Uncut

[Sean55]

I was circumcised at birth, however I want to be uncut. Is there any way I could get the sking back on my penis.

[heymynameis]

there is a surgery thing called foreskin restoration which you could look into if you wanted to.

[TWDjacob]

you can do natural ways that take a long time but get the results eventually. google exercises and theres stuff like gently pulling the skin for a few minutes each day

[ska8er]

Why would u want to go thru
that type of surgery. I'm sure
it is not comfortable with pain
and swelling.

[jamie_n5]

You can Google foreskin restoration on the internet. There is plenty of information there.

[NewLeafsFan]

You can not get that skin back, but you could try foreskin restoration. I would not recommend it though. It involves stretching what skin is left so that it covers part of your penis glands. There is no guarantee as to how much it will stretch or how it will end up looking. And tbh, it sounds somewhat painful.

I got circumcised just less than a yr ago and I think that unles you are circumcised really tightly, you are better off to be circumcised. It is more visually appealing and I think foreskin just acts as a barrier during any sexual stimulation. You may have read so much false info about circumcision that you believe it was some type of infant torture. That seems to be a common misconception on this site.

[ilc.69]

Nowadays there must be some kind of surgery which can help you with that problem, but I don’t know about anything yet

[Turbofan explosion]

You can try non-surgical foreskin restoration. Supposedly, it will restore some sensitivity but not all.

Surgical restoration does not restore sensitivity, and is risky. It is not recommended.

[Zuka]

There factually is an operation for such a thing. Though I don't know where to get into it. You'd have to do some further research about it all.

[Turbofan explosion]

there is a surgery thing called foreskin restoration which you could look into if you wanted to.

Why would u want to go thru
that type of surgery. I'm sure
it is not comfortable with pain
and swelling.

There is a such thing as non-surgical restoration, it has been said to be better than surgical. Non-surgical can restore some sensitivity, however it can take several years. Surgical is usually not recommended.

[cutboys]

i donot think but surgery is hard

[Hermes]

...It is more visually appealing...

They say beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Of course our ideas of aesthetics can be very individual but they are also influenced by fashion. I guess what I am saying is that such an opinion is just that, not an absolute.

I am not sure to which mis-information you refer but I, for one, have not been trying to make out a case that consenting people should not be circumcised if they wish. The case I want to make is that infants who have no concept of what it is about should be left the freedom to choose for themselves when they are old enough to understand. Circumcising them at birth takes away that choice precisely because you can never quite get back what was cut off, only an approximation.

As for surgical restoration, as opposed to stretching, it seems completely perverted to me that the very people whose Hippocratic oath should have prevented them carrying out, and therefore profiting from, neonatal circumcision should further profit it by been paid to undo it as best they can.

[NewLeafsFan]

They say beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Of course our ideas of aesthetics can be very individual but they are also influenced by fashion. I guess what I am saying is that such an opinion is just that, not an absolute.

I am not sure to which mis-information you refer but I, for one, have not been trying to make out a case that consenting people should not be circumcised if they wish. The case I want to make is that infants who have no concept of what it is about should be left the freedom to choose for themselves when they are old enough to understand. Circumcising them at birth takes away that choice precisely because you can never quite get back what was cut off, only an approximation.

As for surgical restoration, as opposed to stretching, it seems completely perverted to me that the very people whose Hippocratic oath should have prevented them carrying out, and therefore profiting from, neonatal circumcision should further profit it by been paid to undo it as best they can.

I have lived both ways. Before I was circumcised I still though being cut looked better. f you do research, you will find that most people are in agreement with me. I have no idea what you meant be 'misinformation".

[Hermes]

I have lived both ways. Before I was circumcised I still though being cut looked better. f you do research, you will find that most people are in agreement with me.

Most of which people? Americans?

I have no idea what you meant be 'misinformation".

You said:

You may have read so much false info about circumcision that you believe it was some type of infant torture. That seems to be a common misconception on this site.

[Two.Cool.]

I am in the same boat as you. I'm working on manual foreskin restoration, its going well, and is a legitimate thing. PM me for details...

[NewLeafsFan]

Most of which people? Americans?



You said:

I am aware of the facts that I stated. Again misinformation?

[Hermes]

I am aware of the facts that I stated. Again misinformation?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misinformation?wprov=sfla1

[NewLeafsFan]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misinformation?wprov=sfla1

I don't recall asking for a definition. I asked where I misinformed somebody. It appears to me that you have misinformed yourself in your application of misinformation.

[Hermes]

I don't recall asking for a definition. I asked where I misinformed somebody. It appears to me that you have misinformed yourself in your application of misinformation.

I did not accuse you of misinforming anyone. You said the OP may have read false information on here. That is what I was referring to. That was why I quoted what you said in my previous reply.