xChrisVx
February 26th, 2014, 06:38 PM
Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26357007
Today, Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale were jailed for life today after being convicted for the murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby in May 2013.
During the sentencing hearing, the defendants repeatedly interrupted the judge, Mr Justice Sweeney, shouting: "Allahu Akbar!" "That is a lie!" and were removed forcibly from the court after a fight with nine dock officers.
Adebolajo will never be released after the judge declined to set a punishment part (or tariff) to his sentence. For him, life will mean life.
Adebowale was jailed for a minimum of 45 years, meaning that he has a slim chance of release, but he will be 67 before he is eligible for parole.
Counsel for both defendants argued that sentencing them to a whole life order would be 'inhuman' and would be a breach of their human rights.
My questions to you are:
1) Were these two men given the appropriate sentence is your opinion?
2) What are your opinions on the use of whole life orders?
Today, Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale were jailed for life today after being convicted for the murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby in May 2013.
During the sentencing hearing, the defendants repeatedly interrupted the judge, Mr Justice Sweeney, shouting: "Allahu Akbar!" "That is a lie!" and were removed forcibly from the court after a fight with nine dock officers.
Adebolajo will never be released after the judge declined to set a punishment part (or tariff) to his sentence. For him, life will mean life.
Adebowale was jailed for a minimum of 45 years, meaning that he has a slim chance of release, but he will be 67 before he is eligible for parole.
Counsel for both defendants argued that sentencing them to a whole life order would be 'inhuman' and would be a breach of their human rights.
My questions to you are:
1) Were these two men given the appropriate sentence is your opinion?
2) What are your opinions on the use of whole life orders?