incest

[bijetab]

do you think incest is wrong or are you neutral about it

[Hideous]

I think incest is wrong, not only is it illegal but just picture the physiological effects it will have on every family member.

[Babiole]

I think anything closer than first cousins is gross. One of my aunts is married to her first cousin and her kids are fine. Two of my mom's first cousins married each other as well. They do have a son with Asperger's, but otherwise their three kids are fine. But sibling or parent-child incest...watch Precious and see the grossness of such a thing.

(My best friend, who is of Algerian heritage, is the son of first cousins - his maternal grandmother and his paternal grandmother are sisters.)

[Body odah Man]

do you think incest is wrong or are you neutral about it

I think it's O.K. as long as it isn't close family (say second, 3rd cousins). If it's close family I've ehard it's terrible genetic wise.

[morsar]

Totally wrong. I certainly don't wish I had a hot sister sharing my room...who I could see in undewear...or a bathtowel coming out of the shower...I'm sorry, what were we talking about?

[TheN3rdyOutcast]

Incest is wrong, however, if it only happens once or twice, that's okay, but if one forms an advanced sexual relationship with someone closer that their 2nd cousin, then that's kind of sick.
Also, I'd like to point out that we're all at most, 50th cousins as a human race to having sex with anyone would technically be incest, however, the gene pool has been tampered with so much that there are no bad effects.

[assassin161]

Incest is a very odd topic, I mean, if you follow that the church teaches, that Adam and eve where their, then we're all products of incest.

[Elysium]

It's certainly taboo, but as long as you're not reproducing and you're not hurting yourself or anyone else (so, the implication included here is that both parties consent fully), I don't really see an issue.

[Dennis98]

I am totally against it , it is sick ... My people and me miss capital punishment in my country ...

[Lovelife090994]

I don't like incest but with distant cousins since by 3rd I believe it's legal for them to marry, it can be fine, but not prolonged. I am not too keen on it, but as long as no rape, reproduction, or abuse is going on, why care what goes on between two consenting adults that a related but distant?

[ksdnfkfr]

I think it's basically a very bad idea.

[JustJordan]

I don't agree with it and I think that it is unhealthy to our society as a whole, experimenting with cousins etc. is ok, but long term relationships with close family members disgusts me.

[Gamma Male]

Personally, I wouldn't participate in it as the concept revolts me.

It's certainly taboo, but as long as you're not reproducing and you're not hurting yourself or anyone else (so, the implication included here is that both parties consent fully), I don't really see an issue.
Basically this. As long as all parties are consenting adults who don't plan on reproducing, I don't see anything wrong with it. So far the ick factor is the only real reason I've seen why people oppose it.
I am totally against it , it is sick ... My people and me miss capital punishment in my country ...

So you think we should murder people who commit incest?

[Dennis98]

Personally, I wouldn't participate in it as the concept revolts me.


Basically this. As long as all parties are consenting adults who don't plan on reproducing, I don't see anything wrong with it. So far the ick factor is the only real reason I've seen why people oppose it.


So you think we should murder people who commit incest?


I dont know what " you " should do about it , but I only know that my country should introduce again capital punishment , I dont care what are you going to do about it - West is not normal since Fall of Berlin Wall , I only know what should do my country about it , and not just for incest , capital punishment for killers , pedophiles , drug dealers , drug users , for all types of criminals ...

[Left Now]

Incest is a very odd topic, I mean, if you follow that the church teaches, that Adam and eve where their, then we're all products of incest.

I really don't understand how you say we are all products of incest.

[chadlikestoparty]

i think its wrong long term but everyone gets curious and experimental through puberty so if it happens it happens

[assassin161]

I really don't understand how you say we are all products of incest.

well, if adam and eve were the only ones in the world, they have children. figure the rest out

[Left Now]

well, if adam and eve were the only ones in the world, they have children. figure the rest out

But they were not.There was mankind before Adam and Eve too.They were just a new generation of them.

[AdamS]

I dont know what " you " should do about it , but I only know that my country should introduce again capital punishment , I dont care what are you going to do about it - West is not normal since Fall of Berlin Wall , I only know what should do my country about it , and not just for incest , capital punishment for killers , pedophiles , drug dealers , drug users , for all types of criminals ...

Kill anyone who makes a mistake... Sounds smart n reasonable.

Love is love, if it's mutual n sober, who are we to judge?

[Bmble_B]

I think that incest is very wrong. It just doesn't seem normal to do that with a family member.

[Vlerchan]

As long as all parties are consenting adults who don't plan on reproducing, I don't see anything wrong with it.
I have two questions:

1, what do you believe should happen to the couples who plan on reproducing?

2, do you also believe that individuals with heritable diseases shouldn't be allowed to reproduce?

[Dennis98]

Kill anyone who makes a mistake... Sounds smart n reasonable.

Love is love, if it's mutual n sober, who are we to judge?


Again , I dont care what are you or someone other think about it ... I expressed my opinion , from my signature you can see that I am extreme rightist - so dont think that I am going to write in positive about incest , firstly because religious aspect , second , from my political view aspect ... You asked who we are to judge , well , every country exist because of people , not people because country , so , country that allows incest and other awful things without some kind of punishment is weak , so , every strong country has capital punishment and their society is often exact example of healthy country with healthy society ...

[Vlerchan]

country that allows incest and other awful things without some kind of punishment is weak.
What makes it 'awful'.

I'm also confused as to why you believe killing people is the best way to solve a problem but that's for another thread.

[Gamma Male]

I have two questions:

1, what do you believe should happen to the couples who plan on reproducing?
Nothing, I just don't think it's ethical of them if they know the child's life is going to be miserable.

2, do you also believe that individuals with heritable diseases shouldn't be allowed to reproduce?

I don't think they should be banned from reproducing, but I still believe it to be unethical of them. But me thinking it's unethical doesn't equal me thinking it should be illegal. I don't think it would be very feasible to stop them from reproducing without an extreme invasion of privacy. And what would we do if they do reproduce? Force the mom to get an abortion?

[nikkissippi121]

I can't say I'm in support of it, but I think any two (or more) adults (whatever the legal definition is in their area, usually 18+) who are able to, and do, consent to it, should be able to do what they want sexually.

[plebble]

Animals do it, humans are animals... I can see how it is morally wrong and I completely understand why people think it's wrong... but I think it should be allowed as long as it isn't abusive.

I think parent-child is wrong, but I think siblings is more ok... I don't really know. I'd never do it.

[AdamS]

Again , I dont care what are you or someone other think about it ... I expressed my opinion , from my signature you can see that I am extreme rightist - so dont think that I am going to write in positive about incest , firstly because religious aspect , second , from my political view aspect ... You asked who we are to judge , well , every country exist because of people , not people because country , so , country that allows incest and other awful things without some kind of punishment is weak , so , every strong country has capital punishment and their society is often exact example of healthy country with healthy society ...

Yeah opinion expressed without being able to discuss based on reason = ignorance.

Because of freedom of speech, you are allowed to talk ignorantly, but that is not the intention. The intention is so people with different views can discuss reasonably and grow from it. Balance...

Religion, well there's more than one, is your's right? I wasn't aware of any parties having political views on incest.

Laws, well laws are different in different countries. You said you disagree with the law in your country, so your opinion is a personal one.

America has capital punishment. The scandinavian countries don't. I am pretty sure the scandinavian ones come above america in happiest and healthiest countries to live. Less crime, less gun violence, less murder. So how does executin criminals help???

You are entitled to your opinion, but you state it as fact.

As for the judging others part: afaik you're not a lawmaker so maybe leave the laws to them? And you're not god, so maybe leave the religious judging to him/her/it.

[ConsiderMeDead]

well in creation we r all brothers n sisters so everyone tht is having sex in the world is having incest

[gothy]

It is wrong. On many levels.

[Dennis98]

Yeah opinion expressed without being able to discuss based on reason = ignorance.

Because of freedom of speech, you are allowed to talk ignorantly, but that is not the intention. The intention is so people with different views can discuss reasonably and grow from it. Balance...

Religion, well there's more than one, is your's right? I wasn't aware of any parties having political views on incest.

Laws, well laws are different in different countries. You said you disagree with the law in your country, so your opinion is a personal one.

America has capital punishment. The scandinavian countries don't. I am pretty sure the scandinavian ones come above america in happiest and healthiest countries to live. Less crime, less gun violence, less murder. So how does executin criminals help???

You are entitled to your opinion, but you state it as fact.

As for the judging others part: afaik you're not a lawmaker so maybe leave the laws to them? And you're not god, so maybe leave the religious judging to him/her/it.

And so , what now ... What do you want to say m you want to discourage me from my opinion about that sick shit ... Anyway , rest of your post is not important to me , because I dont care about your text , I will approve that country without capital punishment is weak , because behind every strong country is strong law , anyway , you have example of sick Americans that just enter in school with gun killing everybody around , that is because weak law ( except Texas and few states ) , so , have you ever saw something like that for example in Iran or Saudi Arabia or Belarus ... About my opinion of my country law , my country is scared of my people , because if there would be referendum for introducing capital punishment again , about 60+ % would be for it , only thing that prevent us from referendum is because my country is near to enter in NATO and EU ... If there would not be such situation , be sure that we would demand that referendum ... About religion judging , who you are to tell me that I am not good , anyway , gay like can never understand religion , because you are cursed by every religion ... And last thing , if you want to debate with me about capital punishment , create new thread about it ...

[Vlerchan]

What do you want to say m you want to discourage me from my opinion about that sick shit ...
I just want you to justify why you feel it should be banned?

I personally find far-right views disgusting but I don't believe that we should kill people who engage in advocating far-right views.

---

Your argument about strong law, strong country is also quite fallacious but I'm not going to get off-topic explaining why.

[Dennis98]

I just want you to justify why you feel it should be banned?

I personally find far-right views disgusting but I don't believe that we should kill people who engage in advocating far-right views.

---

Your argument about strong law, strong country is also quite fallacious but I'm not going to get off-topic explaining why.

Well , this debate is more and more going far , this debate about capital punishment is for new thread anyway ... Same as you see rightist political view disgusting , I also see socialism disgusting , so we must accept our differences .. And I dont know why always when I post something there is always 10+ quotes about my post , I really dont understand , question about this thread was what do we think about incest , I wrote that I see it sick and that because persons that commit incest there should be capital punishment , I really dont see WTF is always wrong when I write something , I have my personal opinion and no one is going to change it , and I still dont understand why always is there someone who examine my view about something ?!

[Vlerchan]

so we must accept our differences ..
Yes, my point is why are you not applying this to adults in incestuous relationships?

---

Off-topic but I'll respond anyway:

I really dont see WTF is always wrong when I write something
Being quoted doesn't mean your view is wrong, it means its interesting.

and I still dont understand why always is there someone who examine my view about something ?!
The point of this subforum is that we debate the views posted.

I don't know what happens in other subforums, because I barely if ever read outside here, but I know that's what's supposed to happen in ROTW.

[Pulp501]

I don't think anyone should be ridiculed for what they are attracted to. Even things like incest or pedophilia, or zoophilia, or necrophilia. However, actually performing some of those acts are different. With Incest, I don't think it should be allowed because there's always a risk of getting pregnant and the child could be seriously messed up. But, I'm not sure if the government has any right at all to tell two consenting adults they can't have sex in the privacy of their home. And what about gay incest? There's no chance of reproduction, so is that okay, while straight isn't? The way I see it is, even if it's illegal, people will do it in secret if they really want to and it's probably best that they do.

[AdamS]

I really dont see WTF is always wrong when I write something , I have my personal opinion and no one is going to change it , and I still dont understand why always is there someone who examine my view about something ?!

Until you learn not to talk crap, get used to people disagreeing with you.

Just because someone tells you, you are talking crap...does not mean they wish for you to change your opinion. Sometimes it is just done to point out to you the crap you are talking.

If you continuously talk crap, you will get called on it. It seems like this is something you need to get used to for the rest of your life.

I am quite amazed people are allowed to go around telling gay people they are cursed.

Also to refer to your last attack quote post of me. Concerning religion i said you were not god, so leave it to your god to judge. I did not say you were not good, your posts do that for me.

[saea97]

Incest doesn't automatically cause genetic problems in offspring, as so many of the (quite disturbing) posts in this thread imply. If both sexual partners share a gene that can cause deformities, then the child may inherit them. This can happen in non-incestuous relationships as well; the only difference is that two related people are more likely to have some of the same genes*** (and thus, if one of them has a gene which can cause a genetic disease, the other is more likely to). I question whether this increase in probability - which is far from a guarantee - is enough to justify describing incestuous relations as 'sick', especially when foetuses can be screened for genetic conditions and appropriate action can be taken.

In short, no, I don't think there are valid ethical objections to incest.

***I am a layman, but fairly confident this is the gist of it.

[Lewis1234]

It's certainly taboo, but as long as you're not reproducing and you're not hurting yourself or anyone else (so, the implication included here is that both parties consent fully), I don't really see an issue.

My thoughts exactly!

[Perfectly Flawed]

If it's consensual I don't see the problem as long as there is no reproduction. If there is a higher chance of birth defects with births through incest then we shouldn't be risking that chance.

(While I think the increased risk of genetic deformities is not worth taking, it's important to note that the chances of deformities for babies conceived through incest is not as high as many seem to think).

[Silicate Wielder]

I think it's O.K. as long as it isn't close family (say second, 3rd cousins). If it's close family I've ehard it's terrible genetic wise.

It is, but I agree that as long as the person isnt close family, it's okay, if the person is not related to you by blood, its okay.

[liptonlee]

if it's a form of love then, oh well, different people have different modes of affections i guess

but the people should really think about the potential/guaranteed negative effects for offsprings (if any) from incest

[jacko]

I think it's wrong on many levels, but morally above all

[Broken Toy]

i dont judge a lot of people based on what they do but if they influence of people because of it then i have a problem with it. like if youre in love with your sister/brother/first or second cousin thats fine but if youre going to have kids then youre kind of selfish that you are risking the health of your child because you want a kid. if youre desperate then adopt, theres a reason having kids with first cousins is illegal, they need the different dna

[Gamma Male]

i dont judge a lot of people based on what they do but if they influence of people because of it then i have a problem with it. like if youre in love with your sister/brother/first or second cousin thats fine but if youre going to have kids then youre kind of selfish that you are risking the health of your child because you want a kid. if youre desperate then adopt, theres a reason having kids with first cousins is illegal, they need the different dna

Actually, having kids with a first cousin only increases the odds of the baby having a birth defect by a few percent. No more than having kids at the age of 35.

[Broken Toy]

Actually, having kids with a first cousin only increases the odds of the baby having a birth defect by a few percent. No more than having kids at the age of 35.

if a 100 couples between 1st cousins had kids, then that few percent could mean that 10 children had a defect rather than 1 or 2. it just doesnt seem fair to take that risk because a 'defect' could be anything

[Gamma Male]

if a 100 couples between 1st cousins had kids, then that few percent could mean that 10 children had a defect rather than 1 or 2. it just doesnt seem fair to take that risk because a 'defect' could be anything

Well it's not just cousins, any number of things can cause the risk of birth defects to go up. Certain occupations, genes, unhealthy lifestyles, etc. Would you consider it unethical for obese people or steel mill workers to reproduce?

[Broken Toy]

Well it's not just cousins, any number of things can cause the risk of birth defects to go up. Certain occupations, genes, unhealthy lifestyles, etc. Would you consider it unethical for obese people or steel mill workers to reproduce?

thats slightly different. i believe that if someone is 20 stone for reasons beyond their control they should lose weight of their own accord. we cant govern their whole lives. and the steel mill workers, i dont know where you're getting that from. i think the fact is these people CHOOSE to risk their childrens lives, i have a diseases running in my family that could kill, but its beyond our families control and was only found out about 20 years ago

[Typhlosion]

Let's please stay on topic and not mock each other's beliefs.

[darkangel91]

I think homosexual identical reinvest is okay, because they're like copies of each other, but otherwise it's creepy. No intergenerational stuff, definitely. I once felt horny for a cousin of mine, though I never told him - that seems fine to me. It's a complicated issue, not at all black and white like people often think.

I think it's only okay when it's not intergenerational, and preferably when it is homosexual, so that there's no risk of pregnancy... mostly though it's not appropriate.

Merged. ~Typhlosion

[Dimentio]

I think it honestly depends on everything!
Like, this to me especially so if you are identical twins, but i don't personally count being nude or masturbating around a sibling as incest, I think of that as comfort or just not caring, and if you're siblings, and like i said, especially twins, I see no issue in it, I do not do it personally, though i probably would if my brother said he is fine with it as it makes life so much easier XD And i think parent and child nudity is fine too, not the masturbation though, as, growing up it happened to me but it stopped when i hit my teen years, but this is when i see it as wrong!
Okay if there is anything sexual about it, like if you want to see the family member naked or get off to them getting off or being naked or sexually touch each other or do sexual things to each other/together, then that is when i am a bit like "Yeah this is kind of weird!" But as long as there are no sexual intentions and no physical touching in a sexual manner, who cares? It's two or more people doing what ever makes them happy so let them do it!
But then when it does become sexual and stuff, yeah, like, they're family, and that is just when i see it as weird haha

[Cognizant]

I usually try to keep an open mind and am not quick to judge people based on certain actions/preferences.

Incest is one of my many exceptions to that rule.

[dontfiguremeout]

It's wrong no matter what type of sex it is with your family members, even if it's not reproducing.

[DeadEyes]

It's certainly taboo, but as long as you're not reproducing and you're not hurting yourself or anyone else (so, the implication included here is that both parties consent fully), I don't really see an issue.

My thoughts exactly.

[CosmicNoodle]

I know someone who is supposedly a product of incest.....he is nowhere near right in the head...

I'm not against it so long as they don't plan on reproducing, they are concerning adults, let the fuckers do as they wish. I don't see why its any of anyone else's business.

[DeadEyes]

I know someone who is supposedly a product of incest.....he is nowhere near right in the head...

It doesn't necessarily mean it has to do with it.

[CosmicNoodle]

It doesn't necessarily mean it has to do with it.

It doesnt, but it's definately an odd coincidence...

[DeadEyes]

It doesnt, but it's definately an odd coincidence...

If everyone who are messed up would be products of insest, we would almost all be (maybe creationism makes sense afterall).

[Gamma Male]

If everyone who are messed up would be products of insest, we would almost all be (maybe creationism makes sense afterall).

Assuming you believe in the Adam and Eve orgin myth.

[CosmicNoodle]

If everyone who are messed up would be products of insest, we would almost all be (maybe creationism makes sense afterall).

I'm not saying everyoen whos messed up is the product os it, I'm saying that its a coincidence that he is the product of it and that he's not right. And no, creationism is nowhere near right, it's the oposite end of right, in my opinion.

[DeadEyes]

Assuming you believe in the Adam and Eve orgin myth.

I'm not saying everyoen whos messed up is the product os it, I'm saying that its a coincidence that he is the product of it and that he's not right. And no, creationism is nowhere near right, it's the oposite end of right, in my opinion.

I should've used my sarcasm font.

[CosmicNoodle]

If only sarcasm was a font, on facebook when me and my friends want to get across sarcasm we put (S) before and after the sentance

[DeadEyes]

If only sarcasm was a font, on facebook when me and my friends want to get across sarcasm we put (S) before and after the sentance

I prefer to just enjoy watching people not getting it.

[CosmicNoodle]

I prefer to just enjoy watching people not getting it.

Naaa, winds me up when people don't get it.

[DeadEyes]

Naaa, winds me up when people don't get it.

It just amuses me.

[Gaz1414]

do you think incest is wrong or are you neutral about it

To be honest I have never had sex with a family member but have fantasised about it! If the opertunity arose I would defo give it a try! I don't care what you say! I would **** both my mum and my sis cos they are fit!

[Buddy 912]

My gf is/was abused by her father. She tells me that it seemed wrong at first but now she is more than OK with it. Is there something wrong here? Any advice?

[allisonmyers]

Theres a fine line with that and its so fine its tough to see if you cross it

[DeadEyes]

Theres a fine line with that and its so fine its tough to see if you cross it

Not so fine: parents shouldn't have sex with their kids.

[James Dean]

Between step cousins and step brothers and sisters and anything "step" to where it isn't blood related. I think depending on how things came to be and what the situation was, I wouldn't accept or understand it, but I wouldn't be like "those people are wacko".

Anything else, hell no. Incest in my opinion is just a gross topic in my opinion.

[Uranus]

I believe it's wrong. Because....well shit, its family!
But I'm not going to stop them. After all it ain't my problem or business. And it's not me who'll get looked down upon

[darthearth]

Incest doesn't automatically cause genetic problems in offspring, as so many of the (quite disturbing) posts in this thread imply. If both sexual partners share a gene that can cause deformities, then the child may inherit them. This can happen in non-incestuous relationships as well; the only difference is that two related people are more likely to have some of the same genes*** (and thus, if one of them has a gene which can cause a genetic disease, the other is more likely to). I question whether this increase in probability - which is far from a guarantee - is enough to justify describing incestuous relations as 'sick', especially when foetuses can be screened for genetic conditions and appropriate action can be taken.

In short, no, I don't think there are valid ethical objections to incest.

***I am a layman, but fairly confident this is the gist of it.

This. As far as I know genetic deformities don't increase significantly until multiple generations of incest. But go ahead and forget about reproduction for a while, there are plenty of other activities, not one person who claims incest is morally wrong on this thread has presented a reasoned case.

Really, is there anyone who can defend non-reproductive incest as being wrong on reasoned grounds here? I would love to hear an argument. Arguments are what this thread is for not "oh, that's gross" comments. Personally I have yet to see a compelling case to consider all forms of incest sex to be immoral, so I call it it moral indeed unless shown otherwise.

[voodoo doughnut]

i think it's sick

[Vlerchan]

Personally I have yet to see a compelling case to consider all forms of incest sex to be immoral, so I call it it moral indeed unless shown otherwise.
I'd consider the skewed power-relations inherent to cross-generational incestous relations to lend themselves to immorality.

[ethana512]

I think parents and kids is just wrong. I know this is weird but I think it's ok with a bro or sis if its gay since you can't get pregnant. I don't have a bro or anything I'm just saying that's what I think.

[DeadEyes]

I think parents and kids is just wrong. I know this is weird but I think it's ok with a bro or sis if its gay since you can't get pregnant. I don't have a bro or anything I'm just saying that's what I think.

I really don't see anything wrong with two brothers (as long as they are around the same age and both willing).
I bet you would love having such a brother Ethan, hehe.

[ksdnfkfr]

I really don't see anything wrong with two brothers (as long as they are around the same age and both willing).
I bet you would love having such a brother Ethan, hehe.

Me and my cousin share the bed and are the same age, and I'm gay....but there's just not that kind of feeling at all. So it's really hard for me to understand the idea two brothers feeling that way for each other.

[DeadEyes]

Me and my cousin share the bed and are the same age, and I'm gay....but there's just not that kind of feeling at all. So it's really hard for me to understand the idea two brothers feeling that way for each other.

Then again, you might share bed with a male friend who you don't find attractive. I don't think it has anything to do with being family or not.

[ksdnfkfr]

Then again, you might share bed with a male friend who you don't find attractive. I don't think it has anything to do with being family or not.

Good point. I guess I can see brothers being in love like that I suppose. Just can't see it with mine (almost brother).

[DeadEyes]

Good point. I guess I can see brothers being in love like that I suppose. Just can't see it with mine (almost brother).

What if you were attracted to him? Would you find it disturbing because he's your cousin?

[ksdnfkfr]

What if you were attracted to him? Would you find it disturbing because he's your cousin?

Well that and the relationship we've had all these years. I mean I'm really glad that when puberty started I didn't start feeling the way about my cousin the same as I did my best friend. And it seems like the type of love I have for my cousin is more pure if that makes sense.

[DeadEyes]

Well that and the relationship we've had all these years. I mean I'm really glad that when puberty started I didn't start feeling the way about my cousin the same as I did my best friend. And it seems like the type of love I have for my cousin is more pure if that makes sense.

Sure, it's brotherly love.
But just like friendly love, it can turn into romantic love, but it doesn't have to be love, just sexual attraction.

[ksdnfkfr]

Sure, it's brotherly love.
But just like friendly love, it can turn into romantic love, but it doesn't have to be love, just sexual attraction.

And there's probably brothers who do stuff with each other just because it feels good and it's fun. I have to admit, it would be convenient. But I'll tell my cousin what you said, just to make him uncomfortable :P

[DeadEyes]

And there's probably brothers who do stuff with each other just because it feels good and it's fun. I have to admit, it would be convenient. But I'll tell my cousin what you said, just to make him uncomfortable :P

You know, even if it's not romantic love, I think it's better if two brothers actually have sex rather than hate each other and try to hurt each other all the time.
And your cousin probably will just think it's gross.

[ethana512]

I really don't see anything wrong with two brothers (as long as they are around the same age and both willing).
I bet you would love having such a brother Ethan, hehe.

lol maybe I would. Idk like I say I don't have a bro at all so maybe in real life it's not really that sexy, like Ezra says with his cuz.

[DeadEyes]

lol maybe I would. Idk like I say I don't have a bro at all so maybe in real life it's not really that sexy, like Ezra says with his cuz.

So if there was another cute teen boy your age in your home who you even see nude sometimes and know that he likes to play around with boys, you don't think you would be tempted?

[ksdnfkfr]

You know, even if it's not romantic love, I think it's better if two brothers actually have sex rather than hate each other and try to hurt each other all the time.

Well that's one way of looking at it.

And your cousin probably will just think it's gross.

He already gave his opinion about it in this thread:

i think it's sick

And I still pretty much still think it's probably wrong.

[ethana512]

So if there was another cute teen boy your age in your home who you even see nude sometimes and know that he likes to play around with boys, you don't think you would be tempted?

Maybe. I mean it sounds good haha I just know a lot ppl say thinking about sex with a bro or sis is a total turn off. So idk if it would think about my bro that way if I had one.

[DeadEyes]

Maybe. I mean it sounds good haha I just know a lot ppl say thinking about sex with a bro or sis is a total turn off. So idk if it would think about my bro that way if I had one.

Well, I don't have a brother either, but if I did have a cute one who is willing, I would be turned on for sure, hehe.

[Cangirl]

I think it might be a bit more on how u define incest. Does masturbating with a sibling count? or does it have to be oral some other sex? what about playing doctor ? i know a lot of sibs who've done that.

[voodoo doughnut]

You know, even if it's not romantic love, I think it's better if two brothers actually have sex rather than hate each other and try to hurt each other all the time.
And your cousin probably will just think it's gross.

i do think it's gross

I think it might be a bit more on how u define incest. Does masturbating with a sibling count? or does it have to be oral some other sex? what about playing doctor ? i know a lot of sibs who've done that.

siblings masturbating at the same time if they were watching porn together wouldn't be incest. but if one was masturbating the other it would be.

Use the 'edit'/'mulitquote' buttons. Do not double post. ~Typhlosion

[Typhlosion]

As I feared, this thread has gone way too personal.

:locked: