View Full Version : cirsumisised guys only
frothinsam
May 4th, 2009, 06:51 AM
i was just wondering how circumsised guys masturbate? like how can u masturbate with out the forskin rubbing the head of ur dick?
i am uncut
InTheUK
May 4th, 2009, 07:14 AM
Well I use my finger to act as the foreskin so just rubbing up and down whilst moving dick up and down with other hand
theOperaGhost
May 4th, 2009, 07:35 AM
With my hand, just the same way you do. The removal of a tiny piece of skin does not hinder the ability to masturbate at all.
FalconSmash
May 4th, 2009, 03:19 PM
^Agreed.
I mean, the only way to really experience it would be to pull and hold back your foreskin while you masturbate.
irishguy913
May 4th, 2009, 03:23 PM
i just use my hand i dont thinks there is no diffence
LUCKY555
May 4th, 2009, 03:27 PM
well i rub my head with my palm and then jack like you do....it is the same
ezduzit323
May 4th, 2009, 09:57 PM
sometimes i use lube but other times i just rub my penis. a foreskin isn't really that necessary. it's easy to masturbate without one.
pcd31
May 4th, 2009, 11:30 PM
The rubbing of something against skin is what stimulates the nerves. No matter what you're rubbing your dick with it's still the same.
frothinsam
May 5th, 2009, 05:31 AM
thanks guys i wasent to shore how cut guys masturbated
thought the head might be to sensitive to masturbate with
Stark
May 6th, 2009, 06:39 PM
I just grab my penis and rub.
The Joker
May 6th, 2009, 07:59 PM
I just realized today that I am cut. We do it the exact same way as you do it, we just don't have the foreskin.
iJoel
May 7th, 2009, 06:33 AM
thanks guys i wasent to shore how cut guys masturbated
thought the head might be to sensitive to masturbate with
I'm not circumcised, but just was going to say that after being at leat 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and beyond you build up an extremely strong callus on your gland or "penis head" and it is just like touching your finger, well not exactly but it is not sensitive and will not ever be sensitive again.
byee
May 7th, 2009, 10:23 AM
I'm not circumcised, but just was going to say that after being at leat 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and beyond you build up an extremely strong callus on your gland or "penis head" and it is just like touching your finger, well not exactly but it is not sensitive and will not ever be sensitive again.
This is incorrect.
A 'Callus' is a protective pad of skin that results from repeated contact btw'n that part and some hard surface (think: the palm of the hands, esp. of bike riders or tennis players, etc.). The glans is exposed only to the air and the inside of your underwear (which is soft), so there's not much change, and there's no diff in sensitivity.
Regardless of your personal feelings about circumcision or your own penis, common sense should tell you that something wouldn't become 'routine' if it actually resulted in a loss of function.
Whatever you have, it's basically the same thing.
theOperaGhost
May 7th, 2009, 12:41 PM
This is incorrect.
A 'Callus' is a protective pad of skin that results from repeated contact btw'n that part and some hard surface (think: the palm of the hands, esp. of bike riders or tennis players, etc.). The glans is exposed only to the air and the inside of your underwear (which is soft), so there's not much change, and there's no diff in sensitivity.
Regardless of your personal feelings about circumcision or your own penis, common sense should tell you that something wouldn't become 'routine' if it actually resulted in a loss of function.
Whatever you have, it's basically the same thing.
Exactly. I obviously don't know what it is like to have a completely intact foreskin, but I can tell you that being circumcised doesn't decrease sensitivity down to nothing. Masturbation and sex still feels quite amazing, which means there is plenty of sensitivity. I know I wouldn't enjoy it if it were any more sensitive...
radnaskela
May 7th, 2009, 02:04 PM
I have read somewhere that when the cut guys masturbate like the uncut feel pain, is it true?
SlightlySane
May 7th, 2009, 06:04 PM
I'm cut and I normally rub my head quickly or do long strokes along my dick. Sometimes I pull on my balls to tighten the skin and j/o with the other hand
ThatCanadianGuy
May 7th, 2009, 06:08 PM
I do the exact same thing as any uncut guy would masturbate, but then again I was not very tightly circumsized, so I have nearly half of my foreskin left, so... hey I don't need any lube at least :D
theOperaGhost
May 7th, 2009, 06:44 PM
I do the exact same thing as any uncut guy would masturbate, but then again I was not very tightly circumsized, so I have nearly half of my foreskin left, so... hey I don't need any lube at least :D
Same...I'm not tightly cut at all.
fuji
May 8th, 2009, 01:55 AM
I just grab my penis and rub.
same
iJoel
May 8th, 2009, 01:56 AM
This is incorrect.
A 'Callus' is a protective pad of skin that results from repeated contact btw'n that part and some hard surface (think: the palm of the hands, esp. of bike riders or tennis players, etc.). The glans is exposed only to the air and the inside of your underwear (which is soft), so there's not much change, and there's no diff in sensitivity.
Regardless of your personal feelings about circumcision or your own penis, common sense should tell you that something wouldn't become 'routine' if it actually resulted in a loss of function.
Whatever you have, it's basically the same thing.
Not to be rude, but you knew perfectly well that I was trying to use a example; yes the word callus may not be a great word but I was just describing how the penis does build up a stronger layer of skin after an amount of air and touch put towards the gland.
theOperaGhost
May 8th, 2009, 02:25 AM
Not to be rude, but you knew perfectly well that I was trying to use a example; yes the word callus may not be a great word but I was just describing how the penis does build up a stronger layer of skin after an amount of air and touch put towards the gland.
Not to be rude, but I find arguments over the (possible) difference in sensitivity of the penis head with or without the foreskin to be extremely pointless. Circumcised guys do not know what it feels like to have a completely intact foreskin. We do not know if there is less sensitivity there or not, because we haven't experienced it. I know I'm perfectly satisfied with how sensitive my penis head is.
The same holds true for uncircumcised guys. You do not know what it feels like to be (partially) exposed (I say partially, because I really don't think most circumcisions are tight...very few of the penises I've seen have been tight, which means at least part of the foreskin is left intact). You do not know if circumcised penises are less sensitive because you've never experienced it.
It is impossible for an uncircumcised man to say that circumcised penises are less sensitive since there is no proof of it.
byee
May 8th, 2009, 08:57 AM
Not to be rude, but you knew perfectly well that I was trying to use a example; yes the word callus may not be a great word but I was just describing how the penis does build up a stronger layer of skin after an amount of air and touch put towards the gland.
Joel, you and I are not off to a good start here. First, it's not OK to acknowledge that you shouldn't be rude, and then proceed to be rude.
Second, as Jared has correctly identified, it's not OK to enter into an argument based soley on your own, one sided personal experience. Third, language matters, the word 'callous' is incorrect. The word you're looking for is 'keratinize', which sounds far worse than it is, and doesn't affect sensitivity.
It's OK to prefer what you have, but it shouldn't be Ok to insult what others have.
GlamourOfTheKill
May 8th, 2009, 10:37 AM
I had a foreskin, until my early teens(cut for medical reasons, not completely removed), and as far as i know, there isn't really a difference that i recognise. a couple of years have past, it still feels the same basically. Not much of a difference, except i can touch my glans, as it was more sensitive to touch. But the actual process doesn't feel any different, still feels good.
CoolBri94
May 8th, 2009, 06:27 PM
Not to be rude, but I find arguments over the (possible) difference in sensitivity of the penis head with or without the foreskin to be extremely pointless. Circumcised guys do not know what it feels like to have a completely intact foreskin. We do not know if there is less sensitivity there or not, because we haven't experienced it. I know I'm perfectly satisfied with how sensitive my penis head is.
The same holds true for uncircumcised guys. You do not know what it feels like to be (partially) exposed (I say partially, because I really don't think most circumcisions are tight...very few of the penises I've seen have been tight, which means at least part of the foreskin is left intact). You do not know if circumcised penises are less sensitive because you've never experienced it.
It is impossible for an uncircumcised man to say that circumcised penises are less sensitive since there is no proof of it.
Actually that isn't completely true. Not everyone is circumcised at birth, my friend's uncle was circumcised at 33 for personal reasons. He said the loss of sensitivity is barely noticeable but he feels better about it because he's always wanted it done. People who have gotten circumcisions later in life have different stories though, I'm sure some say it feels better, others say it feels worse and others don't notice a difference. :)
iJoel
May 8th, 2009, 06:45 PM
Fine, sorry guys lol don't know what got into me. Don't want to act like a bitch haha, but when someone starts me off well, you know heh. You guys obviously know a greater more about circumcision then myself. So sorry again
theOperaGhost
May 8th, 2009, 06:49 PM
Actually that isn't completely true. Not everyone is circumcised at birth, my friend's uncle was circumcised at 33 for personal reasons. He said the loss of sensitivity is barely noticeable but he feels better about it because he's always wanted it done. People who have gotten circumcisions later in life have different stories though, I'm sure some say it feels better, others say it feels worse and others don't notice a difference. :)
I'm aware that men can and do get circumcised later in life and was going to include it in my post but didn't really think it was all the relevant. Most people who are circumcised are circumcised when they are very young, so I was just generalizing.
SkyKing
July 25th, 2009, 08:48 AM
i just rub the head and body i guess i have seen my uncircumcised friends wank before i even wanked them so comparing cut and uncut i guess it's the same just that we dun use the foreskin, so our hands come in dirrect contect with our penises also sometimes i prefer to use sliva, lotion or lube cause there can be friction and it amy be slightly uncomfortable
kyle95
July 25th, 2009, 08:57 AM
my gf uses a lube whilst doing it, so i don't see the necessity for the extra skin
YourFriend
July 25th, 2009, 09:08 AM
With my hand, just the same way you do. The removal of a tiny piece of skin does not hinder the ability to masturbate at all.
It's not really that tiny XD.
kdddd
July 25th, 2009, 09:15 AM
i am pretty sure that being cut or not dose not really change the way that you masturbate, but to answer the OP's question you just rub your dick
Requin
July 25th, 2009, 10:02 AM
Two months old guys. Please don't bump old threads. Thanks. :locked:
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.