Log in

View Full Version : anyone to pm


britishboy
April 21st, 2013, 07:10 AM
Its soooo annoying how i cant pm cos i dont have 100 posts and its pointless why cant i?:/

Rayquaza
April 21st, 2013, 07:13 AM
This is a quote from the VTHQ FAQ: (http://www.virtualteen.org/forums/showthread.php?t=153812)

4. Why do you need 100 posts to send a Personal Message?

VT has a requirement to have 100+ posts in order to cut down the amount of harm a spammer could do before he/she was stopped.
This is also set in place to protect members from being harassed or solicited by other members. This rule is for your own safety and security on the site, and will not be changing any time soon.

DerBear
April 21st, 2013, 09:20 AM
You've got 87 posts another 13 won't take long.

ImCoolBeans
April 21st, 2013, 10:25 AM
I can confidently say that this rule will not be changing if I have anything to do with it. A lot of people use the system just to abuse it. 100 posts is hardly anything and still doesn't weed out most of the bad seeds, maybe it should be raised? :P

Apollo.
April 21st, 2013, 10:36 AM
I can confidently say that this rule will not be changing if I have anything to do with it. A lot of people use the system just to abuse it. 100 posts is hardly anything and still doesn't weed out most of the bad seeds, maybe it should be raised? :P

I'm actually seriously for it being raised! Genuine members wouldn't be dettered by it and also anything following the rules can be said by vm, like 150 posts or something would be good. It would also give mods more of an idea whT the person is like if they see the kind of things people are discussing by vm

nice
April 21st, 2013, 12:08 PM
I'm actually seriously for it being raised! Genuine members wouldn't be dettered by it and also anything following the rules can be said by vm, like 150 posts or something would be good. It would also give mods more of an idea whT the person is like if they see the kind of things people are discussing by vm

This I think it should be raised too. Maybe 150 or 175 if they were truly a good member it wouldn't take that long it took me less that 2 days if I remember to hit 100.

Iron Man
April 21st, 2013, 12:55 PM
I'm actually seriously for it being raised! Genuine members wouldn't be dettered by it and also anything following the rules can be said by vm, like 150 posts or something would be good. It would also give mods more of an idea whT the person is like if they see the kind of things people are discussing by vm

Screw that. 200 or 250 seems like a good deterrent to me.

Erasmus
April 21st, 2013, 01:26 PM
Screw that. 200 or 250 seems like a good deterrent to me.

I would support 200.

Apollo.
April 21st, 2013, 02:21 PM
We'll... This has backfired on the OP:P

Wonder.
April 21st, 2013, 05:03 PM
I think it should stay at 100. Using myself as an example, I joined almost four years ago, yet I don't even have 1000 posts. It probably took me a week just to get to 50! I realize most people post more than me, but even 150 seems way too high for a feature most forums offer right when you join. 100 is fine where it's at.

dontfiguremeout
April 21st, 2013, 09:11 PM
I like 200 because that's when most restrictions come off anyways! Plus I don't think it would hurt to do another 200 posts. By then you'll be use to the site and make some friends you can pm.

Ryhanna
April 21st, 2013, 09:23 PM
I'd support it being raised, actually. Really, 100 posts is quite easy to rack up. It's not much work to prove that you're capable of using the PM system without abusing it.

PinkFloyd
April 21st, 2013, 09:38 PM
Fuck it. My vote is 250. Lately I've been seeing some people with their post count at 100-125 saying some dumb stuff. Hell, when I had that post count I had one red box for my rep. (I am not getting into any sort of rep discussion!)

ImCoolBeans
April 21st, 2013, 09:44 PM
Hmm... Not actually going to change it :P I was just kidding around.

dontfiguremeout
April 21st, 2013, 10:55 PM
Hmm... Not actually going to change it :P I was just kidding around.

Dude! Mikey, you got me all excited for this as a change! hahahaha Your Aprils Fools joke came a little late! :P

DerBear
April 22nd, 2013, 01:24 AM
I can confidently say that this rule will not be changing if I have anything to do with it. A lot of people use the system just to abuse it. 100 posts is hardly anything and still doesn't weed out most of the bad seeds, maybe it should be raised? :P

lol

I think maybe 666 posts to PM maybe? :P:P

Like Mike said the number isn't really high I mean 100 posts is doable within even a few hours depending on where you post.

Kevin Bacon
April 22nd, 2013, 06:03 PM
Even though I have less than 100 already, I'm all for it being raised. It's not hard to hit 100 posts in a day if you know where to post.

britishboy
April 25th, 2013, 02:20 PM
I understand why it's there now thanks:)