iSideWith quiz

[phuckphace]

oh look another political quiz

http://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz

this one's a bit longer than the others. make sure you look over all possible answers by clicking "Other Stances" before you submit your results. also look for the "Show More Questions" button.

mein results:

http://i.imgur.com/uU6ILIY.png

[phuckphace]

some of my answers:

Q: Should foreign terrorism suspects be given Constitutional rights?
A: No, they should be tried in military tribunals but not subject to torture

Q: Should the U.S. formally declare war on ISIS?
A: No, not until they attack us on American soil.

Q: Should the Federal gov't raise the minimum wage?
A: Yes, and adjust the wage level according to inflation every year.

Q: Should able-bodied, mentally capable adults who receive welfare be required to work?
A: No, but their benefits would expire after two years of unemployment.

Q: Would you favor an increased sales tax in order to reduce property taxes?
A: No, property taxes are the most reliable and consistent form of state revenue

Q: Should the Federal gov't subsidize US farmers?
A: Yes, but only subsidize small local farms instead of large corporations

Q: Should the US require labeling of genetically engineered foods?
A: Yes, I trust the science of responsible food engineering but don't trust the motives of food companies.

Q: Should the federal government continue to give tax credits and subsidies to the wind power industry?
A: Yes, the wind power industry is an important alternative to coal and natural gas

Q: Should the government increase environmental regulations to prevent global warming?
A: No, global warming is a natural occurrence.

Q: Should law enforcement be allowed to detain illegal immigrants for minor crimes so that federal immigration authorities can take custody of them?
A: Yes, all illegal immigrants should be turned over to federal authorities and deported

Q: Should immigrants to the U.S. be required to learn English?
A: Yes, and remove multilingual translations from government documents and services

[Vlerchan]

I never thought this quiz was very good. Here's my results though:

Green Party: 92% [domestic, foreign, social, environmental, healthcare, immigration, education].
Democrats: 80% [domestic, foreign, social, environmental, healthcare, immigration].
Libertarians: 68% [domestic, immigration, healthcare].
Socialists 64% [environmental, immigration, healthcare].
Constitution: 34% [none].
Conservative: 11% [none].
Republicans: 7% [none].

http://www.isidewith.com/results/879570385

Is it strange that I'm not matched with a party on economics?

You can also view the answers I gave through the link.

[Emerald Dream]

This is either proof that the survey isn't very good, or that all political parties are essentially the same on a lot of issues (or I am very much in the middle on everything):

http://i.imgur.com/Mscgmpf.png

[Capto]

http://i.imgur.com/5yRnp2L.png

ayyy

[Abyssal Echo]

Constitution Party: 90%
on immigration, domestic policy, foreign policy, social, and education issues.
Conservative Party: 88%
on immigration, domestic policy, foreign policy, social, and education issues.
Republicans: 85%
on immigration,domestic policy, foreign policy, social, and education issues.
Libertarians: 69%
on domestic policy, healthcare, and education issues.
Democrats: 65%
on domestic policy, economic, and environmental issues.
Green Party: 61%
on domestic policy, environmental, and economic issues.
Socialist: 12%

[phuckphace]

This is either proof that the survey isn't very good, or that all political parties are essentially the same on a lot of issues

I think it's more the latter tbh

my Third Positionist responses tripped it up pretty bad since US politics has nothing resembling this whatsoever, I guess centrist was the closest concept they could find

[lyhom]

https://www.isidewith.com/results-image/888158677.jpg

idk

[Katie96xox]

Republicans: 97%
On social, economic, foreign policy, domestic policy, environmental, immigration, healthcare, and education issues
Conservative Party: 93%
On social, economic, foreign policy, domestic policy, environmental, immigration, and education issues
Constitution Party: 90%
On social, economic, foreign policy, immigration, environmental, domestic policy, and education issues
Libertarians: 61%
On economic and environmental issues
Democrats: 7%
No major issues
Socialist: 4%
No major issues
Green Party: 1%
No major issues

[Atom]

http://www.isidewith.com/results/894822478

[Typhlosion]

Parties I side with...

76% Constitution Party
on immigration, economic, environmental, and education issues.

75% Conservative Party
on immigration, domestic policy, environmental, and education issues.

74% Libertarians
on domestic policy, economic, social, and environmental issues.

74% Republicans
on immigration, domestic policy, environmental, and education issues.

62% Green Party
on social and healthcare issues.

58% Democrats
on healthcare issues.

34% Socialist
on social issues.

I only answered Yes/No and gave all my answers a Somewhat Important weighting.

[kailynr]

Green 93%, Democrats 87%, Socialist 60%, Libertarians 54%, Constitution Party 16%.

Huh. Wonder if I meet the definition of flaming liberal? ;) LOL

[Fritos43]

92% Green Party
on domestic policy, social, foreign policy, immigration, economic, healthcare, and environmental issues.

83% Democrats
on domestic policy, social, foreign policy, immigration, and environmental issues.

65% Libertarians
on foreign policy and healthcare issues.

57% Socialist
no major issues.

27% Constitution Party
no major issues.

6% Republicans
no major issues.

I'm really ironic, a Green Party Liberal living in the South.

[Babs]

Green party 94%
On social, domestic policy, foreign policy, economic, education, immigration, and environmental issues.
Democrats 87%
on social, economic, domestic policy, foreign policy, immigration and environment issues.
Libertarians 65%
on foreign policy and social issues.
Socialist 52%
on social and environmental issues.
Constitution party 16%
No major issues.
Republican 4%
No major issues.

[Danny_boi 16]

http://www.isidewith.com/results/937675124

I know it says Green Party, and I like the GP, but I just disagree with a lot of their basic stances in their platform. I personally think I agree with the Democrats, but if the GP fixed some things I'll sign up in a heart beat.

It also said 92% Bernie Sanders and 78% HRC. I like HRC and most likely will vote for her, but I think I'll take a look at Sanders now.

[Sir Suomi]

I Side With:

Libertarians:89%
Constitution Party:84%
Republicans:78%
Democrats:57%
Green Party:57%
Socialist:30%

Makes sense

[Airrd]

http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn187/eric_meyers1/Screen%20Shot%202015-06-11%20at%2012.09.48%20AM_zpszkxidv8k.png (http://s304.photobucket.com/user/eric_meyers1/media/Screen%20Shot%202015-06-11%20at%2012.09.48%20AM_zpszkxidv8k.png.html)

I like the Green Party but what sucks about American Politics is that it is a 2 party race. It said the candidate I was suited best for was Bernie Sanders and I am not going to vote for him however because voting for a third party candidate is basically throwing your vote away. I mean third party candidates dont even get to debate with the Reps and Dems on Natl' tv

[Danny_boi 16]

I like the Green Party but what sucks about American Politics is that it is a 2 party race. It said the candidate I was suited best for was Bernie Sanders and I am not going to vote for him however because voting for a third party candidate is basically throwing your vote away. I mean third party candidates dont even get to debate with the Reps and Dems on Natl' tv

It's not really trowing your vote away. Third parties can make a difference, just look at 1968. There just need to be more support for the minor parties. Plus the Green party will have it's own presidential candidate soon. Will that person win, probably not, but who knows in the future maybe. Democracy!

[Airrd]

It's not really trowing your vote away. Third parties can make a difference, just look at 1968. There just need to be more support for the minor parties. Plus the Green party will have it's own presidential candidate soon. Will that person win, probably not, but who knows in the future maybe. Democracy!

I did some research just now about the 1968 election and that's another thing that makes me mad. Nixon won by 500,000 votes but he also won by over 100 electoral votes and that's what really matters not the popular vote so... so much for democracy. And I thought you would have quoted the election of 1912 when Eugene V. Debs, a Socialist candidate, received nearly a million votes

[Melkor]

Well, If I was in USA this would be the stance I would take.
https://www.isidewith.com/results-image/938418454.jpg

[Danny_boi 16]

I did some research just now about the 1968 election and that's another thing that makes me mad. Nixon won by 500,000 votes but he also won by over 100 electoral votes and that's what really matters not the popular vote so... so much for democracy. And I thought you would have quoted the election of 1912 when Eugene V. Debs, a Socialist candidate, received nearly a million votes

I was quoting that election because a third party candidate actually got some electoral votes, which maters more. But, Eugene V. Debs as a good third party run, as well as TR's bull moose party. But if you are looking at popular vote, the elections of 1924, 1948, 1980, 1992, and 1996 were all good performances by third party candidates.