Log in

View Full Version : Court frees US teen jailed for oral sex


Gumleaf
October 27th, 2007, 01:39 AM
Saturday Oct 27 14:50 AEST


A US man sentenced to 10 years in jail without parole for having consensual oral sex with a 15-year-old girl when he was 17 walked free after Georgia's top court ordered his early release.

Genarlow Wilson was greeted by his family as he left the Burruss Correctional Training Facility in Monroe County, Georgia, after serving two years and eight months in jail in a case that sparked a national campaign on his behalf.

"I was pretty confused for the most part (in jail) not knowing what to expect with all the (legal) disappointments we dealt with early on but I am finally happy to see that we have got justice now," Wilson told reporters.

He described what happened as a "learning experience" and said his first priority was to return to education.

Wilson was given a mandatory 10 years after he was convicted in 2005 of aggravated child molestation for having oral sex at a New Year's Eve party in a hotel in Georgia. The act was captured on an amateur video.

In 2006, the law was changed to make a crime such as Wilson's a misdemeanour punishable with a maximum one-year sentence and no entry into the child sex registry.

In a split decision, the Georgia Supreme Court upheld the ruling of a lower court judge that the sentence constituted "cruel and unusual punishment" banned under the US Constitution.

"Although society has a significant interest in protecting children from premature sexual activity, we must acknowledge that Wilson's crime does not rise to the level of culpability of adults who prey on children," Chief Justice Leah Ward Sears wrote in a 4-3 majority opinion.

"For the law to punish Wilson as it would an adult, with the extraordinarily harsh punishment of 10 years in prison without the possibility of probation or parole, appears to be grossly disproportionate to his crime," the opinion said.

Georgia's attorney-general, Thurbert Baker, who challenged the lower court's ruling in June and thus kept Wilson in jail, said he accepted the decision.

"I hope the court's decision will ... put an end to this issue as a matter of contention in the hearts and minds of concerned Georgians and others across the country who have taken such a strong interest," Baker said in a statement.

The case sparked legal challenges and a campaign led by civil rights leaders including Al Sharpton and Joseph Lowery who argued that, while Wilson's deed was wrong, the sentence was excessive, especially given that the law had been changed.

They also argued the sentence would ruin the life of a teenager who had a good school record, was an athlete on his high school football team and had no criminal record.

"It's a banner day for Georgia because clearly this was a miscarriage of justice. ... This time the state has come through with flying colours," Lowery said in an interview.

"Prosecutors need to be more just and sensitive, less ambitious in their decisions," he said.

In a dissenting opinion, Justice George Carley said that when the 2006 law was passed the Georgia legislature said it should not be applied retroactively.

Maverick
October 27th, 2007, 09:30 AM
Yep I heard about that here. This isn't the first case where this happened either.

"Although society has a significant interest in protecting children from premature sexual activity, we must acknowledge that Wilson's crime does not rise to the level of culpability of adults who prey on children," Chief Justice Leah Ward Sears wrote in a 4-3 majority opinion.
I agree. Although that is why you need to be careful when dealing with teenagers. They can be younger than you think.

serial-thrilla
October 27th, 2007, 02:33 PM
thats really REALLY stupid that hes in any trouble at all.

ctw4451
October 27th, 2007, 07:03 PM
I think he should have had a way less severe punishment. Almost like none at all.

0=
October 27th, 2007, 07:05 PM
How about compensation from the state? He didn't commit a crime.

RaisingSand
October 27th, 2007, 10:38 PM
In the eyes of the law, he did commit a crime, though it depends where you stand ethically when you look at a case like this.
In New Zealand there have been cases where an 16 or 17 year old male has been imprisoned for sexual acts with their younger girlfriends (aged 15). In this case, the two persons had been dating for nine months and had only engaged in oral sex, but the girl's parents found out and went off the wall, and took their daughters boyfriend to court, where he receieved a two year jail sentence.
It's cases like this that are stupid, and I believe the above one is as well. At 15, the girl is old enough to know what she's doing, control her own decisions when it comes to sex, and it is as much her fault as it is his.
If the roles here were reversed, it is almost certain to say that the court would not have awarded such a harsh punishment, if one at all, to a female.
This sort of thing is sexist to a point, and a little bit ridiculous. I mean, come on, 10 years for consensual oral sex? Get real people. That's the kind of sentence you get in New Zealand for date rape.

Attax
October 28th, 2007, 10:38 PM
Law is law and the law did change so it should effect him as well