View Full Version : What should Serbia buy for it's air force?
Stronk Serb
May 23rd, 2013, 02:49 PM
Ok, here are the choices:
Modernized MiG-29s, initally made for Syria, but the war broke out first. Traits:
Great physical characteristics (aerodynamics, shape, wing span etc.), crappy computer systems.
US-made F-16s, modernized. Traits:
Crappier physical characteristics then the Russian MiGs, great computer systems.
Chinese variations on Sukhoi and MiGs, not sure about the models. Traits:
Good physichal characteristics, between the upper two I think, computer systems are between the two also.
My opinion:
Take the Chinese fighters. They are cheaper and more advanced then the MiG-29s, despite those being modernized. I would rather buy new planes which would be modernized 10 years later, and be better then then the MiGs and serve longer.
britishboy
May 23rd, 2013, 03:00 PM
why lol? Serbia doesn't even have an air forve does it?
Stronk Serb
May 23rd, 2013, 03:02 PM
why lol? Serbia doesn't even have an air forve does it?
We do, but old planes need to be replaced.
britishboy
May 23rd, 2013, 03:06 PM
We do, but old planes need to be replaced.
dont you have factories and research centers? and just buy the cheapest, your country is not the kind of country that uses them
Stronk Serb
May 23rd, 2013, 03:12 PM
dont you have factories and research centers? and just buy the cheapest, your country is not the kind of country that uses them
We used to make our own planes, but due to corruption during the fascist regime from '88 to 2000 the factories went bankrupt, the centers also. We should have at least 60 modern planes, and focus more on AA systems. Now we have rockets which can reach 10000 meters. We should have rockets which can reach 15000+ meters. Why I mentioned the planes is because we have 50 planes of which only 4 can counter modern fighters. We still have our helicopter industry, but I think the Air Force did not make any orders since '05 or earlier.
britishboy
May 23rd, 2013, 03:16 PM
We used to make our own planes, but due to corruption during the fascist regime from '88 to 2000 the factories went bankrupt, the centers also. We should have at least 60 modern planes, and focus more on AA systems. Now we have rockets which can reach 10000 meters. We should have rockets which can reach 15000+ meters. Why I mentioned the planes is because we have 50 planes of which only 4 can counter modern fighters. We still have our helicopter industry, but I think the Air Force did not make any orders since '05 or earlier.
why AA systems lol? your not at war haha and modern fighters are advancing everyday so you must update but not all countries need to such as Australia, a perfect country filled with natural beauti and they do not chase heavy guns etc, they are in the commonwealth and friendly with America so they dont need to you should do a similar thing
Stronk Serb
May 23rd, 2013, 03:25 PM
why AA systems lol? your not at war haha and modern fighters are advancing everyday so you must update but not all countries need to such as Australia, a perfect country filled with natural beauti and they do not chase heavy guns etc, they are in the commonwealth and friendly with America so they dont need to you should do a similar thing
Because if shit hits the fan like in '99, I would not like my ground forces defenceless if my planes are shot down. AA missile systems was what I was talking about, not AA cannons. Jets are too fast for those. Why do the ass-scratching in NATO to save yourself if you can arm yourself so that an air invasion would be easily repelled, while a ground invasion would bog down in a stalemate, and the enemy driven off after a year max. Always be ready for a war. There cannot be peace in these times. I do not mean the Aussies are ass-scratching the Commonwealth or the NATO, but it is better to be a power in your own right then to have only allies backing you. Your words should be backed by your own strength.
britishboy
May 23rd, 2013, 03:29 PM
Because if shit hits the fan like in '99, I would not like my ground forces defenceless if my planes are shot down. AA missile systems was what I was talking about, not AA cannons. Jets are too fast for those. Why do the ass-scratching in NATO to save yourself if you can arm yourself so that an air invasion would be easily repelled, while a ground invasion would bog down in a stalemate, and the enemy driven off after a year max. Always be ready for a war. There cannot be peace in these times. I do not mean the Aussies are ass-scratching the Commonwealth or the NATO, but it is better to be a power in your own right then to have only allies backing you. Your words should be backed by your own strength.
your AA systems could not repel an invasion and a ground attack bog down in a stalemate as nato out numbers and out guns you, yoy should try and be more friendly to other countries
Stronk Serb
May 23rd, 2013, 03:37 PM
your AA systems could not repel an invasion and a ground attack bog down in a stalemate as nato out numbers and out guns you, yoy should try and be more friendly to other countries
It is because our crappy old systems i the '90s could only lock on targets up fo 5000 meters. If NATO would not lose a million men about something trivial, they would fall bak since it is not worth the loss.
Human
May 23rd, 2013, 03:43 PM
I think the F-16s
It always looks better for the country to have F-16s than MiGs... In my opinion hehe :D
britishboy
May 23rd, 2013, 03:48 PM
It is because our crappy old systems i the '90s could only lock on targets up fo 5000 meters. If NATO would not lose a million men about something trivial, they would fall bak since it is not worth the loss.
we have so many tanks and artillery lol I think its more likely you being able to withhold a air attack but no chance on the ground and even our transport planes have anti missile flares
Stronk Serb
May 23rd, 2013, 03:56 PM
we have so many tanks and artillery lol I think its more likely you being able to withhold a air attack but no chance on the ground and even our transport planes have anti missile flares
Flares are not 100% efficient. Your planes had them in '99, but we shot down the ones that strayed too low. Not much strayed lower then 5000 meters though. It could be easy to repel you if we have air superiority. Even if we do not, after NATO loses 500,000 men, there would be enough space for a peace negotiation.
britishboy
May 23rd, 2013, 04:15 PM
Flares are not 100% efficient. Your planes had them in '99, but we shot down the ones that strayed too low. Not much strayed lower then 5000 meters though. It could be easy to repel you if we have air superiority. Even if we do not, after NATO loses 500,000 men, there would be enough space for a peace negotiation.
I think your amry would be flattened before we lose 10 000 and also you will never have air superiority, Serbia has no experience in war
Stronk Serb
May 23rd, 2013, 11:50 PM
I think your amry would be flattened before we lose 10 000 and also you will never have air superiority, Serbia has no experience in war
We do. The Yugoslav civil war. It was more a slaughter then a war.
britishboy
May 24th, 2013, 01:11 AM
We do. The Yugoslav civil war. It was more a slaughter then a war.
nato is experienced and your so close to Britain we dont need a carrier, our bombers can take off from britian
Stronk Serb
May 24th, 2013, 04:45 AM
nato is experienced and your so close to Britain we dont need a carrier, our bombers can take off from britian
But you will need approval from countries above which the bombers will fly over. If France and Germany do not give the approval, it is a really long detour.
britishboy
May 24th, 2013, 09:45 AM
But you will need approval from countries above which the bombers will fly over. If France and Germany do not give the approval, it is a really long detour.
we cab easily do the detour and its unlikely they wont approve, were allies and all ib NATO, they may disagree but wont stop us
Stronk Serb
May 24th, 2013, 09:51 AM
we cab easily do the detour and its unlikely they wont approve, were allies and all ib NATO, they may disagree but wont stop us
Let's get this on topic not talk about NATO vs. Serbia.
britishboy
May 24th, 2013, 10:03 AM
Let's get this on topic not talk about NATO vs. Serbia.
lol lets not im just saying, you cant defend your self from the 'civilian killing' NATO so you should be friendly
Stronk Serb
May 24th, 2013, 07:21 PM
lol lets not im just saying, you cant defend your self from the 'civilian killing' NATO so you should be friendly
You killed civilians in Yuoslavia, it's a fact. Maybe not intentionally, but you killed civilians in your bombing raids as if you were flying in WWII bombers in small numbers. Why would we be friends with people who bombed us? That is the same as if you are trying to be friends with a guy who bullies you.
britishboy
May 25th, 2013, 03:46 AM
You killed civilians in Yuoslavia, it's a fact. Maybe not intentionally, but you killed civilians in your bombing raids as if you were flying in WWII bombers in small numbers. Why would we be friends with people who bombed us? That is the same as if you are trying to be friends with a guy who bullies you.
you tryed to wipe out a certain race, if we wanted to kill civilians we would have targeted them, cluster bombs are designed to do a lot of wide inaccurate damage and for trade, for example were actually allies with Germany
Stronk Serb
May 25th, 2013, 08:48 AM
you tryed to wipe out a certain race, if we wanted to kill civilians we would have targeted them, cluster bombs are designed to do a lot of wide inaccurate damage and for trade, for example were actually allies with Germany
Actually, the Albanians started it first. While Kosovo was under the Ottoman Empire, Albanian bandits were trying to ethnically cleanse the Serbs on Kosovo, and had the full support of Albanian leadership back then. Serbian Kingdom deployed covert troops to attempt to stop the violence. After the Balkan wars, Serbia got Kosovo, so the problem wa solved. When the nineties started, Yugoslavia fell apart, Kosovo Albanians started getting violent. The government sent police and military forces to stop it. NATO got involved just like they did in Bosnia. By saying that only Serbs were genocidal is like saying that the Pope is not Catholic. Let's get this back on topic already, lol. PM me if you want to know more.
Harry Smith
May 25th, 2013, 08:52 AM
It doesn't really matter what Planes they get, Drones are the way forward in Aerial Warfare
Stronk Serb
May 25th, 2013, 09:02 AM
It doesn't really matter what Planes they get, Drones are the way forward in Aerial Warfare
On the Independence Day celebration (15th of February) I saw that we had some Israeli scout drones. The only problem is, as far as I heard, they have no aerial defence countermeasures which means that even a biplane could shoot them down, but they are cheaper then planes. I would focus on AA missile systems, and have 60 fighter jets or air superiority and ground support, and buy a hundred drones meant for air support and aerial combat. NATO forces depend on air support in the Iraqi and Afghan warzones. That is the key to minimal casualties.
Harry Smith
May 25th, 2013, 09:08 AM
On the Independence Day celebration (15th of February) I saw that we had some Israeli scout drones. The only problem is, as far as I heard, they have no aerial defence countermeasures which means that even a biplane could shoot them down, but they are cheaper then planes. I would focus on AA missile systems, and have 60 fighter jets or air superiority and ground support, and buy a hundred drones meant for air support and aerial combat. NATO forces depend on air support in the Iraqi and Afghan warzones. That is the key to minimal casualties.
The problem with any country trying to upgrade there Air force is that you could have the most advanced Fighter Jets yet it is all about the Personal and Training. That's why the Iraqis proved so bad in '91 because the Mig's were fine it's just there pilots were shit. I Just think countries like Serbia should make sure they have the infrastructure to support the jets e.g good air bases, good logistics, good planning before they spend billions on new fighters
Stronk Serb
May 25th, 2013, 09:41 AM
The problem with any country trying to upgrade there Air force is that you could have the most advanced Fighter Jets yet it is all about the Personal and Training. That's why the Iraqis proved so bad in '91 because the Mig's were fine it's just there pilots were shit. I Just think countries like Serbia should make sure they have the infrastructure to support the jets e.g good air bases, good logistics, good planning before they spend billions on new fighters
Another reason to start attending international military excersises, also referred as "wargames". I am still pretty proud that our army is slowly moving from '50s-'80s armamets to the late '90s and 21st century armaments. Air force has still to be worked on. We have 50 fighters of which only 4 are theoretically able to counter modern enemy fighters. Iraqi pilots weren't shit, they knew how to operate their planes, but the NATO forces had better training amd more numbers.
Cygnus
May 25th, 2013, 09:51 AM
I would rather buy Eurofighter Typhoons but since you gave three options I'd say the chinese MiGs.
Stronk Serb
May 25th, 2013, 09:59 AM
I would rather buy Eurofighter Typhoons but since you gave three options I'd say the chinese MiGs.
I saw those. They look similar to the F-16s in physical appearance, but I do not know anything about their electronics or anything else to make a good judgement. My grandfather was in the air force, he retired in '91, he says those are the German versions of the F-16. I know Germans make good tanks and all that, but I do not know about modern planes due to the fact that I never read about them.
britishboy
May 25th, 2013, 10:53 AM
Actually, the Albanians started it first. While Kosovo was under the Ottoman Empire, Albanian bandits were trying to ethnically cleanse the Serbs on Kosovo, and had the full support of Albanian leadership back then. Serbian Kingdom deployed covert troops to attempt to stop the violence. After the Balkan wars, Serbia got Kosovo, so the problem wa solved. When the nineties started, Yugoslavia fell apart, Kosovo Albanians started getting violent. The government sent police and military forces to stop it. NATO got involved just like they did in Bosnia. By saying that only Serbs were genocidal is like saying that the Pope is not Catholic. Let's get this back on topic already, lol. PM me if you want to know more.
I honestly dont care, you were trying to wipe them out and we sent up bombers who dropped a few old cluster bombs to get rid of old stockpiles, its not that big a deal and the Serbs have been proved to be using propaganda and I think your the victim of it, was you there?
Stronk Serb
May 25th, 2013, 11:02 AM
I honestly dont care, you were trying to wipe them out and we sent up bombers who dropped a few old cluster bombs to get rid of old stockpiles, its not that big a deal and the Serbs have been proved to be using propaganda and I think your the victim of it, was you there?
No, I was a one year old in a bomb shelter, with my parents hoping we would not get hit. If it is up to wartime propaganda, you are the victim of it also. You say you are just, but did not punish the Albanians responsible for genocide against Serbs. Those 3 British soldiers that got killed, I could not care less. They had it coming the moment they took the uniform. All soldiers have it coming, especially soldiers who fight on foreign soil for foreign oil.
Harry Smith
May 25th, 2013, 11:04 AM
No, I was a one year old in a bomb shelter, with my parents hoping we would not get hit. If it is up to wartime propaganda, you are the victim of it also. You say you are just, but did not punish the Albanians responsible for genocide against Serbs. Those 3 British soldiers that got killed, I could not care less. They had it coming the moment they took the uniform. All soldiers have it coming, especially soldiers who fight on foreign soil for oil.
We didn't fight for Oil, that is completely illogical. I assume your referring to Iraq. Have you seen the massive pipe that we built? It brings in all the oil from Iraq straight to the streets of Britain...
The Iraqis, the saudis and the Iranians were all selling us oil right up until 2003, we had no reason to invade for it. They were selling it to us legally
Stronk Serb
May 25th, 2013, 11:06 AM
We didn't fight for Oil, that is completely illogical. I assume your referring to Iraq. Have you seen the massive pipe that we built? It brings in all the oil from Iraq straight to the streets of Britain...
The Iraqis, the saudis and the Iranians were all selling us oil right up until 2003, we had no reason to invade for it. They were selling it to us legally
Then I must have mistaken you for the US. I heard that they got tons of oil from the last invasion of Iraq.
britishboy
May 25th, 2013, 11:07 AM
No, I was a one year old in a bomb shelter, with my parents hoping we would not get hit. If it is up to wartime propaganda, you are the victim of it also. You say you are just, but did not punish the Albanians responsible for genocide against Serbs. Those 3 British soldiers that got killed, I could not care less. They had it coming the moment they took the uniform. All soldiers have it coming, especially soldiers who fight on foreign soil for foreign oil.
of course if theyre fighting its just wartime death but are you making reference to the london soilder? and no matter what jets you buy you are so close to us we could use our bigger cluster bombs now and remember... we have bunker busters so you cant hide underground any more
Stronk Serb
May 25th, 2013, 11:09 AM
of course if theyre fighting its just wartime death but are you making reference to the london soilder? and no matter what jets you buy you are so close to us we could use our bigger cluster bombs now and remember... we have bunker busters so you cant hide underground any more
So you are saying that you would use weapons banned by the UN against civilians? Interesting. I wonder what would the UN say if something like that happened.
britishboy
May 25th, 2013, 11:13 AM
So you are saying that you would use weapons banned by the UN against civilians? Interesting. I wonder what would the UN say if something like that happened.
we use them all the time and they have complained
Stronk Serb
May 25th, 2013, 11:18 AM
we use them all the time and they have complained
If you were in charge, you would order your air force to use them. This time you would target civilian bomb shelters. A great way to achieve world peace. Peace through extermination.
britishboy
May 25th, 2013, 11:26 AM
If you were in charge, you would order your air force to use them. This time you would target civilian bomb shelters. A great way to achieve world peace. Peace through extermination.
of course I wouldn't im British not a Serb and we wont exterminate just look at Serbia or Hitler and you wil see why not
Stronk Serb
May 25th, 2013, 11:55 AM
of course I wouldn't im British not a Serb and we wont exterminate just look at Serbia or Hitler and you wil see why not
Generalizing all Serbs as genocidal scum is the same as if I generalized all British as tea drinking burgeous pigs. There are Serbs who would do another genocide, but they are a blight on our society.
britishboy
May 25th, 2013, 12:08 PM
Generalizing all Serbs as genocidal scum is the same as if I generalized all British as tea drinking burgeous pigs. There are Serbs who would do another genocide, but they are a blight on our society.
it was only 20 years ago and I wasnt generalizing I was just saying look wgat happened to Hitler and the Serbs not that you would do it today
Stronk Serb
May 25th, 2013, 05:28 PM
it was only 20 years ago and I wasnt generalizing I was just saying look wgat happened to Hitler and the Serbs not that you would do it today
That happened to us because:
1. We had shit equipment
2. We had the shittiest political leadership
3. We had the shittiest paramilitaries
britishboy
May 26th, 2013, 04:06 AM
That happened to us because:
1. We had shit equipment
2. We had the shittiest political leadership
3. We had the shittiest paramilitaries
well it wont happen again then and we dont like you today because you refuse to recognize some countries independence and if you were nice to us we could be allies and we will protect you.
Stronk Serb
May 26th, 2013, 05:03 AM
well it wont happen again then and we dont like you today because you refuse to recognize some countries independence and if you were nice to us we could be allies and we will protect you.
Why would we recognize Kosovo's independence if their government is full of terrorists who massacred Serbian civilians?
britishboy
May 26th, 2013, 05:27 AM
Why would we recognize Kosovo's independence if their government is full of terrorists who massacred Serbian civilians?
just grow up and recognize it and thats why you cant join the EU and if I remember rightly it was the Serbs who tryed to kill everyone and then moan because cluster bombs are being flown over so move on from the past
Stronk Serb
May 26th, 2013, 06:02 AM
just grow up and recognize it and thats why you cant join the EU and if I remember rightly it was the Serbs who tryed to kill everyone and then moan because cluster bombs are being flown over so move on from the past
Albanians were ethnically cleansing us, and still are, by forcing Serbs out.
britishboy
May 26th, 2013, 07:16 AM
Albanians were ethnically cleansing us, and still are, by forcing Serbs out.
serbs out of Serbia? piss off u racist they are just like jews or Christians as far as im aware stop hating
Stronk Serb
May 26th, 2013, 08:10 AM
serbs out of Serbia? piss off u racist they are just like jews or Christians as far as im aware stop hating
Read before you make yourself a full retard .
britishboy
May 26th, 2013, 09:38 AM
read before you make yourself a full retard .
nato had to bomb you and remove idiots from power because you were trying to wipe out a race, you are the bullies not the victims
Stronk Serb
May 26th, 2013, 09:41 AM
nato had to bomb you and remove idiots from power because you were trying to wipe out a race, you are the bullies not the victims
No. Albanians started a small uprising, and we sent in the police and the army. They were armed with western weapos and with what they looted here. They massacred our civilians. Our exrltremists massacred them. The genocide was mutual.
britishboy
May 26th, 2013, 09:43 AM
No. Albanians started a small uprising, and we sent in the police and the army. They were armed with western weapos and with what they looted here. They massacred our civilians. Our exrltremists massacred them. The genocide was mutual.
firstly I dont care, secondly YOU WERE TRYING TO WIPE THEM OUT
Stronk Serb
May 26th, 2013, 10:02 AM
firstly I dont care, secondly YOU WERE TRYING TO WIPE THEM OUT
Do not spread your retarded propaganda here. Get back on topic or do not reply.
britishboy
May 26th, 2013, 10:11 AM
Do not spread your retarded propaganda here. Get back on topic or do not reply.
hahaha my propaganda?!?! Serbia beets the nazis for propaganda and racism and I dont care what planes you should get you will probably only kil your own people with then and NATO will have to shoot them all down
Stronk Serb
May 26th, 2013, 10:15 AM
hahaha my propaganda?!?! Serbia beets the nazis for propaganda and racism and I dont care what planes you should get you will probably only kil your own people with then and NATO will have to shoot them all down
Bye bye.
britishboy
May 26th, 2013, 10:20 AM
Bye bye.
typical communist and stealth fighters/ bombers and drones the stealth can avoid rader and drones saves lives, have them theyre the best
Stronk Serb
May 26th, 2013, 10:30 AM
typical communist and stealth fighters/ bombers and drones the stealth can avoid rader and drones saves lives, have them theyre the best
Stealth fighters are for offensively-oriented countries and those who have enough cash for them. Better to get some good AA missiles and radars, 60 modern fighters for air superiority first. Serbia signed the contract on thursday. They are getting MiG-29m-s :)
britishboy
May 26th, 2013, 10:34 AM
Stealth fighters are for offensively-oriented countries and those who have enough cash for them. Better to get some good AA missiles and radars, 60 modern fighters for air superiority first. Serbia signed the contract on thursday. They are getting MiG-29m-s :)
a bit old but better than nothing are you gonna be getting drones?
Stronk Serb
May 26th, 2013, 10:37 AM
a bit old but better than nothing are you gonna be getting drones?
These MiGs are like up-to-date F-16s. We have some recon drones. Pobably gonna get offensive ones too. I can't wait when Serbia starts doing peace keeping missions.
britishboy
May 26th, 2013, 11:20 AM
These MiGs are like up-to-date F-16s. We have some recon drones. Pobably gonna get offensive ones too. I can't wait when Serbia starts doing peace keeping missions.
are you in NATO? theyre great at peacekeeping missions
Stronk Serb
May 26th, 2013, 11:55 AM
are you in NATO? theyre great at peacekeeping missions
Nope. I think we act independently. But our peacekeepers wear those fancy blue UN helmets.
CharlieHorse
May 26th, 2013, 11:57 AM
They should buy flowers and give them to people to help spread and promote peace.
Stronk Serb
May 26th, 2013, 02:29 PM
They should buy flowers and give them to people to help spread and promote peace.
No. No. No. Flowers, never.
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.