Cut vs Uncut

[conradpjones]

I was told by a friend that uncut people are more likely to shoot cum than people who are cut. Is that true?

[ska8er]

I don't c if u r uncut that it makes a
difference but Im cut and I can shoot
sometimes over my shoulder. Maybe
guys that r uncut have more sensation
and it may cause them to shoot more-IDK

[ShineintheDark]

Can't think of any biological reason for why foreskin could affect cumming

[rgconrad23]

Can't think of any biological reason for why foreskin could affect cumming

I agree.

[teenboyNathan]

There isn't a correlation between dick types to shoot cum. You can either do it or you can't

[Red Light Bandit]

I don't think so

[Gazebo]

It would make literally no difference, so no that is certainly not true

[Maxbreak]

I dont think foreskin really makes a difference, other than being right over the pee hole at that moment. The best way to practice control over the musscle at the base of ur penis that contracts as u orgasm

[Lionsden04]

I can’t see it making too much difference, some people can shoot some can’t

[Jericho14]

Surely not true. Im cut but i always shoot cum

[gregz]

It doesn't matter, it will always depend on your mood.

[Jason2005]

I would say that being cut or uncut makes no difference. On most guys that are uncut, once we get hard our foreskin retracts and we look cut, it all depends on the person.

[MasonBA]

uncut and don't shoot, my cut friends do

[jamie_n5]

I seriously doubt that being circumcised or not makes a bit of difference whether or not a guy is able to shoot. It's just something that some guys can and can't do. It's nature.

[NigelG]

Most guys who were cut at birth or very young are more probable to shoot rather than dribble due to the urinary meatus (pee hole) closing up slightly from scarring which is caused by the forced separation of the foreskin from the glans as part of the procedure.

Guys with foreskins don't usually have this narrowing so will dribble unless they have a narrow urinary tract anyway.

It is also affected by the muscles that push the sperm along the tube and the pressure and strength of the prostate.

[JayA]

I was told by a friend that uncut people are more likely to shoot cum than people who are cut. Is that true?

I don't think that is true -- shooting for me is more how horny I am and how long/how many time recently I have jacked off. Don't think cut/uncut makes any difference.

[jamie_n5]

Most guys who were cut at birth or very young are more probable to shoot rather than dribble due to the urinary meatus (pee hole) closing up slightly from scarring which is caused by the forced separation of the foreskin from the glans as part of the procedure.

Guys with foreskins don't usually have this narrowing so will dribble unless they have a narrow urinary tract anyway.

It is also affected by the muscles that push the sperm along the tube and the pressure and strength of the prostate.

I totally disagree with this except for the last sentence that says about muscles and the prostate.

[Turbofan explosion]

From my understanding about the human body, there's really no correlation. Having a foreskin or not having one doesn't affect the muscles.

[damien]

seems made up to me

[german_boy]

It had various factors, mainly the prostate, how much you drink and also your mood. Having a skin or not doesn't affect it at all.

[Allstar49]

I don’t see any reason why being cut vs uncut would have any correlation with how far you can shoot. I’m cut and I shoot really far and I know uncut people who just dribble.

[NigelG]

If you are unsure of the validity of the statement, have a look online at restoration pages they cite the metus reduction as a consequence of early childhood circumcision. Think of a hosepipe, when you squeeze the end the pressure increases.

[hairy balls]

I don't think so

[Falcons_11]

I think that there's no connection in the amount of sperm one can shoot being cut or uncut. I believe it is many other factors that determine the amount of sperm that is ejaculated at any given time during masturbation. Circumcised or not has nothing to do with that.

[justa16yearoldaussie]

its the pelvic floor muscles as well as the accumulation of sperm that makes you shoot, not your circumcision status

[allgrownup]

of course it's not true lmao

[JQL---]

Not only is that untrue, but also kinda ridiculous. While many things COULD be possible (no strong scientific correlation), that makes no sense. The hypothesis would be near (or fully) impossible to test due to different people having different bodies. Whoever told you this needs to provide some evidence.