Dylann Roof thread

[phuckphace]

the Roof is on fire, let the motherfucker burn

itt we examine the white trash Anders Breivik, and discuss what punishment he should get. for the unaware he walked into a church a few months ago, sat down and chatted with the group for about an hour, and then stood up and started spraying lead at some innocent black people.

just in case you forgot his grimly dysgenic mug:

http://i.imgur.com/0USxyBJ.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/QZIgHtU.jpg

damn son nice bod (lmao do you even lift?)

murder, in my opinion, demands the rope. perhaps a contest on who gets to drop the trapdoor?

now we get to watch the hamhanded murrican "justice system" spend over 1488 gorillion dollars keeping this waste of oxygen alive, as he'll likely dodge the death penalty and get prison for life.

[Microcosm]

He really should get the death penalty. He is certainly guilty and may the punishment befit the crime.

[phuckphace]

I've heard it said that being obviously mentally unstable, he should get committed instead. like that would actually do anything.

now if he had gone to the ghetto and started capping hoodrats with gang tattoos, I'd give no phucks (although committing him even in that case would still be a good idea). but the fact that he psychotically targeted the obviously innocent is a clear sign that he's beyond help and needs to die. our society does not benefit from keeping specimens like this alive, and giving them taxpayer-funded meals and lodging.

[tonymontana99]

I've heard it said that being obviously mentally unstable, he should get committed instead. like that would actually do anything.

now if he had gone to the ghetto and started capping hoodrats with gang tattoos, I'd give no phucks (although committing him even in that case would still be a good idea). but the fact that he psychotically targeted the obviously innocent is a clear sign that he's beyond help and needs to die. our society does not benefit from keeping specimens like this alive, and giving them taxpayer-funded meals and lodging.

Nah, no point in keeping him alive, he'll never contribute to society and will just make the rest of us who are trying to defend our race look bad. It's just wasting tax dollars. If it were up to me, every mass murder / homicide would always imply capital punishment. Not even a death row; you are sentenced and the next day you're dead.

[Uniquemind]

Part of me feels we should just reestablish gladiator games.

And people like Dylan can voluntarily join and fight against someone else who voluntarily wants to fight back against the ideals Dylan stands for.


Like Dylan vs that black reporter guy who shot his co-workers.


Whose manifesto cited Dylan's is why he took up violence.


If they wanna fight voluntarily, let em, just minimize the damage to innocent people please who want no part of the violence.

[Miserabilia]

muh death penalty :murica:

[phuckphace]

muh death penalty :murica:

I'm sure you'd prefer doing it like Norway does (stash them in a hotel-prison for 5 years and then release them back into the general populace). I'd like to sucker punch you through the internet

[Miserabilia]

I'm sure you'd prefer doing it like Norway does (stash them in a hotel-prison for 5 years and then release them back into the general populace). I'd like to sucker punch you through the internet

:rolleyes::rolleyes: stash 'm in a hotel prison and just don't release them

[phuckphace]

:rolleyes::rolleyes: stash 'm in a hotel prison and just don't release them

:lol3: except that even life sentences are considered CRUEL AND UNUSUAL by you limp-wristed west euros

can't think of anything better to spend public funds on than keeping psychos alive?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnfinn_Nesset

His crimes include the murders of at least 22 people, as well as attempted murder, document forgery (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Document_forgery) and embezzlement (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embezzlement). He may have murdered up to 138 people. In 1983 he was convicted of poisoning 22 patients and sentenced to 21 years in prison. He served 12 years and 10 years supervision, and is thought to be living under an assumed name.

LMAO

[StoppingTom]

Dude's got a bowl haircut in the 21st century, jean shorts (obviously skips leg day) and takes pictures with guns and the Confederate flag with that weird stare, and no one thinks "Hey, we should keep an eye on this guy"?

[Miserabilia]

:lol3: except that even life sentences are considered CRUEL AND UNUSUAL by you limp-wristed west euros

can't think of anything better to spend public funds on than keeping psychos alive?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnfinn_Nesset



LMAO

I don't concider it cruel, I do concider it unusual tho that's just because I'm not used to it.

Can't think of anything better to spend public funds on than having to prepare a death sentence for some public sense of punishment?
The only reason i'm against the death penalty is that having it available is just not a pleasent idea for a democracy and it can take so many wrong turns unless it's controlled to the point where it costs more money than it saves (which it, already does, in the usa), not because I wouldn't like it in the moment. Obviously I want that man to die as well, I just don't aggree with the idea of having laws that allow the state to decide a punishment of death.

[phuckphace]

his own uncle is on record as saying he'd push the button himself if Roof was sentenced to death.

so at least some of his extended family has their heads on straight. not sure why they didn't make the connection before.

in most of these cases the person shows clear signs of being disturbed, but people just ignore it until it's too late. we need a better mental health system, for one.

Can't think of anything better to spend public funds on than having to prepare a death sentence for some public sense of punishment?

the point of the death penalty is to permanently remove dangerously unstable individuals from society. DEMOCRACY is the whole reason the death penalty process is so convoluted and expensive, by the way. a quick trial to establish guilt and a bullet to the head is fairly cheap, and a rope is even cheaper.

[Porpoise101]

DEMOCRACY is the whole reason the death penalty process is so convoluted and expensive, by the way.
True democratic governments would just straight up kill you. Athenians would poison you, and I'm pretty sure that remote areas still stone people if they don't fit in with the majority. It's just the fact that we abide by this "innocent until proven guilty" bs.

[Uniquemind]

his own uncle is on record as saying he'd push the button himself if Roof was sentenced to death.

so at least some of his extended family has their heads on straight. not sure why they didn't make the connection before.

in most of these cases the person shows clear signs of being disturbed, but people just ignore it until it's too late. we need a better mental health system, for one.



the point of the death penalty is to permanently remove dangerously unstable individuals from society. DEMOCRACY is the whole reason the death penalty process is so convoluted and expensive, by the way. a quick trial to establish guilt and a bullet to the head is fairly cheap, and a rope is even cheaper.


Just hang him up like a piñata, the little blindfolded kids can beat him to death.

No bullet required.

The cheapest method of execution would be carbon monoxide chambers though. I also imagine it would be less messy.

[Vlerchan]

Not even a death row; you are sentenced and the next day you're dead.
An average of 5 people are exonerated from death row each year in the US.

---

I also think that utmost caution should be taken when it comes to governments in particular relinquishing citizens of their right to life. Leading on from that it seems safer that governments just don't do it at all.

[tonymontana99]

Can't bulletproof the Roof!

[phuckphace]

True democratic governments would just straight up kill you. Athenians would poison you, and I'm pretty sure that remote areas still stone people if they don't fit in with the majority. It's just the fact that we abide by this "innocent until proven guilty" bs.

well I was reading up on 19th and early 20th century serial killers and they sure didn't waste time hanging the fuckers. generally seemed to take no more than a year before they got their turn to sit in the hot seat. I say without the rule of law (I AM THE LAW) we could whittle it down to 2 weeks at the most, or 24 hours when proof of guilt is absolute (as in the OP)