Log in

View Full Version : Weather Channel Founder: Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’


Maverick
November 12th, 2007, 10:41 AM
Intro by Joe D’Aleo, Icecap, CCM:
I was privileged to work with John Coleman, the founder of The Weather Channel in the year before it became a reality and then for the first of the 6 years I was fortunate to be the Director of Meteorology. No one worked harder than John to make The Weather Channel a reality and to make sure the staffing, the information and technology was the very best possible at that time. John currently works with KUSI in San Diego. He posts regularly. I am very pleased to present his latest insightful post.



COMMENTS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING

By John Coleman

[email protected]

it is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM.

Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data back in the late 1990's to create an allusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental wacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the "research" to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus.

Environmental extremist, notable politicians among them then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild "scientific" scenario of the civilization threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda.

Now their ridicules manipulated science has been accepted as fact and become a cornerstone issue for CNN, CBS, NBC, the Democratic Political Party, the Governor of California, school teachers and, in many cases, well informed but very gullible environmental conscientious citizens. Only one reporter at ABC has been allowed to counter the Global Warming frenzy with one 15 minutes documentary segment.

I do not oppose environmentalism. I do not oppose the political positions of either party.

However, Global Warming, i.e. Climate Change, is not about environmentalism or politics. It is not a religion. It is not something you "believe in." It is science; the science of meteorology. This is my field of life-long expertise. And I am telling you Global Warming is a nonevent, a manufactured crisis and a total scam. I say this knowing you probably won't believe me, a mere TV weatherman, challenging a Nobel Prize, Academy Award and Emmy Award winning former Vice President of United States. So be it.

I suspect you might like to say to me, "John, look the research that supports the case for global warming was done by research scientists; people with PH D's in Meteorology. They are employed by major universities and important research institutions. Their work has been reviewed by other scientists with PH D's. They have to know a lot more about it than you do. Come on, John, get with it. The experts say our pollution has created an strong and increasing greenhouse effect and a rapid, out of control global warming is underway that will sky rocket temperatures, destroy agriculture, melt the ice caps, flood the coastlines and end life as we know it. How can you dissent from this crisis? You must be a bit nutty.

Allow me, please, to explain how I think this all came about. Our universities have become somewhat isolated from the rest of us. There is a culture and attitudes and values and pressures on campus that are very different. I know this group well. My father and my older brother were both PHD-University types. I was raised in the university culture. Any person who spends a decade at a university obtaining a PHD in Meteorology and become a research scientist, more likely than not, becomes a part of that single minded culture. They all look askance at the rest of us, certain of their superiority. They respect government and disrespect business, particularly big business. They are environmentalists above all else.

And, there is something else. These scientists know that if they do research and results are in no way alarming, their research will gather dust on the shelf and their research careers will languish. But if they do research that sounds alarms, they will become well known and respected and receive scholarly awards and, very importantly, more research dollars will come flooding their way.

So when these researchers did climate change studies in the late 90's they were eager to produce findings that would be important and be widely noticed and trigger more research funding. It was easy for them to manipulate the data to come up with the results they wanted to make headlines and at the same time drive their environmental agendas. Then their like minded PHD colleagues reviewed their work and hastened to endorse it without question.

There were a few who didn't fit the mold. They did ask questions and raised objections. They did research with contradictory results. The environmental elitists berated them brushed their studies aside.

I have learned since the Ice Age is coming scare in the 1970's to always be a skeptic about research. In the case of global warming, I didn't accept media accounts. Instead I read dozens of the scientific papers. I have talked with numerous scientists. I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct when I assure you there is no run away climate change. The impact of humans on climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril. It is all a scam, the result of bad science.

I am not alone in this assessment. There are hundreds of other meteorologists, many of them PH D's, who are as certain as I am that this global warming frenzy is based on bad science and is not valid.

I am incensed by the incredible media glamour, the politically correct silliness and rude dismal of counter arguments by the high priest of Global Warming.

In time, a decade or two, the outrageous scam will be obvious. As the temperature rises, polar ice cap melting, coastal flooding and super storm pattern all fail to occur as predicted everyone will come to realize we have been duped.

The sky is not falling. And, natural cycles and drifts in climate are as much if not more responsible for any climate changes underway.

I strongly believe that the next twenty years are equally as likely to see a cooling trend as they are to see a warming trend.

0=
November 12th, 2007, 04:28 PM
Interesting. Hope he's right.

Bobby
November 12th, 2007, 04:31 PM
Wow. That's fascinating.


(that wasn't sarcasm)

Underground_Network
November 12th, 2007, 04:34 PM
Its ok if this is true... We could still die from a billion other things that lie in our near future... Black holes, supervolcanoes, holes in the magnetic field, etc..

Maverick
November 12th, 2007, 04:35 PM
Yeah while I wouldn't call this article like "The smoking gun of global warming" because some things said are subjective I think it addresses some perspectives that really aren't heard about or taken into consideration. It was kind of refreshing to hear another view point with actually some good reasons behind it.

Underground_Network
November 12th, 2007, 04:39 PM
Yeah, I'm a strong believer in global warming, but I'm not against him in anyway, I definitely see what he's talking about... But I don't think this going to change a lot of people's opinions, and it may not get as much notice as it deserves.

Maverick
November 12th, 2007, 04:46 PM
I definitely agree with that. Things have been very one sided when it comes to global warming and I doubt that will change anytime soon.

Patchy
November 12th, 2007, 04:53 PM
Its ok if this is true... We could still die from a billion other things that lie in our near future... Black holes, supervolcanoes, holes in the magnetic field, etc..

Hmm I suppose your right but I hate this idea, you know 30-60 years ago we didnt have the knowledge on this stuff and now because of modern tech we know lots more about our earth and most of the new knowledge is depressing, I know we should use it to our advantage but frankly I hate it when I watch the news and its always something like "News just in the next million years (Or something like that) the sun is going to go out" Its really deppressing and I just think it's pointless broadcasting this stuff since it worries people, and causes panic and obviously the news companies turn it into a big story and blow it out of porportion most of the time.

This is really interesting I hope its true because it really really dont want to think that if I have children if I'm older, that my children wouldnt reach the age of 60 because of global warming :(

Maverick
November 12th, 2007, 04:59 PM
All this warning of the world going to hell happens in every generation. That's apart of life. Take them with a grain of salt and enjoy life. No use in getting worked up over things that aren't 100% proven. According to the 1970s we should be in an Ice Age. Obviously that didn't happen.

R_master
November 12th, 2007, 08:12 PM
eh i'm a bit skeptical of global warming, but its not like john gives any solid evidence for his argument.

although i'm really happy that so much attention is being paid to protecting the environment now. green house gases are really just a small part of what needs to be changed in the world. there are still to many animals going extinct, industrial poisons killing marine life, smog, littering, destruction of coal reefs, and displaced animals from other areas of the world reeking havoc on foreign ecosystems + much much more

Gumleaf
November 12th, 2007, 08:46 PM
wow, that puts a new spin on things.