View Full Version : locking debates because u disagree?
<-Dying_to_Live->
December 24th, 2005, 11:20 PM
do you think mods should be able to lock a debate when they disagree with the opinions of the people debating? for instance josh just locked the wiretapping thread because he personally thinks wiretapping is bad.
This thread is DISCAUSSING. DON'T LET THIS HAPPEN AGAIN.
Locking
whats the point of debating if the thread will be locked because of someone who doesnt value diversity of opinion?
oh and id just like to point out
http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/1339/dictionarycomdiscaussingmaxtho.jpg
in all those suggested corrections, i cant pick out even ONE that would make sense :/
Dante
December 25th, 2005, 12:00 AM
hahahahahahahahahaha omg u r freakin hilarious......thats why r a bad ass...lol....and NO i dont think threads should be locked because someone disagrees
Ravenous
December 25th, 2005, 06:32 AM
Haha Played Cyrus :D
I agree :)
ThePhantom
December 25th, 2005, 06:37 AM
dying dont be a FUCKING BITCH he was doing it becuase it was in everybodys best interest he was helping us! In fact, i bet this will be locked because it is cruel, mean , and geared towards one person only: josh! Which is doesnt need to be you lil cunt . . i hope you die die die!
edit: Oh also, if you have a problem with anything that anybody does here, just leave . . i know a few people who wouldnt mind you gone
///James///
December 25th, 2005, 07:51 AM
well this is my opinon, i dont tink that threads should be locked for the reason of the mod not aggreeing
BUT i think your a hypocrit matt becouse you never respect anyones opinion and you always think your right, when in fact alot of the time the facts dont add up for you. i think before you should complain about mod's opinions you should begin to evaluate other peoples and remeber that you are not always right
merry christmas
TheWizard
December 25th, 2005, 07:54 AM
do you think mods should be able to lock a debate when they disagree with the opinions of the people debating? for instance josh just locked the wiretapping thread because he personally thinks wiretapping is bad.
This thread is DISCAUSSING. DON'T LET THIS HAPPEN AGAIN.
Locking
whats the point of debating if the thread will be locked because of someone who doesnt value diversity of opinion?
oh and id just like to point out
http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/1339/dictionarycomdiscaussingmaxtho.jpg
in all those suggested corrections, i cant pick out even ONE that would make sense :/
I didn't lock that thread so pick on someone else. Generally I don't lock many threads.
ThePhantom
December 25th, 2005, 08:27 AM
yah u lil bitch it wasnt even him *hugs josh* go screw urself you shouldnt be accusing unless you know fur sure ..
BUT i think your a hypocrit matt becouse you never respect anyones opinion and you always think your right, when in fact alot of the time the facts dont add up for you. i think before you should complain about mod's opinions you should begin to evaluate other peoples and remeber that you are not always right
edit: Oh and maybe you were the reason it was locked hmm?
u didnt.
and now u say your not going to.
u are a pussy
Calling somebody a pussy for not commiting suicide. . ya ok whatever hun you have seriouse inside problems . . whatever problem you do have im sure it is too long for me to pronounce :roll:
ThePhantom
December 25th, 2005, 10:25 AM
who wants a mod place me or him?
Whisper
December 25th, 2005, 01:03 PM
Josh locked it becaus everyone was picking on Austin!
I agree with him
So leave Josh alone!
ThePhantom
December 25th, 2005, 01:13 PM
Josh locked it becaus everyone was picking on Austin!
I agree with him
So leave Josh alone!
TheWizard
December 25th, 2005, 01:19 PM
Ok I did lock it. Sorry I missed up by forgetting I locked it I went back and looked over the thread and I stand by my locking it.
Ravenous
December 25th, 2005, 01:32 PM
dying dont be a FUCKING BITCH he was doing it becuase it was in everybodys best interest he was helping us! In fact, i bet this will be locked because it is cruel, mean , and geared towards one person only: josh! Which is doesnt need to be you lil cunt . . i hope you die die die!
edit: Oh also, if you have a problem with anything that anybody does here, just leave . . i know a few people who wouldnt mind you gone
Cyrus is not being a bitch, he is questioning something he disagrees with, surely that is allowed?
i hope you die die die!
and I hope you shut the fuck up.
Whisper
December 25th, 2005, 01:40 PM
Alex don't hide behind me
I'm agreeing with Josh
Not you
Your just being an ass for no reason
Kiros
December 25th, 2005, 01:46 PM
If I'm not mistaken, administrators and moderators are allowed to lock a thread for whatever reason, as they are trusted with their own judgement. Admins, of course, can do anything to/with/for the site as they please, and moderators have earned their position among the staff. If a moderator is not fit for the job, an administrator will see this and demote them. So when a thread gets locked, you might think it's just because the moderator/administrator has a disagreement with you, but really it's that he/she is looking out for the community - trying to stop fighting, severe arguements, spamming, etc.
That's all there is to it...
Sorted.
[LOCKED]
... j/k :P
ThePhantom
December 25th, 2005, 01:48 PM
i know every admin wants to lock this thread so bad but the irony in it would be so great that it would cause a major disruption in the space-time continuim :(
nwshc
December 25th, 2005, 03:51 PM
edit: Oh also, if you have a problem with anything that anybody does here, just leave . . i know a few people who wouldnt mind you gone
Seriously, shut your fucking fat mouth
I know of many people that want you gone also, so just shut the fuck up you fat fucking cunt.
nwshc
December 25th, 2005, 03:57 PM
btw, Josh locked the thread because you matt and austin were again fighting over whether austins a liar for commiting suicide or not.
So, guess what. Josh locked the thread because of that, not because of the subject which was wiretaping.
So matt, don't be a douche and jump to conclutions.
<-Dying_to_Live->
December 25th, 2005, 07:00 PM
well this is my opinon, i dont tink that threads should be locked for the reason of the mod not aggreeing
BUT i think your a hypocrit matt becouse you never respect anyones opinion and you always think your right, when in fact alot of the time the facts dont add up for you. i think before you should complain about mod's opinions you should begin to evaluate other peoples and remeber that you are not always right
merry christmas
disrespecting someones opinion is different than preventing it from surfacing. i would never, NEVER prevent someone from speaking their mind by locking a thread. if i were to do something like that, i wouldnt have anything to debate!! duh, this whole area of vt would be completely useless
<-Dying_to_Live->
December 25th, 2005, 07:04 PM
yah u lil bitch it wasnt even him *hugs josh* go screw urself you shouldnt be accusing unless you know fur sure ..
oh ya? explain to me what other criteria i need to account for when deciding if someone locked something or not:
Locking
IS THAT SERIOUSLY NOT ENOUGH???? what other information am i supposed to go by? honestly, if he SAID he locked it, to not believe him would be flat out mean. and im not "picking" on you josh, im bringing your actions to a debatable perspective
Dante
December 26th, 2005, 12:33 AM
well, what about locking my bad ass good guy thread....was it too protect the Vt community, when noone not even you Kiros had a problem with it.
<-Dying_to_Live->
December 26th, 2005, 01:56 AM
ya honestly, NOBODY had a problem with ur thread dude, we welcomed the insight. we liked it so much patch made a duplicate copy. i mean DAMN not a single person had a problem with it, and then its locked out of nowhere
kolte
December 26th, 2005, 05:48 AM
Dude, fred (cyrus, cuz I feel like it), you know damn good and well, that joshypoo locked that thread becuase it was a fight and off topic, stop defending yourself now that you have reolized your mistake. and just live with it.
WelshLad
December 26th, 2005, 01:46 PM
i know a few people who wouldnt mind you gone
i know A LOT of people who wouldn't mind you gone atlanta. you come here thinking you're god
Everyone here knows Josh is a fair guy and although topics shouldn't be locked because a mod disagrees, like people have said, he wouldn't lock it becoz of that.
<-Dying_to_Live->
December 26th, 2005, 03:16 PM
Dude, fred (cyrus, cuz I feel like it), you know damn good and well, that joshypoo locked that thread becuase it was a fight and off topic, stop defending yourself now that you have reolized your mistake. and just live with it.
um excuse me did i give you permission to spread such nubsaucing around?
how could you possibly know what im thinking, do you read minds? "now that you have realized..." you have NO idea what i have or have not realized, so to say something thats completely fictional is irresponsible and just makes you look bad. dont try to assert mythical claims as fact of life
kolte
December 26th, 2005, 03:21 PM
Dude, fred (cyrus, cuz I feel like it), you know damn good and well, that joshypoo locked that thread becuase it was a fight and off topic, stop defending yourself now that you have reolized your mistake. and just live with it.
um excuse me did i give you permission to spread such nubsaucing around?
how could you possibly know what im thinking, do you read minds? "now that you have realized..." you have NO idea what i have or have not realized, so to say something thats completely fictional is irresponsible and just makes you look bad. dont try to assert mythical claims as fact of life
ok.
<-Dying_to_Live->
December 26th, 2005, 03:23 PM
wow talk about debate ending :(
nwshc
December 26th, 2005, 04:39 PM
Someone start a new debate before matt starts to cry
Skhorpion
December 26th, 2005, 04:58 PM
which came first, the chicken or the egg?
nwshc
December 26th, 2005, 04:59 PM
According to Joe Tower, the chicken came first because God made him first.
*waits for matt to jump in*
<-Dying_to_Live->
December 26th, 2005, 05:03 PM
pft you losers got it all wrong, __ I __ came first :D
Skhorpion
December 26th, 2005, 05:05 PM
so chickens evolved from you?
nwshc
December 26th, 2005, 05:06 PM
pft you losers got it all wrong, __ I __ came first :D :fists:
you wish
redcar
December 26th, 2005, 05:31 PM
which came first, the chicken or the egg?
without any hesitation it is the egg. thats not a debate topic cause everyone knows its the egg!
ThePhantom
December 26th, 2005, 06:18 PM
I asked my science teacher and he said from an evolutionary standpoint the egg came first . . but it depends on which state of evolution of ''the eggf' you are talking about. . :D
*BrokenInside*
December 26th, 2005, 07:00 PM
I would say that egg came first but then again you need a chicken to lay the egg.. But then how would the first chicken ever there be made with no other chicken b4 it lol...
redcar
December 26th, 2005, 07:08 PM
I would say that egg came first but then again you need a chicken to lay the egg.. But then how would the first chicken ever there be made with no other chicken b4 it lol...
evolution. chickens didnt magically appear one day. they evolved from dinosaurs and such.
*BrokenInside*
December 26th, 2005, 07:13 PM
I nevr said that they just magically appeared here one day.. But whatever have fun with you debate
WelshLad
December 26th, 2005, 07:51 PM
egg
December 26th, 2005, 08:00 PM
im not rele positive of what id say...i agree with both sides...if a topic is rele disgusting then i think it should be locked but on the other hand its a debate topic so it should be debated for peoples opinions
ThePhantom
December 26th, 2005, 08:15 PM
it was not discusting is was discaussing hehe . . . no good was going to come from that after somebody calling somebody else a pussy for not committing suicide it just would of started a new debate
WelshLad
December 26th, 2005, 08:18 PM
good idea to lock this - it's become totally pointless now
ThePhantom
December 26th, 2005, 08:23 PM
so you are saying we should lock it because you disagree? then we would get another thread which would turn into another and then another and then another
"and then another" repeated more than 300 times.
Do not do this again, AtlantaWonder.
//KiroS
December 26th, 2005, 08:24 PM
why did u do that?
ThePhantom
December 26th, 2005, 08:25 PM
do what? post?
redcar
December 26th, 2005, 08:25 PM
/\/\ definition of spam.
no he said it should be locked because it has gone totally pointless, not cause he disagrees.
i agree it should be locked at this stage.
December 26th, 2005, 08:27 PM
[quote="redcar"]/\/\ definition of spam.
were u talking about atlantawonder or me
redcar
December 26th, 2005, 08:28 PM
atlantawonder, that was totally unnecessary.
ThePhantom
December 26th, 2005, 09:18 PM
ok sorry
<-Dying_to_Live->
December 26th, 2005, 09:43 PM
^^^ something tells me thast honest
the problem with the egg and chicken thing is that theres no one point on earth's timeline where a chicken became to be known as a chicken. it evolved from other things, but the term chicken only applies to what humans have been able to observe in our short existance
Kiros
December 27th, 2005, 09:15 AM
AtlantaWonder, please don't spam like that again.
So, have we come to a conclusion yet?
December 27th, 2005, 09:47 AM
not rele..this topic has rele gone nowhere
redcar
December 27th, 2005, 09:50 AM
ok so this started oput about locking topics, then went way of course, then a chicken got involved......i wonder where it will go now?!
WelshLad
December 27th, 2005, 03:03 PM
oh for god sake - i pray to god (or even moderators) to lock thy thread
Dante
December 27th, 2005, 03:23 PM
what the hell was the point of this...if ur gonna change what its about to talk bout a fuckin chicken and egg
ThePhantom
December 27th, 2005, 04:23 PM
Are you saying you want to lock this thread because you do n't agree with what is being said!? Tisk tisk!
Just kidding :D
TheWizard
December 27th, 2005, 04:31 PM
I'm locking it because this thread SUCKS. :(
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.