Gay marriage?

[seansaurusrex]

It's illegal in most states here in the US.
What do you think about gay marriage?

[Iron Man]

In my opinion, love is love. It shouldn't be dictated by who you love. Let it happen.

[Mr. Smithers]

I think that everyone should be able to marry who they want. But I understand why people don't support it.

[Sage]

I think marriage as a whole is antiquated and silly but I am in full support of homosexuals having the right to be as miserable as everyone else.

[Sugaree]

Love is love. No one can tell you who or what to love or how to love that particular object/place/person. Marriage is not some sort of "sacred" ceremony as people lead on. Rather, it is two people who take the vows and promises to stay together until they die. Marriage should not be limited to a man/woman couple. If two men or two women want to get married, I'm all for it. Gay rights is all the more important to the next step in humanitarian efforts.

[2D]

Marriage is a piece of paper. The only thing it is good for is money and for spiritual reasons. I don't see what the big deal about it really.

[L]

i don't think theres going to be a whole lot of different views here...

its sad that where still governed by rules that puts a majority above a minority. but its better then before, black and white people used to have separate toilets.

[carlo123]

its illegal in our country and i think its ok.

[karl]

I wish you a long and lasting happiness

[woody92]

I am gay so yea I sopport it lol! We should be alowed to marry who we want, when we want (just not tooo young, like at 14/15/16 or under):D

[Giles]

Love is love. No one can tell you who or what to love or how to love that particular object/place/person. Marriage is not some sort of "sacred" ceremony as people lead on. Rather, it is two people who take the vows and promises to stay together until they die. Marriage should not be limited to a man/woman couple. If two men or two women want to get married, I'm all for it. Gay rights is all the more important to the next step in humanitarian efforts.

There you go... as it means pretty much nothing if the two people know they are in love then I see no problem with it.

[obiwan94]

Agree with above posts...I dont care about "marriage" as such but it does piss me off that two people who care about each other cant have hospital visitation rights, same inheritance laws, health care coverage, and benefits (and downsides) that legally come with being "married"...if they want to have some ceremony and find someone willing to preside over it, thats cool too but I wouldnt force churches to do it.

[Mental]

In the legal sense, yes. I believe it's legal in my country.

But I don't believe any religious Church, Temple, etc. should be forced to conform to the law and change their beliefs about it, by letting gays/lesbians marry. It'd be great if they conformed by will (as contradictory as it would be), but not forced.

[Zazu]

Love shouldn't be stopped by someone's gender imho.

[chazzrox2]

I'm in the UK, i'm aware it is legal for "Civil Union" and i don't see why people see this as a problem. My mum is gay and i believe she should be perfectly capable of walking to a registry office and coming out "married" to her true love without any prejudism against her.

However if you mean marriage as in a church wedding then i see no problem with not leting homosexuals marry there. Religions are still private "companies" remember with their own rules and restrictions and is up to them what they allow their buildings and doctrine to be used for.

In terms of gay rights my mother has never mentioned being in anyway repressed or segregated because of her sexuality, and besides: If a company is prejudiced against a gay person then that person can sue, what can happen if a straight person is prejudiced against? nothing

[Kitty Purry]

I think that people should b able to marry whoever they want. But America is having alot of new things happening and it's gonna have to b one step at a time

[Ripplemagne]

My religious beliefs say probably, leaning on yes. My political beliefs say no.

So, I'm kind of on the fence.

[Sage]

I don't care if various churches don't want to perform gay weddings. That's fine, I've nothing against that. But I don't see why there has to be a law saying the ones who don't have any problem with it can't.

[BlackBetty]

I don't understand this society! If two homosexual males want to get married, then fucking let them!
Love is love, and there shouldn't be a question about it.
How does it make a damn to anyone if two gay guys get married???

FOR FUCKS SAKE!

[enzenzz]

Getting married isn't just about love; most aren't even in love but do it for other reasons. It's being legally recognized as a union between two persons so that one can have legal responsibilities for their partner.

If you just want love, there's really no need to marry. You don't need a piece of paper and a ceremony to confirm to each other that you are truly in love and will remain that way.

[JackOfClubs]

I completely support homosexual marriage. You should be able to marry who ever you want, no matter your sexual preferences.

[CaptainObvious]

My religious beliefs say probably, leaning on yes. My political beliefs say no.

So, I'm kind of on the fence.

Do you pick your views on issues from a laundry list of what people with your political affiliation ought to believe, or something? That just seems more than a little stupid; political beliefs are second to othe beliefs about the way the world operates, the way it ought to operate, etc., so you can't just have a "political" view unless you're an unthinking propagator of others' political opinions.

I am in favor of it. Marriage is a contract; same-sex - or intersex, or whatever - couples have the exact same ability to make that contract as different-sex couples, so there's no good reason that they shouldn't.

[Severus Snape]

I support gay marriage and scoff at the regressive nay sayers from my high horse of superior logic.

[Ripplemagne]

Do you pick your views on issues from a laundry list of what people with your political affiliation ought to believe, or something? That just seems more than a little stupid; political beliefs are second to othe beliefs about the way the world operates, the way it ought to operate, etc., so you can't just have a "political" view unless you're an unthinking propagator of others' political opinions.


Nice assumption, but no. I'm registered Independent.

[CaptainObvious]

Nice assumption, but no. I'm registered Independent.

Then for what political reason do you believe same sex marriage should be disallowed, exactly?

[Ripplemagne]

Then for what political reason do you believe same sex marriage should be disallowed, exactly?

Do I really have to explain it? I have a pounding headache and the other debate is already draining more time than I have at my disposal.

[Dreaming Cannibal]

to begin with i think that making the homosexual marriage illegal is stupid. To make something illegal a punishment would be necessary to enforce the law and that would mean discrimination. I think the definition of marriage is between a men and a woman. that can't be changed it's something that i grew up knowing, like for me pluto will always be a planet and that the venezuelan flag has only 7 stars. But then again not allowing homosexuals to enjoy the same rights violates freedom, which is the thing america has always been recognized as… the land of freedom.

The reason why i like Canada better.

Freedom in a government is a balance of rules and stuff you want to do. the rules must meet the people expectation and what people want to do accordingly must respect the rules. if people fail to follow the rules a punishment is met. If the rules don't meet people expectation, the rules will be reformed in favour of the majority

[Inconvenience]

STRONGLY AGAINST!

do u people at least know what marriage is? it must be blessed be god.

god's aint gonna bless gay :|

[Ripplemagne]

Homosexuality isn't actually a sin. >>

[Perseus]

STRONGLY AGAINST!

do u people at least know what marriage is? it must be blessed be god.

god's aint gonna bless gay :|

Ah fuck, man. This is why people don't like Georgia.
The defiintion of marriage can change because it used to be man and many woman, now it isn't

Anyway, yes, I think gays should have the right to marry. They're human like everyone else and they should be able to marry wheter or not Christians like it or not.

[Inconvenience]

Homosexuality isn't actually a sin. >>

well that's ur opinion which doesn't coincide with mine

Ah fuck, man. This is why people don't like Georgia.
The defiintion of marriage can change because it used to be man and many woman, now it isn't

Anyway, yes, I think gays should have the right to marry. They're human like everyone else and they should be able to marry wheter or not Christians like it or not.

first of all, how do u know that people don't like georgia?
secondly, there's no change in definition of marriage. marriage's marriage - happening only between opposite sexes.

thirdly, i didnt say they arent human. and still, it's not all about christianity. takin a look from religious point of view, alot of religions deny homosexuality - not sayin anythiing about homo marriage.

still, i appraciate ur oppinion ;)

[Ripplemagne]

well that's ur opinion which doesn't coincide with mine

Not merely a matter of opinion. (http://ripplemagne.weebly.com/1/post/2009/08/is-homosexuality-a-sin.html)

[Rutherford The Brave]

STRONGLY AGAINST!

do u people at least know what marriage is? it must be blessed be god.

god's aint gonna bless gay :|

With thatr assumption marriages that happen not under god are not marriages. God blesses everyone, I recommend you read the bible not skim through it thank you very much.

[CaptainObvious]

Do I really have to explain it? I have a pounding headache and the other debate is already draining more time than I have at my disposal.

It'd be nice, yeah.

[Inconvenience]

With thatr assumption marriages that happen not under god are not marriages. God blesses everyone, I recommend you read the bible not skim through it thank you very much.

u've got me wrong ;) god blesses and loves everyone, but he has set some rules he said we have to obey.

and it is said there's a dead sea now at the place where Sodom was located. guess what it means

[Rutherford The Brave]

u've got me wrong ;) god blesses and loves everyone, but he has set some rules he said we have to obey.

and it is said there's a dead sea now at the place where Sodom was located. guess what it means

I know the story of sodom. The ten commandments are the only rules that god gave, being gay goes against none of them.

[Severus Snape]

STRONGLY AGAINST!

do u people at least know what marriage is? it must be blessed be god.

god's aint gonna bless gay :|

I am utterly shattered that the invisible sky man thinks that being gay is gross. :yawn:

[Perseus]

first of all, how do u know that people don't like georgia?




I have a friend who lives in New York and he's like, "So Jake, have you done any queer hunts lately?" He's just joking and he knows I don't hate gays, but that is one way the north perceives the south. Homophobes who kill gays, y'know, like the KKK used to do and such.
And c'mon, most people down here are homophobic.

[Severus Snape]

Jake, I agree. Most people living in Georgia are very homophobic.

[CaptainObvious]

I have a friend who lives in New York and he's like, "So Jake, have you done any queer hunts lately?" He's just joking and he knows I don't hate gays, but that is one way the north perceives the south. Homophobes who kill gays, y'know, like the KKK used to do and such.
And c'mon, most people down here are homophobic.

Jake, I agree. Most people living in Georgia are very homophobic.

Wrong Georgia, sweethearts.

[Severus Snape]

Wrong Georgia, sweethearts.

And which Georgia is that?

[CaptainObvious]

And which Georgia is that?

Seriously? The country. Didn't you read the guy's location? He's from Tbilisi.

[ChaoticHarmony]

Ah, yes. the age-old debate over gay marriage. there are many ways to see it...and heres mine :)
(obtw, i may be slightly biased seeing as im bi...hmm..oh well.)

my basic belief is that love is love and whoever wants to marry can marry whoever they wanna, regardless of sex. if i wanna marry a girl, i should be able to marry a girl, and the same goes with a guy. the reason for the tension, especially in the US, is religion. many religious buffs hate the idea of gays, and will do anything in their power to stop it. and seeing as the majority of those in politics are religious, some more than others, it appears that us gays are slightly outnumbered, and seemingly without the proper weapons to combat these political giants. i am disappointed that the number of states that allows cousins to marry vastly outnumbers the amount of those that allow gay marriage...thats just not right.
my point is that people need to open their eyes and see that love is love, whether between a man and a woman, man and man, or woman and woman. you gotta find the other half to your soul, no matter what kinda organs the body has on it. stop being so uptight and just let us do what we please.

thats my story and im stickin to it.

[Severus Snape]

Seriously? The country. Didn't you read the guy's location? He's from Tbilisi.

Maybe you're not aware that there are several geographic locations in the world named Georgia, well now you are.

[Perseus]

Seriously? The country. Didn't you read the guy's location? He's from Tbilisi.

Ah well, now I feel like a jackass. Sorry.
One of the main reasons I didn't question that he lived in the country because he typed like a typical American does on the internet.

[CaptainObvious]

Maybe you're not aware that there are several geographic locations in the world named Georgia, well now you are.

No, apparently you aren't aware that there are several Georgias. I am not the one who assumed he came from the US state when his location makes perfectly clear that he lives in the capital of the eastern European country. If you were making a general comment about the state independent of the context of the conversation that's fine, but you need to be clear about it.

[Severus Snape]

No, apparently you aren't aware that there are several Georgias. I am not the one who assumed he came from the US state when his location makes perfectly clear that he lives in the capital of the eastern European country. If you were making a general comment about the state independent of the context of the conversation that's fine, but you need to be clear about it.

And you need a bit of an attitude adjustment, alas, that choice is yours to make. If you treat people like idiots they are bound to respond negatively. It's been a pleasure educating you about basic human social interaction. Good day, try not to be rude next time and contribute to an atmosphere of intimidation in which you crown yourself king of the internet.

[CaptainObvious]

And you need a bit of an attitude adjustment, alas, that choice is yours to make. If you treat people like idiots they are bound to respond negatively. It's been a pleasure educating you about basic human social interaction. Good day.

The fact that you get annoyed by someone pointing out your misunderstanding is a problem for you. If you want to avoid agitation in the future, I'd suggest being right more.

[Appleton]

“They are preserving the sanctity of marriage, so that two gay men who've been together for twenty-five years can't get married, but a guy can still get drunk in Vegas and marry a hooker at the Elvis chapel! The sanctity of marriage is saved!”

Yeah...that makes perfect sense to me....

[Severus Snape]

The fact that you get annoyed by someone pointing out your misunderstanding is a problem for you. If you want to avoid agitation in the future, I'd suggest being right more.

Oh, Jesus, this is rich. You actually believe that I didn't understand there was a nation called Georgia when I live in the state of Georgia? I made an assumption based on posting style that a member was American but you seem to feel the need to rudely indicate I was wrong instead of simply pointing out the member was from the nation of Georgia? The pettiness of your concern is staggering. But do you feel more powerful now? As if you've placed yourself one level above the rest of us?

Remember this (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/georgia/2524550/Russia-invades-Georgia-as-South-Ossetia-descends-towards-war.html)? Yeah, it was a joke here to say "lol omg the Russians are coming" when duh, they were going to (the nation of) Georgia.

[ChaoticHarmony]

OH MY GOD PEOPLE CAN WE STOP ARGUING!!!!!

this is about gay marriage, NOT about a stupid misunderstanding!!!
just stop! you both look stupid now anyway. theres no freakin point.

damn. bunch of brain-dead space monkeys if u ask me..

[Severus Snape]

OH MY GOD PEOPLE CAN WE STOP ARGUING!!!!!

this is about gay marriage, NOT about a stupid misunderstanding!!!
just stop! you both look stupid now anyway. theres no freakin point.

damn. bunch of brain-dead space monkeys if u ask me..

I agree. I apologize if I came off as insulting.

anyway @ OP I don't think legislating a bill to legalize gay marriage on a federal level is viable, the only way I see a federal style mandate being passed down to the states (which will make gay marriage nationally legal) is to win a Supreme Court case. Unfortunately the courts don't seem willing to make that leap at this point. History shows us that if we keep pushing it through states one at a time, eventually momentum will be gained and these other options become more realistic.

[Ripplemagne]

It'd be nice, yeah.

I'd rather not. In case it hasn't been apparent, I've been trying to avoid debates lately.

[Sage]

and it is said there's a dead sea now at the place where Sodom was located. guess what it means

It means you believe everything you're told/read. So by this post you're implying that if people legalize same sex marriage, your God is going to smite the shit out of everything. Only problem with that would be that same sex marriage is legal in a lot of places and they seem to be fairly unsmitten.

[Ripplemagne]

Sodom and Gommorrah had nothing to do with homosexuality anyway.

[Severus Snape]

Sodom and Gommorrah had nothing to do with homosexuality anyway.

erm...

[Ripplemagne]

erm...

Next time, pay attention. (http://ripplemagne.weebly.com/1/post/2009/08/is-homosexuality-a-sin.html)

[Severus Snape]

That's an utterly nonsensical way to view that passage. Of course it is condemning homosexual acts. And no, just because Joe McMember's blog says it isn't about homosexuality doesn't make it right. The Sodomites were engaging in every kind of sexual deviancy. On a side note I always find it amusing when atheists know more about Scripture than religious people.

[Ripplemagne]

That's an utterly nonsensical way to view that passage. Of course it is condemning homosexual acts. And no, just because Joe McMember's blog says it isn't about homosexuality doesn't make it right. The Sodomites were engaging in every kind of sexual deviancy. On a side note I always find it amusing when atheists know more about Scripture than religious people.

That's my blog. Find a dent in it if it's wrong.

[Severus Snape]

Far be it from me to claim myself a literalist. Quite frankly I think problems with interpretations such as the one you are having characterizes a major problem in the Christian faith. Your argument is fallacious in the sense that you compare the actions of priests (not even in the modern day, but at best probably high middle age era clergy) with the laws of the early Israelites who roamed the earth thousands of years before and lived by a drastically different moral code. Despite the fact you are comparing apples to oranges, you also forget that it is relatively easy for people to simply point out that the sinful actions of a minority do not represent the majority, or even so far as to say that the actions of sinful mortals do not reflect on the divinity of god's plan.

Granted, I don't believe any of that but I just punched a rather massive hole in your argument. I admire your drive to question the Bible, but I think the conclusions you have come to are wrong. The problem is you don't take into account historical circumstances and you make broad and general statements without support. I would like to help you revise your approach and conclusion, because you might be onto something, but your evidence leaves it standing on weak legs.

[Ripplemagne]

Far be it from me to claim myself a literalist. Quite frankly I think problems with interpretations such as the one you are having characterizes a major problem in the Christian faith. Your argument is fallacious in the sense that you compare the actions of priests (not even in the modern day, but at best probably high middle age era clergy) with the laws of the early Israelites who roamed the earth thousands of centuries before and lived by a drastically different moral code. Despite the fact you are comparing apples to oranges, you also forget that it is relatively easy for people to simply point out that the sinful actions of a minority do not represent the majority, or even so far as to say that the actions of sinful mortals do not reflect on the divinity of god's plan.

Granted, I don't believe any of that but I just punched a rather massive hole in your argument. I admire your drive to question the Bible, but I think the conclusions you have come to are wrong. The problem is you don't take into account historical circumstances and you make broad and general statements without support. I would like to help you revise your approach and conclusion, because you might be onto something, but your evidence leaves it standing on weak legs.


Okay, but none of that actually addressed anything. That didn't punch a hole in my argument in the least because there's still no condemnation of homosexuality in the account of Sodom and Gammorrah.

But going beyond that with the Levitical laws, it takes full context to understand anything. There is no comparing apples and oranges because I'm pointing out the major problem with citing Leviticus as a source for homosexuality being a sin. That applies very effectively to discussing whether or not homosexuality is a sin.

Then the Romans passage, I go into full detail of why that's wrong.

Where are you going with this?

[Severus Snape]

The Old testament itself is completely divorced from the New Testament. You can look back from the New, but not forward from the Old, if you follow me. My understanding is that merely being homosexual is not a sin, according to the Christian Scriptures. Committing homosexual acts is condemned and punishable, however, in both. The books were written thousands of years apart and for different audiences.

[Ripplemagne]

The Old testament itself is completely divorced from the New Testament. You can look back from the New, but not forward from the Old, if you follow me. My understanding is that merely being homosexual is not a sin, according to the Christian Scriptures. Committing homosexual acts is condemned and punishable, however, in both. The books were written thousands of years apart and for different audiences.

That's exactly what my article said. Except for the latter bit, which is covered in my dissection of Romans.

[Severus Snape]

Hmm, my fault for misunderstanding then. Bravo and well done. Unfortunately all I can bring myself to write on extensively from a religious perspective is the impossibility of the existence of god as seen by mainstream religion. That's a topic for another day though.

[Ripplemagne]

Hmm, my fault for misunderstanding then. Bravo and well done. Unfortunately all I can bring myself to write on extensively from a religious perspective is the impossibility of the existence of god as seen by mainstream religion. That's a topic for another day though.

Thank you. By the way, advice for the future: Came on a little strong. Try not to be so condescending with other religions for future reference.

[Severus Snape]

Thank you. By the way, advice for the future: Came on a little strong. Try not to be so condescending with other religions for future reference.

I find that difficult. I'm an atheist forced to go to school with 1000 Catholics. Prayers are broadcast all over school nine times a day. That's just a taste of what I have to put up with. Unfortunately all the pent up frustration escapes here.

[Ripplemagne]

Does it make you much better than them to behave the same way they do? Devout Christians will differ from your run of the mill Cafeteria Catholics, so try not to lump us all into one category. :P

[Severus Snape]

Does it make you much better than them to behave the same way they do? Devout Christians will differ from your run of the mill Cafeteria Catholics, so try not to lump us all into one category. :P

The dogma is too similar, but I would absolutely love to debate the subject (broadly, how the Christian god can exist) with you.

[Ripplemagne]

The dogma is too similar, but I would absolutely love to debate the subject (broadly, how the Christian god can exist) with you.

It depends. A lot of Churches completely butcher Christianity to the point where it doesn't even resemble what it once was. I don't attend Church because of this. I contrast the difference between someone like me and the people you're probably used to as: Me = Christian. Them = Believers.

Some other time on the debate grounds though. I'm a mess right now and don't have my usual flare for that kind of thing. XD

[nachtspiegel]

I think it comes down to a matter of fairness.
Unless you intend to exemplify someone from paying taxes because they're gay, you shouldn't restrict their rights.

[Ripplemagne]

*exempt

[Kapitan Kokenbalz]

Marriage is inconsequential to me, but everyone should have the opportunity to marry if they please, regardless of whether they are homosexual or heterosexual.

[Marcie]

If one would believe there is a creator, and if the creator calls himself love, and if he has designed the human race to have sexual relationships between man and women; then it must be best, and right, for them to be in those types of relationships.


Romans 1:24-27
"24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error."


Genesis 2:20-24
"But for Adam [ no suitable helper was found. 21 So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man's ribs and then closed up the place with flesh. 22 Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.
23 The man said,
"This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called 'woman,'
for she was taken out of man."
24 For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh."

God created woman for man, he did not create another man to be Adam’s partner.
Personally, I believe that it is wrong to engage in sexual relations, and or marriage, with a partner of the same sex.

I also will say that I have absolutely nothing against people who are gay, in fact several of my friends are gay, though I think it's wrong.

[Rutherford The Brave]

See ripps blog for a contradiction in your posting of the roman section, Marcie.

[Ripplemagne]

Genesis 2:20-24
"But for Adam [ no suitable helper was found. 21 So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man's ribs and then closed up the place with flesh. 22 Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.
23 The man said,
"This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called 'woman,'
for she was taken out of man."
24 For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh."

God created woman for man, he did not create another man to be Adam’s partner.
Personally, I believe that it is wrong to engage in sexual relations, and or marriage, with a partner of the same sex.

I also will say that I have absolutely nothing against people who are gay, in fact several of my friends are gay, though I think it's wrong.


False dilemma (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma), Fallacy of Division (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_division), Ignoratio Elenchi (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignoratio_elenchi), Incomplete Comparison (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incomplete_comparison), Inconsistent Comparison (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inconsistent_comparison), Hasty Generalization (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasty_generalization), Association Fallacy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy), Argumentum ex Silentio (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_silence).

Pick your poison. Might I suggest Argumentum ex Silentio?

[benja]

love is love. i wanna marriage with my dog:P
hahha only kiddingg
i dont have any problem with gay marriage .its your life do whatever you want without bothering otherss.

see u

[Death]

What do you think about gay marriage?

The same as what I think about straight marriage. Why do the genders of those who marry matter?

[Inconvenience]

guys don't argue. whatsoever, u both speak true in ur own way. just a bit of misunderstanding.. but it's all cool

now about the topic, yess u're right, here are alot of homophobic people in georgia, and i 've gitta admit this. idk, maby i'm even one of them.

[Giles]

The same as what I think about straight marriage. Why do the genders of those who marry matter?

In truth they don't. In some states it's illegal, so that's why some people think it matters.

[Death]

In truth they don't. In some states it's illegal, so that's why some people think it matters.

Because they've been brainwashed; makes sense I suppose.

[badash]

I totally support gay marriage. I know everyone says this but if you love someone and want to get married..good for you!! noone should be able to stop you

[Cats In Space]

Wait, wait. Religion = Politics. SOMETHING IS WRONG HERE DAMMIT.

[Nihilus]

Its the fucking church that's against it. I honestly have no problem with gay marriage. People should have the right to marry who they want.

[Nelson]

I personally dont like the idea of gay marriage, but i would say yes on a voting ballot for gay marriage

[Salvi]

theres nothing wrong with gay marriage if two people love each other why try to stop them from being happy. we dont have that right its in the us constitution that a person has the right to pursuit happiness.

[lengthy_brochure]

I have deleted the contents of this post

[Nelson]

well,
Im gay and I fuck anyone who gets in the way of me getting married. End of story.


Pure win mate.

Its not like gay marriage should be illegal anyway, if a man and a woman can get married, why cant two guys or two girls.