View Full Version : Are cut guys les sensitive?
Lord Of Curiosity
April 13th, 2014, 08:09 AM
Hey,
I've been wondering about the difference of uncut and cut penises.
The first thought I got was like this: if a cut guy has less foreskin, does that mean that his penis is less sensitive? Without foreskin, his penis head would constantly be touching his pants and if they are used to that, wouldn't that affect his sensitivity of the pleasure given with sexual acts (apart from oral)? What do you guys think?
ksdnfkfr
April 13th, 2014, 08:12 AM
The glans of an circumcised penis develops a thicker membrane to make up for not being protected by a foreskin, so it's somewhat less sensitive.
Liii
April 13th, 2014, 08:35 AM
As far as I know, it gets less sensitive after some time because the glans is no longer protected by the foreskin.
Ethe14
April 13th, 2014, 08:38 AM
It's less sensitive yes but during masturbation I never noticed the difference.
NeuroTiger
April 13th, 2014, 08:54 AM
Certainly it's somewhat less sensitive...
...but the pleasure remains ;)
pjones
April 13th, 2014, 09:03 AM
since i was cut at birth i wouldn't know the difference, but as others have said here and in other posts, and from what i have read else where a cut penis should be less sensitive
Lord Of Curiosity
April 13th, 2014, 09:08 AM
Thanks guys, I'm uncut myself btw.
mychalo
April 13th, 2014, 10:25 AM
I'm uncut and very sensitive
The captain
April 13th, 2014, 10:31 AM
I'm uncut so idk the difference , but trust me I'm very sensitive
Canadian Dream
April 13th, 2014, 10:40 AM
I've heard uncut penises are sensitive, and what you say about cut penises being in contact with their underwear makes sense but I'm not sure about sexual acts.
Rain Boy
April 13th, 2014, 11:12 AM
It's less sensitive yes but during masturbation I never noticed the difference.
I really haven't noticed any difference in my enjoyment level either. I do remember extreme sensitivity when I was loosening up my foreskin and exposing the glans for the first time, but over time that wore off, even with foreskin covering it.
conker0118
April 13th, 2014, 12:06 PM
depends
nklarke
April 13th, 2014, 12:45 PM
According to MOST of the cut guys who got cut when teens or adults (and they're the only ones who really could compare) NO, there is NOT difference, NO, IT'S NOT less sensitive.
Luke91
April 13th, 2014, 08:25 PM
Before I was cut at 13, my glans were too sensitive in my opinion. I jumped whenever I touched it because it was almost like getting shocked. Now that I am circumcised, I can play with it all I want and it feels great. If I lost some sensitive when I was cut, there is still plenty left. Now I can jo and enjoy it all.
MrIan
April 13th, 2014, 11:40 PM
Hey,
I've been wondering about the difference of uncut and cut penises.
The first thought I got was like this: if a cut guy has less foreskin, does that mean that his penis is less sensitive? Without foreskin, his penis head would constantly be touching his pants and if they are used to that, wouldn't that affect his sensitivity of the pleasure given with sexual acts (apart from oral)? What do you guys think?
Yea.
german_boy
April 14th, 2014, 04:55 AM
Yes, it got less sensitive. But just a little bit
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.