Log in

View Full Version : Letter to Education


Atonement
August 19th, 2009, 07:24 PM
The education system that I am in greatly annoys me. Everything including how they do it, why they do it, and that they don’t recognize that they do it annoys me. If I want to learn, I should be able to. I have so much more potential than what they can offer me. It bothers me to no end.

My school system limits my learning. I could learn so many more things with much greater speed. I understand that it is difficult to accommodate all of the students’ needs, but I am not the only student that is limited. I cannot advance myself because I have to stay in the same classes as people that don’t care about learning. I care about my education. There is no reason as to why I should be held back because of other people being lazy.

In a sense, I can understand the schools’ situations. It is difficult to accommodate all of the students’ needs. Also, we don’t have the funding for individual programs. I even understand that the state pays colleges for each student and high school students can’t take college classes in an excess of twelve credit hours a semester because it would be taking twice the money from the state. Though, if someone is willing to pay the difference in what the state gives the schools and pay for classes that aren’t for free through post secondary education options, they should be allowed to take those classes and get credit for them in high school because they are above and beyond the requirements and cover the same, if not more, topics. I understand the problem, but that doesn’t mean its okay.

One of the most frustrating parts of it for me is that I cannot change it. I can’t change the fact that the government put a cap on how much I am allowed to learn. I can’t be on the school board and represent myself. There isn’t much of a way around it without going to a private school or being homeschooled both of which would hinder my social development. I see no way that I can change this problem.

It annoys me most of all because it is wrong. It is wrong to not accommodate to all special needs students. Everyday people that are below average get aid and help from the government through grants and special teachers. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 was intended to better our school systems by bringing up the low end. Though, why bring up the below average students when you bring down the above average students? It is completely counterproductive to make everyone equal. A story entitled "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut discussed a society that hindered the above average in order to make everyone equal. The people of the story wanted equality, but since they couldn’t make the below average better, they made the above average worse. This is a great metaphorical description of how I feel about the education system. It outrages me that it is a double standard of fairness

theOperaGhost
August 20th, 2009, 12:59 AM
This is a problem in every public school, and is probably the biggest problem in these schools (although possibly second to bullying in some schools). I also faced this throughout my high school education. There really isn't anything you can do about it. I do think that catering to the people who don't excel instead of the ones who do is really not a good way to operate a school, but it will probably never change.

Modus Operandi
August 20th, 2009, 10:20 AM
I notice this too. They need to find a way to fund ALL levels of children equally.
It's not good to just fund the above avg. or below avg., because then the other group gets left out.

I think the logic behind this is that the above avg. kids will find out for themselves what the school dosen't teach them, which isn't true for all kids. Also humans pity those who are deemed as "stupid" or "retarded". This is thanks to the ACLU and thier stupidity(it's like PETA for humans!). Not that they made NCLB into law, but they would sue if it wasn't.

Atonement
August 22nd, 2009, 01:00 PM
For the American's here, No Child Left Behind should be shoved back up Bush's ass.

Its great to help the lesser functioning students, ofcourse. But at the price of brining down the one's that are moving at a faster pace.

Antares
August 22nd, 2009, 01:38 PM
Well at my school, if you need to be challenged, it is very easy.
Theres a program where you can basically start going to college and not even showing up to school during junior and senior years.

So being challenged isn't really the problem at my school. Also, theres IB program and some AP Classes (wish there were more) and Honors classes which isn't to different from the regular classes.

However, as far as the NCLBA what it does is dicipline the school when the kids aren't learning but...thats just creating more and more problems. I agree it needs to be repealed because I don't think its working to be honest.

Modus Operandi
August 22nd, 2009, 04:26 PM
For the American's here, No Child Left Behind should be shoved back up Bush's ass.

Its great to help the lesser functioning students, ofcourse. But at the price of brining down the one's that are moving at a faster pace.

^

Thank you.

theOperaGhost
August 22nd, 2009, 08:44 PM
For the American's here, No Child Left Behind should be shoved back up Bush's ass.

Its great to help the lesser functioning students, ofcourse. But at the price of brining down the one's that are moving at a faster pace.

No Child Left Behind is pretty much killing small schools. For instance, my high school. There aren't enough teachers around to teach basic high school courses. When I was a senior we ended up having to take physics online because our physics teacher, who had been teaching it for 15 years and was amazing at it, didn't have a concentration in physics..only biology and math. It's bullshit...he's plenty qualified to teach it.

Maverick
August 22nd, 2009, 08:58 PM
Government and politicians have failed us at improving education which goes to show that government should probably stay out of education altogether. I wholeheartedly believe that education could improved if it went back to local control.

Atonement
August 23rd, 2009, 12:52 AM
Education needs to be specialized, not socialized. Like, back in the day, like, our parents and grand parents generations, there were tracks of difficulty and rate at which people learned. So there could be a red, blue, and yellow track each in a varying difficulty. And now, because parents are afraid oftheir kids getting made fun of when people should be glad they are getting the help they need. In my school, we can take college courses during the day year 11 and 12, and before if you are in a special program. But, they limit that too. If I could, I would take all college courses and band and choir at highschool, but no.

theOperaGhost
August 23rd, 2009, 02:52 AM
They would consider it to be discrimination if it were specialized. I think that's bullshit.