Log in

View Full Version : Researchers Discover the "Gay Gene"


Life's Like This
February 14th, 2014, 12:13 PM
Gay Gene Discovery Suggests Sexual Orientation Not a Choice

By Lydia Smith | IB Times*–*8 hours ago
Scientists have found evidence to support the existence of a male genome which may influence homosexuality.
Dr Michael Bailey, from Northwestern University, studied*400 sets of twins to determine if some men are genetically inclined to be gay.
The study identified two areas on the male genome which appear to be linked to sexuality.
Bailey said: "Sexual orientation has nothing to do with choice. Our findings suggest there may be genes at play and we found evidence for two sets that affect whether a man is gay or straight."
Researchers took blood from 409 homosexual brothers and heterosexual members of their family. It is known that siblings share around 50 per cent of their DNA, but it is possible they have a chance of sharing genes associated with sexual orientation.
While the findings revealed genetics accounted for around 30% to 40% of a man's sexuality, the rest was based on social and environmental factors.
The study was presented at the American Association for the Advance of Science's annual conference in Chicago.
The research builds on work by Dean Hamer, the American geneticist who identified an area on the X chromosome that appeared to influence male sexuality in the 1990s.
Using DNA from gay man and their pedigrees, a gene for homosexuality seemed to be maternally linked and found on the Xq28 stretch of the X chromosome.
The latest study confirms this region is likely to be shared by gay twin brothers than by brothers and their other siblings.
Scientists at Northwestern also identified a second genetic region on Chromosome eight, which seemed to have an impact on whether a man is homosexual.
However, there were no genes discovered to determine sexuality that were obvious among all the participants.
Bailey added that the study was not "completely determinative". He added: "There are certainly other environmental factors involved. The study shows that there are genes involved in male sexual orientation."
Yet the discovery of the potential "gay gene" could lead to an eventual advancement in pre-natal tests.
He added: "Although this could one day lead to a pre-natal test for male sexual orientation, it would not be very accurate, as there are other factors that can influence the outcome."
Richard Lane, of the campaign group Stonewall, told the Telegraph the research pointed to a biological root, but firm evidence was yet to be produced.
He said: "The thing that's consistent is that they all point to sexual orientation being something fundamental to a person rather than the lifestyle choice some opponents of equality repeatedly suggest."


Taken from Yahoo! News.

AlexOnToast
February 14th, 2014, 12:34 PM
This won't change much. If people are going to be homophobic, they are going to be homophobic. We already know that evidence and reason looses is purposely ignored constantly...

Its Pretty
February 14th, 2014, 01:13 PM
A male gay 'gene'...? I would think there would be a whole bunch of genes or a certain combination that yields the possibility of homosexuality.

Synyster Shadows
February 14th, 2014, 09:59 PM
I have a very difficult time believing that this is true.

TapDancer
February 14th, 2014, 10:16 PM
Can you provide a link. I really want to believe this is true, it would be great.

PinkFloyd
February 14th, 2014, 11:39 PM
Wow, this is an incredible discovery. I mean like.... history right here.

ksdnfkfr
February 15th, 2014, 12:42 AM
Can you provide a link.

Here you go (http://uk.news.yahoo.com/gay-gene-discovery-suggests-sexual-orientation-not-choice-085610185.html#4ZWcD8v)

Life's Like This
February 15th, 2014, 12:42 AM
This is the link guys. http://uk.news.yahoo.com/gay-gene-discovery-suggests-sexual-orientation-not-choice-085610185.html

Body odah Man
February 15th, 2014, 04:35 AM
That would solve a LOT of problems

Syvelocin
February 15th, 2014, 05:37 AM
The only thing that worries me is if this isn't fake is this paragraph from the article I originally read on this:

The results of the controversial study by researchers from the Chicago University could also pave the way for discrimination against homosexuals. Insurance companies could require genetic tests to determine if their clients are gay. Genetic tests could also be used by pregnant women for selective abortion if they don't want to have "gay babies."

Honestly, if any of that were to start happening, I would prefer we still didn't know about the "gay gene." WE know it isn't a choice; we don't need any proof of this.

The other question is female homosexuality. We already have studies that have shown the link of genetics and male homosexuality, but I've yet to see anyone do studies about sisters and homosexuality. I would want to hope its similar, but I'm intrigued as to why they only study homosexual men.

Elysium
February 15th, 2014, 08:10 AM
The only thing that worries me is if this isn't fake is this paragraph from the article I originally read on this:

The results of the controversial study by researchers from the Chicago University could also pave the way for discrimination against homosexuals. Insurance companies could require genetic tests to determine if their clients are gay. Genetic tests could also be used by pregnant women for selective abortion if they don't want to have "gay babies."

Honestly, if any of that were to start happening, I would prefer we still didn't know about the "gay gene." WE know it isn't a choice; we don't need any proof of this.

It would be interesting to see someone who's pro-life and homophobic have to decide between having a gay baby or aborting it. In all seriousness though, I completely agree with you. Not to mention it would kind of take away what I think to be a vital part of life; finding yourself and identifying yourself. That's something I don't think a parent can or should do for their child.

Also, this whole thing interests me greatly because I have cousins who are identical twin brothers. One of them is married to a woman and they have three children together. The other is married to a man and they're expecting a baby (via a surrogate, if anyone was curious). The latter is a geneticist himself and he's studying the same thing: what made him gay and not his brother, especially considering they share the exact same genetics? I don't really have an answer to any of this. I know sexuality is in no way a choice. I just think it's something to think about. We're still a ways away from determining what, if anything, "causes" sexuality.

Irrelevant Update: Their baby boy was born sometime in the past 12 hours.

Nomad_X
February 15th, 2014, 10:17 PM
The "gay gene" was supposedly discovered a few times over the past decade or so.

Luminous
February 15th, 2014, 10:45 PM
This won't change much. If people are going to be homophobic, they are going to be homophobic. We already know that evidence and reason looses is purposely ignored constantly...

I agree. Some people still dislike disabled people, even though they can't help it. A gene isn't going to change anything, or much.

Camazotz
February 16th, 2014, 10:02 AM
There's no single gene that determines sexual orientation, these types of articles are on general news sites to catch readers' eyes. The actual research article wouldn't say anything conclusive. This is a comment in the comments section of that same article:

Typical Yahoo, headline says one thing, article says another ... "which appears to support" - or maybe not, "seemed to", etc, etc ... actually this is no evidence at all and as such is NOT SCIENCE ... as a biologist I can't stand these so-called journalists who report what they want to see happen, instead of what actually happened ! This is the real headline (taken from the article) "there were No Genes Discovered to determine sexuality that were obvious among all the participants." Go back and try again.

AlexOnToast
February 20th, 2014, 11:53 AM
Genetic tests could also be used by pregnant women for selective abortion if they don't want to have "gay babies."

That genuinely scares the shit out of me...

Miserabilia
February 20th, 2014, 01:59 PM
It's obvious that homosexuality couldn't be 100% caused by a single gene, the gene wouldn't survive.

I think it's a combination of the mentioned genes in this thread, plus factors from hormones in the womb.

Zenos
February 21st, 2014, 07:36 PM
nothing new they been saying that sinc e the 90's gay gen this gay gene that

daniel74
February 22nd, 2014, 03:10 PM
I think it's biologically impossible to define love for another human being in terms of genes. Although not specific to this article, the media does like to scaremonger and exaggerate to the extremes.

D

Fanta_Lover44
March 2nd, 2014, 08:42 AM
I agree, I don't really think its true....

ninja789
March 2nd, 2014, 11:09 AM
This won't change much. If people are going to be homophobic, they are going to be homophobic. We already know that evidence and reason looses is purposely ignored constantly...

well put :)

Landbuscus97
April 8th, 2014, 05:33 AM
That genuinely scares the shit out of me...

No kidding, all though just the fact that science has been able to locate those genes is simply amazing to me