Log in

View Full Version : foreskin = grower?


jacksonthelan
February 7th, 2013, 05:26 AM
i just read a thread and almost everyone said that they are a grower, i think that if you have foreskin that you penis will "grow" more when you get a boner because it has more skin to expand into, but if you dont have foreskin then you should be a shower because your penis doesnt have as much skin to expand into?

what do you guys think? im stumped and would like an out side opinion

Wakesetter03
February 7th, 2013, 06:06 AM
Tbh I don't think it would make a difference. Having skin to expand into, especially when it generally gets pulled back, wouldn't make a difference I don't think.

deanbrodi
February 7th, 2013, 06:24 AM
Hi Jackson. Being a shower or grower has nothing to do with the amount of foreskin you got. Erections happen by blood filling the insides of the penis when you're horny. There's always foreskin along the shaft of the penis - it's only the end part of the foreskin that is missing if you were circumcised. I think the was some lying or false bragging going on in that thread :)

FergusDunn
February 7th, 2013, 10:29 AM
i just read a thread and almost everyone said that they are a grower, i think that if you have foreskin that you penis will "grow" more when you get a boner because it has more skin to expand into, but if you dont have foreskin then you should be a shower because your penis doesnt have as much skin to expand into?

what do you guys think? im stumped and would like an out side opinion


I dont think it makes any difference at all cut or uncut - mostly the foreskin retracts anyways when hard but yeah I kinda see how some guys would think like that - be happy with what you got.

brandon1995
February 7th, 2013, 12:49 PM
i just read a thread and almost everyone said that they are a grower, i think that if you have foreskin that you penis will "grow" more when you get a boner because it has more skin to expand into, but if you dont have foreskin then you should be a shower because your penis doesnt have as much skin to expand into?

what do you guys think? im stumped and would like an out side opinion

No, that's not how it works. I got circumcised 6 months ago so I can tell. It's the same size erect as it ever was. It if normall a little bigger flaccid afterwards tho, so the shower thing is partly true.

AvMan
February 7th, 2013, 02:04 PM
Tbh I don't think it would make a difference. Having skin to expand into, especially when it generally gets pulled back, wouldn't make a difference I don't think.

I think that too :)

dvd333
February 7th, 2013, 04:40 PM
Its more a matter of muscle than skin

BakeBake
February 7th, 2013, 10:41 PM
That has nothing to do with it... The length of the penis depends on the amount of flesh that is inside the penis... When the flesh that is filled with the blood to make the erection occur, that is what depends on the size.

jacksonthelan
February 11th, 2013, 05:22 AM
Its more a matter of muscle than skin

but if there was more muscle than skin wouldn't it restrict the growth?

Straya
February 11th, 2013, 08:19 AM
It all depends on how much room there is for the blood to expand into and that is determined by genes not foreskin

jacksonthelan
February 13th, 2013, 04:35 AM
ok i got ya now