Log in

View Full Version : Instagram seeks right to sell access to photos to advertisers


TigerBoy
December 18th, 2012, 09:30 AM
Facebook's photo-sharing site Instagram has updated its privacy policy giving it the right to sell users' photos to advertisers without notification.

Unless users delete their Instagram accounts by a deadline of 16 January, they cannot opt out.

The changes also mean Instagram can share information about its users with Facebook, its parent company, as well as other affiliates and advertisers.

The move riled social media users, with one likening it to a "suicide note".

The new policies follow Facebook's record $1bn (£616m; 758 euro) acquisition of Instagram in April.

Facebook's vice-president of global marketing solutions Carolyn Everson earlier this month had said: "Eventually we'll figure out a way to monetise Instagram."

A notice updating the privacy policy on the Instagram site said: "We may share your information as well as information from tools like cookies, log files, and device identifiers and location data with organisations that help us provide the service to you... (and) third-party advertising partners."

"To help us deliver interesting paid or sponsored content or promotions, you agree that a business may pay us to display your username, likeness, photos, in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you," it said in its terms of use.

But Instagram said that its aim was to make it easier to work with Facebook.

"This means we can do things like fight spam more effectively, detect system and reliability problems more quickly, and build better features for everyone by understanding how Instagram is used," it said in a statement.
'Suicide note'

However, the updated policy will not change how it handles photo ownership or who is able to see a user's pictures, it added.

But the new policy has triggered a backlash among social media users, with some threatening to quit.

One user tweeted: "Good bye #instagram. Your new terms of service are totally stupid and nonsense. Good luck playing with the big boys."

New York-based photographer Clayton Cubbit wrote on his account that the new policy was "Instagram's suicide note".

Analysts said that the new policies could deal a blow to Facebook's reputation and alienate some users.

Richard Holway, chairman of TechMarketView, said: "Every time Facebook has altered their privacy policy it has led to a backlash and they've been forced to retreat. They tamper with people's privacy at a cost. People are very upset."

Alan Pelz-Sharpe, research director at 451 Research, added: "It's a barefaced tactic that Facebook and Instagram have taken, and one that will likely meet with many challenges, legally and ethically.

"The fact is that Facebook has critical mass, and is quite confident that such moves may cause uproar, but not a flight of business.

"Larger firms like Facebook are essentially trailblazing before specific regulations can catch up with them, and as we have seen with Google in the past, regulations and laws have limited real impact on their business operations - so they tend to move forward regardless of opposition."


Source: BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20767537)

Infidelitas
December 19th, 2012, 08:14 PM
All of more reason to not use Instagram. It would be nice to be able to live in a world where we don't get out intellectual property sold -.-

nfs4394
December 20th, 2012, 03:16 PM
If anything, this will just prevent people from posting perverted and weird pictures or using the the site altogether. Personally, I would be kinda flattered if they chose one of my pictures for an ad

TigerBoy
December 20th, 2012, 03:44 PM
If anything, this will just prevent people from posting perverted and weird pictures or using the the site altogether. Personally, I would be kinda flattered if they chose one of my pictures for an ad

Have you thought about how you'd feel if they associated your picture with a campaign for something you disagreed with? For example if you became the poster boy for "teens against violent video games", or "atheist teens for the elimination of religion" or something? Would you not want some sort of control over if and how your image is used? I know I would.

MrDaniel2K13
December 27th, 2012, 02:20 PM
I think Facebook has said that idea won't be happening anymore

HunterSteele
January 29th, 2013, 03:58 AM
I'm confused. I thought all image hosting sites did this. Otherwise how do they make money? The bandwidth and storage space must cost a ton and I can't see them giving it all away for free just to be nice. They can't make money from ads either, since if I upload an image and embed it somewhere there's no where for them to display ads.