Would you have your son circumcised?

[Ttssman]

Would you have your son circumcised? I personally would.

[West Coast Sheriff]

yeah. I think most US doctors would advise/do that.

[Danuuuu]

I would have him circumcised just because I don’t want him to worry too much about cleaning underneath his foreskin.

[Zachary G]

I think I would have my son clipped.

[mick01]

This is a good question. I legit don't know. I'd like to see what some uncut guys say.

[CoryW]

I'm cut and I would have my son cut.

[Astronomerplanes]

I’d keep my son uncut because he should be able to enjoy his foreskin. It’s really not that difficult to clean you just slide it back and then the water runs over your glans in the shower.

[Bleppo]

I dont think as a father you should really have that power, id let them grow up to a reasonable age, show them all the info and leave it up to them

[NotSky]

I'm uncircumcised. I definitely wouldn't do it at birth. Although I live in the U.S., there aren't really that many benefits to circumcision. I'm not going to ignite a debate over the benefits. Don't get me wrong. There are some, but it's not that severe or important. It's their body, so I'd wait until puberty or when they get older and understand it. I wouldn't mind them doing it in their life as long as it's their decision.

[jamie_n5]

Hell fucking no way on earth would I circumcise my son.

[Ethan19]

Yeah I would

[abcdeqwe]

I would never allow that to happen when they have no say, if they decide they want it later then fine but at birth, no way.

[Turbofan explosion]

Heck no! Id leave him intact itd be his body not mine. I hate that i was cut and would not do that to him. According to studies less and less people are circumcising thei kids because they realise its not as benificial as drs say and that alot of insurance companies stopped paying for it cuz its now considered"cosmetic" and not medically necessary.
If he decided he wanted to be cut when he was older id support him and pay for it. But itd be his choice

I agree. I am probably going to wait until he is like 13 and ask him if he wants to. It is his body, his choice.

[CanadaBoy]

I think so, but depends I guess.

[Sean55]

I’m cut, and I’d never put my son through that.

[INACTIVEchaosphere]

It would be his choice when he was old enough to make it. People shouldn't have the right to choose something like that for someone else, whether its their child or not.

[CoryW]

Why is it that the most people on this thread is against being cut are not cut.
How can you say anything against it if you don't know what it like.

[Spooky_Eli]

Why is it that the most people on this thread is against being cut are not cut.
How can you say anything against it if you don't know what it like.why does anyone do anything, for there own personnel interests.

[SilverSM]

Hell to the heck no, I'm keeping that skin on him I'm happy with mine. Plus I was born in Mexico so its really more of a Mexican thing for me to not clip off the skin. If my son wants to do it whens he's older i'm making him fully consider it before going any further

[SilverSM]

Why is it that the most people on this thread is against being cut are not cut.
How can you say anything against it if you don't know what it like.

We're used to having the skin, we can't imagine living without it so we learned to be protective of it.

Plus, in American society having the foreskin seems unsanitary and disgusting causing lots of hate and unfair treatment to uncut guys. So we defend ourselves to help normalize the idea of guys being uncut nowadays.

[Agent X]

Not at birth. I'd let him decide when he's a teen. If he wants to get cut then I'll let him, but I think it should be his decision.

[NewLeafsFan]

Because I have a history of foreskin issues, I would get him circumcised as this things can be hereditary I think it would irresponsible not to

[azurzg]

As a general rule, I am not in favour of any kind of body mutilation.
Therefore, I would not have my son circumcised.

[JamesCam]

Why is it that the most people on this thread is against being cut are not cut.
How can you say anything against it if you don't know what it like.


I’ve been both.
I don’t mind that I’m cut , it was for medical reasons.
I know cut guys that wish they were uncut and I know uncut guys that wish they were cut. The difference, if you’re uncut you can choose to be cut. If you’re cut it’s too late , you can’t get it back.
I would never have my children done.
People who say cut is cleaner , if a guys hygiene it that bad .. I don’t think it’s gonna matter if he’s cut or not. We do have soap and water.
Less chance of UTI’s they are minimal anyway, girls get them more than boys we don’t perform surgery for that.
Less chance of HIV , check the stats for prevalence of HIV in first world countries .. the USA has highest rate of circumcision and one of the highest of HIV. Thinking it protects stops people using condoms. Educate your child.
Look like parent .. really . I sure as hell don’t wanna look like My dad thanks, I’m me.
I’ve seen botched circumcisions and I’ve seen circumcisions so tight it’s hurts. Would o risk that on my child .. hell no..
People have babies and say “look he’s perfect, so perfect let’s slice the end of his dick off with no anaesthetic”
Nah I’ll leave my kids unless they need or want it

[Shamal]

Nope, I'm happy with mine so I'd leave him intact

[SeansLittleBro]

No! No! No! No! No!

[Jaffe]

Definitely not.
I am uncut, and if I ever have sons, they will be uncut. If they want to get circumcised, they can make that decision themselves.

As to the 'cleanliness' that many guys refer to... my mum taught me when I was tiny, to clean under the foreskin in the bath. Never been an issue. 2 seconds per day. That seems to be a rather poor reason to do surgery.

[Brent2003]

No I would not do it. I would let him decide that later in life.

[user-999]

I'd leave it, just because it's the norm here + I don't see the reason for it.

[Chefzg]

Yes I would

[Don Giovanni]

Yeah probably.

[imanopenbook]

yeah. my dad and brother and me are so I guess I would.

[Inactive]

Probably not, i like being uncircumsized

[Jericho14]

Probably not even if im cut. Not the norm here in Australia. Might just let him decide in later life

[jamie_n5]

I would not and side with the people saying it would be my sons choice down the line if he chose to have it done.

[Skylark]

Absolutely not, I'd let him make his own decision once he's old enough to understand all the facts.

I also question why a lot of these guys on here would have their kids cut? Like can you give me a legit reason for it?

[ChaseDakoda]

Most or 99% of guys on this thread were born and then circumcised.at birth They dint know anybetter.
They never had a foreskin
I got mine, and foreskin is not for just masturbation.

Read this:
Just as the clitoris is covered by the prepuce (clitoral hood) to keep it sensitive and protected, so is the glans (head of the penis) covered by the prepuce (foreskin) to keep it sensitive and protected. The clitoris and glans (head of the penis) are internal organs, only meant to come out for “special” occasions. All animals, male and female, human and nonhuman, are born with a prepuce (clitoral hood/foreskin) because of the protection it offers our most sensitive and intimate body parts.

So no boy should be circumcised, girls arnt.

And keeping foreskin clean is no big deal.
This is a HOT TOPIC.

I WILL KEEP FINDING PROOF THAT thst are cut at birth got no idea of what your doung.

YOU DADS


You selfish dad's someday will be sued For mutilatingyour son's penis.

That is the main reason that I am going to college to be a lawyer. My specialty will be suing parents that mutilate their sons pene'us at birth. See you in court

I’ve been both.
I don’t mind that I’m cut , it was for medical reasons.
I know cut guys that wish they were uncut and I know uncut guys that wish they were cut. The difference, if you’re uncut you can choose to be cut. If you’re cut it’s too late , you can’t get it back.
I would never have my children done.
People who say cut is cleaner , if a guys hygiene it that bad .. I don’t think it’s gonna matter if he’s cut or not. We do have soap and water.
Less chance of UTI’s they are minimal anyway, girls get them more than boys we don’t perform surgery for that.
Less chance of HIV , check the stats for prevalence of HIV in first world countries .. the USA has highest rate of circumcision and one of the highest of HIV. Thinking it protects stops people using condoms. Educate your child.
Look like parent .. really . I sure as hell don’t wanna look like My dad thanks, I’m me.
I’ve seen botched circumcisions and I’ve seen circumcisions so tight it’s hurts. Would o risk that on my child .. hell no..
People have babies and say “look he’s perfect, so perfect let’s slice the end of his dick off with no anaesthetic”
Nah I’ll leave my kids unless they need or want it


GOOD POST
NOW YOU CUT GUYS READ THIS POST.

IT RESLLY IS NOT YOUR DECISION TO CIRCUMCISE YOUR CHILD.
1, To look like you
2, to wonder what it would of been like to have foreskin.
3. Insurance will not pay for it, so let your son decide, not you selfish person.

You know what? Maybe you cut dad's are just jelious because your son will grow up with PLEASURES you did not get.

Your sick 🤕🤕🤕🤕🤕🤕🤕🤕

[bonbon]

No, unless there is a health issue forcing to do it.

[ChaseDakoda]

Because I have a history of foreskin issues, I would get him circumcised as this things can be hereditary I think it would irresponsible not to

I m 18, you can't fool me, like the younger guys.

FORESKIN ISSUES ARE NOT HEREDITSRY.

What did you have?

PHIMOSIS is not heredietary, it can be treated.

[NewLeafsFan]

I m 18, you can't fool me, like the younger guys.

FORESKIN ISSUES ARE NOT HEREDITSRY.

What did you have?

PHIMOSIS is not heredietary, it can be treated.

The chances that a medical illness can be hereditary (which it can be) and the possible methods of treating it are strongly unrelated. I'm not trying to fool anyone, but you seem to be fooling yourself.

As mentioned, there are methods of treatment. Most of which that are non-surgical have terrible reviews. Many only slightly improve the problem, act as a temporary fix, or are very painful. The foreskin is a very delicate thing. Surgery on it that does not remove it is actually more painful and has a much more strenuous and lengthy recovery. Circumcision is usually a better option.

Some guys like to pretend that their foreskin is something really important for sexual pleasure. It really isn't unless you get circumcised really tightly there isn't much difference to how I do things and experience things.

[ChaseDakoda]

NewLeafsFan
I had Phimosis, I was given a,chance on my own decision to keep mine, maybe at a young age I wanted it more foe masturbation. So i used the creams and streaching devices. I think I got a beautiful penis and retractable foreskin. Mine is not tempory, it's permanent.

I have had many enjoyable years with my for skin and not for everything that use think guys needed for. It's just that I know my glans is covered it's nice and warm and it's got all the benefits that a and cut person will never have so because a person is cut at birth he can't really say that it's the best thing in the world because hes never experienced it before period why don't you why don't you agree with some people once in a while instead of fighting with them?
Quite putting people down cause they don't do want you think is better for them. And Phimosis is not passed done at berth or Is it hereditary? I can tell you that I've looked within a last 24 hours and there is no way that PHIMOSIS is not hereditary so wherever you're getting your information from Maybe you shouldn't make sure that it is correct before you say Phimosis Is hereditary because it is not.

My intentions are not to embarrass you my intentions are to the people that read this and wonder how can for moss's be hereditary and it's not as the last timing and a say this if you have a problem with me or a question why don't you pm me

[filipche]

NO for me the excuse about bigger hygiene and clening under foresking is stupid they just made it because they didnt know why are they cutting it

[ChaseDakoda]

There is a circumcision device called the PREPLEX.CON. No cutting no needles, once installed you got 24 hours to change your mind and have it cut off.

Great idea if parents would give there son the decision.

[Mikebillyboy]

In the UK unlike the USA, it is not common to have males circumcised at birth. There are no proven medical benifits from having it done. I am cut but thats because I had a tight foreskin when I was 11. As long as you can pull the foreskin back when needing to clean it there is no point to having it removed.

[ChaseDakoda]

In the UK unlike the USA, it is not common to have males circumcised at birth. There are no proven medical benifits from having it done. I am cut but thats because I had a tight foreskin when I was 12. As long as you can pull the foreskin back when needing to clean it there is no point to having it removed.

But why went options explained to You?
Like cream
Streaching rings?

Because you did not need circumcision, you coukd have had option, but all doctor wanted WAS YOUR MONEY.

RIGHT?

Contact information removed. ~Elysium

[TWDjacob]

I mean probably because health reasons doctors explain. It's easier as a baby to get and you can restore it when you're older if you really want, it works

[Alumni]

I'm uncut but I had a short bout with phimosis and it's really something that doctors put a lot of pressure on you to fix.

Managed to pull my foreskin down and everything was good.

If my son had any medical issues with their foreskin, I would snip it. But as long as he knows how to take care of it, I don't see why not.

[lolshanedawson]

I guess so. There's really no reason but I just feel like culturally I should.

[ryanblue]

No it’s only Muslims, Jews, and Americans that do that. Originally foreskin was taking away because it reduces the pleasure for men and so that boys don’t masturbate. There is no health benefit since it’s actually cleaner for penis to have some skin around the head to keep it moist and avoid any bacteria from coming in

[ChaseDakoda]

Thank you for supporting us Uncut teens.

I think I would have my son clipped.

I think the UNCUT guys have spoken. What's your opinion now?

Posts merged. Next time, please use the "Edit" button. ~Elysium

[Ttssman]

No it’s only Muslims, Jews, and Americans that do that. Originally foreskin was taking away because it reduces the pleasure for men and so that boys don’t masturbate. There is no health benefit since it’s actually cleaner for penis to have some skin around the head to keep it moist and avoid any bacteria from coming in

Are you circumcised?

[ChaseDakoda]

Are you circumcised?

I almost was, but I got cream and streaching rings, I had Phimosis. Doctors are too laze to help young teens save there foreskin, they like the money they get to circumcised.

I love mine now.

[Hermes]

Of course not. Why should I get a piece of his body chopped off where there is no medical need and as far as cosmetic appearance is concerned he can decide for himself when he's older? Even more so when to do so is not reversible - restoration is getting only an approximation of it back.

[Ttssman]

No it’s only Muslims, Jews, and Americans that do that. Originally foreskin was taking away because it reduces the pleasure for men and so that boys don’t masturbate. There is no health benefit since it’s actually cleaner for penis to have some skin around the head to keep it moist and avoid any bacteria from coming in

Are you uncircumcised?

[Zachary G]

I think the UNCUT guys have spoken. What's your opinion now?

No change... its just how I feel, but I guess that would be a decision I would really have to make with my partner when the time came.

[ChaseDakoda]

You will have to answer your son as to why he was cut.

[NewLeafsFan]

You will have to answer your son as to why he was cut.

Wonderful. I look forward to explaining that among other things and as to why he should have his sons circumcised as well. I would explain it, but I've explained it to you more then once.

NewLeafsFan
I had Phimosis, I was given a,chance on my own decision to keep mine, maybe at a young age I wanted it more foe masturbation. So i used the creams and streaching devices. I think I got a beautiful penis and retractable foreskin. Mine is not tempory, it's permanent.

I have had many enjoyable years with my for skin and not for everything that use think guys needed for. It's just that I know my glans is covered it's nice and warm and it's got all the benefits that a and cut person will never have so because a person is cut at birth he can't really say that it's the best thing in the world because hes never experienced it before period why don't you why don't you agree with some people once in a while instead of fighting with them?
Quite putting people down cause they don't do want you think is better for them. And Phimosis is not passed done at berth or Is it hereditary? I can tell you that I've looked within a last 24 hours and there is no way that PHIMOSIS is not hereditary so wherever you're getting your information from Maybe you shouldn't make sure that it is correct before you say Phimosis Is hereditary because it is not.

My intentions are not to embarrass you my intentions are to the people that read this and wonder how can for moss's be hereditary and it's not as the last timing and a say this if you have a problem with me or a question why don't you pm me

I'm not going to explain it again. I'm glad you think your limited internet research is more accurate than the specialists I've chatted with.

As far a keeping your glands warm, it sounds like you have a wonderful new business venture. About 33% of males are circumcised so you should have a large market for your new line of penis head sweaters. If you honestly believe that it is a problem, I honestly think you should go for it. Are you wondering why no one has invented it yet? BECAUSE NO ONE WOULD BUY IT.

If I had a problem with you, I would PM you. But I don't. Nothing wrong with friendly debate.

[Mikebillyboy]

But why went options explained to You?
Like cream
Streaching rings?

Because you did not need circumcision, you coukd have had option, but all doctor wanted WAS YOUR MONEY.

RIGHT?

Contact information removed. ~Elysium

No it was for the best to have it cut off as it was painfull and when I got hard it hurt, very tight. There were two options discussed with the doctor but the final decision came down to the surgeons. One thing discussed was a remolding, which meant cutting and reshaping but keeping the foreskin, but they said as I grow older it could become tight again, so better to have it cut. Also no it was not down to money as here in the UK we have the NHS (national health service) so it was free. Also cream would not have helped long term and streaching rings sound wrong and not medical but sexual.

[ChaseDakoda]

Everybody, I m so sorry for going off on you.
I have my personal reasons for not circuming boys, as I am tell I g in my posts, I will tell more of the truth in the days to follow.

[jerrion]

Its not our choice to do something like that , you should let the kid deside.....

[ChaseDakoda]

Its not our choice to do something like that , you should let the kid deside.....

You are right but teens figure that since they were circumcised at birth thats it the norm to be circumcised, problem is no one told them why they were circumcised.

[jerrion]

You are right but teens figure that since they were circumcised at birth thats it the norm to be circumcised, problem is no one told them why they were circumcised.

im uncircumsized and i believe its alot better like this cuz u have more protection

[ChaseDakoda]

My site was shut down, goes to show that the truth hurts.

There are so many more reasons you should not be cut, ya protection is one.

If you start a thread or want help starting one, let me know, I m done fighting.

[Turbofan explosion]

You are right but teens figure that since they were circumcised at birth thats it the norm to be circumcised, problem is no one told them why they were circumcised.

This might be a bit off topic, but. I forgot, was it that you were cut a few years ago?

[mikkeldk]

No. He should choose himself when he gets older - it is his body.
No one is really circumcised here in Denmark unless they are in a religion that requires it, which almost never happens. It is interesting to read the posts here by Americans - is it a norm in US?
There is a lot of talk about making it illegal for parents to circumcise their kids here in Denmark since they cannot give their consent at a young age.

[ChaseDakoda]

No. He should choose himself when he gets older - it is his body.
No one is really circumcised here in Denmark unless they are in a religion that requires it, which almost never happens. It is interesting to read the posts here by Americans - is it a norm in US?
There is a lot of talk about making it illegal for parents to circumcise their kids here in Denmark since they cannot give their consent at a young age.

Dad's in America have there sons circumcised because they do not read about what the foreskin does to a boy pre puberty and puberty all the way to death.
Dad's that were circumcised at birth are either upset at there parents so they get there sons circumcised. Or the dad wants there sons to be circumcised like they are, it's dumb cause there is no fashion show that I know of where father and son show off there penis.
The foreskin is not dirty, you learn young how to clean it, actually I know most us guys in school are cleaner than cut boys cause we use tissue to dab it off, in cut shake it and put it away.
When uncut masturbate we have natural lube, cut guys need lube and dobt say u don't, because y'all lije the gliding feeling with lube, well that's what a foreskin feels like.

AND SOME DAY YOUR SON WILL ASK WHY HE WAS CUT, ANSWER THAT WUTHOUT LYEING.

[Falcons_11]

Probably not. I'm not circumcised and neither is my dad. I wouldn't circumcise any of my sons.

[robin246]

Would you have your son circumcised? I personally would.

unless for some reason he needs to be cut then no i wouldn't im uncut and im perfectly fine

[Leon03]

Never

[Kovic2]

Why is it that the most people on this thread is against being cut are not cut.
How can you say anything against it if you don't know what it like.

I was circumcised as a teenager, done of my own accord. I know what life was like with both and I liked it, but that doesn't mean that my son will.

Unless there's a medical necessity I believe parents should leave decisions like this about their children's body up to them - when they're of the age that they can understand all the options and make their own choice.

Reasons like "A son should look like his father!" or "What if he get's teased!" or "I (or they) won't have time to clean it!" are stupid IMO.

[TheMagicPotato]

No. I don't like circumcision that much.

[CoryW]

I was circumcised as a teenager, done of my own accord. I know what life was like with both and I liked it, but that doesn't mean that my son will.

Unless there's a medical necessity I believe parents should leave decisions like this about their children's body up to them - when they're of the age that they can understand all the options and make their own choice.

Reasons like "A son should look like his father!" or "What if he get's teased!" or "I (or they) won't have time to clean it!" are stupid IMO.

How old are you now?

[Kovic2]

How old are you now?

Turning 19

[BaileyWill]

I wouldn’t

[CoryW]

Turning 19

Are you cut ?

[ChaseDakoda]

How old are you now?

CORY, why does Age have a factor? If he is 12 he understands the reason guys should not get circumcised,
Talk to a guy from UK, they don't get cut.

[NewLeafsFan]

Dad's in America have there sons circumcised because they do not read about what the foreskin does to a boy pre puberty and puberty all the way to death.
Dad's that were circumcised at birth are either upset at there parents so they get there sons circumcised. Or the dad wants there sons to be circumcised like they are, it's dumb cause there is no fashion show that I know of where father and son show off there penis.
The foreskin is not dirty, you learn young how to clean it, actually I know most us guys in school are cleaner than cut boys cause we use tissue to dab it off, in cut shake it and put it away.
When uncut masturbate we have natural lube, cut guys need lube and dobt say u don't, because y'all lije the gliding feeling with lube, well that's what a foreskin feels like.

AND SOME DAY YOUR SON WILL ASK WHY HE WAS CUT, ANSWER THAT WUTHOUT LYEING.

Why would parents lie? You act like they've committed a crime. I would have no trouble explaining why to my son.

[ChaseDakoda]

Why would parents lie? You act like they've committed a crime. I would have no trouble explaining why to my son.

WHY?

[Kovic2]

Are you cut ?

I stated that I was in the first sentence of my initial comment

[LewieUda98]

No, I'm uncut and almost everybody is here in uk , unless it's a medical reason.

[NewLeafsFan]

WHY?

What do you mean why? The question is why would I have trouble explaining to my son why he id circumcised.

[ImAPerson]

Personally it would depend on how old he is and what he thinks about it.

[Jeff1857]

100% getting him circumcised.

[Inactive]

Would you have your son circumcised? I personally would.

I would not, as there are very few medical reasons to do so

[Ttssman]

100% getting him circumcised.

Agreed

[Franciscofixe]

(uncut) and I wouldn't because it will loose the sensitivity

[dunbar07]

Absolutely not, I'm circumcised and I hate that I was. My child should be able to enjoy his body and everything it has to offer him.

[The captain]

not at all

[Curiousdude]

Yeah I would definitely get him cut.

[Skylark]

100% getting him circumcised.

Agreed

Not trying to start anything, but i just want to know your guys’ reasoning for that? Like it’s out of the question not to have your future child circumcised?

[agurkas]

I would leave his foreskin. Later if he wants it , he can become circumcised

[MasonBA]

i would not

[german_boy]

I've discussed it with my gf and we would do it.

[Chetz]

Would you have your son circumcised? I personally would.

If he asked me to be circumcised, then why not.

[Bubba24]

I personally would not have my son (s) cut but I would mention it to them when they get older and let them decide if they wanna keep it or not

[Vicboy2707]

No way in hell the only thing you need to do is pull it back rub some sope on and then wash it off when circumcision become big it was because people didn’t have clean water to wash properly especially in war time it was common to get inflation so they used to circumcise soldiers but now there really isn’t a need for it in

[sidric8]

The best time to be circumcised, if you're going to be, is as a baby. It heals better and faster, plus the benefits start immediately. And since I would love him and want the best for him, yes, I'd give him a circumcision since that's what I think the best is.

[Chrisbm]

Yes I would.

[bastile23]

The best time to be circumcised, if you're going to be, is as a baby. It heals better and faster, plus the benefits start immediately. And since I would love him and want the best for him, yes, I'd give him a circumcision since that's what I think the best is.

what benefits?
your baby will have a chafed, desensitized penis by all that time hes penis will rub on his underwear (until hell reach puberty about 13 years)
and as a baby, he would have a deep, bloody open wound in his diaper,
along with his feces.

personally i would circumcise my baby only if i had his consent. until he would be able to give it, hell remain the way nature intended it.

[IcyCool]

I think I would! Apparently there are benefits or something, but I would do it because where I live, an average person is, and I don't want my son to be subjected to any type of discriminative discrimination. At all.

[Svladimere074]

Heck yes for religious, medical and hygienic reasons.

[Ttssman]

Heck yes for religious, medical and hygienic reasons.

Exactly how I feel. I would do it for health reasons.

[Thicc]

I probably won't have my son circumcised

[MasinoD]

Yes. It looks way better, for one.

[sidric8]

what benefits?Oh come on. There are benefits both ways. It sounds like we differ on how much we value the different sets of benefits, but I can admit that being uncut has some benefits. Being cut does too. It's just a matter of which one you think is best on balance.

your baby will have a chafed, desensitized penis…and as a baby, he would have a deep, bloody open woundThat's over dramatic. It is a skin cut, not a "deep wound", and it totally heals in a few days in infants, which are basically little healing/growing machines. And "chafed" is a pretty hyperbolic characterization—there are real sensitivity and skin differences, but actual chafing is a different thing. Whether the differences are negative, positive, or neutral, inaccurately dramatizing the descriptions isn't useful. If your opinion is supportable (which I think it is, actually, I just came to a different one myself), you don't need to do that.

the way nature intended it.Nature didn't intend vaccines or dentistry. I'm glad we aren't always at the mercy of "nature".[/QUOTE]

[Svladimere074]

Oh come on. There are benefits both ways. It sounds like we differ on how much we value the different sets of benefits, but I can admit that being uncut has some benefits. Being cut does too. It's just a matter of which one you think is best on balance.

That's over dramatic. It is a skin cut, not a "deep wound", and it totally heals in a few days in infants, which are basically little healing/growing machines. And "chafed" is a pretty hyperbolic characterization—there are real sensitivity and skin differences, but actual chafing is a different thing. Whether the differences are negative, positive, or neutral, inaccurately dramatizing the descriptions isn't useful. If your opinion is supportable (which I think it is, actually, I just came to a different one myself), you don't need to do that.

Nature didn't intend vaccines or dentistry. I'm glad we aren't always at the mercy of "nature".[/QUOTE]

God made nature and yet he was the one who said we should do it. LOL

[Dev.]

I'm uncut and HELLL NO! Personally I can't even fathom how someone would be okay with cutting an infants foreskin off.

[bastile23]

Oh come on. There are benefits both ways. It sounds like we differ on how much we value the different sets of benefits, but I can admit that being uncut has some benefits. Being cut does too. It's just a matter of which one you think is best on balance.

That's over dramatic. It is a skin cut, not a "deep wound", and it totally heals in a few days in infants, which are basically little healing/growing machines. And "chafed" is a pretty hyperbolic characterization—there are real sensitivity and skin differences, but actual chafing is a different thing. Whether the differences are negative, positive, or neutral, inaccurately dramatizing the descriptions isn't useful. If your opinion is supportable (which I think it is, actually, I just came to a different one myself), you don't need to do that.

Nature didn't intend vaccines or dentistry. I'm glad we aren't always at the mercy of "nature".[/QUOTE]

Pleaae stop being a circ fan boy
Being circumcised doesnt really have benefits: health wise, std rates in europe and arab countries(mostly cut vs mostly uncut) are the samr, foreskin problems that are unfixable occur on 1 percent of uncut males, and since daily showers, condoms and soap were invented, circumcision lost its hygenic argument.

Im not iver dramatic, your just trying to tap on ur ego.
Botched circumcisions happen in 10 percent of circumcision. The other 90 percent are left with 60 percent less nerves on the penis and thickened skin (keranitazion)
These are the facts, do what u want with them.
Just know that mutilating ur sons body forever is his choice, not yours.

[Jon_]

Although i think there are benefits to being cut, like being more convenient when peeing and better hygiene wise as well, i would leave the decision to him when he grows up a little older.

[Spooky_Eli]

Pleaae stop being a circ fan boy
Being circumcised doesnt really have benefits: health wise, std rates in europe and arab countries(mostly cut vs mostly uncut) are the samr, foreskin problems that are unfixable occur on 1 percent of uncut males, and since daily showers, condoms and soap were invented, circumcision lost its hygenic argument.

Im not iver dramatic, your just trying to tap on ur ego.
Botched circumcisions happen in 10 percent of circumcision. The other 90 percent are left with 60 percent less nerves on the penis and thickened skin (keranitazion)
These are the facts, do what u want with them.
Just know that mutilating ur sons body forever is his choice, not yours.

mutilating? really? it's not like we're talking about chopping of the kid's dick, and those 10 percent happen in 2/3 world country's by doctors that shouldn't even be aloud to practice.

[Dev.]

I disagree. In my personal opinion a parent paying for their child's foreskin to be cut off because of hygiene and stds is just as ridiculous as surgically removing all their teeth because you don't want them to get cavities.

[David_rupp]

yeah i would

[Aussiekid2018]

I would have to talk ablut it to who ever the mother to my son would be, and get advice from a docter but I would most likely just leave it how it is.

[Snowfox]

I had this discussion with my girlfriend and we are gonna do it if we get son some day

[gayboy153]

Yeah

[thatrandomguy01]

i'm from the US. My dad, me, and my brother are all circumcised. It isn't based on religion, we just are circumcised. All of my friends that I've seen naked are circumcised. I will have my son circumcised.

[HeyCameron]

Nope. None of the men in my family are cut and my hypothetical son won't be either. If he wants to have it done as an adult, that's his choice, but not having it done as an infant.

[teenboyNathan]

I would let him decide if he wants to be circumcised or not

[billy1646]

I would leave him uncut. It should be his choice

[Aussiekid2018]

It depends, I would get advice from the docter and have to talk to my wife or girlfriend about it but most likely no

[Jeff1857]

100% I would have him circumcised.

[Henry333]

i woldnt, id leave it till he was old enough to make the decision

[Cycler21]

No, I'm not. Also, circumcision makes your penis less sensitive.

[Ttssman]

100% I would have him circumcised.

Agreed

[SDeLucca]

I am not cut and I will not circumcise my son

[Brandon618]

I am circumcised and I really don't know, but I don't think I would have my son done.

[Riley2015]

Would you have your son circumcised? I personally would.

yes i would :yes:

[igalg]

Probably I would.

[JohnnyMac]

I would not, and when he is about 11 or 12, before puberty, i will let him decide.

[nicktheman2003]

Right now I say yes, but I could change my mind at the moment.

[Michael52]

I'm uncut and honestly. wouldn't have my son circumcised. for me, that seems like a very personal descision. plus, over time, I've come to really appreciate my foreskin.

[kro814]

I am cut and would also have my sons cut.

[ShiveringScientist]

Subjecting your kids to medically unnecessary surgeries shouldn't even be a thought, but this is america we're talking about. If you would cut him simply because youre cut, perhaps you should think about it more and break the cycle. circumcision only exists anymore because its taboo, no one wants to talk about it. if it were common knowledge what circumcision actually is and does, it wouldnt be around much longer. its because of the "his should look like mine" attitude that this continues. all im suggesting is you put more thought into it and research it, maybe watch a video of it. i think youll come around. I'm cut, but if i have kids i wont have their genitals cut. i wouldnt if it was a girl and i wouldnt if it was a boy. of course doctors support circumcision, it makes them thousands a year, its a conflict of interests. not a credible source, parents or family arent a credible source either. let him decide when hes older, but who would want less dick?

[xanadu4]

I have no idea.

[Kody]

I would have to say no to this. I am uncut and as long as you clean good theres no reason for concern. And its not that hard to teach.

[london98765]

nope, i wouldn't

[ShiveringScientist]

Heck yes for religious, medical and hygienic reasons.

are you a practicing Jew or Muslim? if not then theres no religious reason, if you catholic consider the pope isnt cut nor anyone in the papacy. same goes for protestant and orthodox. i can find the bible passages if you want. you'll have to explain the medical part to me, unless your talking about the 00.01% difference in utis or the aids study that was flawed and conducted in africa or std myth, to be honest im not too sure who came up with that one, but i can tell you condoms are a lot more effective than amputation and they arent permanent. penile cancer is incredibly rare cut or not and you could argue cutting off any tissue will give you a less of a chance of developing cancer. hygiene is a weird one, smegma is a natural product of the body and completely safe. it can be easily washed away and if its really that big of an issue for you, women have 4x as much as uncut men. how is an open wound sitting in a dirty diaper hygienic? we dont cut off any other organ for the sake of hygiene why would we for the foreskin? actually same goes for religion how many body parts do we cut off for that? or cosmetic how many body parts do we cut off infants so they look better?

[NigelG]

I am cut, there is no way on earth would I let a doctor go near my sons dick!!!

[LITHIUM101]

I would force my son to learn how to clean down there and live naturally with his foreskin

[Some Kid]

I wouldn’t have him cut. I was cut, and I’m looking into foreskin restoration. I’ve heard people who’ve restored their foreskin have liked it a lot more than when they were cut, and it’s all around more enjoyable.

It would be his choice, so I would wait until he was 13-14 and see what he thinks about it then.

[SpartansL]

Yes. I love the look of mine and cannot imagine not wanting the same for my kids

[Ttssman]

Yes. I love the look of mine and cannot imagine not wanting the same for my kids

Are you loosely circumcised?

[SpartansL]

Are you loosely circumcised?
What do you mean by "loosely"?

[Ttssman]

What do you mean by "loosely"?

Like extra skin that bunched up behind the head..that's how I am..would want that way for a son I had probably

[ShineintheDark]

I'm cut but i don't hugely care about circumcising my child but I guess my spouse may end up having a strong opinion

[InternetTeen]

No. I would wait until he is mature enough to make the decision he wants. He can choose whether to be cut or uncut.

[tomhero]

I‘m uncut but I would circumcise my boy, I want to get circumcised too, so we would be equal again

[NamelessHuman]

Yes, but only once they have stopped wearing diapers, because at that point foreskin really does loose it’s use. So either at age 3-5 or age 7-10, as at 7-10 I could discusss it with them, and give them some choices of the way it’s done, the amount of skin to be took of etc, and obviously they don’t have to learn a new way to mastubrate at that age.

[NamelessHuman]

Like extra skin that bunched up behind the head..that's how I am..would want that way for a son I had probably

Same

[tomhero]

Yes, but only once they have stopped wearing diapers, because at that point foreskin really does loose it’s use. So either at age 3-5 or age 7-10, as at 7-10 I could discusss it with them, and give them some choices of the way it’s done, the amount of skin to be took of etc, and obviously they don’t have to learn a new way to mastubrate at that age.

Yeah the second time period makes sense. If we can talk to them about it and describe them what happens, I think they will enjoy all positive aspects on this topic.

[Chefzg]

I'm cut and I would have my son cut.

[Leon2]

I'm cut and I would have my son cut.

so you like being cut? Why?

[Ttssman]

so you like being cut? Why?

Ease of keeping it clean has a main reason for me..

[Leon2]

Ease of keeping it clean has a main reason for me..

fair enough

[Ttssman]

fair enough

And looks

[german_boy]

I would

[tomhero]

No. I would wait until he is mature enough to make the decision he wants. He can choose whether to be cut or uncut.

Would you offer him both options actively or would you wait and look whether he would get interested in this topic or not?

[arca]

Please do not.

[Robbie14]

Yes of course

[EricLund]

I think so. Brother and dad are circumcised, so it goes with our family.

[Morgan_15]

No, I am glad I am not cut. I would not have a son cut.

[The_Spaz]

Nah, I don't find it a very pertinent procedure to do right after birth. I'd rather have him stay intact until a disorder developes, then go for surgery. Unless that happens I see no point in needlessly disassembling him for preventative purposes.

[sam476]

Definitely not. I'm uncut and there's honestly no need (in my opinion) for it to be removed if there's no medical reason

[cinderfella]

I mean I know I'm gay and all so it may be more difficult getting a child of my own and will depend on circumstances of who and how I marry.

I guess I would probably leave the decision to them. I don't know if this is possible in a gay adoption or its comes with but who knows. But in all honesty if they do want to get circumcised its gonna be hard for them given how painful I heard it was. Cut from birth so I don't know.

[Darw1n]

No. Your son should have full rights to his body and what comes off of it (as long as he's healthy). Foreskin has a purpose. Your penis head isn't supposed to be exposed all the time and gets less sensitive if it is.

If everything is working properly, let your kid make the big decisions on his own.

[JQL---]

Why would people make this decision now? When I have a kid, I don't know what the science will point to then. I shouldn't be making decisions now. If I say, that he will be circumcised, what if by then we find out that circumcision makes you die a year earlier? If I say that he won't be circumcised, what if by then we learn that there are health benefits, and there is no difference in pleasure? Nobody should be making these decisions so far in advance.

[justa16yearoldaussie]

id wait till they can make conscious decisions/when they hit puberty and ask if they want it done.

[Coping]

I'm uncut, as most UK guys are and I would leave any son of mine intact. If he wanted to when he was older that's his decision to make, but I'd leave him with the 20,000 nerve endings on his foreskin to start with.

[TristanM]

No. I am uncut and my son should look like his dad which is what my dad says and I think he is right about this. If it's not broken don't try to fix it.

Skin for the win!

[David_rupp]

I would.

[Terran]

NO! I would not. I'm personally against circumcision. I think its dumb and unnecessary. I like having foreskin thank god, I wasn't circumcised. People claim it helps with hygiene, but thats a load of crap. If you take a shower and wash yourself properly then theres no problem. Plus the trade off is not worth. It feels better to have foreskin. Your foreskin lubricates and ppl with no foreskin lose sensitivity, so they no longer feels as good touching the head. I think it looks better. It rolls back when your hard anyways.

Why is it that the most people on this thread is against being cut are not cut.
How can you say anything against it if you don't know what it like.

Because I know and they know what’s it’s like to have a foreskin. So they can imagine what’s it’s like losing it. Plus rolling back your foreskin does pretty much the same thing. If someone ask you how could you be against amputating your arm when u don’t know how it’s like not to have a arm what would you say?

[Mark smith]

I wouldn’t I will leave his penis normal

[TrueCharlie14]

I'm uncut and I would not cut my son, let him decide later in life.

[GeorgeSmith4309]

I would never have my son circumcised at birth. That would be his decision later in life. I was circumcised at birth and really hate that my parents made that decision for me. If it had been up to me, I would have chose to keep my foreskin. Here's why: your foreskin is the the part of your penis with the highest concentration of nerve endings. More nerve endings = more sensation (therefore more pleasure). Cutting the foreskin off literally cuts off 3 square centimeters of skin that is made up of thousands and thousands of these nerve endings. Why would anyone want to cut that off??!? I understand some of the reasons behind getting circumcised (religion, medical reasons) but anyone who says being circumcised is more sanitary has no clue what they are talking about. Cleaning under the foreskin is as easy as sliding it back and cleaning it just as you do the rest of your dick. Also, the US is one of the only countries where circumcision at birth is the norm. Most doctors don't even emphasize it much anymore because there really are no benefits to it. This will never change as long as father's keep with the mindset "his should look like mine." Educate others so this will end!!

[lucasfin]

No way! I would let him make that big of a decision. It's his body.

[hot lazer]

Hell fucking nooooooooo

[jimbojones]

Absolutely not.

[Diable rouge]

Never.