Log in

View Full Version : Missing pants case returns to DC court


george
October 25th, 2008, 12:11 AM
WASHINGTON – A former administrative law judge who unsuccessfully sued a dry cleaner for $54 million over a pair of lost pants tried to convince an appeals panel Wednesday that he deserves the money because he is a fraud victim.

"This is not a case about a pair of suit pants," Roy L. Pearson argued before the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Rather, it is about whether the owners of a neighborhood business misled consumers with a sign that claimed "Satisfaction Guaranteed," he said.

"There is an unconditional guarantee," he argued, unless the merchant indicates otherwise.

Pearson said the sign was deceptive and that the burden was on owners Jin Nam Chung and Soo Chung to explain whether the promise came with restrictions.

Pearson sued Custom Cleaners in northeast Washington in 2005 after claiming the Chungs lost a pair of trousers from a $1,100 blue and burgundy suit, then tried to give him a pair of charcoal gray pants that he said were not his. A D.C. Superior Court judge ruled against Pearson more than a year ago, awarding him nothing.

Christopher Manning, an attorney for the Chungs, said the business owners believe they did not lose the pants.

Whisper
October 25th, 2008, 12:52 AM
seriously that asshole should be dragged outside and shot

Neverender
October 25th, 2008, 01:20 AM
there was an episode of Law and Order about this!!:D

ShatteredWings
October 25th, 2008, 01:47 PM
That's a bit much to sue over a pair of pants.

Still, it's valid, as the man was guranteed that it'ed be done, CORRECTLY

Sugaree
October 25th, 2008, 01:54 PM
*facepalm*

Zephyr
October 25th, 2008, 10:02 PM
Dear lord.
HOW many businesses promise satisfaction guarantee?
It's just a pair of pants
If they ruined then,
The business should replace them.
But other then that,
If you don't like the job that is done,
DON'T go back.
Losing your business is the worst thing that can happen to a company

george
October 25th, 2008, 10:11 PM
I know, now a days, you can sue ANYONE for ANYTHING pretty much. Its retarded.

Mzor203
October 25th, 2008, 10:20 PM
$54,000,000?

That... is a bit overboard. I can see why he would be angry... but 54 million dollars... no.