Log in

View Full Version : Scientists find 2,000 year-old brain


Sugaree
December 13th, 2008, 10:40 AM
LONDON – British archaeologists have unearthed an ancient skull carrying a startling surprise — an unusually well-preserved brain. Scientists said Friday that the mass of gray matter was more than 2,000 years old — the oldest ever discovered in Britain. One expert unconnected with the find called it "a real freak of preservation."


The skull was severed from its owner sometime before the Roman invasion of Britain and found in a muddy pit during a dig at the University of York in northern England this fall, according to Richard Hall, a director of York Archaeological Trust.


Finds officer Rachel Cubbitt realized the skull might contain a brain when she felt something move inside the cranium as she was cleaning it, Hall said. She looked through the skull's base and spotted an unusual yellow substance inside. Scans at York Hospital confirmed the presence of brain tissue.


Hall said it was unclear just how much of the brain had survived, saying the tissue had apparently contracted over the years. Parts of the brain have been tentatively identified, but more research was needed, he said.
He said it was a mystery why the skull was buried separately from its body, suggesting human sacrifice and ritual burial as possible explanations.
The existence of a brain where no other soft tissues have survived is extremely rare, according to Sonia O'Connor, an archaeological researcher at the University of Bradford in northern England who helped authenticate the discovery.


"This brain is particularly exciting because it is very well preserved, even though it is the oldest recorded find of this type in the U.K., and one of the earliest worldwide," she said.
The old brain is unlikely to yield new neurological insights because human brains aren't thought to have changed much over the past 2,000 years, according to Chris Gosden, a professor of archaeology at Oxford University unconnected with the find.


He confirmed it was the oldest brain found in Britain. He noted that far older preserved brains, thought to be approximately 8,000 years old, were found in 1986 when dozens of intact human skulls were uncovered buried in a peat bog in Windover Farms in Florida.
"It's a real freak of preservation to have a brain and nothing else," Gosden said. "The fact that there's any brain there at all is quite amazing."
Hall said the brain found at York University was being kept in its skull in an environmentally controlled storage facility for further study.

Donkey
December 13th, 2008, 10:48 AM
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/45291000/gif/_45291212_iron_age_brain_226in.gif

Awesome :) let's hope they do something useful with it :P

Perseus
December 13th, 2008, 11:00 AM
Must be weird to find a brain.

Zephyr
December 13th, 2008, 11:27 PM
Wicked :D

Though it may not hold much scientific value past researching why is was preserved for so long,
That's still pretty cool.

BeautifulSilence
December 14th, 2008, 12:52 PM
Wow, it holds 2000 years of memory :P

That is cool though :)

Rathu
December 15th, 2008, 11:15 PM
Wow, that's a great discovery!
That shows the cruelty of the guys who lived 2000 years ago.
Burying a skull without a body,..... ugh that's weird!!

Kaleidoscope Eyes
December 17th, 2008, 02:14 PM
I realize I'm a little late here, but @ Rathu:

How is burying the head separately cruel? The guy wasn't using it anymore, I doubt he would suffer much because of it. xP Let's assume that the dating is correct (which is probably is; we know a lot about how skull shapes have changed over the years although carbon dating is fairly useless for a find from this time frame). This skull belonged to someone who lived in the late BC's or early BCE's. Let's think Biblical times, here. Culture was VERY different, and in addition to cultures which our own has direct connections to, there were also many different cultures which don't even exist today in any form. The whole "ritual sacrifice" theory is indeed just a theory. Obviously the guy can't tell us what happened and he wasn't buried with his biography. Would it change your perspective if the word "sacrifice" hadn't been mentioned?

I'm studying to become an archaeologist, and it bugs the crap out of me when people make immediate judgments about cultures they know nothing about. Even if you personally wouldn't buy into their beliefs, or wouldn't want to be a part of their lifestyle, you still have to respect that they're not you. This is called cultural relativism. You don't have to condone everything other cultures do, but you do have to understand that your own cultural beliefs mean nothing when you're trying to look at someone else's. Especially in this country we have a habit of being ethnocentric, that is thinking our culture is better than everyone else's, and cultures that are radiacally different than our own are simply ridiculous. You have to remember that our culture isn't the "normal" way for humans to do things. It's just the way our culture does things. It's hard to think of your own culture as culture, because we're constantly immersed in it, but all of our values, beliefs, lifestyle choices, that's culture. And every culture is different. Maybe this man's culture buried the head seperately for a religious reason. Maybe the man was killed in an altercation and for whatever reason they didn't find the body. Don't be so quick to accuse.

It's also possible that the skull was separated from the rest of the body after burial. Yes, they can tell pretty conclusively if the guy was decapitated perimortem versus postmortem. However, it's hard to say for sure if the body was intentionally buried separately. The original grave may have been shallow, which means an animal may have gotten into it. This often leads to bones being seperated from one another as the animal searches for food and explores what may be an unusual find. Theories are only theories, and nothing has been proved yet about what exactly happened to this man.