Log in

View Full Version : Don't call it "Swine Flu"


Sugaree
April 30th, 2009, 05:45 PM
WHO to stop using "Swine Flu"




By FRANK JORDANS, Associated Press Writer Frank Jordans, Associated Press Writer – 1 hr 1 min ago
GENEVA – The World Health Organization announced Thursday it will would stop using the term "swine flu" to avoid confusion over the danger posed by pigs. The policy shift came a day after Egypt began slaughtering thousands of pigs in a misguided effort to prevent swine flu.
WHO spokesman Dick Thompson said the agriculture industry and the U.N. food agency had expressed concerns that the term "swine flu" was misleading consumers and needlessly causing countries to ban pork products and order the slaughter of pigs.


"Rather than calling this swine flu ... we're going to stick with the technical scientific name H1N1 influenza A," Thompson said.
The swine flu virus originated in pigs, and has genes from human, bird and pig viruses. Scientists don't know exactly how it jumped to humans. In the current outbreak, WHO says the virus is being spread from human-to-human, not from contact with infected pigs.


Egypt began slaughtering its roughly 300,000 pigs Wednesday even though experts said swine flu is not linked to pigs and not spread by eating pork. Angry farmers protested the government degree.
In Paris, the World Organization for Animal Health said Thursday "there is no evidence of infection in pigs, nor of humans acquiring infection directly from pigs."
Killing pigs "will not help to guard against public or animal health risks" presented by the virus and "is inappropriate," the group said in a statement.



China, Russia, Ukraine and other nations have banned pork exports from Mexico and parts of the United States, blaming swine flu fears.
Most in the Muslim world consider pigs unclean animals and do not eat pork because of religious restrictions. The farmers in Egypt raise the pigs for consumption by the country's Christian minority.
WHO also reported the number of confirmed swine flu cases rose to 257 worldwide Thursday, with cases in Mexico rising to 97 from 26, with seven deaths. The WHO confirmed tally from the United States now stands at 109, with one death.


Other confirmed cases include 19 in Canada, 13 in Spain, eight in Britain, three each in Germany and New Zealand, two in Israel and one each in Austria, Switzerland and the Netherlands.
Thompson told reporters in Geneva that at least one of the Spanish cases involved a person who had not traveled to Mexico. Spanish officials said that was a man who apparently got the virus from his girlfriend, who recently returned from Mexico.


WHO raised the pandemic flu alert to phase 5 on Wednesday, one step away from the highest level indicating a global outbreak. WHO flu chief Keiji Fukuda said Thursday there were no indications in the past day that would prompt the U.N. body to raise the alert further.
To move from pandemic alert level 5 to level 6 means that WHO believes there is evidence of big outbreaks in at least two world regions and a pandemic is under way.



Fukuda said the jump in confirmed cases from Mexico was probably the result of scientists working their way through a backlog of untested samples from suspected cases.
"They are going through several thousands of laboratory specimens right now," he said.
WHO has started distributing its stockpile of 2 million treatments of the antiviral drug Tamiflu to regional offices, which will decide where to send them next.
Many of those drugs will go to developing countries that don't have stockpiles of their own and some will be sent to Mexico, Fukuda said, without providing figures.

Stevo 69
May 1st, 2009, 02:56 PM
You have a point, swines are pigs but I haven't heard of pigs having flu recently, it's not like thousands of pigs are ill, where the hell did "swine" come from?

Viral Death
May 1st, 2009, 04:53 PM
I just call it mexican flu

Sage
May 1st, 2009, 05:08 PM
Those damned dirty pigs.

Sugaree
May 1st, 2009, 05:13 PM
You have a point, swines are pigs but I haven't heard of pigs having flu recently, it's not like thousands of pigs are ill, where the hell did "swine" come from?

"Swine" is a better term for "pig". I personally like it to be called "Swine Flu" to "H1N1".

Oblivion
May 1st, 2009, 05:15 PM
So they are saying that you can't catch it from pigs... But that's how the little boy in Mexico got it started right?
Bleh.

Sapphire
May 1st, 2009, 05:28 PM
So they are saying that you can't catch it from pigs... But that's how the little boy in Mexico got it started right?
Bleh.
They're saying that the virus is being spread through human-human contact, not pig-human contact and that it is unclear how this virus strand jumped from pigs to humans.

Oblivion
May 1st, 2009, 05:32 PM
Ah, ok.
Because one or two days ago it was thought that if an infected pig sneezed in your face, you would get it.
I guess that's why this is in Daily Chronicle :P

Sapphire
May 1st, 2009, 05:34 PM
Ah, ok.
Because one or two days ago it was thought that if a pig sneezed in your face, you would get it.
I guess that's why this is in Daily Chronicle :P
Yeah, that's just media scaremongering :P

Viral Death
May 1st, 2009, 09:58 PM
When I walk in school I say if "you got mexican infuenza get away?"

bobtom
May 1st, 2009, 10:32 PM
I will call it pig flu then. :)

Antares
May 1st, 2009, 11:00 PM
I don't like the term Swine Flu either. I like N1H1. It seems smarter :P

INFERNO
May 2nd, 2009, 03:30 AM
You have a point, swines are pigs but I haven't heard of pigs having flu recently, it's not like thousands of pigs are ill, where the hell did "swine" come from?

Bold part: I think you answered your question already, swine = pig. I assume "swine flu" sounds more scientific than "pig flu".

Ah, ok.
Because one or two days ago it was thought that if an infected pig sneezed in your face, you would get it.
I guess that's why this is in Daily Chronicle :P

No, that's a result of the media twisting a story or adding in garbage to make it sound better, despite the fact that their knowledge in science, especially diseases and physiology is dismal compared to the scientists researching a cure for H1N1. Hence, why I most often take what the media says with a grain of salt, until I find other sources backing it up (ideally that are not very biased, although that's hard to get) or more objective sources.

Archos
May 2nd, 2009, 04:46 AM
I've been calling it "That flu thing" just so people don't start screaming at the mention of "Swine flu".

Truth
May 3rd, 2009, 11:24 PM
.........

Specter
May 7th, 2009, 03:25 PM
You have a point, swines are pigs but I haven't heard of pigs having flu recently, it's not like thousands of pigs are ill, where the hell did "swine" come from?


The pigs aren’t sick they are carriers of the flu, kind of like monkeys and A.I.D.S :yes:

-Specter

Apparitions
May 8th, 2009, 05:03 PM
I don't think the name matters so much, what matters is if we are all gonna die or not, that's what the WHO should be worried about

EverlostPoet
May 8th, 2009, 07:46 PM
i call it H1N1 xP

Sapphire
May 9th, 2009, 11:40 AM
I don't think the name matters so much, what matters is if we are all gonna die or not, that's what the WHO should be worried about
They are.
But WHO are right to try to put a stop to the misunderstanding that sparked Egypt to order all of the pigs in the country (about 300,000 in total) to be slaughtered.

Neverender
May 9th, 2009, 07:40 PM
I don't like the term Swine Flu either. I like N1H1. It seems smarter :P

Even though the correct term is H1N1, not N1H1, John.