View Full Version : North Korea Vows 'Annihilating' Nuclear Strike if United States Attacks Pre-Emptively
fdsgfg55465
July 3rd, 2006, 07:21 PM
if we attack them because of thier missles they say they will kill us all what do you all think of it? heres the link http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,201956,00.html
kermit
July 3rd, 2006, 07:25 PM
Well, I personally feel that Korea has every right to attack the United States if they attack them, for what ever reason. Who died and made the US leader, nobody, thats who!
mRojas2000
July 3rd, 2006, 07:28 PM
"The Bush administration responded sternly..." just started reading that line and i stopped... i hate bush with all my soul. i mean, he has made way too much wars, deaths, and poverty, and im sure he knows it, but he doesnt want to realize it
kermit
July 3rd, 2006, 07:33 PM
Bush is not a very good leader, but I wouldnt go as far to say I hate him. In fact I almost admire him, his skill. To be able to fuck us so deeply in the ass and walk away will millions of our dollars and a relection. He must be some kind of ingenious. Really, just think about it.
mRojas2000
July 3rd, 2006, 07:50 PM
Bush is not a very good leader, but I wouldnt go as far to say I hate him. In fact I almost admire him, his skill. To be able to fuck us so deeply in the ass and walk away will millions of our dollars and a relection. He must be some kind of ingenious. Really, just think about it.
you made my day :)
fdsgfg55465
July 3rd, 2006, 07:51 PM
lol who likes bush? i like usa not bush.
kermit
July 3rd, 2006, 07:56 PM
you made my day :)
Whoa I made your day literally. Good then, that feels nice, unless of course your being sarcastic, in which case I don't truthfully understand. But Good, I think. No, not many people actually like Bush anymore, even those that once did I think are now just going along out of habit. Not actually considering the possibility there wrong. If there is more then one opinion, chances are, only one is right. So theres a good chance that its your opinion that is wrong. Could be mine, but thats just an opinion.
mRojas2000
July 3rd, 2006, 08:00 PM
Whoa I made your day literally. Good then, that feels nice, unless of course your being sarcastic, in which case I don't truthfully understand. But Good, I think. No, not many people actually like Bush anymore, even those that once did I think are now just going along out of habit. Not actually considering the possibility there wrong. If there is more then one opinion, chances are, only one is right. So theres a good chance that its your opinion that is wrong. Could be mine, but thats just an opinion.
i was serious :)
mRojas2000
July 3rd, 2006, 08:39 PM
i agree with all your statements
kermit
July 3rd, 2006, 08:54 PM
North Korea has every right in the wolrd to do what it wants. The USA tests bombs all the time, and the USA allready has nuclear missils and, don't forget, the USA is the only country to have used the millils before. The USA is much more of a threat to the world then tiny little North Korea.
fdsgfg55465
July 3rd, 2006, 09:16 PM
North Korea has every right in the wolrd to do what it wants. The USA tests bombs all the time, and the USA allready has nuclear missils and, don't forget, the USA is the only country to have used the millils before. The USA is much more of a threat to the world then tiny little North Korea.
sorry about correcting you but missiles are spelled like that not "missils" and the usa is not a communist country like n Korea
serial-thrilla
July 3rd, 2006, 09:53 PM
what the hell does communism have to do with not being allowed to have nukes.
fdsgfg55465
July 3rd, 2006, 11:06 PM
what the hell does communism have to do with not being allowed to have nukes.
they are like less trusted with them if you cant tell
Whisper
July 4th, 2006, 06:39 AM
North Kores bluffing
they cant really do anything that will significantly cripple america while still allowing there own country to survive
nobody can
The American Empire does whatever the hell it wants
god Eisenhower must be rolling over in his grave
Now I honestly dont belive North Korea wants to go to war
its dying as is
and it has ZERO allies
its drug smugling and blackmarket counterfiting have been shut down by the United Nations so its running really low on money
It dosent want a fight it wants international attention and aid but the government still wants to remain in absolute power
so they want to try and get aid at gun point
they are like less trusted with them if you cant tell
I'm guessing your american
i hate to break it to ya hun
but NOBODY trusts you with them either
Not to mention your the only country
the ONLY country ever to have used them
Not once
but twice
LIsailer19
July 4th, 2006, 06:49 AM
North Kores bluffing
they cant really do anything that will significantly cripple america while still allowing there own country to survive
nobody can
The American Empire does whatever the hell it wants
god Eisenhower must be rolling over in his grave
Now I honestly dont belive North Korea wants to go to war
its dying as is
and it has ZERO allies
its drug smugling and blackmarket counterfiting have been shut down by the United Nations so its running really low on money
It dosent want a fight it wants international attention and aid but the government still wants to remain in absolute power
so they want to try and get aid at gun point
I'm guessing your american
i hate to break it to ya hun
but NOBODY trusts you with them either
Thank You :)
North Korea knows that if they bomb the US, congress will instantly declare war. Not only that, but the UN, NATO, Japan, etc will be all over their ass. Japan recently made a personal threat to North Korea, that if they bombed the US, they would go to war. North Korea doesnt have the military strength (or the balls) to start that kind of war.
kermit
July 4th, 2006, 09:28 AM
sorry about correcting you but missiles are spelled like that not "missils" and the usa is not a communist country like n Korea
Hey I'm only 13, I think a bit of leway when it comes to my spelling is in order. It's really insignificant to point out somebody's mistakes like that, and rather rude. I don't understand why you would take such a low blow.
North Korea and there little bombs. They know more then the USA that if they use those bombs they die. The USA is the country to watch I tell you, brandshing there little war machines around like a rapper with his gold chain.
fdsgfg55465
July 4th, 2006, 11:40 AM
Hey I'm only 13, I think a bit of leway when it comes to my spelling is in order. It's really insignificant to point out somebody's mistakes like that, and rather rude. I don't understand why you would take such a low blow.
North Korea and there little bombs. They know more then the USA that if they use those bombs they die. The USA is the country to watch I tell you, brandshing there little war machines around like a rapper with his gold chain.
no i'm not saying it in a mean way I'm just telling you because sometimes there are mean people that will call you stupid or things because of spelling errors and stuff i don't spell that great either but i use Google toolbar spell check it works great =P im only 14 and *}Whisper{* i know no one trusts us with anything but they don't like say anything about it.
Ravenous
July 4th, 2006, 01:08 PM
I'm guessing your american
i hate to break it to ya hun
but NOBODY trusts you with them either
Not to mention your the only country
the ONLY country ever to have used them
Not once
but twice
Owned. America showed us the effects nukes really have when they decided to bomb the shit out of Hiroshima, and then incase we still didn't see, Nagasaki aswell.
What do you mean no one says anything about America? Open your ears up man. A hell of a lot of people think that America are just gonna set off a Nuclear war soon. Which middle eastern country are you gonna invade next time you get scared about the price of oil? Maybe someone will stop taking all the shit they get from the "good old US of A."
Whisper
July 4th, 2006, 04:59 PM
I told you!!
His stupid missiles failed miserably
all 3 of them only one was the long range one capible of reaching NA and it failed "Very Quickly" after launch
North Korea is nowhere near being a threat
its just a todler having a temper tantrum
boognish
July 4th, 2006, 06:46 PM
now hold up a second. you see there is a difference between a nuke and an a-bomb. we are the only ppl to use a-bombs out of testing. we used them 2 times. only 2 and japan surrendered. we have the ability to make alot. drop alot. now if the us ever really got pissed, that little red button that is labeled, launch hell, would be pushed and that enemy of ours...well you get it. now the US would never do that. why? cause when we dropped the a-bombs we had no idea of the aftermath. we would have never dropped them if we knew. that has been proven and stated by the presidents of that time. now with the nukes, we had the largest store of nukes in the world, but we had to dismantle quite a few of them, but im pretty sure we still have the highest number. no one in their right mind would make motions or even serious hints to attacking the US. we have so much power, but we dont use it. you think the US is power and money hungry? we have the largest market in the world i believe, we have the largest and possibly most sophisticated army, we have the most weapons, we could seriously pwn the rest of the world in less than 48 hours, and we created disney, there is no way around it, the US could destroy the world, could wipe out ALL of our enemys and at the same time we would end up destroying our friends. so we donot do anything. we sit and wait, for an idiot radical to attack us first. its like the kid the 9 foot 400 pound dad, waving his money, taunting, doing nothing against any one though. but as soon as some one takes the money or attacks the taunting, the kid calls his 9 foot 400 pound dad and his dad fucks the shit out of the other kid(s). the US may taunt and flaunt its power and money, but dont hurt us and we wont hurt you
fdsgfg55465
July 4th, 2006, 10:44 PM
now hold up a second. you see there is a difference between a nuke and an a-bomb. we are the only ppl to use a-bombs out of testing. we used them 2 times. only 2 and japan surrendered. we have the ability to make alot. drop alot. now if the us ever really got pissed, that little red button that is labeled, launch hell, would be pushed and that enemy of ours...well you get it. now the US would never do that. why? cause when we dropped the a-bombs we had no idea of the aftermath. we would have never dropped them if we knew. that has been proven and stated by the presidents of that time. now with the nukes, we had the largest store of nukes in the world, but we had to dismantle quite a few of them, but im pretty sure we still have the highest number. no one in their right mind would make motions or even serious hints to attacking the US. we have so much power, but we dont use it. you think the US is power and money hungry? we have the largest market in the world i believe, we have the largest and possibly most sophisticated army, we have the most weapons, we could seriously pwn the rest of the world in less than 48 hours, and we created disney, there is no way around it, the US could destroy the world, could wipe out ALL of our enemys and at the same time we would end up destroying our friends. so we donot do anything. we sit and wait, for an idiot radical to attack us first. its like the kid the 9 foot 400 pound dad, waving his money, taunting, doing nothing against any one though. but as soon as some one takes the money or attacks the taunting, the kid calls his 9 foot 400 pound dad and his dad fucks the shit out of the other kid(s). the US may taunt and flaunt its power and money, but dont hurt us and we wont hurt you
amen so true! =D
xTheLordsServantx
July 4th, 2006, 11:45 PM
For those of you who do not know:
Today, North Korea launched 5 nuclear missiles. Four were short range, while 1 was long range. All five missiles crashed into the sea near Japan a short time after being launched.
My question is: What do you think the US will do in response to these launchings although there is no proof that these missiles were directed at US targets? Also, do you think that George W. Bush will throw the United States into another war?
Trademarked
July 4th, 2006, 11:47 PM
george bush the dumbass probably will start another war. that idiot
boognish
July 5th, 2006, 12:50 AM
first off, i support bush.
second off, if the 5th long range one was armed with explosives, and aimed toward the us, that is a sign some one is trying to attack you
some one has a gun, there are 4 blanks and 1 real bullet. they fire the 4 blanks randomly but the real bullet is aimed at you. they miss and dont hit you, but you know they aimed the real bullet at you and you have a gun to. they are reloading with 5 more accurate bullets. do you talk or shoot back? common sence you cant talk to some one who is dead set on killing you. if we know that the missile was armed and aimed at us, yes we should show them we still have the power to pwn everyone.
Whisper
July 5th, 2006, 01:05 AM
neither of the bombs needed to be dropped
Japan had been trying to surrender all summer
Trudeau wouldnt listen
Eisenhower despised the dropping of the atomic bombs
It was done for one simple reason
to show off
to scare Russia and to fuck with Cuba
they wern't needed to end the war
and america fucks with other people all the time
thats exactly why nobody likes america anymore
your constantly toppling governments or invading
hell the problems in the middle east (severe anti-americanism was caused by america
you meddled
and as a result you had what the CIA calls "backlash"
America is spending more money on its military then anybody like WAY more over 22% of your ENTIRE yearly budget
for a comparison your number one ally right now (Britian) spends 8
Your biggest rival and possible enemy China spends betweer 14-16
americas schools used to be the best on the planet
now your k-12 education is barley holding onto 20th place
your health care is in severe trouble
there threatening to scrap your entire NASA space program
yet you have no porblem spending 3/4 of a trillion dollars on the millitary
crap i got waaaaaay off topic
North Korea dosent stand a chance
they dont even want to hit you
they never have
is it anywonder why they made no effort to hide the missiles what so ever
or why they timed the lanches to happen at the same time Discovery launched
Or why they only actually fired one long range missile (that cant actually even have a nuclear warhead on it its to small for there nukes) the others were short range
or why they failed misserably seconds after launch
Kim just wants attention
Whisper
July 5th, 2006, 01:18 AM
The missiles were NOT nukes they cant fit there nuclear warheads onto there missiles there to big
there was 6 not 5
and one almost crashed in russian waters JUST missing the territorial waters
it wasent closer to Japan
god get ur facts straight
no
no you wouldnt
you dont just invade on a whim
and ANY use of nukes by america will put russia and china on high alert which could lead to a nuclear war
this is something you have to handle carefully
and his missiles are of ZERO danger to you
even if they wernt so pathedic they fail on there won seconds after launch
even if he could put an actual nuclear warhead onto them (he cant theres are to big to fit)
even if it was fired and on its way to america it still wont hit you
long range ballistic missile defence
member
can somebody PLEASE merge this
I've seen like 3 topics on this one subject now
honestly
boognish
July 5th, 2006, 01:23 AM
ok, if they werent armed and dangerous, i said we shouldnt take action. we should only attack back if they were obviously aimed at us, and were armed to do harm. if one or both were false, i agree a military strike would make no sence at all and would hurt america all around
boognish
July 5th, 2006, 01:33 AM
neither of the bombs needed to be dropped
Japan had been trying to surrender all summer
Trudeau wouldnt listen
Eisenhower despised the dropping of the atomic bombs
It was done for one simple reason
to show off
to scare Russia and to fuck with Cuba
they wern't needed to end the war
you sure about that? cause i was under the impression that truman spent quite some time trying to get japan to surrender until he dropped the bomb, and even then japan refused to surrender so he dropped the second.
and america fucks with other people all the time
thats exactly why nobody likes america anymore
your constantly toppling governments or invading
hell the problems in the middle east (severe anti-americanism was caused by america
you meddled
and as a result you had what the CIA calls "backlash"
actually, wrong. were are well loved in every area of iraq execpt the area that worshiped saddam. and guess where that idea of sever anti-americanism is? there. every where else in that country we were praised. i listened to stories from 2 soldiers stationed in iraq. one was stationed far out nearish the boarder i think, and the other baghdad. the one far away said he was surprised, children were hugging him, people were thanking him, america was praised. but the one in baghdad, well said he was hated and spitted at. goes to show huh, the people that loved saddam hate us but the people that were harmed oppressed and killed by saddam love us. but you will never hear of the soldier on the border any more on the media. cause who wants to hear america is loved some where? no one would watch
America is spending more money on its military then anybody like WAY more over 22% of your ENTIRE yearly budget
for a comparison your number one ally right now (Britian) spends 8
Your biggest rival and possible enemy China spends betweer 14-16
americas schools used to be the best on the planet
now your k-12 education is barley holding onto 20th place
your health care is in severe trouble
there threatening to scrap your entire NASA space program
yet you have no porblem spending 3/4 of a trillion dollars on the millitary
i agree almost completely.
North Korea dosent stand a chance
they dont even want to hit you
they never have
is it anywonder why they made no effort to hide the missiles what so ever
or why they timed the lanches to happen at the same time Discovery launched
Or why they only actually fired one long range missile (that cant actually even have a nuclear warhead on it its to small for there nukes) the others were short range
or why they failed misserably seconds after launch
Kim just wants attention now this i agree with completely, Kim is just the little kid that breaks stuff so that his parents wont notice the other son and pay attention to him.
Aηdy
July 5th, 2006, 01:55 AM
i heard on the news this morning that there were 5 fired, 4 short range anf 1 long range, the long range one big enough to fit a nuclear war head on top.
kermit
July 5th, 2006, 08:30 AM
Yes, I read that there were five, one being long range, and four being short range. And hey, *}Whisper{*, there is no reason to be an asshole, were just having a conversation, one that was going swimingly untill your ego got involved.
kermit
July 5th, 2006, 08:37 AM
North Korea is digging its grave. Its not just the United States that has beef with them. China, Russia, USA, Japan, the Aussies, South Korea, they all are very displeased. But this is not the first time North Korea has acted like this. In 1998 they shot a missle OVER japan, which was pretty crazy in the reigion apparently. North Korea needs to be stopped, but not by america, not right now. They are not as dangorous as you think, though we said that with Iraq and now look, were years into a war we cant get out of.
xTheLordsServantx
July 5th, 2006, 11:04 AM
u guys r getting too heated over this
First of all, there were 5. Second, North Korea denies and there is no evidence saying that they aimed the missiles at us. George Bush and his cabinet just BELIEVE that North Korea aimed at us. For all we know, they could have just been doing some practice firing. Lets not jump to conclusions
Heres the website incase any of u r interested
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2005/north.korea/
it says nothing about it being aimed at the US
redcar
July 5th, 2006, 11:24 AM
ok i merged the two threads, no point having two North Korea threads on the same page and right beside each other.
and as for the test, as Cody says its Kim looking for attention. we gotta remember that Kim Jong-Il is a mad dictator. he wont be too happy that say the like of Iran are getting attention etc, so its like him saying dont forget we are here! although he has done wat i think he wanted by pissing people off. not a smart move when they still want aid, but sure what can we do, he is as mad as a bag of springs.
fdsgfg55465
July 5th, 2006, 02:19 PM
ok i merged the two threads, no point having two North Korea threads on the same page and right beside each other.
and as for the test, as Cody says its Kim looking for attention. we gotta remember that Kim Jong-Il is a mad dictator. he wont be too happy that say the like of Iran are getting attention etc, so its like him saying dont forget we are here! although he has done wat i think he wanted by pissing people off. not a smart move when they still want aid, but sure what can we do, he is as mad as a bag of springs.
when i made this thread there was not other n.korea threads on the same page so i'm sorry
Charlotte
July 5th, 2006, 02:38 PM
No you're fine. Alex was talking about the threads that were made after you made this one.
LIsailer19
July 5th, 2006, 02:38 PM
North Korea is digging its grave. Its not just the United States that has beef with them. China, Russia, USA, Japan, the Aussies, South Korea, they all are very displeased. But this is not the first time North Korea has acted like this. In 1998 they shot a missle OVER japan, which was pretty crazy in the reigion apparently. North Korea needs to be stopped, but not by america, not right now. They are not as dangorous as you think, though we said that with Iraq and now look, were years into a war we cant get out of.
1) if north korea has nukes, and kim has his finger on the button, then they are that dangerous.
2) we went into iraq for NO REASON. bush is just stupid. he wanted revenge, so he started a war but could not fugure out how to get us out. its all bushs fault.
Ravenous
July 5th, 2006, 03:18 PM
1) if north korea has nukes, and kim has his finger on the button, then they are that dangerous.
2) we went into iraq for NO REASON. bush is just stupid. he wanted revenge, so he started a war but could not fugure out how to get us out. its all bushs fault.
1. They can do alot of damage yes, but not as much as their enemys can do to them.
2. You seriously think there was no reason? Think about it, America loves its big SUV's, planes and other oil guzzling things. Oil is running out in easy to reach places, prices rise. America want more Oil, Iraq has lots of Oil. I'll let you figure the rest out.
It has been said before, but yes North Korea has alot of enemys and is not stupid enough to start a nuclear war just yet. They are not nearly powerfull enough. They are just trying to scare the rest of the world, showing off basically. One of these days they are going to show off a bit to much and the USA or Japan or wherever will just say 'enough' and boom WWIII, Nuclear.
Parasite
July 5th, 2006, 03:23 PM
you guys look like idiots, because it seems cody is the only one who actually knows something about this.
Boognish:"I support bush"
Well what the hell has he done for you, except make your parents spend a hell hole of money and stress about an un needed war. George bush isn't even going to finish off this war. he doesn't know how to. he is going to give the job to the next ignorant dick that becomes president.
Parasite
July 5th, 2006, 03:28 PM
you guys look like idiots, because it seems cody is the only one who actually knows something about this.
Boognish:"I support bush"
Well what the hell has he done for you, except make your parents spend a hell hole of money and stress about an un needed war. George bush isn't even going to finish off this war. he doesn't know how to. he is going to give the job to the next ignorant dick that becomes president.
*edit*
tim, you really think we are in this for oil?
Seriously if we were why would we have so little and why would gas be higher than ever? america could so easily get oil and kill millions of iraq's people..but we aren't.
LIsailer19
July 5th, 2006, 04:08 PM
2. You seriously think there was no reason? Think about it, America loves its big SUV's, planes and other oil guzzling things. Oil is running out in easy to reach places, prices rise. America want more Oil, Iraq has lots of Oil. I'll let you figure the rest out.
i dont want this to get off topic but i just want to say i'm an american and i hate oil. it's smelly and dirty. saying americans love to burn oil is a steryotype. the war had nothing to do with oil. saddam tried to assainte bush the 1st. so his idiot son created an excuse to start a war, the excuse was oil, but the real reason was revenge.
LIsailer19
July 5th, 2006, 04:15 PM
george bush the dumbass probably will start another war. that idiot
amen ;). my theory is that george bush started a war because he wanted to be a memorable president. its funny, it blew up in his face.
Scar
July 5th, 2006, 04:22 PM
ok thats lame, every country has bombs but i think we should there asses up.
kolte
July 5th, 2006, 04:31 PM
The Bush administration and the Congress of the United States BOTH made the desision to go into war for many reasons. Getting Iraq's oil, not one of them. Since, well, we havent used any of it, its still all there, not touched by us yet. We may have done it because of reason relating to oil, europe and the dollar. look it up ;p
We also invaded to take out a violent and evil man, Saddam, who killed his on people and treatened the us, what did he expect. We also did it to help the millions of underprivlidged iraqi's.
Bush haters make me laugh. I don't support bush, but I don't pretend that hes god either. He doenst get to do anything and everything and its not all his fault.
Ravenous
July 5th, 2006, 05:33 PM
tim, you really think we are in this for oil?
Seriously if we were why would we have so little and why would gas be higher than ever? america could so easily get oil and kill millions of iraq's people..but we aren't. Gas prices are higher than ever because Oil is harder to come by, its in harder to reach places, the war in Iraq is costing alot of money and lives, so oil will still be expensive to pay for the war. America isn't just going crazy in Iraq, they are disguising it. If they did what you said, "kill millions of iraq's people" then the middle east and other parts of the world would attack the US. Thats why.
i dont want this to get off topic but i just want to say i'm an american and i hate oil. it's smelly and dirty. saying americans love to burn oil is a steryotype. the war had nothing to do with oil. saddam tried to assainte bush the 1st. so his idiot son created an excuse to start a war, the excuse was oil, but the real reason was revenge. Well if you hate oil, then you will also hate cars, planes, roads, waxes, lubricants etc etc. Why do you think everywhere is after oil so badly? Because crude oil has so many usefull products!
Its hardly a steriotype, its a truth of the american lifestyle.
Oil was not an excuse, oil was the reason, has Bush said that they went in for oil? No but thats the truth, the excuse was to help the civilians or some bullshit like that.
ok thats lame, every country has bombs but i think we should there asses up. Not every country mate, when was the last time you saw Etheopia blow shit up?
Maybe this should be split to a Iraq war thread?
WelshLad
July 5th, 2006, 06:01 PM
--> Debate
fdsgfg55465
July 5th, 2006, 08:22 PM
you guys look like idiots, because it seems cody is the only one who actually knows something about this.
Boognish:"I support bush"
Well what the hell has he done for you, except make your parents spend a hell hole of money and stress about an un needed war. George bush isn't even going to finish off this war. he doesn't know how to. he is going to give the job to the next ignorant dick that becomes president.
*edit*
tim, you really think we are in this for oil?
Seriously if we were why would we have so little and why would gas be higher than ever? america could so easily get oil and kill millions of iraq's people..but we aren't.
lol you know theres and edit button right?
fdsgfg55465
July 5th, 2006, 08:23 PM
--> Debate
this is not supposed to be a debate...its just going of topic
Ravenous
July 6th, 2006, 04:06 AM
lol you know theres and edit button right?
Thats what he just used, he was just saying that it was an edited part of his post.
fdsgfg55465
July 6th, 2006, 09:55 AM
Thats what he just used, he was just saying that it was an edited part of his post.
oh because he posted a whole new post with pretty much the same thing well he did i guess he fixed it now
zombieahh
July 6th, 2006, 04:42 PM
I don't think that Korea is a big threat
boognish
July 6th, 2006, 11:09 PM
does anyone realize that if this question was asked in 2001, should we go to war? everyone in america would say yes. we go but nothing really happens, we get rid of saddam and some terrorists but who gives, we arnt getting anything back. so what happens? people say that bush went for oil...dude oil revenge? HE WENT BECAUSE WE TOLD HIM TO. think about it. ppl against bush probly watched fahrenheit 9/11, well did you know 2 things, micheal morre almost got sued by the family of the author of fahrenheit 451 for copyright infringment, and that you will never see that "documentery" in a learning environment? if you see a real documentery it would show both sides of the argument, not stress imaginary arguments. you see bush is an idiot, but he didnt want to go to war. donald rumsfeld is from his fathers presidency. almost all of bushes advisors were from his fathers administration. because the ones that joined bushes and did want saddam removed that convinced bush to attack iraq. now we all know powell, he was also the top advisor and had convinced bush not to do anything. but after 9/11 powell was on vacation and was unable to reach bush. bush had been swayed by his advisors and the rest of the public. now about bush not stopping the attacks if he could...anything that happens in the first year or 2 of a new presidency cant be fully blamed on the current president but first the last president (clinton) should be looked at, proven inocent or guilty then check the new president for guilt. well we skipped clinton and went straight to bush. you see the clinton administration had a rather large part in the attacks, it wasnt only bush that ignored them. think about it, would you really plan a massive terror attack in under 2 years? no, clinton knew, clinton ignored. i support bush, not because he did anyting great, not that he improved my life, in fact he probly made everyones worse. but i support him for the simple fact THAT HE IS OUR PRESIDENT, IF OUR PEOPLE HATE OUR PRESIDENT, WE LOOK WEAK WE LOOK STUPID. anyone heard of dante's inferno? does anyone know who resides in the lowest most terrible ring of hell? currently 3 people. the 2 people that betrayed ceasar and judas i think, this is because the final ring of hell is reserved not for sinners or breakers of the 10 comandments, BUT PEOPLE WHO BETRAY THEIR LEADER. i also support bush because he got stuck in a sticky situation did the only course of action, and those who think differently your wrong, and got stuck with a bum rap, we fell got back up but kicked our leader when he was down. because he is hated by the ignorant, because he is condemed without trial, because he is an average man fit to represent average america but america doenst like reality, so we believe that the terrorists and radical religious peoples want to talk whilst they bomb us, that it really is our fault that they hate us. return to reality, people hate us for our freedom, you think the arabs love that fact that our women can wear 2 peice swim suits? you think they understand nudists? we are so free we cannot comprehend people opressed by a leader or religion, not that we arnt just that we dont believe we are. you people that dont try to learn how the people we are fighting think and act make me sick. "the first rule of war is know thine enemy" LEARN YOUR ENEMY BEFORE YOU ATTACK YOUR LEADER, without a leader you are nothing
rEpReSsIoN.?
July 10th, 2006, 02:46 PM
knowing America they will go blundering into some sort of war with north Korea because they correct me if im wrong at yet have nuclear weapons.
Hyper
July 11th, 2006, 04:40 AM
Id just like to say this
USA just wants only their ally's to have nukes
And why shouldnt the Koreans fire back if fired at? Any1 would do the same
rEpReSsIoN.?
July 11th, 2006, 10:42 AM
I don't think that Korea is a big threat
it has like 1 million or something troops.
Ravenous
July 11th, 2006, 05:30 PM
Troops wont do shit nowadays, most nations would just give em a nuke or two in a full scale war.
cmpcmp
July 15th, 2006, 01:21 PM
OK first of all North Korea is (under current rule) a very bad place.
Its leaders have put together a huge army that rivals (in #) the USA
I would like to point out that they have no way of getting their army accross the pacific. While having over 700,000 troops in a country of 23,000,000 ppl
the pesants are starving under the brutal dictator ship. North Korea has repetedly promised to end its missile program, along with other things, (like counterfeiting millions of dollars in US money every year) Under previos presidents like clinton.
So here's what were left with
-make promises
-dont keep promises
-starves own ppl
-has 700,000 troops (similar to american #, but us population is 300,000,000)
-very unstable country
-will (and have) sold illegal technology for money
After all of this what is one to do if they say "hey let us make a nuke, then a intercontanental balistic missile to get it to you rlargest city" that we can't let happen. Also becasue the DEMS have been stalling the missile defence program for so long we can't say for sure that if they did launch a nuke that we would be able to shoot it down. GOOD job guys.
SO what do you think should happen? let probly the most evil dictator today get a nuke and means to launch it to anywhere in the world?
Me personaly i say we tell them let your inspectors in to see if you are keeping your prommises. IF telll us to go fuck ourselves (which they have) then we hit there missile sites with tomahawk missiles every time they amke a new one.
and also you can't have it both ways, u can't say bush should have had miltilateral talks with iraq, then say that WE MUST have one on one talks w/ korea. Criticize bush as unilateral and them say that we need to have one on one talks. Just dint be stupid.
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.