Moral Dilemma thing

[Church]

Well I saw someone post a Moral Dilemma, was the one if ship sank you can switch rafts etc etc.

Well mine is this, imagine your in a war, you were ambushed, fought back but started retreating because of being outnumbered and flanked etc, while retreating a soldier in your company or something gets shot, he can't continue and he says go on without him, he can't move and there is no 100% chance of his survival, your choices are, A. Pic him up and risk getting shot yourself and if you get to safety he might die anyways, B. Cut your loses and run

What would you choose?

[Cloud]

Save him. if you leave him to die its on your chest forever.
Just get your men to give supressive fire while you stay low and fast adn youll be able to get to him.

[Sage]

I'd save him, because in war there's just as good a chance I'd die myself if I left him behind.

[Whisper]

Leave no man behind
thats what separates the west from all the enemy forces we've faced previously
You may enlist for your country but you FIGHT for the solider the brother in arms next to you

Ya your risking your life for him but he'd do the same
that simple

[Zephyr]

Save him.
He'd do the same for me.

[Perseus]

Save him, no one in a company deserves to die because he got immoblized.. and a medic would be able to save him because of war law, you cant shoot a medic(anymore).

[INFERNO]

Pft, I'd say just save myself. He'd be dead anyways so it doesn't really matter. I may die myself, however, without dragging him along, my odds are far better.

[Camazotz]

Leave no man behind
thats what separates the west from all the enemy forces we've faced previously
You may enlist for your country but you FIGHT for the solider the brother in arms next to you

Ya your risking your life for him but he'd do the same
that simple

I agree completely. I may not want to risk my life for him, but I could not leave him behind. He would risk his life for mine, so I would do the same.