View Full Version : post your benchmark results
navtiidia
October 6th, 2005, 07:04 AM
UPDATED
ok here are some tips to get your computer goin fast.
go here http://pddod.no-ip.info/tracker/details.php?info_hash=92d754fe929944abb0dc6d021edcba07f7fa2489
get those drivers if you have a ATI card. then follow these instructions if the requirements apply
http://pddod.no-ip.info/guppy/articles.php?lng=en&pg=80
then get this 3d benchmark
http://futuremark.com/download/?3dmark03.shtml
then post your results
-----------------------------------
MY SPECS
http://my.opera.com/pddod/homes/files/mustbewrong.jpg
----------------------------------------------------
here are mine
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4305709
Gothic_Knight
October 6th, 2005, 01:59 PM
I'm going to say, right away...that benchie is flawed...
Someone with a GTX and a 4800+ X2 lost to a P4 3.4 Ghz...and it says my 3500+/X700 combo is like, better than 95%...
3D Mark 05 is the new benchie system, as well...
Also, that is a pitiful score...there is NO way you should be getting that low, even with a Pentium 4 and a mobile card...something's wrong...
navtiidia
October 6th, 2005, 02:42 PM
i know. i just woke up sorry i didnt respond. i noticed that my score was unusually low. did you notice that my 3d card says 9800xt... lol...
anyways i noticed that im not oced up all the way.
also i didnt shut down all of my processes. i had everything running that i usually run. so 50% of my mem was taken.
navtiidia
October 6th, 2005, 03:58 PM
i just reinstalled my drivers (omega) and still its slow. so im trying some others. i really dont know whats wrong.
im gunna try the only drivers i never tried
DHzer0point
Gothic_Knight
October 6th, 2005, 04:16 PM
Nevermind...
Gothic_Knight
October 6th, 2005, 06:40 PM
Have ya'll tried the new Catalyst 5.9? They're not Omega, but they gave a BIG FPS boost in everything...plus...Adaptive AA ^_^
navtiidia
October 6th, 2005, 08:54 PM
here are my benches after i upgraded and fixed my 3d card with DNA drivers
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4306982
navtiidia
October 6th, 2005, 09:05 PM
no, it used to me much better. i just dont know WTF is wrong with my
[email protected]@KING computer.
i also own a desktop with a athlon 64 3200+ and that roxorz.
navtiidia
October 6th, 2005, 10:11 PM
its not set up at the moment. my parents took that computer away.... but i still got my lappy. i dont know weither to be mad or happy.
navtiidia
October 6th, 2005, 11:08 PM
HAHAHA funny. the wierd thing is they took away the least expencive computer. im currently on a computer that cost $3096USD the other one i guess coast a lil over $1400USD. i built it.
hey if your not suceptible to seizure go here
http://pddod.no-ip.info/siezure.html
navtiidia
October 7th, 2005, 12:16 AM
those 10k RPM hdds?
UPDATE :: here is some odd info http://my.opera.com/pddod/homes/files/SI.html
navtiidia
October 7th, 2005, 01:05 AM
YAY. nice. should load games super fast.
navtiidia
October 7th, 2005, 01:20 AM
actually do you remember a lil company called ummm i think its.... ummm leibermen systems????
they made those systems with the memory drives.... thats what you need.
navtiidia
October 7th, 2005, 01:26 AM
yeah they made systems that could cost with all the options about 20kUSD. lol OMFG. also they had humongus displays. they were multiple 30" LCD's on one stand to make one big screen. also memory drives and "no wait boot up".
Gothic_Knight
October 7th, 2005, 06:17 AM
yeah they made systems that could cost with all the options about 20kUSD. lol OMFG. also they had humongus displays. they were multiple 30" LCD's on one stand to make one big screen. also memory drives and "no wait boot up".o.o Do you know how MANY CARDS that'd be?
Considering the X1800XT is the only known card to support dual Apple Cinema's...what card did they run it on, and how many?!
Blahages
October 7th, 2005, 10:48 AM
My Laptop:
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b191/blahages/Test.jpg
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b191/blahages/3Dmark03.jpg
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4308366
Like half the hardware info on that page is wrong. Hmm... It finds the Video memory, the System Memory, and I believe the clock speeds wrong too.
I thought I had a higher score a while back when I tested it. I'll see if I can find that.
My Desktop is Benchmarking right now. I'll post that when it's done.
EDIT: Desktop's Done. Like I thought, it doesn't do very well. :)
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b191/blahages/DesktopSpeed.jpg
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b191/blahages/Desktop3DMark03.jpg
navtiidia
October 7th, 2005, 02:14 PM
good..... someone else with a laptop gets a SUCK score!!!!
Blahages
October 7th, 2005, 06:53 PM
My laptop did pretty good. I'm sure it had a score of just over 3000 last time I did it. I can't find the screenshot, so, I'll just mess with the drivers and settings later, and try it again. Nothing's overclocked in the computer, either.
Don't really trust overclocking on my laptop. Still, I think it was pretty good getting a 2700 score when your alienware laptop that has atleast twice the ram (is it 128 or 256?) and twice the ram. I'm using the Regular ATI Catalyst drivers. I'll mess with all that later. Still got a "WWOW!!" label on that other thingy.
I think it's kind of funny, though, that my laptop only cost 1000$ (can get it for a little less some places) when that alienware that got the same score cost 3000. Hmm... I mean, it doesn't have the best video card, I'd like more ram, and the HDD is only 4200, but still. Works pretty good for most everything.
That score on my desktop is pathetic. ;) I probably should have disabled the graphic stuff I had running. Maybe I will later. Kind of supposed to be writing an essay right now. (Yay for distractions)
pwned again ;)
Is that a desktop or a laptop? Was it a AMD 64 3400? And, it's a Radeon 9600 128meg right?
That's what my laptop is. Except the CPU is 3400+ 2.2GHz and Radeon 9600 64 Meg.
Blahages
October 7th, 2005, 07:13 PM
Yeah, that's what I thought. But, just incase they were wrong, like they are sometimes.
But, you didn't say if it was a laptop or a desktop. Err, wait, it looks like a desktop, since it has the Creative Soundblaster PCI.
I don't know if it's the best idea to overclock my laptop. It gets pretty hot as it is. Especially since the video card is acting up.
But, thats what the warranty is for. :) I gotta use that soon because the screen like flash off and on a lot. Not always, but it gets annoying.
Blahages
October 10th, 2005, 09:07 PM
If someone really wants to give their system a run for it's preformance try the 2005 version. My laptop like died on that test. Well, It didn't, but it didn't do good.
Blahages
October 10th, 2005, 09:40 PM
eh i meant OC to 2.3 not 3.3 lol that would be huge for a Winchester core
Ha, yeah I knew what you meant.
Blahages
October 10th, 2005, 11:09 PM
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b191/blahages/3dmark05.jpg
Wow. Look at that. 1150. Jeeze, that's bad. A few tests didnt even make it past 3fps. And, at that, they stayed at 1fps most of the time. Even had 0 twice. Highest fps was an 8 like twice.
Jeeze. 3DMark05 doesn't like my computer. It won't even run on my desktop.
Gothic_Knight
October 11th, 2005, 03:00 PM
05 will destroy anything...it's rare to see a 9800/X700/6600GT/6800 vanilla system top 4000...it's really up to your card, and what setting you run it on...highest score can only be achieved with an FX-57/FX-55 or 4000+ San Diego OCed to 2.8 ghz and either 7800 GTX's in SLI or, most likely, X1800 XTs in Crossfire...but yea...
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.