Sig pictures

[Green Arrow]

Why doesn't the [IMG*] codes work in sigs as I want to put an image in it so it isn't just boring text. lol :P

[StoppingTime]

Use the code instead.
To do this, go to edit signature, and either choose a picture from a website, or upload one from your computer. Then click, Insert signature picture, and move the SIGPIC tags where you'd like it.
As a note, pictures cannot excede 400X125 pixels.

[Green Arrow]

Use the code instead.
To do this, go to edit signature, and either choose a picture from a website, or upload one from your computer. Then click, Insert signature picture, and move the SIGPIC tags where you'd like it.
As a note, pictures cannot excede 400X125 pixels.

Thank you! +rep :)

[TheMatrix]

We don't allow images to be added randomly because it can lead to signatures taking half a page. Just imagine what animated GIFs would do...
Therefore, we have the SIGPIC, which limits your signatuere to one picture, smilies excluded.

[Green Arrow]

We don't allow images to be added randomly because it can lead to signatures taking half a page. Just imagine what animated GIFs would do...
Therefore, we have the SIGPIC, which limits your signatuere to one picture, smilies excluded.

I can see why you do it however I have used many forums where you can use the IMG code and can have multiple images but have a limit to how big the pictures and the actual signatures are. I think that the signatures look kind of dull without images personally. I also found it extremely difficult to find an image that would fit with the criteria for sig pics.

[DerBear]

Well you see that's the point the requirements are there to make everything look neat and tidy that all it.

[kenoloor]

I can see why you do it however I have used many forums where you can use the IMG code and can have multiple images but have a limit to how big the pictures and the actual signatures are. I think that the signatures look kind of dull without images personally. I also found it extremely difficult to find an image that would fit with the criteria for sig pics.

This site isn't about having the most exciting signature. You seem to be more pre-occupied with how "dull" you think the signatures look, which is entirely irrelevant to the purpose of this site and doesn't pertain to jack shit.

[Donkey]

This site isn't about having the most exciting signature. You seem to be more pre-occupied with how "dull" you think the signatures look, which is entirely irrelevant to the purpose of this site and doesn't pertain to jack shit.
Was there really any need for that? Absolutely not.

Looks like the OP has his answer. :locked2: