Log in

View Full Version : Early bloomers vs. Late bloomers


newblue2
June 18th, 2009, 11:35 AM
Which would you rather be and why?

Lights
June 18th, 2009, 11:36 AM
Early, you're more likely to have the respect of your friends for being early than late. Luckily I am an eary bloomer (:

pkid
June 18th, 2009, 11:48 AM
Early would be better because you could do things earlier I guess.. Oh and I'm am early bloomer

The Ninja
June 18th, 2009, 12:11 PM
I'm glad I'm early :D

pontiacdriver
June 18th, 2009, 04:17 PM
Which would you rather be and why?

In retrospect, I would much rather be a late bloomer. Being an early bloomer can be hard especially if one develops ahead of one's friends and gets strange looks for looking older while being around younger looking folks. At least a younger looking person hanging out with older looking people won't get too strange looks as most people will assume the person in question is just a late bloomer. Also, and another big problem with being an early bloomer is puberty can be kind of hard especially if one is not expecting it or has the vocabulary to understand it. Being a late bloomer is easier in that respect because if one starts puberty by 14/15 one would have had sex ed and have the mental maturity to figure out the basics of puberty whereas a 10/11 year old would not have that reserve of knowledge.

sebbie
June 18th, 2009, 04:46 PM
I was early in some aspects of hitting puberty but later in others, I never had a hard time off anyone and I am happy the way I have been :)

bowlheadhere
June 18th, 2009, 05:03 PM
I'm just glad with what I am. I just take what life gives me, and make the best of it. Therefore, I wouldnt mind being either an early or late bloomer. I don't really care if I were to be a late bloomer, because I would be shorter, but you just have to think of yourself as though you are normal and that you will eventually be at that level. That is how I look at things...?

JackOfClubs
June 18th, 2009, 07:00 PM
I was an early bloomer, I remember getting annoyingly long erections when I was 8 or 9. Of course i had no idea what they were, so it was even worse. It was quite bad in the 5th and 6th grade getting erections and trying to hide them. But I'm happy i was an early bloomer, no reason really, can't change it now though, can I?!?

toyota098
June 19th, 2009, 02:29 AM
I'm happy with what i am!

The Boy Genius
June 19th, 2009, 08:00 AM
Being and late blomer I would prefer to be an early blommer because it relly sucks being and early blomer

HelloWorld123456
June 19th, 2009, 08:07 AM
Well I am a very early bloomer at 9 I ejaculated and I am late bloomer from an other side ... I havent a lot of hair ... Havent had my growth spurts yet ...

I think I am just fine like this

thecanadianfawcett
June 19th, 2009, 11:00 AM
id rather be a early bloomer because you dont have to worry about when there will be changes

The Ninja
June 19th, 2009, 01:58 PM
In retrospect, I would much rather be a late bloomer. Being an early bloomer can be hard especially if one develops ahead of one's friends and gets strange looks for looking older while being around younger looking folks. At least a younger looking person hanging out with older looking people won't get too strange looks as most people will assume the person in question is just a late bloomer. Also, and another big problem with being an early bloomer is puberty can be kind of hard especially if one is not expecting it or has the vocabulary to understand it. Being a late bloomer is easier in that respect because if one starts puberty by 14/15 one would have had sex ed and have the mental maturity to figure out the basics of puberty whereas a 10/11 year old would not have that reserve of knowledge.

Like I said I was an early bloomer (still blooming) and luckily I had a 12 year old brother to talk to so in retrospect I'm lucky :D