearly a day later.

The 22-week infant died one day later in intensive care at a hospital in the mother's home town of Rossano in southern Italy.

The mother, pregnant for the first time, had opted for an abortion after prenatal scans suggested that her baby was disabled.

However, the infant survived the procedure, carried out on Saturday in the Rossano Calabro hospital, and was left by doctors to die.

He was discovered alive the following day – some 20 hours after the operation – by Father Antonio Martello, the hospital chaplain, who had gone to pray beside his body.

He found that the baby, wrapped in a sheet with his umbilical cord still attached, was moving and breathing.

The priest raised the alarm and doctors immediately arranged for the infant to be taken to a specialist neo-natal unit at the neighbouring Cosenza hospital, where he died on Monday morning.

Italian police are investigating the case for "homicide" because infanticide is illegal in Italy.

The law means that doctors have had an obligation to try to preserve the life of the child once he had survived the abortion.

The Italian government is also considering an inquiry into the conduct of the hospital staff.


Full story here (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/italy/7646540/Baby-boy-survives-for-nearly-two-days-after-abortion.html)

Sage
April 29th, 2010, 02:22 AM
inb4 pro-lifers eat this shit up.

Kaius
April 29th, 2010, 04:31 AM
inquiry into the conduct of the hospital staff? Should be sacked.

ShatteredWings
April 29th, 2010, 05:23 AM
Late term abortion much? 5 1/2 months? I thought the latest abortions were 3mo..

Sith Lord 13
April 29th, 2010, 08:15 AM
Late term abortion much? 5 1/2 months? I thought the latest abortions were 3mo..

Unfortunately no. In the US, it is a legally protected right to have an abortion during the third trimester. There is even a method called partial birth abortion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intact_dilation_and_extraction#Partial-birth_abortion
At this point the child can survive outside the womb. I personally don't see the difference between this and infanticide, but whatever.

ShatteredWings
April 29th, 2010, 02:59 PM
Holy FUCK i didn't know they did that here. THAT is wrong.
I don't have a problem with first trimester abortions, but... god no. If the child has ANY chance of surviving outside the womb (yes, with medical intervention), that shouldn't be legal

Sith Lord 13
April 30th, 2010, 03:59 AM
Holy FUCK i didn't know they did that here. THAT is wrong.
I don't have a problem with first trimester abortions, but... god no. If the child has ANY chance of surviving outside the womb (yes, with medical intervention), that shouldn't be legal

Yep. I personally agree with you. Unfortunately, legally, there is no difference between a zygote and a fully developed fetus.

Whisper
April 30th, 2010, 04:10 AM
inb4 pro-lifers eat this shit up.

I saw ur post and I had to use this
its funny

Jess
April 30th, 2010, 07:21 AM
abortion just because her baby might be disabled? that is sick poor baby

nachtspiegel
May 1st, 2010, 02:10 AM
I don't really agree with abortion anyway, but once the infant has the potential to survive outside of the womb - as this one did - it should not, under any circumstance, be legal. Period.

Giles
May 1st, 2010, 06:56 AM
inb4 pro-lifers eat this shit up.

I'm with him ^^

If the mother didn't want the child to live, then I don't care if she wanted the child dead. It's her choice, no one else's.

nick
May 1st, 2010, 07:04 AM
I'm with him ^^

If the mother didn't want the child to live, then I don't care if she wanted the child dead. It's her choice, no one else's.
Whilst I fundamentally disagree with that point of view it isnt really the issue thats raised by this particular news story. The issue is more whether it was right to leave the baby without treatment for 2 days while it was fighting to survive.

Giles
May 1st, 2010, 07:42 AM
Ah right. Seem to of misunderstood.

Still, I don't really care. If the mother asked for the child to be killed, it failed so they let it die. I don't see anything wrong with that.

WaahZombie
May 3rd, 2010, 04:34 PM
pro - life!!

Sage
May 3rd, 2010, 06:41 PM
pro - life!!

Called it.

Tiberius
May 3rd, 2010, 07:00 PM
I'm with him ^^

If the mother didn't want the child to live, then I don't care if she wanted the child dead. It's her choice, no one else's.

So if a mother doesn't want her 7 year-old to live and throws a toaster in the bathtub, that's fine? Obviously, the child was NOT a fetus anymore and was a human capable of life just like anyone else. The mother doesn't have the right to decide if she wants to kill another human. You fail.

Sage
May 3rd, 2010, 07:03 PM
So if a mother doesn't want her 7 year-old to live and throws a toaster in the bathtub, that's fine?

No, that would leave a big mess.