wwe

[mrjc]

anyone watch wwe?
whos gunna win the money in the bank ladder match?

[Microcosm]

TV/C :arrow2: S&F

Doesn't seem very film/cinema/tv oriented. More of a sports discussion.

[SethfromMI]

TV/C :arrow2: S&F

Doesn't seem very film/cinema/tv oriented. More of a sports discussion.

well to be honest with you it depends who you ask. most sports fans do not consider the wwe to be a sport(even if ESPN is doing more with them). sure, it takes a lot of athletics, but it is so scripted. the story lines are more of soap operas for men. I mean I can see why you changed it I am not trying to give you grief, but most serious sports fans do not consider wwe sports

anyways no, I do not watch it haha

[True_Spiderman]

I don't watch it that much but I think it'll be roman reigns because every match I saw with him he did great then dean Ambrose vs. Seth Rollins is a hard one

[mrjc]

im going with orton

[True_Spiderman]

im going with orton



Nah fam if he does I will forever stop watching wwe

lol fair enough



Lol it's only because he had the title waaaaaaaaaay to much

[Kacey]

*ahem*
wRRsXxE1KVY

[Dreamer98]

Nope I don't watch that .

Doesn't look serious to me , it looks more like some movie , not as real fight . :D

[Mil1dreded]

I used to watch it back when it was interesting they were aloud to be more ,well pretend to be more violent and had an interesting roster now it just seems very dull lacking creativity and the roster just aren't good characters was better about 7 years ago

[Chatastraphyse]

I used to watch it back when it was interesting they were aloud to be more ,well pretend to be more violent and had an interesting roster now it just seems very dull lacking creativity and the roster just aren't good characters was better about 7 years ago

Same with me. I was always a huge WWE fan when I was little but it just got bad creativity wise and the lacking ambition of the roster