Log in

View Full Version : Theory of Evolution


Hauptmann Kauffman
November 18th, 2007, 07:40 PM
Basic Evolutionary Timeline

Despite the uncertainty on how life began, it is clear that prokaryotes were the first organisms to inhabit Earth,[135] approximately 3–4 billion years ago.[136] No obvious changes in morphology or cellular organization occurred in these organisms over the next few billion years.[137]

The eukaryotes were the next major innovation in evolution. These came from ancient bacteria being engulfed by the ancestors of eukaryotic cells, in a cooperative association called endosymbiosis.[138][139] The engulfed bacteria and the host cell then underwent co-evolution, with the bacteria evolving into either mitochondria or hydrogenosomes.[140] An independent second engulfment of cyanobacterial-like organisms led to the formation of chloroplasts in algae and plants.[141]

The history of life was that of the unicellular eukaryotes, prokaryotes, and archaea until about a billion years ago when multicellular organisms began to appear in the oceans in the Ediacaran period.[135][142] The evolution of multicellularity occurred in multiple independent events, in organisms as diverse as sponges, brown algae, cyanobacteria, slime moulds and myxobacteria.[143]

Soon after the emergence of these first multicellular organisms, a remarkable amount of biological diversity appeared over approximately 10 million years, in an event called the Cambrian explosion. Here, the majority of types of modern animals evolved, as well as unique lineages that subsequently became extinct.[144] Various triggers for the Cambrian explosion have been proposed, including the accumulation of oxygen in the atmosphere from photosynthesis.[145] About 500 million years ago, plants and fungi colonized the land, and were soon followed by arthropods and other animals.[146] Amphibians first appeared around 300 million years ago, followed by early amniotes, then mammals around 200 million years ago and birds around 100 million years ago (both from "reptile"-like lineages). However, despite the evolution of these large animals, smaller organisms similar to the types that evolved early in this process continue to be highly successful and dominate the Earth, with the majority of both biomass and species being prokaryotes.[80]


Evidence for evolution

Evidence from fossils. Based on myriad similarities and differences between living species, evolutionary biology makes predictions about the features of ancestral forms. For example, numerous features indicate that birds are derived from reptilian ancestors. By contrast, these data reject the possibility that birds were derived from other groups, such as flying insects. Scientists have discovered fossil birds with feathers and legs like modern birds, but which also have teeth, clawed digits on their forelimbs, and a tailbone like their reptilian ancestors. Fossils are especially important evidence for evolution because, with little effort, each of us can use our eyes and minds to observe and interpret the dinosaur and other ancient fossils in public museums.

Evidence from genetics. The genomes of all organisms contain overwhelming evidence for evolution. All living species share the same basic mechanism of heredity using DNA (or RNA in some viruses) to encode genes that are passed from parent to offspring, and which are transcribed and translated into proteins during each organism's life. Using DNA sequences, biologists quantify the genetic similarities and differences among species, in order to determine which species are more closely related to one another and which are more distantly related. In doing so, biologists use essentially the same evidence and logic used to determine paternity in lawsuits. The pattern of genetic relatedness between all species indicates a branching tree that implies divergence from a common ancestor. Within this tree of life, there are also occasional reticulations where two branches fuse, rather than separate. (For example, mitochondria are organelles found in the cells of plants and animals. Mitochondria have their own genes, which are more similar to genes in bacteria than to genes on the chromosomes in the cell nucleus. Thus, one of our distant ancestors arose from a symbiosis of two different cell types.) The genetic similarity between species, which exists by virtue of evolution from the same ancestral form, is an essential fact that underlies biomedical research. This similarity allows us to begin to understand the effects of our own genes by conducting research on genes from other species. For example, genes that control the process of DNA repair in bacteria, flies, and mice have been discovered to influence certain cancers in humans. These findings also suggest strategies for intervention that can be explored in other species before testing on humans.

Evolution in action. Evolutionary change continues to this day, and it will proceed so long as life itself exists. In recent years, many bacterial pathogens have evolved resistance to antibiotics used to cure infections, thereby requiring the development of new and more costly treatments. In some frightening cases, bacteria have evolved resistance to every available antibiotic, so there is no longer any effective treatment. In the case of HIV, which causes AIDS, significant viral evolution occurs within the course of infection of a single patient, and this rapid evolution enables the virus to evade the immune system. Many agricultural pests have evolved resistance to chemicals that farmers have used for only a few decades. As we work to control diseases and pests, the responsible organisms have been evolving to escape our controls. Moreover, scientists can perform experiments to study evolution in real time, just as experiments are used to observe dynamic processes in physics, chemistry, and other branches of biology. To study evolution in action, scientists use organisms like bacteria and fruitflies that reproduce quickly, so they can see changes that require many generations.

So, of course, after all this, i find it hard to deny evolution :/ Opinions, thoughts?

Underground_Network
November 18th, 2007, 07:45 PM
First of all, aren't there already like three threads on this topic? Second of all, you probably could've posted this in one of those threads... But anyway, what is this topic debating... I fully believe in evolution and don't see how creationism has anything to back it up...That is definitely a good way to back up evolution, but again, I don't see why this deserves its own thread in ROTW, it either belongs elsewhere as helpful information, or should be moved into one of the, I believe its two, other evolution threads, we don't need a whole new debate on this topic (at least thats my opinion).

dem.re.cmd.exe
November 18th, 2007, 09:24 PM
Well, somehow that SCIENTIFIC theory should also be taught with the theory of intelligent design, but in that case I want my religion, that the world was made by a giant spaghetti monster who evolved to become the sun and that we should stare at the sun for 20 minutes each day to worship the monster who created us, to be taught in schools, but that's another debate thread. lol



Anywaaaays...
I'm all for the theory of evolution, although it's hardly a theory. If evolution is a theory then I'm going to start calling rain the theory of precipitation. (which techniacally science is nothing BUT theories, .....extremely well proved almost flawless theories that is....) Well, might as well lock the thread lol The next 5 or 6 pages are going to be nothing but everyone posting the same exact post just changing a few words... maybe addiing a few details here and there. xD

Hauptmann Kauffman
November 18th, 2007, 09:29 PM
Well, there is a difference between theories, and laws. The theory of evolution is fact, its just that its called a theory because we are still learning about it, etc. Just because It is called a theory doesnt mean it isnt proven/a fact

sage of craze
November 18th, 2007, 09:37 PM
Is this thread directed towards me? :|

dem.re.cmd.exe
November 18th, 2007, 09:48 PM
Well, there is a difference between theories, and laws. The theory of evolution is fact, its just that its called a theory because we are still learning about it, etc. Just because It is called a theory doesnt mean it isnt proven/a fact


Oh, you'll notice that I don't really ever get small things like that.


Is this thread directed towards me? :|

I doubt that.

sage of craze
November 18th, 2007, 10:00 PM
Look in my diary. After I gave my responce he put this up. Still doubt it? :D

dem.re.cmd.exe
November 18th, 2007, 10:03 PM
Well, it may be a semi-coincidence. It's definitely towards evolution, but you may have inspired the idea...

sage of craze
November 18th, 2007, 10:07 PM
I'm not going to waste my 100th post on arguing with you. You've seen the diary and this, figure it out. :D

Maverick
November 18th, 2007, 10:08 PM
Ok back on topic...

dem.re.cmd.exe
November 18th, 2007, 10:10 PM
.... I'm still confused, but umm... I was curious where you got that information.

Hauptmann Kauffman
November 18th, 2007, 11:20 PM
Yes, back on topic. And btw Sage, you sparked this thread, but It is not directed at you:D

(I got this information from a government website, which I know to be reputable:D)

dem.re.cmd.exe
November 18th, 2007, 11:58 PM
Thanks, just curious of what kind of site. I only skimmed it assuming that you had some sort of ... i don't know how to put it... correct information I guess.

Hauptmann Kauffman
November 19th, 2007, 12:00 AM
lol, all that information is correct:)

dem.re.cmd.exe
November 19th, 2007, 11:39 AM
Well that's good to know! Not that I accused (or suspected) you of getting faulty information....

Hauptmann Kauffman
November 19th, 2007, 06:01 PM
Of course...:)

The Batman
November 19th, 2007, 07:46 PM
i believe in evolution and creationism because all the bible says is seven days it doesn't say how long those days they could range from 1 sec to 1billion years man decided how long days are and second the big bang sounds alot like let there be light