Girls, what's your preference! :P

[Josh Schlacter]

Only girls answer this poll, i don't want the votes to be biased.

[Josh Schlacter]

BrandonA and Christian96, do not vote. You are ruining the poll and it proves you're in denial about your own penis because you have to change the results to suit yourself.

[GigglyAbby]

While I prefer uncut because it's natural and feels better -- I won't shun a guy I love or deeply care about because his parents chose to prevent possible infections or because a doctor tells a boy surgery is the best option.

Oliver -- maybe modify the poll to include guys options?

[Josh Schlacter]

While I prefer uncut because it's natural and feels better -- I won't shun a guy I love or deeply care about because his parents chose to prevent possible infections or because a doctor tells a boy surgery is the best option.

Oliver -- maybe modify the poll to include guys options?

Yeah, that's good, you have good morals and standards. A uncircumcised guy wouldn't even get an infection unless he didn't wash his penis for a very long time.... I'd even say weeks.... But i'm pretty sure other guys like me wash their penises in the shower as often as they wash their hair.

I probably should of made a guys option. But i didn't want the votes to be biased, because obviously someone going to try to make themselves seem better, especially guys and their penises. I guess i wasn't thinking about that last thing too much.

[Josh Schlacter]

Discounting the male voters.

Both circumcised and uncircumcised are equal on 1 vote each
and 3 have voted on it doesn't really matter.

[GigglyAbby]

Sorry if this is off-topic

A uncircumcised guy wouldn't even get an infection unless he didn't wash his penis for a very long time....

Maybe I wasn't clear but as far as some infections I meant the risk for penile cancer is somewhat reduced if a baby boy is circumcised and the risk of a STI and HIV/AIDS is allegedly reduced by circumcision. I wonder if the stats are influenced by a high amount of uncircumcised males having unsafe sex compared to cut males or if throughout the world the uncut to cut ratio is quite high. Circumcision is NOW an option in the U.S. that is left up to the parents -- I hear back in my aunt's generation circumcision was something automatically done by the doctor.

[Josh Schlacter]

Sorry if this is off-topic



Maybe I wasn't clear but as far as some infections I meant the risk for penile cancer is somewhat reduced if a baby boy is circumcised and the risk of a STI and HIV/AIDS is allegedly reduced by circumcision. I wonder if the stats are influenced by a high amount of uncircumcised males having unsafe sex compared to cut males or if throughout the world the uncut to cut ratio is quite high. Circumcision is NOW an option in the U.S. that is left up to the parents -- I hear back in my aunt's generation circumcision was something automatically done by the doctor.


I don't know how being circumcised or not would change/prevent the chances of penis cancer. I don't know too much about this, but i do know it can be prevented by good hygiene (just washing it with water in the shower), but i did study cancer in human biology and it's a singe celled organism that travels by the blood steam and can appear anywhere in the body, once attached, it mass produces and BAM that's cancer. So... couldn't the cancerous cell enter the body through the other 99.5% of the body and not the foreskin. And for HIV/AIDS. I studied AIDS and HIV quite thoroughly and don't really know how circumcision would change the data, and if it did, it would really on matter in places such as Uganda in Africa where the rate of AIDS is high. The correlation between circumcision and AIDS is still experimental and needs more proof before claims can be made.

And to remove a entire males foreskin just to prevent a few unlikely diseases it pretty disgusting to me. It's a part or what makes us a man. I could understand if the guy wasn't able to retract his foreskin prevent from cleaning but that very hardly happens. That's like cutting of every females breast tissue at birth to prevent them getting breast cancer later on in life.

[GigglyAbby]

I don't know how being circumcised or not would change/prevent the chances of penis cancer. I don't know too much about this, but i do know it can be prevented by good hygiene (just washing it with water in the shower), The correlation between circumcision and AIDS is still experimental and needs more proof before claims can be made.

I don't disagree one bit with you on this. Maybe there are actual studies that show more then we can see but the problem is the media internet and old fashioned adults hear what they want to hear and disseminate what people want to hear. One website took the stance you
WebMD on issue mirrors my thoughts (http://men.webmd.com/features/cancer-risk-its-guy-thing?page=3) Penile: This is a rare cancer that some studies suggest is less common in circumcised than uncircumcised men. However, the issue may be more about hygiene or sexual promiscuity than the presence of extra skin. So for those uncut adults who worry that they might be at risk, it won't hurt to do a quick self-exam. For instance, when you're doing your testicle examination, go ahead and peel back your foreskin and look for anything weird going on -- growths, discoloration, anything that looks unusual -- and report any suspicious findings to your primary care doctor.


And to remove a entire males foreskin just to prevent a few unlikely diseases it pretty disgusting to me. It's a part or what makes us a man. I could understand if the guy wasn't able to retract his foreskin prevent from cleaning but that very hardly happens. That's like cutting of every females breast tissue at birth to prevent them getting breast cancer later on in life.

I too think and have stated in this forum that unless it's truly medically necessary (retraction and known cancer or disease) -- foreskin needs to stay.

[dvd333]

I beg to differ. Im cut and i certainly dont feel like less of a man. my orgasms are great.no complaints whatsoever. I had a proper circumcision where the foreskin is cut so that it lays right under the corona. No disadvantages here to present.

[Josh Schlacter]

I don't disagree one bit with you on this. Maybe there are actual studies that show more then we can see but the problem is the media internet and old fashioned adults hear what they want to hear and disseminate what people want to hear. One website took the stance you

Yeah, sound's about right.




I too think and have stated in this forum that unless it's truly medically necessary (retraction and known cancer or disease) -- foreskin needs to stay.

Yep :)

[Josh Schlacter]

I beg to differ. Im cut and i certainly dont feel like less of a man. my orgasms are great.no complaints whatsoever. I had a proper circumcision where the foreskin is cut so that it lays right under the corona. No disadvantages here to present.

Do you remember what it feels like to have a foreskin? it's so awesome, makes masturbation and stuff better for me!!! I've pulled the foreskin back behind the head and kept it there when masturbating and used lube so "i know what it's like" to jerk when being circumcised. Although it did pretty good, i gotta say regular masturbation with foreskin over the head is much better.

But that ^ cant truly be valid unless i get my foreskin removed and try it, which i'd never do. It serves me functions just like my eyelids lol!!

[dvd333]

Do you remember what it feels like to have a foreskin? it's so awesome, makes masturbation and stuff better for me!!! I've pulled the foreskin back behind the head and kept it there when masturbating and used lube so "i know what it's like" to jerk when being circumcised. Although it did pretty good, i gotta say regular masturbation with foreskin over the head is much better.

But that ^ cant truly be valid unless i get my foreskin removed and try it, which i'd never do. It serves me functions just like my eyelids lol!!

All im saying is that its not bad. Haha. I personally think it doesnt matter

[Sharona]

This is the 21st century - foreskins aren't a threat in the developed world if you have access to good hygiene -infant circumcision is ethically wrong - it's making a choice for a male without his consent when it isn't an issue
It can have all kinds of negative effects