Vlerchan
May 2nd, 2016, 01:52 PM
Mr Becker argued that immigration was out of kilter because of the absence of a price that would match supply and demand. Governments, he suggested, could use economic principles to allocate visas, either by selling the right to migrate at a price that called forth a desired number of migrants, or by auctioning immigrant visas.
http://www.economist.com/node/16424085
The argument is presented in this 2010 Ebook (http://www.iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/IEA%20Challenge%20of%20Immigration%20web.pdf).
Becker's belief was that charging immigrants a fee - or offering visas through auction - to enter as immigrants would attract the most industrious. He suggested a loan scheme so that lower-skilled could access the programme. It could also first be opened up to illegal-immigrants registered in the United States.
He also suggested a separate market for refugees. Each state would be given a quota conditional on it's wealth and capacities for integration. It would then be possible for states to sell parts of their obligation to other states.
So, is there any takers of that idea here?
http://www.economist.com/node/16424085
The argument is presented in this 2010 Ebook (http://www.iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/IEA%20Challenge%20of%20Immigration%20web.pdf).
Becker's belief was that charging immigrants a fee - or offering visas through auction - to enter as immigrants would attract the most industrious. He suggested a loan scheme so that lower-skilled could access the programme. It could also first be opened up to illegal-immigrants registered in the United States.
He also suggested a separate market for refugees. Each state would be given a quota conditional on it's wealth and capacities for integration. It would then be possible for states to sell parts of their obligation to other states.
So, is there any takers of that idea here?