View Full Version : Question about cut
happytimes
April 1st, 2008, 01:35 AM
So I was just talking to my friend about if he was cut (circumcised) or not. He said to me that if you're cut you'll experience less pleasure since your tip is a really sensitive area which you'll get most pleasure from. Is this actually true?
JoshDude
April 1st, 2008, 01:53 AM
I'm cut, and my penis is extremely sensitive haha. Wouldnt that make it more pleasureable?
ThatCanadianGuy
April 1st, 2008, 06:28 AM
I think the main reasoning behind it is that since the foreskin is always covering the head for uncut guys, the head becomes super-sensitive to even the slightest touch; which could even be painful and sting. Cut guys on the other hand, are used to it rubbing against the fabric of their pants and underwear, so it becomes desensitized to a SMALL extent. I'm cut and I don't believe we really lose TONS of sensitivity that uncut guys preach about; I think that I'm just lucky to not have actual PAIN when I even just lightly TOUCH my penis! Not to mention worrying about not being able to pull my foreskin back (a problem which seemed to cause a lot of new threads lately, so it must be a common problem for some uncut guys).
superstar2067
April 1st, 2008, 06:32 AM
I agree with ThatCanadianGuy if ur cut ur penis head is exposed to more touch and there for get a little less senceitive
dogman
April 1st, 2008, 06:39 AM
the only people that could truly answer this, is someone who was cut in their teens, and is now 18-19, does anyone know someone like this
Patchy
April 1st, 2008, 06:39 AM
I think the main reasoning behind it is that since the foreskin is always covering the head for uncut guys, the head becomes super-sensitive to even the slightest touch; which could even be painful and sting. Cut guys on the other hand, are used to it rubbing against the fabric of their pants and underwear, so it becomes desensitized to a SMALL extent. I'm cut and I don't believe we really lose TONS of sensitivity that uncut guys preach about; I think that I'm just lucky to not have actual PAIN when I even just lightly TOUCH my penis! Not to mention worrying about not being able to pull my foreskin back (a problem which seemed to cause a lot of new threads lately, so it must be a common problem for some uncut guys).
He's got it spot on!
Yeah Im uncut and certainly the sensitivity of my head is extremely sensitive
Dolphus Raymond
April 1st, 2008, 07:44 PM
I think the main reasoning behind it is that since the foreskin is always covering the head for uncut guys, the head becomes super-sensitive to even the slightest touch; which could even be painful and sting. Cut guys on the other hand, are used to it rubbing against the fabric of their pants and underwear, so it becomes desensitized to a SMALL extent. I'm cut and I don't believe we really lose TONS of sensitivity that uncut guys preach about; I think that I'm just lucky to not have actual PAIN when I even just lightly TOUCH my penis! Not to mention worrying about not being able to pull my foreskin back (a problem which seemed to cause a lot of new threads lately, so it must be a common problem for some uncut guys).
Well, hold on a bit here. You can't simultaneously claim that there's a big pain difference and that there is a minor loss of sensitivity.
The glans of an uncircumcised male are not typically "super-sensitive." Studies show circumcise guys have 10% to 50% less sensitivity. Is sensitivity good? That depends on your preference. I like it. For some, it is somewhat painful in early puberty. It never was for me, but it can apparently be reduced just by running shower water over the glans. I can't exactly rub mine against rough surfaces, but I doubt that's much fun for cut guys either. The sensitivity has never been an annoyance for me; quite the opposite. That's just me, though.
As for foreskin retraction, we actually have numbers on that. About 1 in 20 males past early puberty have difficulty with retraction. That explains why we get so many people with it (it is 1-in-20), but 95% of uncut guys never have much trouble. I imagine that 5% is comparable to the number of males who are circumcised so tightly they have to use lubricant -- which is a non-transitory, essentially incurable problem that I doubt is much fun either.
(Just respectfully providing the counter-perspective! I'm glad you're happy with what you have, but that doesn't mean the alternative has to be bad.)
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.