When will we see World War 3?

[WelshLad]

£20 that america will invade Iran in the next year. Now if they are developing nuclear weapons (which there's no prove of whatsoever) - then both sides have nukes. That's not good people.

Or India could finally get pushed over the edge by Pakistan this year iver Kashmere (both of those countries have Nukes as well).

When will we see World War 3?

[redcar]

mmm i dunno hopefully never but i am sure it will happen. but i think that instead of nations individually fighting others it will be the massive trading and economic blocs like the European Union, who will fighting. cause at this stage every continent, with the exception of Antartica has trading blocs and organisations. so i think that more like the EU will develop creating superstates and then they will fight each other. resulting in the domination fo one bloc, creating the world super state.

ok i know its far fetched, but the most likely start of it will be a rouge nation like North Korea deciding they will go South, and if they went South we will know about it!:D

[kolte]

its possible that it will happen soon, of course there is no telling with war. The middle east is were it is going to start. I think most of us can agree on that. Iran, North Korea, Iraq all on the "axis of evil" its bound to escilade into a large full scale world war.

[WelshLad]

haha North Korea, I loved the way the film team america took the piss out of them.

Their leader is a lunatic. Nah I think somethings gonna happen with Iran first.

or possibly because that every muslim in the world is nowpissed off becuase of some danish newspaper and suddenly it's all of europe's fault. i think it's quite ironic that the cartoon showed mohammed as a terrorist and some muslims are retaliating by burning european flags and calling for nations to be blown up.
lucky that britain and ireland havent published these yet. it's france, germany, norway and denmark to my knowledge.

*edit* sorry spain and italy did as well*

:O alex u didn't vote!

[kolte]

America is bound to be at the frontline of any war started soon. We are a little blood hungry right now. Its a middle eastern thing, but once sombody attacks us with people and guns, thats when its gonna go down hard.

[redcar]

:O alex u didn't vote!

i know i am still debating when it will happen!!:P

[Underage_Thinker]

I say that america is first going to get nuked by a rough terrist orginization, considering the fact that almost all terroris orgnizations hate america.

[kolte]

considering no terriost organizations have nuke's, I say thats doubtfull

[redcar]

all though in years to come rougue nations who have developed nuclear weapons could very easily sell to them.

[kolte]

the only "rouge" nation with nuclear weapons is North Korea. I'm hoping that commerce and trade will keep anymore rouge nations from developing nuclear programs.

[redcar]

well technically its uncertain if they do. but remember it only takes one nuclear warhead to start things off. like WWI was started with the assination of Archduke Franz Feerdinand. one bullet.

[Underage_Thinker]

considering no terriost organizations have nuke's, I say thats doubtfull

Right now none do. But in 10, 20 years isay it is possible

[Dfsg]

Terrorist groups do have great access to nuclear material, however. Iraq had many tons of nuclear material sitting around. There's masses of nuclear material sitting around Russia, it's all over the place. Terrorists take it, and strap it to a conventional bomb, making a dirty nuclear bomb, as they are called. Not as bad as a Nuclear Warhead, but nasty stuff.

If we aren't in WWIII now... I'd say we just have to watch hammas, the militant radical muslim group that just was voted in as the leadership of Palastine. Many people say that Israel/Palastine will get us into WWIII.

(although, historically, it's more like WWVII or so)

[kolte]

it would be considered WW3.
I don't know how it will happen, but it will start in the middle east, if it hasnt allready. So yeah, I agree with Dfsg.

[rEpReSsIoN.?]

Nostradamus predicted it:
In the City of God there will be a great thunder,
Two brothers torn apart by Chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb'
'The third big war will begin when the big city is burning'
- Nostradamus

...on the 11 day of the 9 month that...two metal birds would crash into two tall statues...in the new city..and the world will end soon after"

"From the book of Nostradamus"

Assuming "the City of God" is New York City, then the "two brothers torn apart by Chaos" must be the fallen towers of the Word Trade Center. The "fortress" is obviously the Pentagon, the "great leader" succumbing is the United States of America and "the third big war" can only mean World War III.

But still all of that could be a hoax.

[--Josh--]

^ False ^
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/predict.htm

[kolte]

^ False ^
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/predict.htm

indeed, but of course, those of us who arent spirtiual or supernatural allready dismissed the claims, saying weather he said it or not, makes no difference.

[serial-thrilla]

hopefully wwIII happends when im too old to fight in it.

[rEpReSsIoN.?]

^That's sickening the fact u rather others die instead of u, like u children and (or) future family but not yourself. Sorry I think that was a poor quality post.

[kolte]

^That's sickening the fact u rather others die instead of u, like u children and (or) future family but not yourself. Sorry I think that was a poor quality post.

dude.......I would rather you die then me........to me, my life is more important then sombody that I don't even know

[BillyWitchDoctor.com]

i would think that "the city of God" would refer to Isreal because Jerusalem is there which is where Jesus was born according to scripture. so i think that ww3 will start in the middle east

[rEpReSsIoN.?]

^That's sickening the fact u rather others die instead of u, like u children and (or) future family but not yourself. Sorry I think that was a poor quality post.

dude.......I would rather you die then me........to me, my life is more important then sombody that I don't even know

So you would rather thousand of strangers die rather than yourself? You one being, one life.
No offence meant.

[kolte]

^That's sickening the fact u rather others die instead of u, like u children and (or) future family but not yourself. Sorry I think that was a poor quality post.

dude.......I would rather you die then me........to me, my life is more important then sombody that I don't even know

So you would rather thousand of strangers die rather than yourself? You one being, one life.
No offence meant.

all's I'm saying is that I value my life more then yours, seeing as how i have absolutly no emotional attatchment to you. If 1000 people were going to be shot in africa, if I didnt let me die.......i honestly cant say what I would do.

[BillyWitchDoctor.com]

you cant just shoot back at someone for saying they care more about their life than someones they dont know at all. its not exactly an easy thing to honestly say, and that thing about the 1000 africans being shot or you is not at all an easy thing to say for some people.

[rEpReSsIoN.?]

^That's sickening the fact u rather others die instead of u, like u children and (or) future family but not yourself. Sorry I think that was a poor quality post.

dude.......I would rather you die then me........to me, my life is more important then sombody that I don't even know

So you would rather thousand of strangers die rather than yourself? You one being, one life.
No offence meant.

all's I'm saying is that I value my life more then yours, seeing as how i have absolutly no emotional attatchment to you. If 1000 people were going to be shot in africa, if I didnt let me die.......i honestly cant say what I would do.
To be honest I can see where u r coming from. But I'm sure if there was a world war you would know about it AND, your do something about it if your family was being killed, OR if your country was being caught up in it. That is where this discussion started from.
And people do care about others deaths even now they are still investigating Princesses Diana?s death + numerous mass murders.

[kolte]

yeah, I care when people die, I'm not heartless, I just don't know if I would die in the place of a thousands of strangers.

[serial-thrilla]

^That's sickening the fact u rather others die instead of u, like u children and (or) future family but not yourself. Sorry I think that was a poor quality post. well no fucking shit id rather other people die then me. i dont love anyone nearly enough to die for them.

[Ravenous]

Theres plenty of people I would die for. I would like to think I would die for most people. Unless they were like, near death from disease or age anyways..

[kolte]

^That's sickening the fact u rather others die instead of u, like u children and (or) future family but not yourself. Sorry I think that was a poor quality post. well no fucking shit id rather other people die then me. i dont love anyone nearly enough to die for them.

word, I'm sorry, but if my brother or something was on the line, I would die for him, but if it was a stranger I had never even seen or heard of, no I want to live.

[serial-thrilla]

Theres plenty of people I would die for. I would like to think I would die for most people. Unless they were like, near death from disease or age anyways.. well i guess you really dont value your life very much if you'd just throw it away for someone just because they werent near death. i mean i would be willing to die for my child if i so choose to have one in the future but right now noone is important enough to have me willing to end my life for them.

[kda2011]

Guys, You have to remember we are not definate on WHEN OR IF we are going in. And about World War 3... I think if that happens we all will be dead.... Considering the fact that we dont know who all has nukes. ICBM's (Intercontinental ballistic missile- they stop missles and nukes at the us ) can take a bunch of nukes so... we couldnt stop them all.

[rEpReSsIoN.?]

^That's sickening the fact u rather others die instead of u, like u children and (or) future family but not yourself. Sorry I think that was a poor quality post. well no fucking shit id rather other people die then me. i dont love anyone nearly enough to die for them.

if you had a chance, to change the world (e.g. saving thousands of people's lives in corrupt governments in Africa) for good and you did not know if it was going to succeed and you are putting your life at risk- would you do it?

[serial-thrilla]

^That's sickening the fact u rather others die instead of u, like u children and (or) future family but not yourself. Sorry I think that was a poor quality post. well no fucking shit id rather other people die then me. i dont love anyone nearly enough to die for them.

if you had a chance, to change the world (e.g. saving thousands of people's lives in corrupt governments in Africa) for good and you did not know if it was going to succeed and you are putting your life at risk- would you do it? no because thats a ridiculas scenerio. no one person can do anything like that. maybe if you give me a realistic scenerio i'll answer it.