Cut or uncut

[Jamie1441]

Witch do you guys prefer

[Renata_cmp]

i don't like mutilated penises, but there's tons of threads about this already anyway.

[Jour_Nuit]

i only had sex with uncut guys, so i don't know what is different

[devon girl]

depends on the guy - try doing a sevey on the guys page

[Beth]

I have only seen circumcized penises in real life, uncircumcuzed online only. I don't have any preference as long as its kept clean and healthy.

[hannaszabo]

No real difference to me.

[saxmatic16]

only experienced circumcised guys but if they keep it clean then I wouldn't be opposed to an uncircumcised guy.

[Jilly]

I like them both. I guess I find like, having both, adds more variety for me to enjoy! if all penis were the same, what would be the point.

But if I had to choose one, I'd definitely say cut. I dunno why. It seems like more of the good stuff is exposed to see, if that makes any sense. Also, it seems like the head is more soft and smooth and not wet and slimy.

But both are ok, right? I mean, it's dick, so waht could be better? LOL!

[LITTLEANGEL19]

I don't bother me. :P

[Iam-Marie]

cut, it look likes better

[Renata_cmp]

I like them both. I guess I find like, having both, adds more variety for me to enjoy! if all penis were the same, what would be the point.

But if I had to choose one, I'd definitely say cut. I dunno why. It seems like more of the good stuff is exposed to see, if that makes any sense. Also, it seems like the head is more soft and smooth and not wet and slimy.

But both are ok, right? I mean, it's dick, so waht could be better? LOL!

uncut ones are much smoother and silky, and cut ones are much more prompt to erectile disfunction while growing old... (plus when hard the head is completely exposed anyway, so it looks exactly the same)

[Laibachd]

Uncut ones are much more fun :3

[Laibachd]

I think the opposite haha, cut ones are so smooth and clean-feeling and silky... so much fun!

It's hard for me, because conceptually I'm opposed to the idea of circumcising babies and can't imagine doing it to my kids! It strikes me as bordering on sexual assault even... BUT, as a girl, it's SO much better cut I can't honestly pretend I don't have a preference...

That's interesting :0

[Laibachd]

I think everyone has the right to their own body as they were born unless it's medically needed. It's so much easier though to do as a baby, so I don't really blame anyone for doing it - but I don't agree.

Also, honest to god i swear I wouldn't love a guy any less if he had a foreskin. It's just prettier and more fun without it!

So you'd want all boys in their teens to desire circumcision on their own? :D It's okay if you do

[Laibachd]

To be honest, yes :D that would be perfect lol.

P.S. And not ALL boys, the world would be boring with everyone the same... just the boys I liked :P

haha you really find cut penises so much better, don't you? xD

[Laibachd]

Honestly, yes, but at the same time that's my guilty pleasure I'm just finally admitting. The actual concept of circumcising babies makes me really sad :( The results - fabulous! Ugh... why can't guys just be born circumcised?

I've only ever experienced uncut penises, so i don't know, maybe they really are better.

Circumcision is horrible though. Maybe they'll find a way to do that less painfully in the future :0 Although boys do lose sensitivity after that

[Laibachd]

But i think oral is better with the foresking, no? :I

[Laibachd]

Ok :/

[Laibachd]

Sorry, I hope I don't seem like a judgemental jerk... again... even admitting it's a preference is a very hard thing for me.

Not at all, it's fine ^^

[Laibachd]

I'm actually pansexual, agender, very body-positive accepts everyone. It's hard for me because let's be realistic - sexually, some things are more enjoyable than others.

That doesn't justify cutting babies at all tho :( so it's a hard one to have a preference for something that usually happens in a way you believe is horrible.

I feel you ^^

[Laibachd]

Thanks, I hate having any type of physical preference... but especially one so insidious in how it happens. I think boys should be circumcised as teenagers, so they could choose not to be. But it should be offered cause it turns out so nice :D - maybe that'd be the best compromise?

Haha, i guess!

[ClaraWho]

The comments surrounding this disturb me.

A) Sex is less pleasurable for guys without the foreskin. That's simple biological fact. If you cut off a load of pleasure receptors - you feel less pleasure. Equally, the head of the penis is meant to be kept moist and protected by the foreskin. Removing it desensitises the head gland of the penis.

Regardless of how a person views it, biology is biology. There is rarely ever a medical reason for circumcision. And it has NOTHING to do with STI's or HIV contraction.

B) As foreskin is pulled back when erect, It doesn't get in the way at all.

C) It is the equivalent of cutting off the hood that protects your clitoris. Does that sound like it would be more pleasurable?!?!!

Imagine if a guy said 'sorry, I prefer it if a girl has her outer labia and clit hood mutilated and cut off - it just looks and feels much nicer'. You wouldn't go anywhere near the creep!

Any plastic surgeon willing to mutilate your vagina to what you think looks more aesthetically pleasing, should be disbarred and kept well away from vulnerable public.

I guarantee you will find a partner who loves your vagina for exactly what it is. And if they don't, they don't deserve to be looking at it.

~ outraged Clara

[ClaraWho]

Actually, yes, it does... at least the labia. I have long hangy ones I want rid of so badly :(

Now, otherwise I agree 100% - that's why it's one of those guilty preferences I have... cut is much nicer. But I want a partner to love, not a set of genitals. I'd never even tell an uncut male partner that I preferred cut, because I wouldn't want them to feel any shame!

My post sent prematurely, so please read the last bit again for reference.

It sounds more pleasurable?

1-1 does not equal 2. Taking away pleasure receptors, the sensitive skin, does not give you MORE pleasure.

Don't you think you'd be wiser spending your time becoming more confident in the body you have, than hacking bits of it off?

It's like cutting off your own nose to spite your face. :confused:

~ Clara

[ClaraWho]

It's just comfort. For myself - the lips are pinchy and feel uncomfortable... they don't feel good they physically hurt. For guys... giving a blowjob to a cut guy just FEELS nicer. Cut penises feel more dry and smooth and just... it's a nicer feeling.

But it's also totally not my choice, that's why I think a good compromise would be offer it to teens. That way, it's consensual. I don't think babies should be circumcised, it's cruel and borders on sexual assault. It takes away a choice they should have.

That said, I don't think there's anything wrong with body mods - I have my belly button pierced, my nose, my ears a bunch of times. I want a tattoo and maybe to get my ears pointed (elf ears). Circumcision and labiaplasty and stuff aren't any different. Body mods that can be AWESOME - but need to be done by people who CONSENT and make their OWN choice.

Sorry, but repeating yourself over and over doesn't validate your points.

If your vaginal lips physically hurt, you should see a doctor as something is medically wrong. That's not an aesthetic thing, that's a medical thing. They shouldn't hurt.

I would assume that giving a blowjob was for his enjoyment more so than yours. Therefore seems odd you're arguing it's more enjoyable to suck, when he receives a lot less pleasure from it. Also, from my experience there's nothing to complain about uncut.

Psychologically teens are not ready to make any big life decisions, a lot of teens our age are complete idiots. So that would mean adulthood, as is the case for major piercings/body modification.

Comparing circumcision and labiaplasty to getting an ear pierced is simply ludicrous though. I'm sorry, but if you're going to make ridiculous claims like that, I cannot take you seriously. One is aesthetic, the others alter the sexual organs of the body dramatically. That's like comparing an ear piercing to have your fingers cut off.

Which could be a body mod. Fact is, the government has a responsibility to protect those unwell enough to take body modding too far. Having said that, ear pointing and inserting horns are all legal in the UK, just only appealing and taken up by microscopic proportions of the populous.

I do agree entirely about babies, and cannot see it as anything other than child abuse.

~ Clara

[Iam-Marie]

... I'm opposed to the idea of circumcising babies and can't imagine doing it to my kids!...

I agree with you. I think the boy could later decide itself

[Kirina]

i agree with you. I think the boy could later be pressured into doing it.

ftfy

[iamsilkspectre]

But i think oral is better with the foresking, no? :I

I for one prefer it uncut.

[kentucky girl]

I prefer uncut but it really doesn't matter to me

[CrazyGirl01]

I prefer it uncut, since most guys in Europe are uncut.

[Amber Bi]

Cut, but that's all Ive seen so I guess that's why it's my preference

[DisneyPrincess27]

I prefer circumcized

[Renata_cmp]

"Location: Los Angeles, California" thats why.

[Abhorrence]

Thread too similar to http://www.virtualteen.org/forums/showthread.php?t=160638. :locked: