Log in

View Full Version : [UPDATED] Gorilla killed after 4-year-old falls into zoo enclosure


Hideous
May 29th, 2016, 10:34 AM
Cameron Knight and Mallorie Sullivan, 11:18 a.m. EDT May 29, 2016

Vo-3RULsZ2E

A holiday weekend outing at Cincinnati's zoo turned doubly tragic Saturday when a 4-year-old boy was hospitalized after falling into a gorilla enclosure - and zoo workers had to kill the rare gorilla to protect the boy.

Cincinnati police and emergency crews responded to a report of a child falling into the exhibit at the Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden at about 4 p.m. Saturday. Police confirmed the child was taken to Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center near the zoo, and was treated for serious injuries that were not considered to be life-threatening.

Cincinnati Zoo President Thane Maynard said the boy crawled through a barrier and fell an estimated 10 to 12 feet into the moat surrounding the habitat. He said the boy was not seriously injured by the fall.

The Cincinnati Fire Department reported in a press release that first responders "witnessed a gorilla who was violently dragging and throwing the child."

Maynard said the zoo's 17-year-old male western lowland gorilla, Harambe, grabbed the boy and dragged him around. Two female gorillas were also in the enclosure.

The boy was with the 400-pound animal for about 10 minutes before the zoo's Dangerous Animal Response Team deemed the situation "life-threatening," Maynard said.

"The choice was made to put down, or shoot, Harambe, so he's gone," Maynard said. "We've never had a situation like this at the Cincinnati Zoo where a dangerous animal needed to be dispatched in an emergency situation."

The fire department release said the boy was in between the gorilla's legs at the time of the shot.

Maynard said the Dangerous Animal Response Team followed procedures, which they practice in drills. He said in the 38-year history of the zoo's gorilla exhibit that they've never had anyone get into the enclosure.

After the gorilla was shot, zoo employees unlocked the gate and two firefighters quickly retrieved the child, according to the fire department.

"It's a sad day all the way around," Maynard said. "They made a tough choice. They made the right choice because they saved that little boy's life. It could have been very bad."

Brittany Nicely of Dayton was visiting the zoo with her two children and four other children on Saturday. They were at Gorilla World when the incident took place.

"Out of the corner of my eye, I saw the little boy in the bushes past the little fence area. I tried to grab for him. I started yelling at him to come back," Nicely said.

"Everybody started screaming and going crazy," she said. "It happened so fast."

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cje0uFHWEAEE7nR.jpg

Nicely said the gorilla rushed toward the boy and led him by the arm through the water in the enclosure. She said initially the gorilla seemed protective and only alarmed by all the screaming.

The area was then evacuated by zoo staff. Nicely stood with her group outside the exhibit.

"About four or five minutes later we heard the gunshot," she said. "We were pretty distraught. All the kids were crying."

Nicely said she spent the whole trip home explaining why they are told to stay close and not run at the zoo.

"That could have been them," she said. "Something like that could have happened. It's a very traumatizing experience for anybody involved. The kids, the zookeepers, the other gorillas that now don't have him there any more."

News of the incident triggered huge social media response. A video posted by the Enquirer had been viewed about 71,000 times at 9:30 p.m. Saturday.

Many commenters criticized the parents of the boy for not watching him more closely. A Facebook group called Justice for Harambe was created and gathered more than 100 "likes" in less than two hours.

"This page was created to raise awareness of Harambe's murder on 5/28/16," the page states. "We wish to see charges brought against those responsible!"

Lt. Steve Saunders, the spokesman for the Cincinnati Police Department, said no charges were being pursued against the child's parents.

The decision to shoot Harambe instead of tranquilizing was made in the interest of the boy's safety, Maynard said.

"In an agitated situation, it may take quite a while for the tranquilizer to take effect," he explained, "At the instant he would be hit, he would have a dramatic response. You don't hit him and he falls over."

Maynard also explained that while Harambe didn't attack the child, the animal's size and strength posed a great danger.

http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/d044ed8b0f44446a6d5d18c3eb9afdf70fb0537a/c=0-125-2932-2330&r=x404&c=534x401/local/-/media/2016/05/29/Cincinnati/Cincinnati/636001135966205385-Harambe1.jpg


Read more at: http://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2016/05/28/police-child-taken-hospital-after-falling-into-gorilla-pen/85095094/
________________________________________________________________________________ ________

Update

Outrage Grows After Gorilla Harambe Shot Dead at Cincinnati Zoo to Save Tot

by ELISHA FIELDSTADT

Animal rights activists continued to protest Monday over the death of a gorilla at the Cincinnati Zoo who was fatally shot so authorities could rescue a child who had fallen into the animal's enclosure.

A change.org petition called for the parents of the 3-year-old boy to be held responsible for the death of Harambe, a 17-year-old male Western lowland silverback gorilla.

The petition had garnered more than 138,000 signatures by Monday afternoon. Cincinnati police, however, said they had no intention of charging the family because they don't believe a crime was committed.

Meanwhile, mourners attended a vigil for the ape, and the hashtag #JusticeForHarambe trended on Facebook.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cjo89OgWgAE10Y7.jpg

'Memorial at statue outside @CincinnatiZoo after Harambe was shot and killed there Sat. http://bit.ly/1XGV3dy' @WLWT on Twitter

The family of the 3-year-old released a statement Sunday night acknowledging the zoo's loss and thanking its staff for their "quick action." The boy was home safe and "doing just fine," the statement said.

The animal rights group PETA criticized the Cincinnati Zoo for not having a second protective barrier around the gorilla habitat, and argued that wild animals shouldn't be housed at zoos in the first place.

http://i.imgur.com/dVbmkBa.jpg

"Even under the 'best' circumstances, captivity is never acceptable for gorillas or other primates, and in cases like this, it's even deadly," PETA said in a statement. "This tragedy is exactly why PETA urges families to stay away from any facility that displays animals as sideshows for humans to gawk at."

Julia Gallucci, a primatologist with PETA, also said in the statement that the gorilla was likely trying to nurture the tot.

"Gorillas have shown that they can be protective of smaller living beings and react the same way any human would to a child in danger," Gallucci said.

A visitor who recorded the harrowing moments after a the boy fell into the gorilla exhibit said Sunday that the hulking ape did, in fact, appear to be trying to protect him from the panicking group of onlookers.

The video shows Harambe place his paw on the child before the boy inches back. Harambe gently nudges the boy toward him and then tugs on the back of his pants.

In a separate part of the video, the 450-pound gorilla stands over the boy on all fours.

"I don't know if the screaming did it or too many people hanging on the edge, if he thought we were coming in, but then he pulled the boy down away further from the big group," Kim O'Connor, who shot the video, told NBC station WLWT.

But in two other parts of the footage, Harambe can be seen dragging the toddler through the water in gorilla enclosure's moat. And Cincinnati Fire Chief Marc Monahan said Saturday that first responders saw the gorilla "dragging and throwing the child."

http://media1.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2016_22/1557611/selectedimage_9cd430eaacbb1a5696931fbe189605ba.nbcnews-ux-2880-1000.png
The Cincinnati Zoo gorilla exhibit remained closed on Monday.

"The Zoo security team's quick response saved the child's life," Cincinnati Zoo Director Thane Maynard said.

Maynard said Harambe wasn't tranquilized because the drugs could have taken a while to become effective in an animal of Harambe's size.

Maynard said "the right choice was made" but expressed remorse that the Western lowland silverback, a critically endangered species, had to be killed.

"The zoo's in the business of taking care of endangered animals, and we don't want to be in the situation in which they have to be killed," Maynard said at a news conference Saturday. "Harambe was a good guy."

The Cincinnati Zoo was open over the holiday weekend, but the gorilla exhibit remained closed.

Read the article at: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/outrage-grows-after-gorilla-harambe-shot-dead-cincinnati-zoo-save-n582706?cid=sm_fb

DriveAlive
May 29th, 2016, 10:56 AM
I think they handled this wrong, but I am not the wildlife expert.

StoppingTom
May 29th, 2016, 11:48 AM
This really upset me, because it's a case of negligent parents forcing the zookeepers hand. Gorillas are extremely territorial (not that I expect a little kid to know that) so the reaction isn't surprising. Obviously, I would be terrified seeing a kid get dragged around by a gorilla, and tranquilisers probably would not have worked in time in case things got worse, so Harambe had to be put down. It's really awful, and I won't even get into my thoughts on apes in zoos, but while the kid was lucky to not have major injuries, I'm sickened that a rare and beautiful close evolutionary cousin of ours had to be killed becase of irresponsible parents.

tl;dr watch ya damn kids

Porpoise101
May 29th, 2016, 10:28 PM
Stupid parents... the humans should have been shot instead honestly. We need more gorillas. We do not need as many humans.

Maybe to prevent this the zoo should try to kid-proof their enclosures. I mean nowadays, you have to expect for the worst to happen because no one seems to have common sense.

kevenity
May 30th, 2016, 12:18 AM
This could have been avoided if the parent was not careless and stupid enough to let the boy even come close to falling in. Also I agree with ^^ Why is there no glass or whatever guarding the habitat? Cincinatti ought to fix their zoo if it were up to me. It's a shame it had to happen though but at least the child remained alive.

Microcosm
May 30th, 2016, 12:26 AM
The parents definitely should've been monitoring their kid's activity around a potentially deadly animal, yet the zoo too had a responsibility to ensure the safety of its guests and customers. Both parties are at fault.

The gorilla was not at fault for this, obviously; however, it's also not capable of seeing reason. It's essentially no better than a crazed criminal holding a gun up to your kid's head whilst you are left with no clue or accurate predictability of what they will do. Thus, you have to assume the worst if you plan on saving your loved one.

I also think that man's life is inherently more valuable to the world than the life of most animals, which isn't to say that we should or should have the ability to kill animals at will with no justification or for the fulfillment of some sick superiority complex, but it is to say that if we had to choose between the life of one or the other, then man should be the choice made.

Body odah Man
May 30th, 2016, 12:54 PM
The parents definitely should've been monitoring their kid's activity around a potentially deadly animal, yet the zoo too had a responsibility to ensure the safety of its guests and customers. Both parties are at fault.

The gorilla was not at fault for this, obviously; however, it's also not capable of seeing reason. It's essentially no better than a crazed criminal holding a gun up to your kid's head whilst you are left with no clue or accurate predictability of what they will do. Thus, you have to assume the worst if you plan on saving your loved one.

I also think that man's life is inherently more valuable to the world than the life of most animals, which isn't to say that we should or should have the ability to kill animals at will with no justification or for the fulfillment of some sick superiority complex, but it is to say that if we had to choose between the life of one or the other, then man should be the choice made.

Or we should choose the animal. Nowhere is it written that man is superior to animal and should always be saved above the other

Judean Zealot
May 30th, 2016, 01:10 PM
Or we should choose the animal. Nowhere is it written that man is superior to animal and should always be saved above the other

Nowhere is it written, but it is dictated by reason. Who has sentience? Who has the capacity to, of their own volition, enhance the lives of potentially thousands of other people?

everlong
May 30th, 2016, 01:21 PM
This really sucks. That gorilla didn't deserve that, just because some parents were careless.

dxcxdzv
May 30th, 2016, 01:28 PM
Many commenters criticized the parents of the boy for not watching him more closely. A Facebook group called Justice for Harambe was created and gathered more than 100 "likes" in less than two hours.

"This page was created to raise awareness of Harambe's murder on 5/28/16," the page states. "We wish to see charges brought against those responsible!"

Are they serious..?

Dalcourt
May 30th, 2016, 01:55 PM
This is really a mess. How can it happen that a kid can get through the barrier without the parents noticing it before it is too late?

It is sad they had to shoot the gorilla but seemingly there was no other way cuz I guess there weren't really well prepared for emergency situations.

Riley2015
May 30th, 2016, 02:07 PM
In the article i read it said that the gorilla was dragging the kid around for 10 minutes. Well what were the zoo keepers doing for 10 minutes. standing around watching before they decided to shoot him? If they could wait 10 minutes before doing anything they had time to get a tranquillizer ready. I don't believe for one second that the only option was to kill the Gorilla.This was a totally needless and avoidable death. Part of me wonders if its a publicity stunt, a bit like that Zoo that killed the poor baby Giraffe for no good reason.

The parents are at fault but also i think the Zoo because how was the child able to get in there in the first place? This should not happen if all safety precautions are in place!

DriveAlive
May 30th, 2016, 02:08 PM
In the article i read it said that the gorilla was dragging the kid around for 10 minutes. Well what were the zoo keepers doing for 10 minutes. standing around watching before they decided to shoot him? If they could wait 10 minutes before doing anything they had time to get a tranquillizer ready. I don't believe for one second that the only option was to kill the Gorilla.This was a totally needless and avoidable death

The parents are at fault but also i think the Zoo because how was the child able to get in there in the first place? This should not happen if all safety precautions are in place!

Gorillas are extremely expensive and also lucrative for the zoo as an attraction. Why would they kill one unless they thought they had no other choice?

Riley2015
May 30th, 2016, 02:12 PM
Gorillas are extremely expensive and also lucrative for the zoo as an attraction. Why would they kill one unless they thought they had no other choice?

I just don't believe killing it was the only option, especially when they waited 10 minutes first!

SethfromMI
May 30th, 2016, 02:13 PM
sad for many reasons, but at the end of the day, the zoo had to do it. if the gorilla would have ended up killing the child...lots of blame could go around in this, but in that moment, you got to think of the safety of the child and clearly they were thinking the same thing too.

sqishy
May 30th, 2016, 03:10 PM
I'm coming back here because whatever the justification either way that parents of the child were in the wrong, and/or the zookeepers were for killing the gorilla, does it need so much media coverage and attention?

A gorilla may have been killed out of excessive caution (one side that can be taken) and it was wrong. Alright. It doesn't need to have such vigorous outrage on either side. Thousands of people have suffered and died for much less attention.

I'm not bringing in the topic of importance of humans over non-humans, I'm only pointing out what I see as an event that does deserve attention for sure, but is getting much more than it should.

lliam
May 30th, 2016, 05:24 PM
Cool, I like such news. Everyone is outraged, makes a molehill. Just a fuss about nothing.

To search for a culprit is total senseless in this case. I categorize this incident simply as an accident.

In the shortest possible time someone had to made a decision. In this case, someone who thus had no experience with those situations, I read.

Perhaps an experienced person would have taken an entirely different decision, but such a person wasn't seen on the scene.

The boy survived, the gorilla is dead. Case closed.
There's nothing more to say about!

Except perhaps that both, the parents and the management of the zoo, hopefully learn something about this incident.

That's why such things always happen.

Body odah Man
May 31st, 2016, 02:32 AM
Cool, I like such news. Everyone is outraged, makes a molehill. Just a fuss about nothing.

To search for a culprit is total senseless in this case. I categorize this incident simply as an accident.

In the shortest possible time someone had to made a decision. In this case, someone who thus had no experience with those situations, I read.

Perhaps an experienced person would have taken an entirely different decision, but such a person wasn't seen on the scene.

The boy survived, the gorilla is dead. Case closed.
There's nothing more to say about!

Except perhaps that both, the parents and the management of the zoo, hopefully learn something about this incident.

That's why such things always happen.

agreed.

Flapjack
May 31st, 2016, 05:50 AM
I don't know whether to blame the zoo or the parents for the girl falling in... suppose both are responsible.

dxcxdzv
May 31st, 2016, 06:12 AM
I don't know whether to blame the zoo or the parents for the girl falling in... suppose both are responsible.
The public can be responsible too because they screamed and apparently excited the gorilla, the parents can be responsible because they didn't watch their kid, the zoo can be responsible for a lack of safety, the zoo staff can be responsible for having shot the gorilla dead. You know, everybody can be responsible, therefore nobody is. This is what we call an accident.

Now I'm really in facepalm mode when I see people creating Facebook groups and asking for "justice", just wtf dude? Some people really think that the staff would have taken the risk to have a kid die in the zoo?

This is just ridiculous.

Flapjack
May 31st, 2016, 06:32 AM
The public can be responsible too because they screamed and apparently excited the gorilla, the parents can be responsible because they didn't watch their kid, the zoo can be responsible for a lack of safety, the zoo staff can be responsible for having shot the gorilla dead. You know, everybody can be responsible, therefore nobody is. This is what we call an accident.

Now I'm really in facepalm mode when I see people creating Facebook groups and asking for "justice", just wtf dude? Some people really think that the staff would have taken the risk to have a kid die in the zoo?

This is just ridiculous.

yeahhh I want to know why they didn't use a dart gun to knock it out?? Maybe it would have taken too long?

ethan-s
May 31st, 2016, 05:48 PM
I can't believe the parents aren't getting charged with neglecte or something. Da hell were the parents at when the little creep jumped in?

Uniquemind
May 31st, 2016, 11:53 PM
The public can be responsible too because they screamed and apparently excited the gorilla, the parents can be responsible because they didn't watch their kid, the zoo can be responsible for a lack of safety, the zoo staff can be responsible for having shot the gorilla dead. You know, everybody can be responsible, therefore nobody is. This is what we call an accident.

Now I'm really in facepalm mode when I see people creating Facebook groups and asking for "justice", just wtf dude? Some people really think that the staff would have taken the risk to have a kid die in the zoo?

This is just ridiculous.

Tbh though I hate this logic.

More than half the "accidents" that happen by humans, are due to incompetence.

A true accident imho, is when all parties do their absolute best, and despite that an undesired outcome occurs.

Maybe I'm just jaded and like to point fingers, but I will not call this an accident.


I can't believe the parents aren't getting charged with neglecte or something. Da hell were the parents at when the little creep jumped in?


Oh the police are looking into charges for the parents. This was a new change in developments according to the news.

-


Let me also say that this is also a failure on zoo inspectors to find structural problems with enclosures, and zoo protocol. The news tonight said the zoo was inspected last April, and this problem wasn't found.

Perhaps the zoo's are cash strapped or some other political problem is getting in the way.

But again I say, this was no accident, this is a flaw in human design that can be corrected, the only question is do we, and do they, care enough.

Microcosm
June 1st, 2016, 05:35 PM
yeahhh I want to know why they didn't use a dart gun to knock it out?? Maybe it would have taken too long?

The article mentions that one of the zookeepers said that a tranquilizer would've evoked a violent response from the gorilla before taking effect, putting the child in significant danger.

sqishy
June 1st, 2016, 06:19 PM
What is surprising me at this point is that Anonymous is getting involved, taking the angle that the parents are at fault. It's not their angle that surprises me, instead that they're getting involved at all into this of all events they have participated in reaction/observation of.


Tbh though I hate this logic.

More than half the "accidents" that happen by humans, are due to incompetence.

A true accident imho, is when all parties do their absolute best, and despite that an undesired outcome occurs.

Maybe I'm just jaded and like to point fingers, but I will not call this an accident.


I'm not agreeing with you to disagree with Reise (may finalise myself with my response with that later), but rather that I agree with this especially in context of car crashes. It's a crash, not an accident, most of the times it happens. I feel that the usage of 'accident' in this zoo thing is, like with cars crashes, a tool of euphemism that is unnecessary and perhaps not helpful sometimes.

What would be better, as example, are more 'reactionally neutral' descriptions that just say the physics of what happened. Cars crash. That way we don't have to add a psychological aspect of it on top of the reaction that's to come anyway (or at least anticipated to). I'm not saying we go hell bent on technical talk with everything, but that we sure can do with less of euphemism because descriptions shouldn't be doing the reasoning-feeling part of our reaction for us.

Hope this makes sense.

CoolGuy108
June 2nd, 2016, 12:41 PM
The article mentions that one of the zookeepers said that a tranquilizer would've evoked a violent response from the gorilla before taking effect, putting the child in significant danger.

Exactly! If you have ever seen animals getting tranqued in the wild for tagging or even in captivity, the animals get the dart and proceed to run around like crazy until it kicks in. Not good for baby.

Although it is sad it does seem like the Gorilla was carrying it around like it would one of its own. Idk if you have seen it on TV or a nature documentary, but they are rough with their kids compared to humans due to the fact that they are literally tougher haha

FuTo
June 2nd, 2016, 03:21 PM
I don't know whether to blame the zoo or the parents for the girl falling in... suppose both are responsible.

Both I mean the zoo should've made it so things cant crawl through but at the same time what in the world were the parents doing that were soo important for them to not notice their child crawling to the edge. The parents need to take responsibility for what happened.

Flapjack
June 2nd, 2016, 04:02 PM
Both I mean the zoo should've made it so things cant crawl through but at the same time what in the world were the parents doing that were soo important for them to not notice their child crawling to the edge. The parents need to take responsibility for what happened.

I don't know, 1000s of people visit the zoo everyday! It was inevitable someone would have fallen. I blame the zoo!

Melodic
June 2nd, 2016, 04:42 PM
In my opinion, it shouldn't be that easy for a four year old to go into a zoo exhibit anyways.

The mother was wrong, obviously. She already talked to the child about not going into the exhibit. She should've paid attention to him after that. I know I would've.