View Full Version : sex
kolte
July 22nd, 2005, 03:34 PM
This is somthing I feel should be talked about. I think that people who are under the age of 18 should not engage in sexual experiences because they are to immature to handle such things. I think that there not ready for it. What about you?
redcar
July 22nd, 2005, 03:39 PM
personaly i feel that 16 is fine as it is, becasue in my experience i find that the majority of people i know are mature physically and mentally to do it
kolte
July 22nd, 2005, 03:42 PM
I can see where a small minority would be ready, but i dont think teenagers are responsible enough to do it. The are just to.......ya know.......unsure of themsleves and vanaralbe.
redcar
July 22nd, 2005, 03:46 PM
i see where u coming from, but i feel that if the state can permit someone to leave school and go anf find full employment, the state must see them competent and mature to a certain extent, i feel the same, so i also feel they are ready to have sex, on a different point i also feel the voting age should be reduced to 16 as well, but thats beside the point.
kolte
July 22nd, 2005, 03:51 PM
actually im glad you brought that up. And I have a good example of why to not have 16 the voteing age. In france they lowered it down considerably, to like 16. And the last presidents left to vote for was a fashist and a dirty republican. Those 4 years france was tossed into an economic depression and the leader was impeached. Now france has moved the voteing age back to 18. Keep the politics to smarter and more experienced people and leave teenagers out of it.
redcar
July 22nd, 2005, 03:56 PM
i find it hard to believe that the lowering of the voting age to 16 would gravely influence the outcome of an election, however a lot of young people are very intrested in politics and i feel that they should have as much say as everyone else. if u are old enough to work and pay taxes to an administration, u should be abvle to elect that administration.
are you talking about the last french election with chirac and jean marie lepen?
serial-thrilla
July 22nd, 2005, 04:51 PM
i think its the persons choice, noone else can tell you if your ready or not.
nwshc
July 22nd, 2005, 05:20 PM
I say 16.
You guys should make another debate on the voting age.
Whisper
July 22nd, 2005, 05:25 PM
i think its the persons choice, noone else can tell you if your ready or not.
agreed
nwshc
July 22nd, 2005, 05:47 PM
I say 16.
You guys should make another debate on the voting age.
I will just do it myself
<-Dying_to_Live->
July 22nd, 2005, 05:52 PM
i think your ready for sex whenever u want to happen and thats differnt for every person and therefore cannot be standardized effectively in a "one age fits all" situation
-_-rise-against-_-
July 23rd, 2005, 12:35 AM
i think that 16 and above is a good age for sex but its up to the person if they want to enage in sex or not..and plus i wuldnt have sex at my age because it be scared shitless that id get the person pregnant
Elokyn
July 23rd, 2005, 11:15 AM
honestly..why should they care what happens? They don't care if a couple of 13 14 15 year old girls get pregnant ..honestly..they really dont. you can't CAN'T CAN NOT set an age to that kind of thing..you say "most" people that age aren't mature enough..how would you know? did you take a poll of the entire US population of 16 year olds? Truth is some 10 year olds are more mature than some 21 year olds you don't know....time does not make you wiser...experience does and yes provided with more time more experience creeps in IF the person is exposed to it.....but you NEVER know what a person has been through ..you dont need to be 18 to know how fucked up and cruel this world can be...how corrupt people are...a LOT of teens are just as mature as adults are....noone is to say "most" are or "most" aren't cus really we dont know I'm just saying you can't set a limit on that kind of thing...you just can't
nwshc
July 23rd, 2005, 11:25 AM
They should care so they can protect them. Can you imagine if all these young teens were pregnant? There would be little to support the new born kids. The teens probably do not have alot of money. So the teens will probably get into crime to support the new baby. Then eventually the baby will get into crime as well. And it will be just one big cycle. All of them will go on well fare and the tax payers will have to support them. So, if you have young teens getting pregnant, it will most likely raise the persentage of crime and poverty. Then you people will be complaining that we suck because there is so much crime and poor.
To summerize, no sex till after 16.
<-Dying_to_Live->
July 23rd, 2005, 12:37 PM
no u just need to teach safe safe earlier, like right when people start reaching puberty. i remember my first sex ed was in 5th grade. we were so young that when we actually realized what we were doing, we burst out laughing and the teacher gave us 5 minutes to just get the laughing out of our system. everything should start there. the governments stance on abstinance is stupid, and everyone should be taught that sex is good and fun, so long as you take precautions to protect yourself
Elokyn
July 23rd, 2005, 01:45 PM
^ perfect except they also need to learn that sex is not just good and fun..it is a dangerous thing to mess with and condoms and pills aren't always effective (which we all know, so I won't get into that) but yeah I do agree...teach them early so when the opportunity arrises they know what they could be gettin into.....
kevin
July 23rd, 2005, 01:46 PM
It's the persons choice, not the governments.
TheWizard
July 24th, 2005, 07:15 AM
I agree. I don't want goverment in my bedroom telling me what to do.
kolte
July 24th, 2005, 05:24 PM
I have a good example of why sex at 16 is bad. In africa the average age is 15 years old. most mothers are between 13 and 18. over 80 percent of the people are infected with hiv. and most of the children die shortly after birth. because so many young people get pregnet they end up not getting good jobs, because they are caring for the baby. how swell, i know i want to live in a world more like that
Abd123
July 24th, 2005, 05:26 PM
I can see where a small minority would be ready, but i dont think teenagers are responsible enough to do it. The are just to.......ya know.......unsure of themsleves and vanaralbe.
18 year olds are still teenagers you nonce
Anonymous
July 25th, 2005, 01:50 AM
This is what I believe it should be, and I think the law agrees with me on most aspects. Sex is fine at any age as long as you are able to handle it. Now, I think that anyone under the age of 18 should be able to have sex with anyone within 3 years of them. I don't want a 13 year old having sex with a 17 year old, too much of a difference. If a 13 year old and a 17 year old fall for each other, too bad, wait for the 13 year old to hit 18.
-Ekia
Whisper
July 25th, 2005, 05:46 AM
What's really gross is that I saw a 14 year old on Maury with a baby, and the father was THIRTY-EIGHT. What would make a 38 year old fuck a 14 year old girl? SO GROSS
the dad would be rotting in jail for a very very long time
Anonymous
July 25th, 2005, 09:26 AM
What's really gross is that I saw a 14 year old on Maury with a baby, and the father was THIRTY-EIGHT. What would make a 38 year old fuck a 14 year old girl? SO GROSS
the dad would be rotting in jail for a very very long time
jerry springer,maury, and all the other talk shows just have actors pretending to be prostitutes. I mean wouldnt they be in jail already???? lol
Whisper
July 25th, 2005, 10:00 AM
pedafile not prostitute
and they should be life without parol
serial-thrilla
July 25th, 2005, 12:30 PM
What's really gross is that I saw a 14 year old on Maury with a baby, and the father was THIRTY-EIGHT. What would make a 38 year old fuck a 14 year old girl? SO GROSS
the dad would be rotting in jail for a very very long time
jerry springer,maury, and all the other talk shows just have actors pretending to be prostitutes. I mean wouldnt they be in jail already???? lol no because its not illegal to be a protitute, you have to be caught in the act of prostituting.
*-tick tock-*
July 25th, 2005, 03:04 PM
damn.. a 14 year old w a thirty eight... thats sick!
i think when your emotionally well enough to handle the situation... and are aware of the consequences.. u should be fine. but then again.. i dont kno
SkaItUp58
July 25th, 2005, 04:24 PM
Arrrggg
nwshc
July 25th, 2005, 04:33 PM
What's really gross is that I saw a 14 year old on Maury with a baby, and the father was THIRTY-EIGHT. What would make a 38 year old fuck a 14 year old girl? SO GROSS
the dad would be rotting in jail for a very very long time
jerry springer,maury, and all the other talk shows just have actors pretending to be prostitutes. I mean wouldnt they be in jail already???? lol
I do not think they are fake. You can not make that stuff up. Plus, jerry already went through that whole aligations and court thing to see if it was fake. It was found to be not.
serial-thrilla
July 25th, 2005, 10:19 PM
and also its not like all protitutes have been caught.
r3dl3g
August 17th, 2005, 11:43 PM
I think if they raise it to 18, teenages are going to have sex anyways the law isn't going to stop it, like when they illegalized drinking and everyone started making moonshine.
<-Dying_to_Live->
August 17th, 2005, 11:58 PM
anyone should be able to have sex whenever they want, swear whenever they want, and watch porn whenever they want. im sick of human beings being held back
DracoMalfoysLilGrl15
August 26th, 2005, 01:22 PM
My opinion: I DON'T THINK ANYONE SHOULD HAVE SEX UNTIL THEY ARE MARRIED. There are so may STD's out there... and why have some stupid one night stand??? My personal opinion is you should only have sex when you are truly in love... none of that lust shit. Sex is a beautiful thing and should not be wasted on some guy you won't even remember in time... it should be with the one you want to spend the rest of your life with.
kolte
August 26th, 2005, 02:06 PM
you do understand that if even an 18 year old has sex with a 16 year old, because the 16 year old was a minor and the 18 year old was an adult, its considered rape. However if the 16 had sex with a 13 year it would not be rape unless the parents consider it rape. Its sooo confusing. btw, i think that its only like that in america. but if you look at the case of sarah johnson, she killed her parents, she was 16 and had sex with her 18 year old boy friend, her parents found out, where going to file lawsuite for sactchatory rape and the daughter killed her parents because she didnt want her boyfriend to get in trouble.
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.