USA Circumcision Survey

[Petyr]

Hi all, curious to see how age, state, and circumcision status is spread across US states. Heard the west is less circumcised...

1. Age:
2. State:
3. Cut or Uncut:
4. Were you born in the USA?

[Petyr]

1. Age: 16
2. State: NY
3. Cut or Uncut: Circumcised

[benjs5000]

Age: 13
State: NC
Cut or uncut: cut

[logan2002]

16
Michigan
Cut

[abcdeqwe]

17
IN
Cut

[jamie_n5]

1. Age:20
2. State:MN
3. Cut or Uncut: Uncut

[Falcons_11]

Age: 16
State: TX
Uncut.

[Zachary G]

1. Age: 19
2. State: MD
3. Cut or Uncut: cut

[sportskid2006]

13
CA
Cut

[JohnC]

1. Age: 18
2. State: TX
3. Cut or Uncut: Cut

[kro814]

age 14 and cut

[scott2002]

1. Age: 17
2. State: OH
3. Cut or Uncut: Circumcised

I see the results so far are 80% circumcised in the USA. For what I've seen in my school and elsewhere. I'd say that percentage is even a little low. I'd put it closer to 90% circumcised. but we also still have very few recent immigrants in my school, too.

I think the survey would be even more interesting if you asked not what state you're from, but if you were BORN in the USA or not. (I bet for boys born in the USA, the percentage would be much higher than 80%.)

[Petyr]

1. Age: 17
2. State: OH
3. Cut or Uncut: Circumcised

I see the results so far are 80% circumcised in the USA. For what I've seen in my school and elsewhere. I'd say that percentage is even a little low. I'd put it closer to 90% circumcised. but we also still have very few recent immigrants in my school, too.

I think the survey would be even more interesting if you asked not what state you're from, but if you were BORN in the USA or not. (I bet for boys born in the USA, the percentage would be much higher than 80%.)

Oh ur so right. That would make more sense. I will edit the question cause yeah i think the percentage is higher than 80 cause i never seen anyone that wasnt cut and was born in my area.

[Jermy]

1. Age: 13
2. State: TX
3. Cut or Uncut: Cut
4. Were you born in the USA? Yes

[Tsall]

1. Age: 14
2. State:
3. Cut or Uncut: cut
4. Were you born in the USA? Yes

But I wasn’t circumcised originally. My brother isn’t. I only was because my foreskin wasn’t growing as my penis was growing, so it was just tight and painful.

[Gay Paul]

1. Age: 17
2. State: OH
3. Cut or Uncut: Circumcised

I see the results so far are 80% circumcised in the USA. For what I've seen in my school and elsewhere. I'd say that percentage is even a little low. I'd put it closer to 90% circumcised. but we also still have very few recent immigrants in my school, too.

I think the survey would be even more interesting if you asked not what state you're from, but if you were BORN in the USA or not. (I bet for boys born in the USA, the percentage would be much higher than 80%.)

I wonder why no American politician has eggs to push through the congress, or what your parliament is called, a law prohibiting circumcision, without no valid medical or religious reasons. I think Norway or Denmark make it as law, most countries have rightly banned the "circumcision" of women, like most countries it prohibited the docking (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Docking_(animal)) of dogs, and yet the dick of a helpless little boy is more important than the ears and tails of dogs. :-(

80% of the circumcised population?
Does this mean that 80% of Americans are Jews or Muslims? :D
(I'm sorry I did not want to offend anyone)

I am curious where it came from, what is the genesis? and why it is still in the 21st century

[Petyr]

****

[MasonBA]

1. Age: 14
2. State: CT
3. Cut or Uncut: Uncut
4. Were you born in the USA? yes
would estimate greater than 90% of the boys at my school i've seen in the shower are cut

[Gay Paul]

1. Age: 14
2. State: CT
3. Cut or Uncut: Uncut
4. Were you born in the USA? yes
would estimate greater than 90% of the boys at my school i've seen in the shower are cut

Did you willing to be cut as other? Would you agree if parents decide to cut you now? :D

[whatsuplol]

1. Age: 15
2. State: massachusetts
3. Cut or Uncut: cut
4. Were you born in the USA? yep

[scott2002]

80% of the circumcised population?
Does this mean that 80% of Americans are Jews or Muslims? :D
(I'm sorry I did not want to offend anyone)

I am curious where it came from, what is the genesis? and why it is still in the 21st century

When I wqas going through puberty my dad was still with me,a nd we had a few very good conversations. And I did ask him, "Why did you and mom decide to have me circumcised?" His answer was that it's always been "like father like son". I hear it was pretty much ALL boys in the USA in the 1940's and 1950's when my grandpa was born, and it has continued ever since.

I know I have no complaints about my cut cock. It works fine and gives me tons of pleasure, and I can't imagine having a foreskin could make it feel even better. But I'll never really know for sure.

[Petyr]

****

[SouthernDude]

1. Age: 14
2. State: KY
3. Cut or Uncut: Cut
4. Were you born in the USA? Mhmm

[teeeem]

1. Age: 20
2. State: CA
3. Cut or Uncut: half-cut
4. Were you born in the USA? yes

[Gay Paul]

Absolutely. But im already cut so nothing left to cut. But i would definitely have it done if i wasnt, and i am definitely circumcising my sons if i have boys one day.

What a brainwashing, for fuck sake!

Maybe America is actually a superpower and the best country on earth, but I'm glad that in that case, I do not live there

I am, in a sense, circumcised, but only partly because I had phimosis and recurrent urinary tract infections, but most of the foreskin is where the surgeon should have removed only what was too much.

So if you had sons, would you circumcise them immediately after birth?
Or maybe you'd wait until the age was right, and ask about their fucking opinion, right?

I once even read in some forum, I think that it was even probably VT about Teen Boy whose parents wanted to circumcise, just because of it, purely for an esthetic reason! I have only one advise for such cases.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B177YS0YGyY

And maybe given fact we talk about America, ask for help from Smith and Wesson :D

[Petyr]

What a brainwashing, for fuck sake!

Maybe America is actually a superpower and the best country on earth, but I'm glad that in that case, I do not live there

I am, in a sense, circumcised, but only partly because I had phimosis and recurrent urinary tract infections, but most of the foreskin is where the surgeon should have removed only what was too much.

So if you had sons, would you circumcise them immediately after birth?
Or maybe you'd wait until the age was right, and ask about their fucking inion, right?

I once even read in some forum, I think that it was even probably VT about Teen Boy whose parents wanted to circumcise, just because of it, purely for an esthetic reason! I have only one advise for such cases.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B177YS0YGyY

And maybe given fact we talk about America, ask for help from Smith and Wesson :D

Sorry but this thread is not for intactivists, arguments, or opinions. It is an informative poll. Please don’t write on here again.

Anyone know how to delete his posts? Or a mod?

[MasonBA]

Did you willing to be cut as other? Would you agree if parents decide to cut you now? :D

My dad has his foreskin and he refused to let me and my brother be cut. I'd never do to my son if I ever have one unless it was absolutely required for a serious medical reason

[Petyr]

My dad has his foreskin and he refused to let me and my brother be cut. I'd never do to my son if I ever have one unless it was absolutely required for a serious medical reason

Hve u seen him and asked why?

[Gay Paul]

My dad has his foreskin and he refused to let me and my brother be cut. I'd never do to my son if I ever have one unless it was absolutely required for a serious medical reason


And this is the correct attitude! :)

Not to mention how many unforgettable sensual experiences can give fun with the foreskin :D

[scott2002]

What a brainwashing, for fuck sake!
...but I'm glad that in that case, I do not live there

I can't disagree for your reason. Even though I'm circumcised I keep thinking that God designed our penises to HAVE a foreskin, and there probably is a good reason for it, but I don't actually miss not having my foreskin.


I am, in a sense, circumcised, but only partly because I had phimosis and recurrent urinary tract infections, but most of the foreskin is where the surgeon should have removed only what was too much.

I have seen and read and heard LOADS more comments from boys and men who, like you, have had problems BECAUSE of their foreskin. Plus, a circumcised penis IS easier to keep clean.

So if you had sons, would you circumcise them immediately after birth? Or maybe you'd wait until the age was right, and ask about their fucking opinion, right?

If you asked 100 uncircumcised boys, let's say between the ages of 7 and 17, and NOT having any problems with their foreskin if they'd want to get voluntarily circumcised, I bet 99 of them would cringe and yell, "NO!!!". I'm glad it was done to me when I was an infant and I didn't know it was being done to me. But I can't disagree that it's unofrtunate that us boys were not given the opportunity to decide for ourselves if we wanted to be mutilated (and that's what it is).

[Gay Paul]

I can't disagree for your reason. Even though I'm circumcised I keep thinking that God designed our penises to HAVE a foreskin, and there probably is a good reason for it, but I don't actually miss not having my foreskin.




I have seen and read and heard LOADS more comments from boys and men who, like you, have had problems BECAUSE of their foreskin. Plus, a circumcised penis IS easier to keep clean.



If you asked 100 uncircumcised boys, let's say between the ages of 7 and 17, and NOT having any problems with their foreskin if they'd want to get voluntarily circumcised, I bet 99 of them would cringe and yell, "NO!!!". I'm glad it was done to me when I was an infant and I didn't know it was being done to me. But I can't disagree that it's unofrtunate that us boys were not given the opportunity to decide for ourselves if we wanted to be mutilated (and that's what it is).

This should be the individual decision of each boy and man, as I mentioned earlier, I was circumcised in a sense, and unfortunately I remember the procedure, but only partially, the surgeon removed only a piece of the foreskin, and most remained.

Many countries have banned female circumcision, and rightly so, why a male penis, does not have the same legal protection as vaginas :D, where is gender equality?

[Jeff1857]

. Age: 16
2. State: TN
3. Cut or Uncut: cut
4. Were you born in the USA? No. Germany (Dad was in military but he made sure I was circumcised). Brothers were born here and cut. I would say based off lockerroom and friends 95% of guys in my high school are cut.

[MasonBA]

Hve u seen him and asked why?

have seen him lots of times but never really asked him why he still has his, maybe my grandpa does

[german_boy]

Many countries have banned female circumcision, and rightly so, why a male penis, does not have the same legal protection as vaginas :D, where is gender equality?

Cause female "circumcision" isn't nearly the same as male. There are several types of FGM (that's what you should rather call it). Some types (that are mainly done within some African countries) include the (partial) removal of the girls' clitoris, sometimes they even narrow the vaginal opening.

Comparing male circumcision to that is purely ridiculous. Looking at the human anatomy, the removal of the clitoris could be compared to the (partial) removal of the head. Some of them are no longer able to feel sexual pleasure. Boys "just" have their foreskins removed (girls have a clitoral hood).

I understand that not everybody is pro-circumcision and there are reasons against medically non indicated circumcisions but comparing male circ to FGM is completely wrong. You can't compare it. It'd talk down the atrocities that some young women and girls suffer from.

[red04]

1. Age: 15
2. State: Massachusetts
3. Cut or Uncut: Cut
4. Were you born in the USA? Yes

[Gay Paul]

Cause female "circumcision" isn't nearly the same as male. There are several types of FGM (that's what you should rather call it). Some types (that are mainly done within some African countries) include the (partial) removal of the girls' clitoris, sometimes they even narrow the vaginal opening.

Comparing male circumcision to that is purely ridiculous. Looking at the human anatomy, the removal of the clitoris could be compared to the (partial) removal of the head. Some of them are no longer able to feel sexual pleasure. Boys "just" have their foreskins removed (girls have a clitoral hood).

I understand that not everybody is pro-circumcision and there are reasons against medically non indicated circumcisions but comparing male circ to FGM is completely wrong. You can't compare it. It'd talk down the atrocities that some young women and girls suffer from.

Maybe the comparison is not really out of place but the foreskin has 8,000 nerve endings, touch receptors, so removing without a valid medical opinion could be considered mutilation.

I also wonder if anyone has heard of something like foreskin business, no? Then read it to yourself.

https://www.vice.com/en_au/article/43bxgm/the-beauty-industry-is-part-of-a-baby-foreskin-flesh-trade-anti-circumcision-activists-warn

[Gay Paul]

Both Boys and Girls need the same level of protection of their vital organs :D

[german_boy]

Maybe the comparison is not really out of place but the foreskin has 8,000 nerve endings, touch receptors, so removing without a valid medical opinion could be considered mutilation.

That's not true. You don't cut the entire foreskin. Especially in the USA where high styles are the most common, about half of the nerve endings are preserved. I see the point but the comparison is out of the place (I get your point, though). I agree both can be considered mutilation but that's all that both have in common.

[JayA]

1. Age: 16
2. State: KS/MO/NE/IA
3. Cut or Uncut: Cut
4. Were you born in the USA? Yes

And I am surprised it's only at 77% cut when I voted -- would have expected to be over 90% cut.

[Petyr]

Numbers seem to be around what 80/20, although reports were that percentages were dropping cuz some states insurance doesn't cover it anymore

[Cycler21]

1. Age: 16
2. State: California
3. Cut or Uncut: Uncut
4. Were you born in the USA? Yes

[Djdj112]

1. Age: 16
2. State: CA
3. Cut or Uncut: Cut
4. Were you born in the USA? Yes

[edog]

1. Age: 16
2. State: Utah
3. Cut or Uncut:cut
4. Were you born in the USA? Yes

[Morgan_15]

1. Age: 15
2. State: KY
3. Cut or Uncut: Uncut
4. Were you born in the USA? Yes

I agree the percentage I have seen are like 90%. I only have one friend that I know is also uncut.

[Gay Paul]

That's not true. You don't cut the entire foreskin. Especially in the USA where high styles are the most common, about half of the nerve endings are preserved. I see the point but the comparison is out of the place (I get your point, though). I agree both can be considered mutilation but that's all that both have in common.


I still think it's barbaric, I know I can offend people of Jewish or Muslim origin with these words, and I'm sorry about that. I believe that circumcision should be allowed only for religious or medical reasons, even if it is, as you write, that in America most cases are the only circumcision, which only removes about half of the foreskin, but have or not have 4,000 nerve endings means something.
In my opinion, a male member deserves the same legal protection as a woman's fanny.

[cubebuilder]

1. Age: 15
2. State: in the east
3. Cut or Uncut: uncut
4. Were you born in the USA? yep

[heresjohnny]

I have seen and read and heard LOADS more comments from boys and men who, like you, have had problems BECAUSE of their foreskin. Plus, a circumcised penis IS easier to keep clean.

Is it really though? While in the diaper, the urethra is either covered up by foreskin or exposed to the contents in the diaper.

[Petyr]

I still think it's barbaric, I know I can offend people of Jewish or Muslim origin with these words, and I'm sorry about that. I believe that circumcision should be allowed only for religious or medical reasons, even if it is, as you write, that in America most cases are the only circumcision, which only removes about half of the foreskin, but have or not have 4,000 nerve endings means something.
In my opinion, a male member deserves the same legal protection as a woman's fanny.

Good for you. Please stop spamming our survey page. It is not meant to discuss this topic, but instead to create an idea of how this procedure is prevalent in different parts of the United States.

[george05013]

Private information

[Petyr]

Private information

Well yeah all ur other posts say ur from the uk in polls and stuff so i think you posted on the wrong poll, which screws up our percentages for US

[Petyr]

Bump

[Petyr]

Hi all, curious to see how age, state, and circumcision status is spread across US states. Heard the west is less circumcised...

1. Age:
2. State:
3. Cut or Uncut:
4. Were you born in the USA?

anymore ppl can help info?

[Impressionist1910]

1. Age: 19
2. State: PA
3. Cut or Uncut: cut
4. Were you born in the USA? Yes