incest

[trouble]

Quick question. A friend told me he and his brother usually suck eachother off. Is this considered incest??
*trouble

[Rutherford The Brave]

Yes, Yes it is....

[Stewart]

Yes, that is disgusting

[Bougainvillea]

That's...definitely incest.

And wrong, on many levels.

[impact_75]

DUH!!

[thisqboy4u]

Incest, yes. Kinky, yes. Weird, yes. Questionable, yes. Provocative, yes. Fun, probably. Would I, ?.

Does age matter?

[Suicune]

I don't even think you needed to ask us on this one. YES it's incest!

[trouble]

I don't even think you needed to ask us on this one. YES it's incest!

I did have to ask this because as I searched other forums there were some people saying that it wasnt considered incest since it was just a blowjob.

[Bougainvillea]

Any kind of sexual activity with someone who is related to you is considered incest.

[Rutherford The Brave]

I did have to ask this because as I searched other forums there were some people saying that it wasnt considered incest since it was just a blowjob.

Dude....Its an sexual act.

is any sexual activity between close relatives (often within the immediate family) irrespective of the ages of the participants and irrespective of their consent, that is illegal or socially taboo. The type of sexual activity and the nature of the relationship between persons that constitutes a breach of law or social taboo vary with culture and jurisdiction. Some societies consider it to include only those who live in the same household, or who belong to the same clan or lineage; other societies consider it to include "blood relatives"; other societies further include those related by adoption or marriage.[1]

THANK YOU WIKIPEDIA!

[BlackBetty]

Whatever floats there boat...... If tby like it ohhhh weeeelll

[adam1995]

Shouldn't have to ask. If this isnt incest what is?

[Eagle1]

honestly i wouldn't consider it incest as sex is defined as engaging in sexual intercourse. and i dont see how a BJ is intercourse. and dont trust wikipedia for anything as its user edited

[Rutherford The Brave]

The crime of sexual relations or marriage taking place between a male and female who are so closely linked by blood or affinity that such activity is prohibited by law.

Incest is a statutory crime, often classified as a felony. The purpose of incest statutes is to prevent sexual intercourse between individuals related within the degrees set forth, for the furtherance of the public policy in favor of domestic peace. The prohibition of intermarriage is also based upon genetic considerations, since when excessive inbreeding takes place, undesirable recessive genes become expressed and genetic defects and disease are more readily perpetuated. In addition, the incest taboo is universal in human culture.

Rape and incest are separate offenses and are distinguished by the fact that mutual consent is required for incest but not for rape. When the female is below the age of consent recognized by law, however, the same act can be both rape and incest.

The proscribed degrees of incest vary among the different statutes. Some include Parent and Child, brother and sister, uncle and niece, or aunt and nephew, and first cousins. In addition, intermarriage and sexual relations are also frequently prohibited among individuals who are related by half-blood, including brothers and sisters and uncles and nieces of the half-blood.

In a number of jurisdictions, incest statutes extend to relationships among individuals related by affinity. Such statutes proscribe sexual relations between stepfathers and stepdaughters, stepmothers and stepsons, or brothers-and sisters-in-law, and such relations are punishable as incest. It is necessary for the relationship of affinity to exist at the time the intermarriage or sexual intercourse occurs in order for the act to constitute incest. In the event that the relation-ship has terminated prior to the time that the act takes place, the intermarriage or sexual inter-course is not regarded as incest.

Affinity ordinarily terminates upon the Divorce or death of the blood relation through whom the relationship was formed. Following the divorce or death of his spouse, it is not a violation of incest statutes for a man to marry or have sexual relations with his stepdaughter or his spouse's sister.

Certain statutes require that the individual accused of incest have knowledge of the relationship. In such cases, both parties need not be aware that their actions are incestuous in order for the party who does know to be convicted.

When intermarriage is prohibited by law, it need not be proved that sexual intercourse took place in order for a conviction to be sustained, since the offense is complete on intermarriage. In statutes that define incest as the intermarriage or carnal knowledge of individuals within the prohibited degrees, incest can be committed either by intermarriage or sexual relations.

Some state laws provide that the crime of incest is not committed unless both parties consent to it. When the sexual relations at issue were accomplished by force, the act constitutes rape, and the individual accused cannot be convicted of incest.

It is no defense to incest that the woman had prior sexual relations or has a reputation for unchastity. Similarly, voluntary drunkenness, moral insanity, or an uncontrollable impulse are insufficient defenses.

Punishment for a conviction pursuant to an incest statute is determined by statute.



Thank you Legal Dictionary...

[malibueedudde]

yea, ew

[Giles]

Yes.
Whether it's wrong or not is up to you.

[JackOfClubs]

Yep. Thats disgusting on so many levels. I don't know how you could even consider doing that.

[gone]

sounds... interesting..?
haha

[joey95]

im gonna have to say yes.lol

[lilum]

ye! that defo insest and it is pretty discusting to :S

[dantheman5000]

yes it is but would call it sexual exploration!

[trouble]

I got it. don't need more answers, but thank you though.
****Trouble

[wishuponastar]

yea it is n thts just wrong

[drewlink99]

Yes, it is!
Is it his biological brother!? Although It is still wrong, step brothers are not flesh and blood... Still wrong though!

[Ulthran]

Urgh, brothers? That's just wrong :/ With any family member...

[cherry_boi]

umm idk if it is....the term they use in legal descriptions of it is "sexual relations" dunno if that means explicit sex or all types of sexual encounters

the whole reason its illegal is because it's dangerous to reproduce with someone who's genes are so similar to your own...it produces genetic defects in the offspring

so oral sex wudn't violate the specific reason the law was made...but it's like playing with fire so i assume it wud still be an issue

and there's the whole emotional weirdness/complexity that comes with it

as teenagers i personally feel it's a bit more understandable then it wud be as an adult

but yea probly still considered incest, which is legally wrong....whether or not it's morally wrong is up to each individual

[sjnp95]

THat is digusting and illeagle trust me that is incest

[Patchy]

I got it. don't need more answers, but thank you though.
****Trouble

Okay, in that case I'll lock the thread

:locked: