Log in

View Full Version : U.S. and Arab allies launch airstrikes against ISIL in Syria


Horatio Nelson
September 23rd, 2014, 10:16 AM
WASHINGTON — The U.S. military, along with Arab allies, launched the first airstrikes against Islamic State targets in Syria late Monday, as the war ordered by President Obama against the militant organization took on an urgent new phase.

A statement early Tuesday from the Department of Defense said 14 airstrikes were carried out against ISIL targets.

"The strikes destroyed or damaged multiple ISIL targets in the vicinity of Ar Raqqah, Dayr az Zawr, Al Hasakah, and Abu Kamal and included ISIL fighters, training compounds, headquarters and command and control facilities, storage facilities, a finance center, supply trucks and armed vehicles," the Defense Department said.


The attack was carried out using a mixture of warplanes dropping bombs, remotely piloted aircraft and ships firing cruise missiles.
Aircraft from several Arab states took part in the attack. They were: Bahrain, Jordan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, according to the Defense Department.
"We wanted to make sure that ISIL knew they have no safe haven, and we certainly achieved that," Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in an interview with a small group of reporters as he flew to Washington after a weeklong trip to Europe.
The Defense Department said the U.S. also took separate action Monday night to disrupt an "imminent attack plotting against the United States and Western interests conducted by a network of seasoned al-Qaeda veterans — sometimes referred to as the Khorasan Group." This group has used Syria as a safe-haven. Only U.S. assets were used in the strike against Khorasan.
The allied strikes in Syria were not invited by the government of Bashar Assad, although the U.S. advised Syria's United Nations envoy of the upcoming attacks, according to Syria's state news agency.
Assad, is waging a brutal civil war against opponents of his regime, including ISIL militants. It's unclear how Assad will react to the U.S.-led attacks. His military possesses sophisticated anti-aircraft missiles, although most of them are near the capital of Damascus and near the border with Israel.


About two thirds of the estimated 30,000 ISIL fighters are based in Syria. The remainder have captured large parts of northern Iraq, although their momentum has been blunted there by U.S. fighter, bomber and drone aircraft. Last week, French warplanes launched attacks on ISIL targets in Iraq for the first time.
For the last several weeks, U.S. spy planes have been flying over Syria collecting intelligence on potential ISIL targets.
There have been 190 U.S. airstrikes on IS targets in Iraq since bombing there started in August, according to statistics from U.S. Central Command, which coordinates military activity in the region.


The goal of ISIL fighters is to dominate a vast stretch of territory from Iraq to the Mediterranean. Last month, they swept through northern Iraq, capturing Mosul, the country's second-largest city after Baghdad, and threatening the semi-autonomous Kurdish region. Kurdish forces and Iraqi commandos, backed by U.S. air power, halted the advance of ISIL fighters and ejected them from control of two key dams near Mosul and Haditha. They also helped prevent the slaughter of religious refugees.
Rolling back IS gains and ultimately destroying the organization, Pentagon and White House officials say, will require competent, local military forces fighting on behalf of representative governments. The formation of a new government in Iraq, rejecting the sectarian rule of Nouri al Maliki, has been hailed by the administration as a step in that direction. U.S. air power alone cannot eliminate the threat from ISIL fighters, officials say.
Also last week, Congress and the president agreed to fund a $500 million program designed to recruit, train and equip a force of moderate Syrians. They will be trained in Saudi Arabia to defend their communities against ISIL fighters and the Syrian regime.

It's about fucking time, honestly.

Exocet
September 23rd, 2014, 10:28 AM
http://defence.pk/attachments/d940bc3e53f2c6cfec008fbc04b8fdd9-png.78198/

thatcountrykid
September 23rd, 2014, 04:02 PM
Come on put boots down

Vlerchan
September 23rd, 2014, 04:12 PM
Only me and probably phuckphace will be able to appreciate the hilarity of this move.

Southside
September 23rd, 2014, 06:43 PM
Why not knock out two birds with one stone and attack the Assad regime as well?

Vlerchan
September 24th, 2014, 01:18 AM
Why not knock out two birds with one stone and attack the Assad regime as well?
Assad has spent the last few years eliminating with extreme prejudice all reasonable factions in Syria. He's done this at the cost of losing large parts of his country to ISIL and other radical Islamist groups. He's created a situation where it's either support him against the Islamists or create a power vacuum that the Islamists are undoubtedly going to be in the best position to seize - It's also the case that not intervening is now dangerous for the West's interests so they can't just let it play out.

I believe this has been a deliberate strategy on Asaad's part. If so, the man's a genius, and probably a fantastic poker player in his spare time.

---

In general creating power vacuums is also an awful idea.

Fractured Silhouette
October 1st, 2014, 09:11 AM
"Gotta get that oil".

This war is such a fucking farse. This doesn't help anybody. Corporations want oil, arabs happen to be on top of it. Obviously bomb them, while they throw fucking sticks at the jets before they burn.

Watch as this shit doesn't help anyone.

CosmicNoodle
October 1st, 2014, 09:14 AM
Only me and probably phuckphace will be able to appreciate the hilarity of this move.

Add me to that list, trust America to once again act an an international clown.

Broken Toy
October 1st, 2014, 04:02 PM
people only seem to care when things might happen to them. its like countries have an inferiority complex.
oh, lots of civilians and others are being killed by religious fanatics, why tell ME this.
what, they are gaining power and could be a slight danger, get the bombs out.

if they had intervened months ago (like everyone, not just 1 country, theres assholes in governments worldwide) they wouldnt be bombing places right now, a few countries (probably america + half of europe, theyre normally good enough at pretending they have good finances) could of just walked over the country and wiped out all these small groups before exactly this happened.

its like when uin newspapers theyll print something like "a plane crashed, 5 brits, along with 96 others" why does it only matter if it involves the country themselves

Capto
October 6th, 2014, 06:57 PM
"Also last week, Congress and the president agreed to fund a $500 million program designed to recruit, train and equip a force of moderate Syrians. They will be trained in Saudi Arabia to defend their communities against ISIL fighters and the Syrian regime."

fucking kek

phuckphace
October 6th, 2014, 09:49 PM
http://i.imgur.com/l9v5Wec.jpg

I spent a decade and trillions of dollars and all I got was this big mean Wahabist Caliphate that won't sell me oil

'murrica. fucking kek indeed.

James Dean
October 7th, 2014, 03:40 AM
I think it's sad how both sides are attacking with the same force. ISIL needs to be stopped and this needs to be resolved, however is the United States Militia any different? I wish we could all get along but we as America take that as a sign of being weak and we want to be seen as a strong country which I can understand.

phuckphace
October 8th, 2014, 10:09 AM
I wish we could all get along but we as America take that as a sign of being weak and we want to be seen as a strong country which I can understand.

it's not weakness they're afraid of, it's being out of a job. and they would be if we got along.