Nikon vs. Canon

[AvMan]

So what do you think? Do you prefer Nikon to Canon or the other way round? Why? :)

[lightPainting]

in my opinion. canon for video and nikon for photos..... I have a canon for photos:)

[Anna G]

Both very good the difference is Canon gives you better quality for a lower price. To get the same quality from a Nikon requires going to the next higher price range.

Canon is also better for video Nikon is more for still images.

[lightPainting]

Both very good the difference is Canon gives you better quality for a lower price. To get the same quality from a Nikon requires going to the next higher price range.

Canon is also better for video Nikon is more for still images.

I wouldn't say that canon offers better image quality for a lower price. The price range is the same but are some unnoticeable differences between the two.

[Abyssal Echo]

as far as I know both are good cameras. since mom has a Canon and it seems to do a good job I guess I'll go with Canon

[LouBerry]

I use a Nikon. I don't know, I've just never really been a fan of Canon.

[AvMan]

I use a Nikon. I don't know, I've just never really been a fan of Canon.

Same here :)

[Cognizant]

I've always used Canon and some old Konica Minolta camera, and I've been satisfied. I wouldn't mind a Nikon for still shots, but I'm not really used to the layout.

[xXl0sth0peXx]

My dad's a Nikon dude, and he'd never, ever let me get away with buying a Canon. So, I guess that makes me a Nikon. I like the Nikon's we have around the house anyways. :P

[Danny Phantom]

I've used both, in terms of photo quality (DSLRs), they are pretty much on par with each other. But I find Canon a bit easier to use.

In terms of Point and Shoots though, Canon is BY FAR better. I've used a Canon Powershot (I own one lol) and a Nikon Point and Shoot and the Canon is by far better.

[unknownuser]

I use and own Pentax DSLRs because they fit my needs and do what I need them to do. I don't have a ton of experience with Canon or Nikon so I can't really compare the two companies upright, we'd need to compare a specific camera; like Canon 6D and Nikon D600. Looking at those two, I would definitely go with the Nikon. Canon DSLRs have crappy build quality (especially the lower/mid end DSLRs), Nikon's build quality is a little better and the ergonomics and button placements are better (and for me, that's a good selling point). Canon I'm just not a fan of.

Both brands, however, do make satisfactory cameras and lenses, that are capable of taking great photos (in the right hands, of course) just comes down to the buyer's preferences, I guess.

[Party256]

Canon

[Steve Jobs]

I use and own Pentax DSLRs because they fit my needs and do what I need them to do. I don't have a ton of experience with Canon or Nikon so I can't really compare the two companies upright, we'd need to compare a specific camera; like Canon 6D and Nikon D600. Looking at those two, I would definitely go with the Nikon. Canon DSLRs have crappy build quality (especially the lower/mid end DSLRs), Nikon's build quality is a little better and the ergonomics and button placements are better (and for me, that's a good selling point). Canon I'm just not a fan of.

Both brands, however, do make satisfactory cameras and lenses, that are capable of taking great photos (in the right hands, of course) just comes down to the buyer's preferences, I guess.



Sums up my experiences :bigsmile:
I grew up in a Canon household, and own a ton of Canon products, Printer, lenses, etc. Magic Lantern is awesome on Canon, not to mention they have a much larger ecosystem, licensing lenses to Black Magic, etc etc.
I've played a lot with both and like both equally though.

[tovaris]

nikom
but even better is Zenit ;)

[roadwarrior]

Canon .

[oneDay]

My previous camera was a lower-end Canon dslr and was replaced with a semi-professional Nikon dslr. I chose a slightly older Nikon system mainly because it was the best value at the time. I noticed more consistent files with the Nikon with better dynamic range and better image refinement than the Canon. However, I do slightly miss my Canon's video capabilities.

I personally recommend using a camera that is suited to your needs than any particular brand or camera manufacturer. Using what you enjoy and experimenting with brands makes photography much more enjoyable than insisting on using a single brand, in my opinion. Good luck Canon, Nikon, and all photography users alike. ;)

[Joe245]

Nikon

[Elliott.5657]

It's kinda like the Mac vs pc debate. Depends on you and and the use of it. Personally I own a bunch of canon glass and 2 bodies.

[lightPainting]

Canon does make more lens than nikon, but the aps-c sized sensor on a nikon is bigger than a canon

[Chris Daniels]

Personally, I like Nikon. My field in photography is generally nature so I use Nikon because it is good for outdoor shots.

Anyways, whatever you feel is better. What do you think? :yeah:

[Horizon]

Well I've used Olympus, Canon, and Nikon (I own a nikon, now)

And there isn't much of a difference, in terms of the actual image quality.

I liked the Nikon and the Canon versus the Olympus because their layout was better.
Though I really do love my nikon and I have been using it to take shots that I am really proud of.

The noise performance of both is really good, for APS-C sized sensors

I just really wish that they wouldn't put ridiculously High ISOs on the cameras, especially since the amount of noise will ruin it.

On my DSLR I can get to 6400 with still usable shots, but if I use Hi-1(12800) the amount of grain and noise is just so no. I don't really see reason to putting an ISO that high if it's not going to produce images that are clean. I don't know, it's just a little pet peeve of mine.

But as of now, I do prefer Nikon because it's pretty easy to use, and it offers a guide mode to those who are new to photography, and it goes in pretty deep with different techniques, and I find that handy. But I don't remember there being that on canon, not that its actually needed, but I think it's a cool addon.

While for canon, sometimes I felt the processing engine would make the pictures a bit too dull? For my taste, at least. But I did love the excellent video quality of canon. One thing I won't miss, is the noisey autofocus of the kit lens. My nikon is near silent, just a bit of a squeaky type noise, but it's not bad at all.

And I won't miss having a Flash go off when I need to focus in the dark. It's irritating and uses up more battery, whilst my nikon(and most others, I think) have this tiny bulb that gives off light to illuminate the subject for focusing and it's not quite as bad as the flash.

And the focusing for the brands is about the same, nothing to squabble about.

All in all, I'll recommend Nikon since I am a Nikon user, but I'll emphasis they also need to pick a camera they also feel will be easy to use for them.

[lightPainting]

Well I've used Olympus, Canon, and Nikon (I own a nikon, now)

And there isn't much of a difference, in terms of the actual image quality.

I liked the Nikon and the Canon versus the Olympus because their layout was better.
Though I really do love my nikon and I have been using it to take shots that I am really proud of.

The noise performance of both is really good, for APS-C sized sensors

I just really wish that they wouldn't put ridiculously High ISOs on the cameras, especially since the amount of noise will ruin it.

On my DSLR I can get to 6400 with still usable shots, but if I use Hi-1(12800) the amount of grain and noise is just so no. I don't really see reason to putting an ISO that high if it's not going to produce images that are clean. I don't know, it's just a little pet peeve of mine.




you should be able to get rid of color noise in post prossesing
and here is a link to a videohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXgFzAzO1Q4

[Horizon]

you should be able to get rid of color noise in post prossesing
and here is a link to a videohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXgFzAzO1Q4

I know how to do that already, but thank your for showing me that video ^^

I tend to not do it though, because removing noise softens the image a bit, and I really like crisp and sharp images.

[julianne_marie]

Nikon, I own one, and I like the design more than the Canon. Although, I've never taken any pictures with a Canon camera.

[DeletedAccount]

being a semi-professional photographer, I would have to go with Nikon products. yes, the prices are up there, but when you want quality, that's just somethingyou have to live with.
I have two Nikon cameras and (at the current time) two lenses. One of those a lens I use for portraits and posed photography, the other a telephoto which I use for sports like tennis, football, soccer, baseball, etc. I love Nikon

[Studentpilot15]

It all depends on your preference on the set up and your priorities. The similar models between Canon and Nikon have ups and downs. Some have more features but let down on the image quality. It depends on what you buy on image quality or features. Now don't always sacrifice a lot if features for a lot more features but if there is a large difference on image quality I would choose that but you need to make you own decision. I can recommend Canon because that is what I use and some good models are the 600D and the 60D. And remember to always invest in your lenses. They determine your image quality more than your camera most of the time.

[Studentpilot15]

It all depends on your preference on the set up and your priorities. The similar models between Canon and Nikon have ups and downs. Some have more features but let down on the image quality. It depends on what you buy on image quality or features. Now don't always sacrifice a lot if features for a lot more features but if there is a large difference on image quality I would choose that but you need to make you own decision. I can recommend Canon because that is what I use and some good models are the 600D and the 60D. And remember to always invest in your lenses. They determine your image quality more than your camera most of the time.

[Ashthefox]

I think Canons are easier to use, but I'm kinda a noob :)

[fordgtguy]

canon

[Marius44]

Prefer Canon, but I'm sure Nikon have the same features. i just prefer the layout of the Canon cameras.

[lacheyman]

i prefer canon i have never reallly used a nikon. so i wouldnt know what there like so i prefer canon i am getting the 600d soon i cant wait

[Arsenalfan123]

Nikon definitely

[Fanta_Lover44]

Nikon, its better for outdoor photos. However its whatever you feel is best that you go with. :P

[frisbee25]

So what do you think? Do you prefer Nikon to Canon or the other way round? Why? :)

It depend what you want to do nikon for action cannon for scenery

[AlexOnToast]

My dad has a Nikkon, so I'm gonna say Nikkon

[Zachary G]

i use a Minolta SLR and it has done me justice, but if i had to choose between the two i would go with Nikon because i like their photo finish quality...if that makes any sense to you.

[kenny89]

canon is the best

[SecretlyKnown]

Nikon - Photos
Canon - Videos

[AvMan]

i use a Minolta SLR and it has done me justice, but if i had to choose between the two i would go with Nikon because i like their photo finish quality...if that makes any sense to you.

Makes sense to me haha. I'm Nikon all the way, love the way they handle and your right finish quality is generally great :)

[Yugen]

I prefer Canon.

[Croconaw]

Canon for me.

[lightPainting]

Im still on canon's side. they have more lenses

[benn_1198]

So what do you think? Do you prefer Nikon to Canon or the other way round? Why? :)

They both have their good attributes and their bad ones.

Canon: good low light and sport, bad lens range

Nikon: good for portraiture and landscape, good function ability and lens range, not so good low light and sport (at least in cheaper models because the nikon d4s is way better then any canon)

[StarSpark]

I'm gonna go with cannon because that's what I use , but I do have to say I'm starting to like Nikon do to the better image quality I see from it . But I'm more of a videographer and I'm gonna stick with my cannons for that :)

[Shaundi]

Sony. Problem ;D?

[Darth Vader]

Kodak or the highway

[lightPainting]

They both have their good attributes and their bad ones.

Canon: good low light and sport, bad lens range

Nikon: good for portraiture and landscape, good function ability and lens range, not so good low light and sport (at least in cheaper models because the nikon d4s is way better then any canon)

what do you mean by bad lens range?

[canonjourno]

Canon--any day of the week!!

[Stepney]

I had a Canon Powershot A-30? I think the name was. I loved that camera, despite being digital. I now have a shiny new Nikon Coolpix (Forget that model, too). The old A-30 was a tank compared to the Nikon. (It's been run over by a mower at idly, dropped numerous times.. into a pond... ehh, it's been a rough life). I will admit that Nikon has truly gotten cheap now.. (Coming from the owner of a Nikon F series).. However, I like my 60's era Cannon SLR just fine. Old Nikon's make a nice picture... when their mercury powered meter works.

[Scarlettohara]

Canon, for sure! Their quality is superior.

[Breezayy]

canon

[flappybird]

I love the feel of Nikons. Though my first camera is a Canon due to budget restrictions and it is not too bad. But Nikons are way more fun to use.

[benn_1198]

what do you mean by bad lens range?

Nikon lenses (in Australia at least) go from low end entrance level lenses and then jump straight up to high end professional lenses like the Nikon trinity. There lacks the in between range where as canon is so much more diverse. They cover everything. I just feel Nikon are either all professional or all beginner with very limited options in between. I'm switching across to canon soon mainly for that reason

[audiophile5]

They're both very good companies that produce amazing cameras. Canon had more users in the 70s for their marketing & advertising was far superior. I like the "look" of Canon, especially on lower-end DSLRs, for they seem more professional - the Nikons offer far more guidance and are easier to use by noobs, whereas Canons are more straightforward, with faster access to all the settings and less instructions. (Again, here, I'm comparing the 1100D & D3100).

[lightPainting]

Nikon lenses (in Australia at least) go from low end entrance level lenses and then jump straight up to high end professional lenses like the Nikon trinity. There lacks the in between range where as canon is so much more diverse. They cover everything. I just feel Nikon are either all professional or all beginner with very limited options in between. I'm switching across to canon soon mainly for that reason

there are other lens companies(like sigma & tamron) who make lenses for nikon cameras.

[ljcareon]

Fujifilm trumps them both

[goodnightxmoonx]

I'm still using my family's Canons so I haven't really had any experience with other brands. We have two PowerShots - one is a point and shoot SD850 IS and the other one is more of an digital SLR S2 IS, although to my knowledge the lenses can't be exchanged so perhaps it is a bigger point-and-shoot??

[Mic fly]

Doesn't matter to me I ilke both:cool:

[Ben_Frost]

I've personally had better shots using Canon cameras over Nikon brand ones.

[benn_1198]

there are other lens companies(like sigma & tamron) who make lenses for nikon cameras.

I know, I just left them out so that I was only comparing nikon to canon

[Cognizant]

Canon because I think the interface is easier to understand/get used to

[Gluteus Maximus]

Prefer Canon.