Who is bigger cut ot uncut

[sdawg]

Is it true that cut people are larger than uncut people? or can jack off better?

[Atonement]

Penis size has nothing to do with circumcision. Some people are of the poinion that circumcised looks larger than uncircumcised. The only difference of masturbation are that uncircumcised have more skin to move which some think makes it easier to masturbate. Also, the head of the penis on an uncircumcised penis is more sensitive since it is like, always covered up. But penis size, as in actually measurement, doesn't change.

[Oblivion]

Flaccid, uncut penises are technically larger, because the skin goes slightly past the head of the penis, but other than that, it doesn't make a difference.
Circumcision happens after you are born; it doesn't change your genetics, or the growth of your penis.

[The Joker]

No, being uncut or cut really has nothing to do with it.

[andrewgonzalez]

Circumcision affects only masturbation, not size. Uncut guys have a foreskin to handle :)

[Atonement]

Flaccid, uncut penises are technically larger, because the skin goes slightly past the head of the penis, but other than that, it doesn't make a difference.


True to an extent. But since most circumcised men measure from base to tip of head, if uncircumcised did the same, the size is the same.

[kipper]

first question no second yes

[FalconSmash]

Well, kipper, the second one is not necessarily true.

The foreskin contains thousands of nerves, and circumcised people don't get all those pleasurable nerve endings because ours are missing.

So it's probably either way with that one.

[bowlheadhere]

Size has no direct connection with circumcision (if i spelt that right). One that is circumcised may appear to be larger due to the vissual effect of the difference in textures and shapes.

On the other hand, we can not truely determine whether sensativity is more or less if you are cut or uncut. There are some cases where some guys get cut later, and they say they don't feel as much, but that could be because their "members" adapted to having a foreskin and can no longer adapt to being without it.

I hope that makes sense?

[nick]

I would say its a definite no to both questions.

The business about uncut guys measuring is not really going to be true in many cases. Not many guys have such long foreskins that they still overhang the end of the penis when you have an erection. Generally once you're fully erect the forskin wont stretch far enough to cover the whole thing any more.

And when you're uncut the movement of the foreskin over the glans is part of the whole wanking experience. I wouldnt want to be without it!

[sdawg]

Thanks

[pkid]

it just looks bigger, sort of.

[MoveAlong]

Flaccid, uncut penises are technically larger, because the skin goes slightly past the head of the penis, but other than that, it doesn't make a difference.

I personally don't believe that the foreskin is part of the size, because it rolls back, and usually does roll back for sex.
I agree with Vindication.

[Agent]

I´m uncut and when I pull my foreskin back, my penis looks smaller in the mirror. I think it depends on the person.

[Wayvrn]

The only real differnce from cut and un-cut is that cut have a bit less sensitivity and cut is also naturally a bit cleaner/hygenic.

[Rain Boy]

it just looks bigger, sort of.

I suppose it looks more 'agressive' since the helmet shows. In fact, I have heard that the glans (head) flares more on a circumcised penis, since it isn't constrained by the skin. Maybe that's just legend.

[Giles]

i think no for both... im uncut btw.

[byee]

The only difference btw'n cut and uncut is that piece of skin.

[nick]

The only real differnce from cut and un-cut is that cut have a bit less sensitivity and cut is also naturally a bit cleaner/hygenic.
Cut cant be naturally anything, it is unnatural, thats a simple fact

[Agent]

Yep, uncut is natural, because your dick is usually uncut when you are born.

[vito22andolini]

Doesnt change anything concerning size but beeing cut is more comfortable and enjoyable:)